Official Everybody Edits Forums

Norwee

Formerly NorwegianboyEE

From: Norway

Joined: 2015-03-16

Posts: 3,773

Norwegianboy's official reviews of EE Tournament worlds.

Use CTRL + F if you want to search and find your entry. 

- ROUND 1 ENTRIES -

▼Hidden text

Team Name: Mr and Mrs JaWapa
    Team Leader: jawapa
    Team Members: jawapa, Mrjawapa

▼Hidden text

Art: 6/10
The art is nothing to complain about, but not all that impressive either. It’s quite simplistic both ingame and on minimap. But seeing as it’s black and white i guess that is to be expected.
Gameplay: 6/10
The gameplay is well crafted, but it’s honestly not my style. It’s also slightly tedious how the arrow paths seem to sometimes work quite well, but other times you fall seemingly without much reason.
While i understand that you made the “opposite” part mirrored to keep up with the theme, i would have appreciated if you slightly changed it (to make it feel different or be slightly harder) instead of just making it an clone and calling it a day.
Creativity: 7/10
It’s a good black and white concept, but i feel like you could have done it even better if you made some adjustments and improvements.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Definitely following the theme.
Total: 29/40

Team Name: ~:u
    Team Leader: ZeldaXD
    Team Members: ZeldaXD

▼Hidden text

Art: 9/10
The art is well done, it fits well with the gameplay. What’s important in these types of levels is to make the art understandable for the player, which it is. Also it has quite some clever little extra details like the “future/past” couple.
Gameplay: 8/10
The gameplay is very good and clever, my only minor complaint is that the world feels almost too short. I suppose you could blame the world limitation, but i’d have preferred it if you used the excess black void in the middle to make more gameplay rather than use it as an seperation. The given world size is too small to worry about such trifling details.
Creativity: 9/10
The concept is very good and well executed in the little space you gave it.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Follows the theme to the letter.
Total: 36/40

Winner:

▼Hidden text

~:u
Note:While both level’s are ranked quite high i definitely prefer ZeldaXD’s level due to the fact that while it’s short, it’s much more enjoyable.

Team Name: Mercury Takes Over
      Team Leader: habbogame
      Team Members: drstereos, coinage, habbogame

▼Hidden text

Art: 7/10
The art looks amazing on minimap, but it’s suffering from problems ingame. The art makes certain tasks such as seeing spikes and arrows properly more difficult. I think the level’s overall quality would have benefitted from more focus on gameplay first and foremost, then creating the art around it. But don’t get me wrong, it still looks really good when not having gameplay in mind.
Gameplay: 6/10
How to describe this… The gameplay just feels… weird. It’s not really put that well together. For example i’m still not sure what the intended solution to the lava cave coin and return is. (Jump through the flames? Swim through lava to reach mud block/checkpoint? Both?) Also the spiked algae + fish coin was rather confusing, i did not realize there was mud inside that fish, making me unable to understand how to get the coin until i just jumped inside the fish thinking there would be invisible blocks, but then i realized the brownish colour inside the other brown colours was supposed to be mud. >_> Then the second coin feels like a throwaway as it’s very simple...
The high-jump/low-jump concept was good, but the gameplay could definitely have been improved.
Creativity: 7/10
It’s a great concept of underwater/lava contrast, with the jump powerups. But it wasen’t done as well as i wished it was.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Nothing to complain about here.
Total: 30/40
To sum it up: Ingame art + gameplay: not very good. Minimap art + concept: amazing.

Team Name: superultramegasonicsupersonicmegasupersoopydoopycinamonstixsuperkidz
      Team Leader: Pqwerty
      Team Member: Pqwerty, Courage6, Rus221

▼Hidden text

Art: 1/10
Absolutely terrible, but at least you guys made something which might be considered “art” in some cultures of the world.
Gameplay: 1/10
Many annoying reset points, many bad decisions. The thing about joke levels is that i’d probably score them highly if they had some redeeming qualities or coherent gameplay, but this is just a mess. However i think through the cracks i can see that at least there was some level of ATTEMPT at making what we’d consider a “level.”
Creativity: 4/10
Not gonna lie, this concept of opposite day could have been done well, but that’s unfortunately not the case. There’s too much bad writing and broken gameplay. There’s nothing wrong with the concept itself however so i’ll give some points for that.
Theme adherence: 2/10
Can’t complain about it not trying. But the theme is supposed to be “opposites”, not “opposite” period.
Total: 13/40

Winner:

▼Hidden text

Mercury Takes Over
Note: I don’t feel like i have to explain myself much for this decision.

Team Name: Puppets
      Team Leader: Edilight2003
      Team Members: Tinu2048,Edilight2003,Wjdnhnwyq

▼Hidden text

[DID NOT COMPLETE LEVEL DUE TO FLAWED LEVEL DESIGN]
Art: 4/10
It doesn’t look very good ingame, on minimap it’s mediocre. The bat/bird things for example describe this level well, on minimap they look passable as birds/bats flying. But on minimap they have totem pole heads, blue hair and cloud cutoff wings. Much of the ingame environment is rather confusing to the eyes as well.
Gameplay: 2/10
Did you guys test your own level? The 3rd coin is literally impossible unless you do a pixel perfect glitch jump. I can’t imagine that was supposed to be intentional. You have to TEST your level before you submit it. That way you can catch noob mistakes such as this. Needless to say, i was unable to complete the level. Though i tried many times to complete the jump. If there’s an invisible portal or something that gets you in there then that’s not acceptable because i couldn’t find anything. As for the other minis i was not impressed. 2 points for effort.
Creativity: 3/10
I was unable to get past the 2nd floor of the creepy house thing, but i didn’t see much of an concept anywhere before that. Just generic noob minis in an haunted environment.
Theme adherence: 5/10
I suppose the opposites theme for this world is “haunted/outside environment? I’m not sure as i didn’t get very far, but the way i see it this level is pushing the boundaries for what’s acceptable a little bit.
Total: 14/40

Team Name: Derps
      Team Leader: Wizard2002
      Team Members: Rene1236789, Matthewapril15, Wizard2002

▼Hidden text

Art: 8/10
Art looks rather fine on minimap and ok ingame as it doesn’t interfere with gameplay too much. The contrast negative world and generic world both look rather nice, so good job. I’d prefer slightly more focus on the ingame view in the minigames though.
Gameplay: 7/10
Pretty good gameplay, but i could break some of the minis, also i wish that the return trip was more interesting than just walking past the minigames you already beat. For example by adding new challenges using the cyan team blocks.
Creativity: 9/10
The alternating gravity effect gimmick is a good concept and it was also done very well, there was even some interplay between the 2 in some of the minis, which i appreciate. It’s simply missing a little bit on the gameplay department, otherwise phenomenal.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Good theme.
Total: 34/40

Winner:

▼Hidden text

Derps
Note:Pretty obvious choice this time around, but that was still quite a fine level by the Derps, keep improving and your levels will get amazing.

Team Name: FireBall
      Team Leader: Nikodemzak
      Team Members: Nikodemzak, Memomemo, Melodycow

▼Hidden text

Art: 8/10
The art looks very good on minimap and ingame, but there are some ill-advised decisions such as putting invisible blocks everywhere to accommodate the art with the gameplay. I’d much prefer it these were left out as there were some annoying moments where i tried to jump only to realise that there was a invisible block above me, hindering it. If you want to use invisible blocks it should be made clear what is invisible and what is not. I really like how the negative world is almost like it’s being mirrored upon the water when looking at minimap.
Gameplay: 6/10
It starts good, but gets rather repetitive. It’s fine to go back and forth 1 or 2 times, but i had to go back and forth collecting switches through the same minigames constantly, it doesn’t help either that the negative world is almost identical except for the lava pool when put into an gameplay perspective, so i had to repeat the same bridge jumping minigame about 8 times. Also if you collect the checkpoint before the switch in the lava pool you get stuck, luckily it’s at the beginning so it didn’t feel that bad to reset. But be careful about these sorts of things.
Creativity: 7/10
It’s quite a clever way of doing the opposites theme, but the minigames are a little bit uncreative. Switch collection only gets you so far.
Theme adherence: 10/10
No complaints here.
Total: 31/40
Good idea, not the best execution.

Team Name: I wasn't on the roster
      Team Leader: MinerMan1963
      Team Members: MinerMan1963

▼Hidden text

Art: 10/10
I really like the ingame art of this level, it’s not intrusive in the slightest and it looks really nice. It’s also very detailed.
Gameplay: 8/10
The level was beat very quickly, i could literally just jump up the volcano and complete the level in less than 10 seconds. I’m not sure if that was intentional since there’s also an ladder inside the volcano which takes you up to the top, but that one is also rather easy to reach. The gameplay doesn’t pose much of a challenge, in that regard. But there are some blue bonus coins which takes slightly more effort to reach. This feels more like a fun little romp level that you’ll enjoy for 3 minutes before moving on to the next one so i was very unsure of what i should rate it. My eventual decision got made because overall i enjoyed the experience, as short as it was.
Creativity: 7/10
This level has many nice touches such as funny npc dialogue and art details which i want to give creativity points for. As for the very few minigames they are very simple and doesn’t offer much… Hence the score given.
Theme adherence: 8/10
The level isn’t exactly textbook example of how to properly implement the opposites theme, but it still gets a pass for it’s volcano/snowland contrast.
Total: 33/40

Winner:

▼Hidden text

I wasn't on the roster
Note: Not an easy choice… But i simply enjoyed MinerMan’s level more. Sorry about that Fireball team, but even if you end up in the loser’s bracket you still have a chance to reach far in the competition! I suggest your team to take my advice to heart and improve your gameplay.

Team Name: Yeeting Builders
      Team Leader: Jorc
      Team Members: Croboy10, Cristiantentu, Jorc

▼Hidden text

Art: 8/10
Art is good for the most part, but it looks a little bit messy at the bottom on the lava mine part. Focus more on the ingame art, especially on small worlds. Otherwise it’s good. Also i like many of the details.
Gameplay: 4/10
Gameplay quality is lacking because there are corner jumps and other precise obstacles which aren’t fun. This level is too hard for its own good. It would have been better if it was less tedious with more cleverly made challenges.
Creativity: 5/10
As i said already, the challenges aren’t very well thought out. And nothing really stands out, it’s all just descending into the mine while doing annoying minigames.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Icy surface contrasted with fiery cavern. Pretty good theme.
Total: 27/40
I just wish the gameplay was better, also it should have some form of concept or thing that makes it more interesting.

Team Name: El Triplete
      Team Leader: Grilyon2
      Team Members: Grilyon2, Eminem421, Totoworld

▼Hidden text

Art: 6/10
I often praise detailed ingame art in these reviews, but this time i think it’s too much. The hyper-detailed environment must have taken a lot of time and it certainly looks good, if not absolutely astonishing at parts. But having to play through them is a nightmare. It’s hard to see what is block and what is background, also the hundreds of closely intertwined colours made my eyes hurt from trying to navigate it. If El Triplete could chill out a little bit with the amounts of eyerape it would have made me much less reluctant to score the art so low.
Gameplay: 3/10
The gameplay is terrible. It’s way too hard and tedious, worst was the arrow wall in the first city section which felt like you had to get past it by using luck. I’d honestly prefer it if the gameplay was left out altogether, making it so that one could simply wander the art and read the signs at one's own leisure. At least you guys tried, but being completely honest with you El Triplete… Minigames are not your fortê, focus on art and story instead.
Creativity: 9/10
I honestly did not expect an Al-gore style speech directed at humanity like this level presented, but it could have worked rather well if the gameplay was better or removed entirely. As for the art it should either have been simplified or made easier to navigate. Anyway it’s a very clever concept, i’ll give you guys that. The writing isn’t exactly perfect, but it gets the point across for the most part.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Contrast between pure nature and the corruption of man.
Total: 28/40

Winner:

▼Hidden text

El Triplete
Note: It was a close shave, but i think i’d prefer El Triplete to win, simply because their level has a lot of ambition behind it, and i’m curious to see where it takes them next. If they get to the next segment i hope they improve themselves. As for Team Yeeting Builders, you should definitely take my advice regardless of which team wins. Focus on improving your gameplay.

Team Name: Give you free win
      Team Leader: turewjyg
      Team Members: turewjyg
- Did not submit entry -

Team Name: Elegant Threesome
      Team Leader: karolv2
      Team Members: karolv2, bartlomiej007, og7deid8

▼Hidden text

Art: 9/10
Looking good for the most part, not sure i have any substantial complaints to be honest. It’s well integrated with the gameplay and has some good looking details as well. I suppose one minor complaint can be that the lava cave does look a little bit average-looking compared to the heaven part.
Gameplay: 7/10
Some minigames are a little bit annoying, like the upper rightmost one. But otherwise they are pretty well made. A tad bit confusing and average on parts, but it does do enough to keep you engaged. Overall an enjoyable playing experience.
Creativity: 8/10
While the concept is rather basic, it’s still quite well done. Also there are some good parts where you need to do thinking with effects. A fun experience.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Heaven and hell.
Total: 34/40

Winner:

▼Hidden text

Elegant Threesome
Note: Team Turewjyg gave you a free win Elegant Threesome, but your level was rather good so just keep doing what you three are already doing while focusing on improving and your team might get far.

Team Name: Studios Ghibli
    Team Leader: Yonanoke
    Team Members: Yonanoke, Carmebe, Tytpro

▼Hidden text

Art: 8/10
The art works well with the gameplay, it’s a little bit hard to parse what’s solid or not sometimes, but otherwise it’s got an nice look to it.
Gameplay: 8/10
The gameplay is challenging and mostly enjoyable. Alternating between low and high jump works well. Some anti.frustration features such as a few more checkpoints would have been welcomed however. Also i wish the upper left quadrant’s water pool would just kill the player instead of making them have to waste time to go back to the checkpoint every time they’d fail the difficult jumps there.
Creativity: 8/10
The minigames are creative enough, but i’m not sure i fully understand the “time leaper” name. Are we travelling in time? It’s more like the player is just randomly teleporting between 2 different dimensions with low and high gravity. Also who is the king at the end? Yeah, the story is all over the place. The gameplay is good however, and that’s what matters.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Alternating between a green and purple world/dimension thing. Fits the theme nicely.
Total: 34/40

Team Name: The Lone Devil
      Team Leader: mutantdevle
      Team Members: mutantdevle, mootantdevil

▼Hidden text

Art [Negated]
Art is not a necessary criterion for judging this level.
Gameplay: 6/10
There are some problems which hold this level back gameplay-wise. 1: It’s quite easy to get stuck if you bump into the pong line thing when you are popping out, which will teleport you to someplace without a reset, meaning you have to reset the level manually. 2: It’s either almost impossible if you did not catch the npc telling you about the preview thing, or it gets rather trivial once you figure it out. The problem is that you can’t really dodge based on reaction time, because the curse is way too brief to allow for that. Thus you can only win if you see where the location of the enemy pong line thing in the 0.1 second it flashes on the screen before shooting you out like a cannonball. It would be much more preferable for the preview to be longer lasting or to make the line bigger and giving more curse time to avoid it. Otherwise this level is amazing, good job on making something so creative for the concept. 
Creativity: 10/10
Very good level idea and execution.
Theme adherence: 10/10
This was a very clever way of interpreting the “opposites” theme.
Total: 26/30

Winner:

▼Hidden text

The Lone Devil
Note: I found myself more impressed by Mutantdevle’s level, even with it’s gameplay flaws due to the fact that he tried to make something so clever. Thus i want to see what he makes next. It’s harsh for Studio Ghibli due to the fact that they also received a very good score, but that’s the nature of competitions i’m afraid. With me being only 1 out of 5 judges they might very likely win anyway. Good job to both teams.

Team Name: "dude i'm so tired end this already"
    Team Leader: Zoey2070
    Team Members: Zoey2070, SmittyW, 21Twelve

▼Hidden text

Art: 10/10
Very interesting art decor which i have rarely seen done that well on EE before.
Gameplay: 7/10
It’s a bit tough to figure out how to beat some of the minis, but if one thinks it through it’s doable. I like this level a lot because it has a new style and does it rather well. Some parts are a touch finicky and annoying though, which takes a couple points away.
Creativity: 9/10
The gameplay could be improved a ton. however the creativity of the decor is not questionable.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Nature/tech theme which follows the theme.
Total: 36/40

Team Name: Eternal Solitude
      Team Leader: MinecraftAwesomeness
      Team Members: MinecraftAwesomeness

▼Hidden text

Art: 7/10
The art looks good on minimap, but ingame it’s not exactly amazing per say. (Before you ask, yes i have a definite strong ingame art bias, hence why that gives you less points than Zoey’s level. Her team’s minimap looked bad compared to the ingame, but i value ingame looks more.) Though it’s cool seeing how the environment changes depending on which “side” you are on, which gives off some neat touches, such as how the sun is bigger in “decay” than on “growth” for example. I think the art would have been better if you focused on simply having 2 worlds rather than 4, thus giving you more space to work your art around with.
Gameplay: 6/10
Coin collection can be a good concept, but the minigames aren’t particularly interesting or creative. The main fun lies in switching between the worlds.
Creativity: 8/10
It was cool to see 4 different worlds instead of 2 like usual, but like i already mentioned. I think your level would have benefitted if you only had 2 different worlds after all. The aforementioned level sizes are too small to have 4 different worlds and making them all look and play well. Still a sound concept though. The growth and decay concept is something i don’t see often.
Theme adherence: 10/10
No complaints here.
Total: 31/40

Winner:

▼Hidden text

"dude i'm so tired end this already"
Note: Zoey’s level felt much more revolutionary and interesting when compared to your level minecraftawesomeness. Still a good job by both teams. Looking forward to what worlds both teams make next.

Team Name: AFK team will forget about contest
      Team Leader: Fdoou
      Team Members: Fdoou, AndrewP
- Did not submit entry -

Team Name: bring peace
      Team Leader: peace
      Team Members: peace
[DID NOT COMPLETE DUE TO BROKEN LEVEL DESIGN]

▼Hidden text

Art: 1/10
1 point for minimap trophy. Otherwise there are no redeemable qualities whatsoever.
Gameplay: 0/10
Way too hard, also you have to reset the level for every small mistake, and it just goes on and on with the terrible noob minis. There is also a point in the stairs where you can’t progress further because you can’t jump that high, so your level is unbeatable. Do i really have to tell you to TEST your level before you submit it? This is terrible.
Creativity: 4/10
You get an acceptable sum of points for the idea itself, but the execution was terrible.
Theme adherence: 2/10
The theme is “opposites” as in more than one opposite. Opposite day doesn’t really work. But at least you tried to make it fit what you interpreted the theme as.
Total: 7/40

Winner:

▼Hidden text

bring peace
Note:You are lucky your opposing team didn’t submit anything. Please try to make a serious, decent level for the next round, for my sake. For all of our sake.

Team Name: The Golden Minions
    Team Leader: Jonathandufresne18
    Team Members: ILikeTofuuJoe, Drpoopie
[DID NOT COMPLETE DUE TO EXCRUCIATING DIFFICULTY AND CHECKPOINT STARVATION]

▼Hidden text

Art: 6/10
The art is quite simplistic to account for the theme, i understand that. But you could have done it better in different ways. By removing the stupid team colour gimmick for example.
Gameplay: 1/10
Way too hard level. Also you need to add checkpoints, the way it stands currently you’re expected to beat two entire columns of incredibly annoying jumps without fail, or you fall all the way back to the beginning. It’s incredibly annoying, also the gameplay itself is rather uninspired with the annoying team colour gimmick, switches etc. It’s not good. It’s not good at all.
Creativity: 5/10
It’s a good idea, just a terrible execution. Also the uninspired gameplay detracts from the score quite a bit.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Black and white parallel dimensions with opposite differences. There is an semblance of good quality here, like the checkpoint which turns into a reset point in the other “side”. But just bad otherwise.
Total: 22/40

Team Name: The campaign masters
    Team Leader: Charlies59876
    Team Members: Charlies59876, filipfun, yamoonsa.

▼Hidden text

Art: 1/10
Very bad box grid art.   la “100 minigames to code” style. Also the entire level just feels bland, with it’s lifeless colours and lack of details.
Gameplay: 3/10
There was an incredibly stupid decision to add that gray part of the level which is literally just holding a key while the arrows slowly move you forward. Incredibly lazy level design, however after that part is a clever one where you are supposed to do the “opposite” of what you would normally do. Jump into a fire pit to progress etc... If you simply kept doing this concept instead of adding that incredibly bad gray part, you might have gained a much higher score as it was a objectively thousand times better idea, sadly it was not really executed flawlessly as the portals were a bit finicky.
Creativity: 5/10
Bit of a mixed bag as there were definitely some creativity here, but it was not presented well.
Theme adherence: 8/10
A bit weird that there were about 3 different concepts for the theme in one world, 1 was terrible, 1 was ok, while 1 was good. Yet you didn’t really commit to either of them. Just choose one concept for next time.
Total: 17/40

Winner:

▼Hidden text

The Golden Minions
Note: Yes you won barely “The Golden Minions”, but mainly because i felt your opponent was worse than your already bad world. If both of the teams want to survive the next round y’all should definitely strive to improve by taking my advice.

Team Name: Gentleman Squad
      Team Leader: MisterStupid
      Team Members: MisterStupid, MissisSmart, MisterZondor

▼Hidden text

Art: 6/10
The art in light world looks neat. I like it quite a lot. The flags in the light world castle looks nice for example. I’m not really a fan of how the dark world was handled however, there are tons of invisible arrows and dots etc, rather than making more coherent understandable gameplay. It does make for a good contrast, but it could have been handled better.
Gameplay: 2/10
The minis in light world are way too hard and tedious while the dark world is just a confusing and lame mess with it’s switches and invisible stuff hidden everywhere. Not a big fan of it.
Creativity: 4/10
Good artistic talent and concept is straddled by the bad gameplay decisions. Switches and invisible arrows… ugh. Story was ok.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Light and dark world.
Total: 22/40

Team Name: The Awesome team
      Team Leader: AwesomeAlgoodo
      Team Members: AwesomeAlgoodo, Kopi66968, Quitin.

▼Hidden text

Art: 2/10
Literally just four colourful arrows drawn onto the empty map. 2 Points for that i guess.
Gameplay: 0/10
No gameplay. There is supposed to be gameplay, your team can’t just submit some hastily drawn art and expect good results.
Creativity: 2/10
I guess arrows can be seen as “opposites” so at least the thought process was somewhere in the right direction.
Theme adherence: 2/10
For arrows, but there needs to be a playable level.
Total: 6/40

Winner:

▼Hidden text

Gentleman Squad
Note:Gentleman Squad put effort into their level, so they win. But please improve yourselves Gentleman Squad, or you might lose the next round.

Team Name: Three Musketeers
      Team Leader: Filip2005
      Team Members: Bluecloud, Filip2005, Veelmoth

▼Hidden text

Art: 7/10
The minimap looks decent, but the ingame view is a bit of a mess, especially with the exploding fireworks everywhere. It’s not that bad, but it does look a bit jarring at parts.
Gameplay: 8/10
I was very confused at first when i entered this world, but the minigames were quite doable once i understood them. I realized they were actually quite clever, but i think the art should have been made simpler for these kinds of minis, they don’t blend together very well.
Creativity: 8/10
Not sure what’s going on with the story, but excluding that. It’s a quite normal lava/water world. However i do give some extra points for the creative gameplay.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Lava/water
Total: 33/40

Team Name: Line
      Team Leader: 1Line087
      Team Members: 1Line087
- Did not submit entry -

Winner:

▼Hidden text

Three Musketeers
Note:Congratulations Three Musketeers, please continue making more creative gameplay, but improve the art.

Team Name: skullz17
      Team Leader: skullz17
      Team Members: skullz17

▼Hidden text

Art: 10/10
The art is just my style. Looks super neat, it’s ingame art, it has many details and it doesn’t obstruct the view of the gameplay. Full score.
Gameplay: 8/10
Simple but nice. One minor complaint is the lack of a definite concept to make the gameplay distinguish itself. It’s good, but also rather forgettable.
Creativity: 8/10
Like i said, gameplay takes a hurting to the score. But the story itself and the art is top-notch creative gold.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Opposites of big mouse/and small elephants? Clever.
Total: 36/40

Team Name: Filler Frenzy
      Team Leader: Freckleface
      Team Members: Freckleface, Yandax

▼Hidden text

Art: 8/10
Art isn’t too amazing ingame, but it doesn’t obstruct the gameplay and there are some nice details like the fire npc and water npc duking it out in that small cave.
Gameplay: 7/10
It’s a little bit hard, i feel like the level would have been more enjoyable overall if the difficulty was toned down a bit. Most of the minis are jumping consecutively while timed from having touched lava. Which is ok, but could use some more variety.
Creativity: 7/10
Being timed from jumping into the lava is a little bit creative, but the overall fire and water concept isn’t all that groundbreaking. It was done relatively well when compared to many worlds though. 
Theme adherence: 10/10
Fire and water theme.
Total: 32/40

Winner:

▼Hidden text

skullz17
Note: It was a ok level by, Filler Frenzy, but Skullz17 impressed me more with his bold theme idea and enjoyable gameplay.

Team Name: MusicMan
      Team Leader: MusicMan
      Team Members: MusicMan

▼Hidden text

Art: 9/10
The art is nice in most ways, but an minor complaint is that some parts are a little bit hard to navigate, understanding what you can stand on, or where you’re supposed to go etc...
Gameplay: 8/10
Like mentioned, some parts are a bit hard to navigate and tedious, especially the future part. But for the past part i have no complaints really, it’s excellent.
Creativity: 10/10
The music, the npc dialogue and variety of environments just reek of creativity. Very impressive.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Future past theme.
Total: 37/40

Team Name: Enter Text Here.
      Team Leader: boom300742
      Team Members: boom300742 squadxzo

▼Hidden text

Art: 10/10
The art works very well for this kind of level and it’s integrated into the gameplay seamlessly. Also that yin-yang circle thing is great.
Gameplay: 9/10
A little bit frustrating having to go back to the beginning of the segment after touching the + effect, but otherwise it’s well made. Especially how you play through different parts of the level by using the up and down gravity effect. I do wish there were maybe some more checkpoints, but it’s also understandable when taking into account this world’s concept.
Creativity: 10/10
This level gives a very bold and interesting take on the opposites gimmick, the small story bits add to it as well.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Full score.
Total: 39/40

Winner:

▼Hidden text

Enter Text Here.
Note: Wow that was a hard choice, 2 very excellent worlds. Whichever wins or loses, i look forward to playing the next world of both teams.

Team Name: SHUTU P
      Team Leader: TaskManager
      Team Members: taskmanager, Gosha

▼Hidden text

Art: 8/10
The art is decent, but it’s nothing too spectacular. Hence this score.
Gameplay: 8/10
Very average level, in many aspects i feel. The gameplay isn’t bad, it just doesn’t impress me that much. 
Creativity: 8/10
Like i described already. Though the concept of going back to the start by using the switched gravity powerup is pretty good.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Green and purple world.
Total: 34/40

Team Name: Who cares
      Team Leader: Luka504
      Team Members: Luka504

▼Hidden text

Art: 0/10
lol
Gameplay: 0/10
lol
Creativity: 0/10
lol
Theme adherence: 0/10
lol
Total: 0/40

Winner:

▼Hidden text

SHUTU P
Note: No description needed.

Team Name: Matt's Team
      Team Leader: Matt
      Team Members: Matt, Oxidizer, Brandon

▼Hidden text

Art: 10/10
I like the art. It looks nice ingame. It has an symbiotic relation with the gameplay which i always appreciate.
Gameplay: 8/10
Gameplay is spike dodging mostly, which i don’t have anything against if it’s done well. I wish the heaven section was a little bit more challenging, even if it doesn’t make that much sense thematically. But still pretty nicely done. The level feels very compact. One small gripe is the missing difficulty curve.
Creativity: 7/10
Not a particularly creative concept (ie dodge spikes) nor is heaven or hell, but the npc dialogue is pretty good. The saving grace is how well the art and gameplay is designed.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Heaven and hell.
Total: 35/40

Team Name: Dead
      Team Leader: Ninjasling
      Team Members: Ninjasling
- Did not submit entry -

Winner:

▼Hidden text

Matt's Team
Note: Well done Matt’s team, looking forward to your next level.

Team Name: Geng and Beng
      Team Leader: Adonis123
      Team Members: Adonis123, Rakszasa

▼Hidden text

Art: 8/10
Art is rather good, lot’s of neat little touches. I’d like to see even more detail however.
Gameplay: 6/10
The gameplay is reminiscent of an exploration level seeing as it’s rather easy and there are very few real challenges except for the lava part, i feel like this could have been improved much more than what we see.
Creativity: 6/10
Exploring a ice and fire cava, with a bunch of signs explaining mundane little events. These signs are not really necessary and should have been limited, though some were quite funny. Problem lies in the gameplay as it’s not very inspired and is lacking any real concept.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Lava and ice.
Total: 30/40

Team Name: Pipec stop Pipeing
      Team Leader: Pipec
      Team Members: Pipec, Fairy, Minimania

▼Hidden text

Art: 7/10
Minimap art looks great, but the ingame doesn’t look very good as an result. It’s not the worst example, but very often worlds that focus on minimap art completely butcher the look and feel of the gameplay.
Gameplay: 8/10
This level has the more classical variety of arrowmini gameplay which i haven’t seen in a while. Not my preferred style, but it works well enough. It’s lacking any real concept except for that one part with the music blocks and ladders.
Creativity: 6/10
I wish there was something more to this level other than the minimap art, the gameplay didn’t really impress me too much, most of these points is for the art itself.
Theme adherence: 10/10
The art follows the theme.
Total: 31/40

Winner:

▼Hidden text

Pipec stop Pipeing
Note: Pipec’s team should focus on improving their creativity to encompass more levels than just the art and to insert some kind of concept to their levels if they wish to score higher in the next round.

Team Name: [ /quote ]
      Team Leader: Muffin
      Team Members: Muffin, Thwink, MrShoe

▼Hidden text

Art: 8/10
The art is good, although some parts do look a little bit strange, i think some of the colours don’t mix very well. I liked the art in the middle though, the void part was well made.
Gameplay: 8/10
Very varied but good gameplay for the most part, although that slidey mini was a little bit confusing, especially on the way back. I also got stuck in the red team door fire pit because i somehow didn’t collect the read team colour on the return trip, which left me slightly grumpy. Otherwise it’s quite fine.
Creativity: 10/10
Very creative gameplay for a fire/ice world. I like how almost every challenge used different effects on the return trip. Also the npc dialogue was interesting.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Fire/ice.
Total: 36/40

Team Name:  guardians of the soap hoard
      Team Leader:  Jet
      Team Members:  Tony111, Jet, eleizibeth

▼Hidden text

Art: 9/10
Nice rendering of a painting. I would have appreciated slightly more focus on the ingame perspective, but that is an very minor complaint indeed.
Gameplay: 10/10
The sign in the beginning set the concept of “finding your own path” which was a nice encouragement of finding one’s own way to the coins. The gameplay was smart, simple to understand and fit the theme perfectly. Maybe a little short, but i won’t let that detract from the score at all.
Creativity: 10/10
Using the two different properties of the “worlds” in the painting to obtain the coins was ingenious. I really like the worlds that manage to make two clearly defined opposites that are still very connected through gameplay.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Day/night painting which works well with the theme.
Total: 39/40

Winner:

▼Hidden text

guardians of the soap hoard
Note: Two very good worlds again, but i prefer the elegant combination of gameplay and art provided by the latter. I look forward to the next worlds of both teams.

Team Name: Shadowda Contested
      Team Leader: Shadowda
      Team Members: Shadowda

▼Hidden text

Art: 10/10
Interesting art direction you went for, i like it alot. Though some of the black void parts are a bit hard to see when you need to go through them. I think it would have been better if you added an dark but visible background for those parts.
Gameplay: 6/10
Most of the minigames are a bit of a hit-and-miss unfortunately, i didn’t really like the first double jump challenge as it was mostly luck whether you would have enough jumps or not when going through the double jump effects. As for the others they are kinda meh… Certainly not as interesting as the art decor. At least you tried an variety of different challenges.
Creativity: 7/10
Points for the creative art decor and variety but not quality of the minigames.   
Theme adherence: 10/10
Industrial/grass theme.
Total: 33/40

Team Name: Whomstdve
      Team Leader: Hyperboy1
      Team Members: Hyperboy1

▼Hidden text

Art: 8/10
It’s clever how almost every decoration has an negative world variety. Though i think you could have placed some more details than what we see here. Many neat little touches tho, like the lava in the sky of the negative world.
Gameplay: 6/10
The gameplay is ok for what it is, and how it used the theme… But it’s very short and i feel like it could have been improved upon by adding a couple more challenges, it definitely would have been possible using some of the empty parts of the level. The middle of the world is almost barren. Gameplay-wise. As it stands it feels a little bit empty.
Creativity: 6/10
Very good concept, but you could have added so much more to it. Also the minigames, while utilizing the theme felt a little bit less creative than what i’d hoped for.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Normal/negative world.
Total: 30/40

Winner:

▼Hidden text

Shadowda Contested
Note: Please improve your gameplay Shadowda, otherwise your creativity is promising.

Team Name - Team Godmode
      Team Leader - Yoshi626
      Team Members - Yoshi626, Rog456, Janaro7666
- Did not submit -

Team Name: And now for something completely Different55
      Team Leader: Different55
      Team Members: Different55

▼Hidden text

Art: 7/10
Art ranges from ok to very good looking. I especially like the hard rain part, it looks amazing to me. Some of the segments don’t look that great though, which detracts from the score a bit.
Gameplay: 7/10
The varied segments are sometimes successful and sometimes not. Some of them were quite annoying to be honest, and why did you add 1x1 hooks? I mean i know it was for a blue coin, but really? All in all though i love what you did with this idea.
Creativity: 8/10
Adding the a-hole ship AI was really great. I loved it’s lines.The concept itself was genius. It detracts a little bit however that the gameplay and art wasn't up to par with the concept itself.
Theme adherence: 10/10
One of the best applications of the theme by far.
Total: x/40

Winner:

▼Hidden text

And now for something completely Different55
Note: Focus on improving the art and gameplay so you can properly supplement your creative ideas.

Team Name: Dragons
    Team Leader: Joeyc
    Team Members: Joeyc, Hexxel, Yoshilogan

▼Hidden text

Art: 8/10
Quite fine art, but a bit more ingame detail would have been appreciated. It does feel a little bit empty when focusing on that perspective.
Gameplay: 9/10
Varied and interesting gameplay concepts, some were a bit hard to understand initially, but after figuring them out it wasn’t as bad.
Creativity: 7/10
The gameplay is very varied, but i feel like this level is missing some text, or art decoration or anything really to make it stand out more. It does feel a little bit like just another level in the crowd, except it’s very small so it’s easily forgettable too. It’s hard to explain, it’s just missing that little “oomph” if you know what i mean.
Theme adherence: 8/10
There’s a blue and red side of the “celestial” but they don’t really feel that different gameplay-wise…
Total: 32/40

Team Name: Sure, Sounds fun
      Team Leader: Sensei1
      Team Members: Sensei1

▼Hidden text

Art: 10/10
I like how you portrayed the difference between the noob and pro kingdom artistically, really hilarious. Lots of neat little details to look at too.
Gameplay: 6/10
The fact that the keys can be trolled if there is more than one player in the world is not very good design, but otherwise it’s quite clever how we see portrayed the difference in philosophy between so-called “noob minigames” and “pro minigames”. I’m going to be perfectly honest though Sensei1, i’m a little bit disappointed with the gameplay in this world. With such a clever idea and excellent artistic abilities you should really strive to make the gameplay more like your usual quality. That part where you need to dodge keys for example is just bad design… Even if it’s intended to be an mockery of “noob minis” i feel like you should make the gameplay have an certain level of quality.
Creativity: 10/10
Very creative level, the npc dialogue is great. I love the fact that the noob npc’s only use quick chat.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Noob and pro kingdom. Super clever.
Total: 36/40

Winner:

▼Hidden text

Sure, Sounds fun
Note:Good luck to whichever team wins the scramble.

Team Name: I'ma lose
      Team Leader: Sapples
      Team Members: Sapples, Joelk4512

▼Hidden text

Art: 6/10
The art style is very classic when compared to the more contemporary styles of the other worlds, there are few backgrounds, tons of shader blocks, keys used for shading and heavy minimap focus, which for this small sized world just doesn’t work very well… I’d appreciate heavier focus on the ingame art.
Gameplay: 6/10
Excluding the use of some effects the gameplay is mostly based on arrowmini mechanics. I never really liked much this kind of gameplay and art, the feeling of fun simply isn’t there... So seeing this blast from the past doesn’t really fill me with nostalgia.
Creativity: 4/10
There aren’t really that many concepts excluding team blocks and a bit of double jump etc… Doesn’t exactly ooze creativity.
Theme adherence:8/10
Heaven and hell theme, but there’s not much difference between the segments, they almost feel exactly the same.
Total: 24/40

Team Name: TMS
      Team Leader: Taylor
      Team Members: Taylor, Teds, Cheesereal

▼Hidden text

Art: 8/10
The art is ingame focus and looks really neat at parts. It does have a few problems like the under detailed interior of the sand castle. Try to be more consistent with the decoration.
Gameplay: 7/10
Most of the gameplay is pretty fun, i also like that you can choose which side’s coins you’d want to go for first. It’s not exactly perfect or super creative by any means, but it does the job.
Creativity: 6/10
The art is quite creative, while the gameplay could use a more consistent style. Find a gimmick and stick with it. As it is now it’s either simple or it tries to do something using effects, but not doing it that well.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Sand/ice castle.
Total: 31/40

Winner:

▼Hidden text

TMS
Note: TMS, take my advice to heart and your team will improve hopefully.

Team Name: k
      Team Leader: Kkay
      Team Members: Kkay

▼Hidden text

Art: 8/10
Art looks quite fine, but more ingame focus would have been better.
Gameplay: 4/10
There’s a lot of overly precise BS which really detracts from the potential joy value of this level. One of these challenges Is basically: “Jump! wait 0.5 seconds before moving left! You’re given 0.1 second to jump! Switch to holding up and right! Jump again in 0.1 second! Hold left and down in the exact timing required! YOU WIN!” God i detest these type of minigames…
Creativity: 6/10
Art is pretty good like mentioned, but i’m not a fan of the level design. There’s not much else of a gimmick other than some lava and a curse effect.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Lava/sand(?) world.
Total: 28/40

Team Name: The Final Team (Unless You Include the Backup Roster)
      Team Leader: Number1KirbyFan
      Team Members: Number1KirbyFan, fishbole
- Disqualified for missing the deadline -

Team Name: okay
      Team Leader: wuthrr
      Team Members: wuthrr
- Did not submit -

Team Name: Herobrine Is Real And He Stole All My Yu Gi Oh! Cards
      Team Leader: Gamerguy (me)
      Team Members: Gamerguy
- Did not submit -

Team Name: Broken Headphones
    Team Leader: Whatahooda
    Team Members: Whatahooda
- Did not submit -

Team Name: Frix and chips
      Team Leader: Frix
      Team Members: Frix
- Did not submit -

Teams i did not have time to properly review. (but i did play their worlds to decide winner of round):

▼Hidden text

Team Name: beeef brocoli (served with oyster sauce)
    Team Leader: Onjit
    Team Members: Onjit, Pingohits, Slabdrill

Team Name: Minam
      Team Leader: Minam
      Team Members: Minam

Team Name: 2 french 1 cup
    Team Leader: Lictor
    Team Members: Kiraninja, Lictor, Kaleb

Team Name: Game mechanics
      Team Leader: Trytu
      Team Members: Trytu and Srom

Team Name: Block Neutrality
      Team Leader: Whirl
      Team Members: Whirl, Blockzoid, Idylliccomfort

Team Name: Hooray
      Team Leader: Latif
      Team Members: Oray

Team Name: I'm 2nuB
      Team Leader: 2B55B5G
      Team Members: 2B55B5G, CheesePizza02

Team Name : Intromania
      Team Leader: Introduction
      Team Members: Introduction

Team Name: CK and Unau
      Team Leader: Commanderkitten
      Team Members: Commanderkitten, Unau

Team Name: Whitney Houston We Have A Problem.
      Team Leader: Thuggishprune
      Team Members: Thuggishprune

Team Name: ErGuoErXiylaNeko
      Team Leader: Chis
      Team Members: Chis, Nekogirl14, Wowgitchiki

Team Name: The Almighty Loaf
      Team Leader: filipao500ml
      Team Members: filipao500ml

Team Name : Ultra 9
      Team Leader : Smileyhunter
      Team Members : Smileyhunter , Everybodyhamish, William2013

Team Name: Radioactive Sunflowers
      Team Leader: azurepudding
      Team Members: azurepudding, misterpotato, mandew

- LOSERS ROUND 4 ENTRIES -

▼Hidden text

Team Name: Mercury Takes Over
    Team Leader: habbogame
    Team Members: drstereos, coinage, habbogame

▼Hidden text

Art: 4/10
Very basic simple minimap art with not much going for it. But at least it doesn’t disturb the gameplay experience. (Even though that’s basically nothing to begin with)
Gameplay: 3/10
This level is clearly very rushed in every department, just putting it out there. So you do some ladder climbing and then the world's most easy spike dodging challenge… It’s not that great… At least it’s not too annoying.
Creativity: 2/10
Some points for storyline, but otherwise extremely uninspired.
Theme adherence: 3/10
Ehhh… A question mark in the minimap art i guess?
Total: 12/40

Team Name: Who cares
    Team Leader: Luka504
    Team Members: Luka504
- Did not submit -

Winner:

▼Hidden text

Mercury Takes Over
Note: Really bad winning level, so please do a better job for the next match Mercury Takes Over.

Team Name: Elegant Threesome
    Team Leader: karolv2
    Team Members: karolv2, bartlomiej007, og7deid8
- Did not submit -

Team Name: Intromania
    Team Leader: Introduction
    Team Members: Introduction

▼Hidden text

Art: 5/10
The art has some good things going for it, but it looks a little bit messy ingame. Almost like you tried to make it look good on minimap. (even though minimap is so small it would be barely invisible) I think you would have benefitted from making it a bit simpler, or a different style.
Gameplay: 6/10
The gameplay is fine, but nothing too spectacular.
Creativity: 8/10
Very clever concept of going through random rooms, the fact that the player can die easily is made less annoying this way since you’d be going through different rooms whenever resetting. If this concept was taken further it would have made the level phenomenal. (But understandably, the world size is a bit of an issue) I also would have appreciated some more inspired gameplay.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Going through random rooms, making it a mystery which route or room you’ll end up taking. Also pretty funny that there are 3 different win rooms with for example godmode block or sand lol.
Total: 29/40

Winner:

▼Hidden text

Intromania
Note:Focus more on creative gameplay and better art, your idea itself was good.

Team Name: bring peace
    Team Leader: peace
    Team Members: peace

▼Hidden text

Art: 2/10
Art points for minimap question mark block. Otherwise it doesn’t look good.
Gameplay: 2/10
The gameplay fails due to the fact that the level literally becomes a time waster near the end. You have to gamble for 1 out of 24 effects, but to get to the victory trophy the requirement is to get every single effect at least once. Meaning you’ll waste ages on those last 3-4 coins. Something which may take hours. I did not finish the world due to this reason. Other than that, the gameplay is acceptable, but i got stuck sometimes due to getting an combination of effects that doesn’t allow one to leave the starting room. There are too many untested variations of effects which really makes it impossible to properly design an challenge room to accommodate them. Though you tried. Some points for attempted creative level design.
Creativity: 6/10
The concept is the best part of the level, i just wish it was done better. Fewer effects and better level design for example.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Mystery mario block.
Total: 20/40

Team Name: Game mechanics
    Team Leader: Trytu
    Team Members: Trytu, Srom

▼Hidden text

Art: 0/10
Default gray bricks and switch systems with no background.
Gameplay: 1/10
The level looks like a prototype and half of it doesn’t work. It’s just a big sign mess, but if it doesn’t do what it’s supposed to that’s a failing grade. 1 point for at least attempting to make something. WARNING: Editing past the deadline is not allowed you guys. Your team might get disqualified for that. Even if the level improves after i played it.
Creativity: 1/10
Attempted RPG thingie. 1 point for at least having a potentially good idea.
Theme adherence: 0/10
This world is a mystery in itself. I’m sure the story has something to do with mystery… but eh....
Total: 2/40

Winner:

▼Hidden text

bring peace
Note: Please improve your gameplay and art Peace, i’ll give you one thing tho. You have some creative ideas. Just work on execution.

Team Name: SHUTU P
    Team Leader: Taskmanager
    Team Members: Taskmanager, Gosha

▼Hidden text

Art: 0/10
Haha omg so funny u guys.
Gameplay: 0/10
Please stop the judge abuse, we have to actually PLAY this level you know.
Creativity: 5/10
I… guess… it… can’t… be… denied… that… this… level… is… creative… in… one… way...
Theme adherence: 10/10
This level is a mystery.
Total: 15/40

Team Name: FireBall
    Team Leader: Nikodemzak
    Team Members: Nikodemzak, Memomemo, Melodycow
- Did not submit -

Winner:

▼Hidden text

SHUTU P
Note: norwegianboy here, contest community judge also why am i a cow. wow i fell in love with this world, gameplay, concept and art fit together. i love it. this world is best. i vote for it. why is it not in winners bracket

Team Name: [ /quote ]
    Team Leader: Muffin
    Team Members: Muffin, Thwink, MrShoe

▼Hidden text

Art: 6/10
The art could have been great, the problem is that there’s so much text and npc’s cluttering the world that it just feels super messy and hard to look at sometimes.
Gameplay: 4/10
It’s a weird level. So much random crap going on that it’s hard to even think about what the player is actually supposed to be doing, it seems like one would have to either just rush past everything or stop every 2 seconds of progress to read another lengthy monologue… It’s too much. Also there’s a puzzle at the end which was hard for me to understand, which way are the characters supposed to go? By “last”, do they mean further to the left or right? It’s confusing. I could not solve the puzzle without cheating and looking at the switch system. Overall i didn’t have much fun playing this level…
Creativity: 8/10
The level is really creative, but it feels too cluttered. Give the player some breathing room please.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Mysterious signs, mysterious gameplay, mysterious portals, mysterious npcs, mysterious storyline. Mystery mystery mystery mystery.
Total: 28/40

Team Name: The Almighty Loaf
    Team Leader: filipao500ml
    Team Members: filipao500ml
- Did not submit -

Winner:

▼Hidden text

[ /quote ]
Note:Please follow my advice for the following rounds.

Team Name: TMS
    Team Leader: Taylor
    Team Members: Taylor, Teds, Cheesereal
- Did not submit -

Team Name: Studios Ghibli
    Team Leader: Yonanoke
    Team Members: Yonanoke, Carmebe, Tytpro

▼Hidden text

Art: 10/10
The art looks great in this level, and most importantly it enhances the gameplay. Cool style. The way the environment gradually lights up is a nice touch.
Gameplay: 8/10
I liked how you have to constantly find new ways to get around by using hidden switches and blocks etc… Lots of neat little secrets to find too, the spike mini was slightly annoying and should have had more checkpoints, the light bulb part was also slightly finicky, but otherwise phenomenal.
Creativity: 10/10
Many creative gameplay concepts and a neat art style. There’s a story too, but it kind of confused me. Maybe that was intentional to keep up with the “mystery” theme though? Also the light bulb part was nice.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Mysterious tunnels, house thing. Mysterious story. Mystery mystery.
Total: 38/40

Winner:

▼Hidden text

Studios Ghibli
Note: Focus on improving gameplay and keep doing what y’all are doing.

Team Name: I’m 2nuB
    Team Leader: 2B55B5G
    Team Members: 2B55B5G, CheesePizza02

▼Hidden text

Art: 8/10
Art works well for this type of level, i think a few more decorations and detail would have been better to have though.
Gameplay: 8/10
Neato, a bit short. And it’s also slightly disappointing that the solution isn’t as complicated as i had honestly hoped it would be. But it’s still fun to wander the loop and trying to find the solution.
Creativity: 8/10
Very clever. But as i mentioned, the solution feels a bit too simple. Your team could have gone further with this. Even though it’s medium size.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Loop/puzzle.
Total: 34/40

Team Name: Dragons
    Team Leader: Joeyc
    Team Members: Joeyc, Hexxel, Yoshilogan

▼Hidden text

Art: 10/10
Excellent.
Gameplay: 8/10
Some of the challenges were a bit annoying. Such as the dot gaps where you have to hold space, otherwise it was perfectly acceptable. 
Creativity: 9/10
I SUUUPER liked the introduction of the world where we are introduced to the suspects. (The judges lol) Then having to hunt for clues. But i feel like there was a BIG missed opportunity here. Instead of using the clues found to actually figure out who the killer is… it turns out that none of them are the killer after all, making the entire clue hunting utterly pointless. Why on earth did it become this way? Such an good idea… kind of wasted… Sad really. Well it’s really creative anyway.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Who’s the killer? (Turns out it’s not one of the judges. Lame! SUPER LAME!!)
Total: 37/40

Winner:

▼Hidden text

Dragons
Note: Two very good levels, but i feel like Dragon’s team did more with their concept overall, even though that is exactly what i criticized their team for not exploring deeper.

Team Name: Radioactive Sunflowers
    Team Leader: azurepudding
    Team Members: azurepudding, misterpotato, mandew

▼Hidden text

Art: 8/10
The art ranges from good to passable, the colour scheme is slightly too much in the last quadrant.
Gameplay: 6/10
Not sure i agree with having to do the exact same minigame 3 times each, how about making the switches change the gameplay slightly? Or using team doors for this purpose. Anyway ignoring that, the concept of guessing the food items and seeing it presented through disappearing switch doors is great. It’s a fun world to romp through for the story and art elements. It’s just too bad the gameplay itself is a bit average, and gets boring already by the 2nd time one would have to beat it. I wanted to replay to see the other endings, but having to do the same average minigames for the nth time is just discouraging. 
Creativity: 8/10
Very creative story and art. However the gameplay is a bit uninspired with the repetition.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Guessing the mysterious food taste.
Total: 32/40

Team Name: Team Godmode
    Team Leader: Yoshi626
    Team Members: Yoshi626, Rog456, Janaro7666

▼Hidden text

Art: 4/10
Eye-rapey, but slightly less than what i’ve gotten accustomed to from this team. Good job on improving slightly.
Gameplay: 3/10
The gameplay is really frustrating and annoying with the spike hell, checkpoint starvation, switches, effects, tight jumps. Etc… I do have to grudgingly admit though, there is some serious creativity hidden among the hookjumps and eye-rapey art. Lots of unique setups and obstacles that really show that effort went through this level. It’s just a bit annoying having to wade through the certain bad minis… And the good but frustrating certain other minis! There is also some detective work which is funny, too bad you have to bypass super hard minigames to even progress on that laughably tossed in little gimmick you guys got. Let’s be real now, you guys wanted to make super hard minigames. So to justify that you three threw in this little simple “oh whos the killer? The guy with a knife or the guy with no hands? ohHOHO! WHAT A MYSTERY AM I RITE???!!! WHO STOLE THAT POKEMON?! NOT TEAM ROCKET YOU THINK? OHHOOOOHOOHOHOHOHOH!!!!”
I couldn’t finish this. I got stuck on a extremely precise or unclear spike hell challenge.
Creativity: 4/10
It’s really just a bunch of semi-creative/semi-sh** hard minigames with an very bare-bones detective system slapped in for good measure. 
Theme adherence: 4/10
This could have been done so much better.
Total: 15/40

Winner:

▼Hidden text

Radioactive Sunflowers
Note: pleasedontmakemeplayanotherspikehelllevelpleasedontmakemeplayanotherspikehelllevelpleasedontmakemeplayanotherspikehelllevelpleasedontmakemeplayanotherspikehelllevelpleasedontmakemeplayanotherspikehelllevel

- LOSERS ROUND 5 ENTRIES -

▼Hidden text

I was not a big fan of the theme this round really… Feels a bit too restrictive to allow us creative goodness.

Team Name: Intromania
    Team Leader: Introduction
    Team Members: Introduction

▼Hidden text

Art: 4/10
I don’t like the art much… It just feels messy. I wish it would have been made more smooth and easy on the eyes rather than this badly attempted minimap art. It has some creative vision behind it, but overall it feels too abstract and unnatural for my taste.
Gameplay: 6/10
The gameplay isn’t too bad, and like the sign says. It’s meant to be a difficult world, which it is. Mostly slidey minigames though, which is disappointing. The switch doors do “switch” things up a bit however! (oh god, kill me now for making that joke)
Creativity: 6/10
Having to waste lives to get coins and activate switches is a bit more unique than simply allowing the player to get every coin sequently. So props for that. The gameplay itself isn’t too much to brag about. But i liked how you incorporated the cat’s lives into the level.
Theme adherence: 10/10
9 lives / cat.
Total: 26/40

Team Name: Mercury Takes Over
    Team Leader: habbogame
    Team Members: drstereos, coinage, habbogame

▼Hidden text

Art: 6/10
The stadium is nice, but black system blocks dominate elsewhere.
Gameplay: 2/10
PHD in instrumentation is required. No but seriously, it was so hard to play this level. The music is brief and indistinguishable, making it difficult to understand the difference between the musical tones. It doesn’t help that the hints are gibberish. How can a sound be “bright”? Am i expected to read 40 pages of wikipedia just to understand this complicated music theory? Maybe i’m just tone deaf, but for me the level required at least 10 people inside it just to explain to me how it’s supposed to work. I really didn’t have much fun playing this level.
Creativity: 6/10
It’s a creative concept, but it’s not very friendly towards anyone who doesn’t have pre-existing  extensive knowledge of music, i saw many confused people in this level who shared my sentiment.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Limited tries until the audience leaves the stadium.
Total: 24/40

Winner:

▼Hidden text

Intromania
Note:I had more fun playing Intromania’s level, even though it had many flaws.

Team Name: SHUTU P
    Team Leader: Taskmanager
    Team Members: Taskmanager, Gosha

▼Hidden text

Art: 7/10
Nothing amazing, but it’s ok art.
Gameplay: 7/10
This seems like a ordinary level with the limited lives concept slapped on at the end, which is fine i suppose… The theme isn’t that great. The minigames are average just like the art.
Creativity: 6/10
Not that creative to be honest, though the death stairs were a nice addition.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Limited lives, limited stair ascension.
Total: 30/40

Team Name: bring peace
    Team Leader: peace
    Team Members: peace

▼Hidden text

Art: 2/10
Why is bowser a frog? Also the level looks quite bad in general…
Gameplay: 1/10
Very very bad.
Creativity: 1/10
Mario.
Theme adherence: 2/10
There’s some kind of weird life system in place which doesn’t make much sense to me. 
Total: 6/40

Winner:

▼Hidden text

SHUTU P
Note:Congratulations.

Team Name: Studios Ghibli
    Team Leader: Yonanoke
    Team Members: Yonanoke, Carmebe, Tytpro

▼Hidden text

Art: 8/10
Art looks good enough.
Gameplay: 6/10
It’s a RPG battle, but there’s not much strategy involved other than “attack monster, dodge monster” over and over again. Powerups aren’t really necessary as the dodging is easy on normal mode, and you can’t use them on the harder modes. It’s great that you guys attempt to make something creative like an RPG battle system instead of the regular platforming worlds, but often people forget that it has to be fun as well. This one is kinda “meh” as far as these types of worlds go.
Creativity: 6/10
I wish it had some actual strategy and thinking involved. As for the dodging and the “hitting monster” minigame, they are tired cliches i have seen all too often before.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Limited lives to defeat RPG monster.
Total: 30/40

Team Name: [ /quote ]
    Team Leader: Muffin
    Team Members: Muffin, Thwink, MrShoe

▼Hidden text

Art: 9/10
Art is great and works well with gameplay.
Gameplay: 9/10
The normal route is fun to play, it’s a really creative way to incorporate the theme, and it’s done well too. The secret ending however is super frustrating, but i suppose that’s no problem since it’s optional. It’s also reassuring to finally see a good use of the world portals.
Creativity: 10/10
Very creative concept and gameplay. The backstory from Different’s world is also super funny and i loved it.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Limited lives, but also using them to progress and fill holes.
Total: 38/40

Winner:

▼Hidden text

[ /quote ]
Note: Very creative and well done level by Thwink and Muffin. (And MrShoe)

Team Name: Radioactive Sunflowers
    Team Leader: azurepudding
    Team Members: azurepudding, misterpotato, mandew

▼Hidden text

Art: 8/10
Art is a little bit weird… although it’s ok overall since it fits with the story.
Gameplay: 7/10
The gameplay is like regular minigames, but it has at least some unique setups which make it a little more interesting. Hard mode isn’t that hard, so i don’t see why it would be necessary to hide it.
Creativity: 9/10
How do you come up with this stuff? The story and art is so strange, but good at the same time. Also why are there so many worlds with cats in this round? :3 Nine lives?
Theme adherence: 10/10
Follows the theme.
Total: 34/40

Team Name: Dragons
    Team Leader: Joeyc
    Team Members: Joeyc, Hexxel, Yoshilogan

▼Hidden text

Art: 10/10
I really like this more simple type of art style. It doesn’t have to be super complex and hyper-detailed all the time. This style is just fine too.
Gameplay: 8/10
The quintessential Yoshilogan level. The creative concept - The super hard and frustrating minigames - Don’t forget the limited lives which stop you from beating the level! Not that you’d be able too… that last minigame is just hell and hatred incarnate. Really nicely done and neat little level, i think it would be better if the limited lives concept didn’t HAVE to be slapped on. But that’s the theme of the round so whatever…
Creativity: 8/10
Neat little gameplay concept that’s used to its full extent. However I wish you used the limited lives concept more creatively.
Theme adherence: 10/10
I wish there was a more creative way to implement this system other than what we see, but i can’t really complain about it either.
Total: 36/40

Winner:

▼Hidden text

Dragons
Note: Artistic simplicity and good gameplay vs artistic complexity and good story.

- WINNERS ROUND 4 ENTRIES -

▼Hidden text

Team Name: Derps
    Team Leader: Wizard2002
    Team Members: Rene1236789, Matthewapril15, Wizard2002

▼Hidden text

Art: 10/10
Really good-looking art style. I like it alot.
Gameplay: 8/10
It gets a bit repetitive and it’s also quite easy once one understands the rules of the games. But it’s very well made and fun to play through.
Creativity: 8/10
Very creative for the most part, my only complaint is i wish the gameplay was made a bit less monotonous. This level reminded me of Merlee’s mansion from Super Paper Mario, which is a nice nostalgic feeling.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Gambling.
Total: 36/40

Team Name: “dude i’m so tired end this already”
    Team Leader: Zoey2070
    Team Members: Zoey2070, SmittyW, 21Twelve

▼Hidden text

Art: 10/10
Interesting art style. Gives off a Chinese vibe. 
Gameplay: 8/10
Creative gimmick of using limited jumps to beat the level, too bad i broke the level sometimes. I don’t know how, but i noticed my jumps were reset at times. I have no idea what caused it.
The minigames requires some thinking before one jumps, which is a habit that is hard to change from my usual playstyle. But i like it. It’s almost like a big puzzle world. The fact that my jumps reset sometimes dock a few points however.
Creativity: 10/10
Very neat concept and gameplay.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Limited jumps to collect all coin rewards.
Total: 38/40

Winner:

▼Hidden text

“dude i’m so tired end this already”
Note: Close shave, but i preferred the gameplay of Zoey’s team since it had a less repetitive feeling.

Team Name: Three Musketeers
    Team Leader: Filip2005
    Team Members: Bluecloud, Filip2005, Veelmoth

▼Hidden text

Art: 8/10
I think there was a sign in the level which i believe accurately describes the art. Can you figure out which? It’s not that bad though. But i wish there was less minimap focus.
Gameplay: 9/10
Neat gameplay, though i wish it was less “find the flowers” and instead finding one's own way through. But that’s the style your team went for i guess.
Creativity: 10/10
Is the story meant to be funny or poetic? I really can’t tell. What the hell was i reading? Oh well… Creative level overall, especially the minigames.
Theme adherence: 2/10
I’m not sure how this fits the theme... Did you guys mistake the losers round theme of limited lives for the winners round theme of “risks and rewards”? This docks quite a few points. Sorry about that Three Musketeers.
Total: 29/40

Team Name: MusicMan
    Team Leader: MusicMan
    Team Members: MusicMan

▼Hidden text

Art: 10/10
Really nice, i love the casino themed art when playing the minigames and how it’s made into an representation of gambling.
Gameplay: 7/10
This is the most frustrating world i have played in a long while, i spent about 20 minutes on this level, even though it would probably just take 4-5 if everything went perfect. The problem is that due to the “risk and reward” nature of the system you’d have to repeat so many of the minigames to win. So imagine my horror when i entered the 100 coin gambling room and noticed i got a one chance 1x1 hookjump “joker” room. I was screaming.
Ignoring the frustration factor it’s a really good level, i only wish the challenges were made to be a bit easier.
Creativity: 8/10
Very creative and well made, but the gambling would have been more fun and less annoying you didn’t rely on just spike minis. I thought each different form of gambling would be unique, but it really just ramps up the difficulty of the spike challenges…
Theme adherence: 10/10
Gambling.
Total: 35/40

Winner:

▼Hidden text

MusicMan
Note: Musicman wins because his level fits the theme.

Team Name: And now for something completely Different55
    Team Leader: Different55
    Team Members: Different55

▼Hidden text

Art: 1/10
Yeah...
Gameplay: 2/10
So uhh… What happened Different55? Too little time? Too much pressure? It’s just a nightmare to play this...
Creativity: 5/10
Seems like there was a lot of potential here.
Theme adherence: 2/10
I guess the level tried to follow the theme in some way.
Total: 10/40

Team Name: beeef brocoli (served with oyster sauce)
    Team Leader: Onjit
    Team Members: Onjit, Pingohits, Slabdrill

▼Hidden text

Art: 9/10
Art is good and detailed. A bit more clarity in gameplay would have improved it.
Gameplay: 6/10
It’s way too hard like the sign says, i could barely get 7 coins in my best run. How are you supposed to reach beyond that? Anyway, i’ll be the first to admit, i didn’t really play this world as extensively since Diff’s world was clearly unfinished so i felt it was unnecessary to get that deep into this one. The concept itself of the temple getting harder the more coins one collects is genius, and i wish it wasn't that hard to begin with. But it’s quite difficult to make the difficulty curve perfect in a world such as this. Still a really neat level.
Creativity: 8/10
Excellent concept and touching story, but restrain the difficulty in the future. It’s also a bit hard to figure out many of the challenges, as creative as they are.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Collecting coins makes level harder.
Total: 33/40

Winner:

▼Hidden text

beeef brocoli (served with oyster sauce)
Note: Easy choice.

Team Name: 2 french 1 cup
    Team Leader: Lictor
    Team Members: Kiraninja, Lictor, Kaleb

▼Hidden text

Art: 10/10
Excellent.
Gameplay: 8/10
I had to give some points off for that lengthy boss battle, because it’s quite tedious and annoying. It’s heartbreaking to make it through the entirety of the level twice, only to die 10 times to precise switch block parkour and game over. After some practise i actually beat the level without dying once though, so there’s that. Let’s go to the positives, well... this level is a masterpiece. There are puzzles and creative challenges which almost makes this level feel like a zelda dungeon. Very good job!
Creativity: 9/10
Very creative, but i’m not the biggest fan of that boss battle. Couldn’t it have been done better?
Theme adherence: 10/10
Risk and reward checkpoint system.
Total: 37/40

Team Name: CK and Unau
    Team Leader: Commanderkitten
    Team Members: Commanderkitten, Unau

▼Hidden text

Art: 10/10
Super duper neat.
Gameplay: 8/10
I’m not sure i personally agree with requiring the player to “buy the trophy” and leaving no reward for collecting every coin using all upgrades… But it still leaves an opportunity to reset the world and attempting to waste less on upgrades so it works both ways. The diving is a really neat gameplay concept, but i feel like the gameplay isn’t fully up there compared to the excellent art and creativity. This seems an recurring theme with CK and Unau’s worlds where their score ranks high on art and story, but the gameplay usually isn’t the best part of the level. That reminds me, there wasn’t that much of a story on this level. Weren’t you guys masters on this? Make it better!
Creativity: 8/10
Good ideas as always, but i wish the execution was even better.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Risk of diving, reward of coins.
Total: 36/40

Winner:

▼Hidden text

2 french 1 cup
Note: Close close, but as the finals approach ever closer, the judges have to become more and more heartless.

- LOSERS ROUND 6 ENTRIES -

▼Hidden text

Team Name: “dude i’m so tired end this already”
    Team Leader: Zoey2070
    Team Members: Zoey2070, SmittyW, 21Twelve

▼Hidden text

Art: 8/10
Quite refreshing new art style, but it is a bit annoying to look at in spots though. Even so, it mostly gets a pass since its used for making the gameplay feel different.
Gameplay: 5/10
The level starts really interesting with having to seek out “hints” to be able to pass over the seemingly uncrossable bridge. This world is all about illusion challenges, requiring the player to think about how to achieve their objective. It all seems very clever initially, but it’s just too bad the bridge minigame is so obscure that even with the hints i was unable to figure out exactly what the hell you were supposed to be doing. With so vague hints, it renders the level unbeatable to me. Believe me i tried to cross the bridge, but i just don’t get how this obscure tight fit skipping mechanic is supposed to work.
Creativity: 8/10
Very creative art style and minigames, but i wish the hints were a bit more noob-friendly.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Seek out hints to pass bridge.
Total: 31/40

Team Name: Radioactive Sunflowers
    Team Leader: azurepudding
    Team Members: azurepudding, misterpotato, mandew

▼Hidden text

Art: 7/10
It’s ok, i just wish it was a little less obstructive on the eyes.
Gameplay: 8/10
Really cute level where you control Cirno and the goal is to make cupcakes for Sunny, Luna and Star. In this Touhou univ- *Cough* In this magical universe the player is expected to go through small minigames and get’s ranked based on how well they do in each of them. Sort of like [ /quote ]’s level for the “avoidance” round. It’s not as creative as that one i feel, but it’s still pretty fun to romp through this one.
Creativity: 7/10
Well i’ve seen this concept before, and i don’t know if you lifted it from Muffin and Thwink’s level like mentioned, but it’s still a neato concept. Also the story is definitely inspired by Touhou.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Complete sub-objectives non-linearly until doing the major objective.
Total: 32/40

Winner:

▼Hidden text

Radioactive Sunflowers
Note: 1st team should improve gameplay while the 2nd one should get a creative concept that haven’t been done before and improve the art.

Team Name: Three Musketeers
    Team Leader: Filip2005
    Team Members: Bluecloud, Filip2005, Veelmoth
- Did not submit -

Team Name: [ /quote ]
    Team Leader: Muffin
    Team Members: Muffin, Thwink, MrShoe

▼Hidden text

Art: 9/10
Pretty good.
Gameplay: 9/10
The minigames are actually quite clever. Good job!
Creativity: 3/10
A clone level? Not even as a parody? Just lifted the exact same layout from a earlier round level but in a 50x50 world? Some points for creativity in gameplay i guess.
Theme adherence: 8/10
There’s only 1 split path, but you need to do them both anyway. Not exactly the most non-linear design.
Total: 29/40

Winner:

▼Hidden text

[ /quote ]
Note: Don’t copy earlier level ideas unless it’s intended as a parody.

Team Name: And now for something completely Different55
    Team Leader: Different55
    Team Members: Different55

▼Hidden text

Art: 7/10
I actually like the art a bit, feels like something i’d make. Not exactly the best though. (Just like my art skills)
Gameplay: 7/10
The gameplay is a bit average, but it adds at least something of substance to the level.
Creativity: 6/10
It’s quite fun to explore the aliens compound, but it does feel a little bit empty. Maybe it’s the art that’s too undetailed, or maybe you should have added more NPC’s and story? The level feels strangely empty and rushed in a way. Though the concept is clever as always, i really like your settings. It just feels like you didn’t do enough with it this time, unlike that excellent “old” level.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Alien base with some non-linear pathing. 
Total: 30/40

Team Name: SHUTU P
    Team Leader: Taskmanager
    Team Members: Taskmanager, Gosha

▼Hidden text

Art: 9/10
Really good and fits with gameplay.
Gameplay: 7/10
Weakest part of the level, but still not bad.
Creativity: 9/10
I like the multiple endings and multiple bad ends. Good job on creating a true non-linear world! Gameplay could have been a bit improved, however it’s great otherwise.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Multiple ending/bad end.
Total: 35/40

Winner:

▼Hidden text

SHUTU P
Note: Just improve the gameplay and it would have been close to full score.

Team Name: CK and Unau
    Team Leader: Commanderkitten
    Team Members: Commanderkitten, Unau
- Did not submit -

Team Name: Mercury Takes Over
    Team Leader: habbogame
    Team Members: drstereos, coinage, habbogame
- Did not submit -

Winner:

▼Hidden text

CK and Unau
Note: To put it into Kirby’s own words. CK and Unau wins because it’s about “whoever advances further in the winners bracket”

- LOSERS ROUND 7 ENTRIES -

▼Hidden text

Team Name: Radioactive Sunflowers
    Team Leader: azurepudding
    Team Members: azurepudding, misterpotato, mandew

▼Hidden text

Art: 8/10
Good effort, but looks a bit messy in some spots. Also some of the art is mostly intended for minimap it seems.
Gameplay: 9/10
For the most part it’s excellent, it’s very fun to play as different characters and experience the level in a different way, it reminds me of an older contest world created by me and Ravatroll for one of the earlier contests. Enjoyable to play all around. One complaint is that there could have been a bit more creativity in gameplay concepts.
Creativity: 9/10
The characters add an artistic flair, especially the addition of a secret unlockable character. Art and story also adds to it. Other than more creativity in the minigames like i mentioned it’s a creative world.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Level contains power ups.
Total: 36/40

Team Name: [ /quote ]
    Team Leader: Muffin
    Team Members: Muffin, Thwink, MrShoe

▼Hidden text

Art: 10/10
I don’t have any complaints against the art, it looks great.
Gameplay: 8/10
This level uses limited jump power ups as a means to make illusion minigames. It’s quite an ambitious level which requires a lot of thinking and time on the players part. The puzzles are all very well designed and hard to figure out. My main gripe is that some of the jumps are a bit frustrating and the level itself is almost too hard for my taste. It’s also very difficult to guess which next coin or power up you’re supposed to be going for, which almost becomes a puzzle in itself. It’s a real time sink, but i won’t deny the creative efforts behind the level.
Creativity: 9/10
Very very creative, only a few of the puzzle solutions feel a bit lame. Most of them are clever.
Theme adherence: 10/10
There are power ups.
Total: 37/40

Winner:

▼Hidden text

[ /quote ]
Note: Hard choice, but i think quote’s team did the best job in creating an ambitious level while meshing most of the elements together.

Team Name: SHUTU P
    Team Leader: Taskmanager
    Team Members: Taskmanager, Gosha

▼Hidden text

Art: 0/10
No.
Gameplay: 0/10
F you. Spike spam.
Creativity: 0/10
No.
Theme adherence: 0.5/10
It has powerups.
Total: 0.5/40

Team Name: CK and Unau
    Team Leader: Commanderkitten
    Team Members: Commanderkitten, Unau
- Did not submit -

Winner:

▼Hidden text

SHUTU P
Note: Only for following theme.

- WINNERS ROUND 5 ENTRIES -

▼Hidden text

Team Name: Derps
    Team Leader: Wizard2002
    Team Members: Rene1236789, Matthewapril15, Wizard2002

▼Hidden text

Art: 10/10
Looks pretty cool, also really neat how there’s this big contrast between the light happy worlds and the darker nightmare worlds.
Gameplay: 5/10
The gameplay is very meh… There’s just a bunch of dull arrowminis together with an useless gameplay concept which is basically just (Do you want to activate progression? - Yes - No) Honestly, just have a switch right there instead of asking if the player wants to activate it… x_x
The last nightmare section has no checkpoints which is a bit frustrating.
Your team should have focused more on using the power ups wisely instead of navigating arrow spam since as of right now the gameplay is the worst part of the level.
Creativity: 8/10
The story, art and environment is all very well thought out, but the score takes a small hit for the lack of creativity in gameplay.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Definitely a dreamland.
Total: 33/40

Team Name: MusicMan
    Team Leader: MusicMan
    Team Members: MusicMan

▼Hidden text

Art: 10/10
Excellent art.
Gameplay: 9/10
Some of the minigames are overly hard and one of them is downright terrible, but ignoring those few instances the minis are overall mostly creative and fun but also challenging!
Creativity: 10/10
There is a ton of variety in gameplay which even has some new concepts like the “follow the background trail” ones. Story is brilliant and the art too has creative elements. The cow’s dream is the best one.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Dreams of 3 different people + 1 cow + the player.
Total: 39/40

Winner:

▼Hidden text

MusicMan
Note: No contest for me. MusicMan’s level is superior.

Team Name: beeef brocoli (served with oyster sauce)
    Team Leader: Onjit
    Team Members: Onjit, Pingohits, Slabdrill

▼Hidden text

Art: 10/10
Art is pretty cool i think, i like the 3 different dream versions of the same area.
Gameplay: 6/10
Seemed to be good initially, but the world feels bare bones compared to what i’ve seen from this team before. We’ve gone from amazing switch system levels to a level that sounds good on paper but a bit poorly executed gameplay and story-wise. Also it seems like the world wasn't properly playtested since 2 of the actual hints to which gift mom wants in the dark dream section is not even reachable. I just had to guess which green item she wanted out from the “everyone loves green things” hint. It’s also a tad bit annoying having to restart the level for choosing the wrong gift, since it’s almost required that the player must perform the guessing game to find the correct gift. Overall quite disappointing experience. I wish there were more content to interact with, minigames, NPC’s… etc…
Creativity: 7/10
Story is decent, also there’s nothing wrong with the concept like already mentioned, just not done as well as i’d wished it was.
Theme adherence: 10/10
3 Different dream worlds.
Total: 33/40

Team Name: 2 french 1 cup
    Team Leader: Lictor
    Team Members: Kiraninja, Lictor, Kaleb

▼Hidden text

Art: 9/10
Art is a bit lame on chest dream, but otherwise great.
Gameplay: 7/10
It’s a hit and miss depending on dream section. Chesthead is a terrible noob mini, while Barrelhead is so badly designed you can literally just hold space to clear it. But Pipehead, Pothead and Bloodhead sections are brilliant. The overall experience is great though, even if the murder mystery is a bit easy and obvious to figure out. “It was the outsider cop after all? Shocking! What a plot twist!”
Creativity: 8/10
I like that the team attempted to make different minigame concepts like the past Zelda-esque level, but some of the concepts are really bad this time and almost like they are lifted from a sub-par EE lobby world. The pipe section however is excellent, also i like the detective drama even if not all that mind-boggling.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Going into dreams to find the murderer.
Total: 34/40

Winner:

▼Hidden text

2 french 1 cup
Note: 2 french 1 cup had a more finished and compact level than beeef’s team, so even if they made some bad decisions their world is superior overall.

- LOSERS ROUND 8 ENTRIES -

▼Hidden text

Team Name: Derps
    Team Leader: Wizard2002
    Team Members: Rene1236789, Matthewapril15, Wizard2002

▼Hidden text

Art: 4/10
Art is really generic and looks uninteresting on both minimap and ingame.
Gameplay: 3/10
I was never a fan of this type of gameplay, and it doesn’t help that it feels atrocious, i didn’t understand what button combination you were supposed to be holding in the water section so it felt more like luck than anything. It’s extremely annoying to keep failing due to not understanding what magical button combination the gameplay creator expects from the player. The portal section is also very annoying… The saving grace is that even though i dislike this style immensely, there is at least an attempt at differentiation by having a new gameplay concept in each quadrant of the 4x4 world layout. The final minigame is just absolutely trash and borderline unbeatable with 2/3 blue coins collected, and i’m not restarting all those minigames just to get there with less. Very boring and frustrating experience overall.
Creativity: 6/10
My main praise is the story for being really funny and refreshing to read between the lame gameplay.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Feels more like a remake than a sequel to “Revenge of Syssba” but it gets a pass.
Total: 23/40

Team Name: SHUTU P
    Team Leader: Taskmanager
    Team Members: Taskmanager, Gosha

▼Hidden text

Art: 0/10
*sigh*
Gameplay: 0/10
*facepalm*
Creativity: 0/10
*barf*
Theme adherence: 10/10
Eh, it’s a fitting sequel i guess. But making a sequel to a terrible level doesn’t make your new one any better.
Total: 10/40

Winner:

▼Hidden text

Derps
Note: Thank you Taskmanager, you make my judging so easy. I literally just have to glance at your world, give it losing score and move on.

Team Name: 2 french 1 cup
    Team Leader: Lictor
    Team Members: Kiraninja, Lictor, Kaleb

▼Hidden text

Art: 8/10
Not too bad, gotta love that classic feel.
Gameplay: 8/10
Making a sequel to a “beat everything in one go or you lose” world? Bold move. It’s actually surprisingly well designed and fun to play.
Creativity: 9/10
I like what you guys did with the level. I’d argue it’s improved from its original form since it’s in a smaller world, making the one life concept much less frustrating.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Sequel to that one life pyramid level.
Total: 35/40

Team Name: [ /quote ]
    Team Leader: Muffin
    Team Members: Muffin, Thwink, MrShoe

▼Hidden text

Art: 8/10
Good art.
Gameplay: 8/10
A bit frustrating at parts, and the portal mini is a little broken. But otherwise it’s a very solid level of dodging coins.
Creativity: 10/10
A big plus that this level makes a sequel which still has a new creative concept. Good job.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Probably not the most likely sequel Ex crew would come up with, but still pretty valid. I don’t want to be too strict with these theme points.
Total: 36/40

Winner:

▼Hidden text

[ /quote ]
Note: I feel like the execution of both levels was about equally good, but Muffin’s theme made a more creative sequel in my opinion since it didn’t just copy the style completely from the original and instead used the level as a way to introduce a different concept.

- LOSERS ROUND 9 ENTRIES -

▼Hidden text

Team Name: Derps
    Team Leader: Wizard2002
    Team Members: Rene1236789, Matthewapril15, Wizard2002

▼Hidden text

Art: 8/10
The spike challenges are coloured clearly so there isn’t any confusion gameplay-wise, that is good. Also the slimes look neat. It’s hard to ever disconnect the feeling of simply travelling through black and purple switch system paths the whole time though.
Gameplay: 5/10
Sigh… This level… It’s another RPG battle thing. After beginning with a textual assault to explain all of the features, which i really just hurriedly skimmed over and could still understand the level mechanics easily. There are a bunch of battles against “slimes” which translates (in EE terms) to dodging spikes and hitting the green spot to do damage. There is a also 5 second pause every time the turn ends because of the switch system. The main problem is that i really just don’t find this level fun, especially when in the later parts the spike dodging get’s unforgiving which makes the player die easily, meaning they have to reset the entire world which is already long enough to begin with because of all the waiting in between performing attacks and so on. EE really isn’t fit for RPG battles in my opinion, all this does is make me want to play a real RPG like Touhou Puppet Dance Performance rather than continue on with this kinda boring level. On to the positives, it doesn’t have any game breaking bugs as far as i can see, and there was clearly a lot of effort put into the level in making the switch system work and by adding extra features like the heal and double attack option, but even with all the effort put in i just can’t bring myself to enjoy this.
Creativity: 3/10
Making an RPG world in EE was creative some time ago, but now there have been so many that they need to be judged on their own right, and this level doesn’t do anything that which earlier RPG worlds haven’t done already. Not to mention all we are fighting are slimes, the story isn’t good either is what i’m saying.
I was not a big fan of the simple and repetitive musical piano note intervals so i muted the sound and cranked up this much more epic sounding music instead -> (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vOhZLOTAfEI) It made the battle feel a little bit less boring than it honestly was.
Theme adherence: 4/10
Considering the theme of “exploring new mechanics” this level doesn’t present anything out of the ordinary, i have seen these RPG worlds many times in this and earlier contests, it doesn’t really have anything i’d consider new or particularly interesting. Low score.
Total: 20/40

Team Name: [ /quote ]
    Team Leader: Muffin
    Team Members: Muffin, Thwink, MrShoe

▼Hidden text

Art: 8/10
The art is perfectly fine.
Gameplay: 8/10
A bit hard, but the gameplay is fun overall. The level is very good and i don’t have any real complaints other than the fact that some of the challenges are quite unforgiving.
Creativity: 10/10
Now that’s what i’m talking about. Very creative new concept which has a lot of meat to it. There were many good ideas like the one way challenge and the one with boosts which really adds to a already quite genius concept. Story added to it.
Theme adherence: 10/10
It’s not easy to come up with an entirely new concept as a theme, but this level aces it. I have never seen this sort of concept done in a EE world before.
Total: 36/40

Winner:

▼Hidden text

[ /quote ]
Note: Quote came up with a much better concept and did it well, so that certainly beats a mediocre RPG world.

- WINNERS ROUND 6 ENTRIES -

▼Hidden text

Team Name: Musicman
    Team Leader: Musicman
    Team Members: Musicman

▼Hidden text

Art: 9/10
Mostly awesome art and aliens. Looks good on both ingame and on minimap.
Gameplay: 5/10
A potentially great level ruined by many bad decisions. Choices DO matter in this case as you really should have “chosen” better design like removing the “only one life” for such a difficult level, it’s extremely annoying to make it through some surprisingly difficult challenges only to die trying to save some crew guy and restarting the entire level, i understand you can “choose” to simply skip the dangerous parts and just go straight to the goal, but most people would want to experience the level rather than just skipping ahead to the ending.
The difficulty really is unfortunate, for example the first minigame in the lower route of the spaceship, don’t you think it’s a bit too hard and finicky to complete when compared to most of the other minigames? Also the solution for the containment cell room is quite ridiculous for being on the supposed “easy” path.
“Sorry Musicman, i really liked many of your levels, but the gameplay in this one is positively lamerizing.”
- Quote by Ipwner (2016)
Creativity: 6/10
Many of the minigames are creative and i really like the challenge some of them bring, even if many are tedious and annoying.
The story would have been more interesting if there was some more deep and impactful decisions rather than doing the same “save crew member X or move on” routine almost all the time through the level.
Theme adherence: 10/10
The only choice that really matters gameplay-wise is which path to take at start. Other than that it’s mostly skip or not to skip minigames that affect the ending.
Total: 30/40

Team Name: beeef brocoli (served with oyster sauce)
    Team Leader: Onjit
    Team Members: Onjit, Pingohits, Slabdrill

▼Hidden text

Art: 8/10
I unironically like this style, also the face drawings are perfection.
Gameplay: 6/10
The first minigame is terrible, who the heck approved it? The other ones are not so bad... and dare i say, almost decent?
Creativity: 7/10
Very intense satire of postmodern America and pseudo-intellectualism. I loved it. The drawings and signs are really comical, i think this level would overall be much better if there either was put more focus on having creative gameplay and keeping out the trash or simply going all out with the story and art and forfeiting the gameplay altogether.
Theme adherence: 6/10
Ignoring all the fanfare and pep talk about how “choices matter” the joke in this level should have been that they really don’t matter at all, choose to kick a puppy or sing in a choir, nobody cares. Instead the player ends up in a hastily put together crap or good ending with either god or satan. It’s a really lame ending to the level’s pacing which felt cool otherwise. I think a better solution for this kind of level is to literally just go with the “choices don’t matter” route as a joke rather than giving us a weak lackluster ending which feels more like a kick in the balls than anything. Who’d want to reset the level only to get one NPC saying either “you suck you damn sinner” or “wow you rule you kindly person!”. Sigh...
Total: 27/40

Winner:

▼Hidden text

Musicman
Note: Turns out Musicman won my vote after all, i was sure he would lose since i felt like i gave him a much lower score than usual. But Beeef’s level had a bit of a identity crisis which made it lose many points. Good luck to whichever team wins anyway.

- LOSERS ROUND 10 ENTRIES -

▼Hidden text

Round info: Theme was changed from “Hurry up” to “Arcade game”

Team Name: beeef brocoli (served with oyster sauce)
    Team Leader: Onjit
    Team Members: Onjit, Pingohits, Slabdrill

▼Hidden text

Art score omitted.
Gameplay: 4/10
Normal mode is too hard to really get invested into, while easy mode is a little bit better. I’m not sure what to say to be honest, on the one hand it’s very well done to make this kind of world in only 25x25 space, but on the other hand it’s not really that much fun to me. It’s a very simple and kinda dull concept i don’t find myself eager to repeat 999x times as is apparently required for godmode. 10x times for trophy was more than enough.
Creativity: 7/10
I wish it was more exciting to actually play, but i assume it wasn’t too easy to fit this kind of level into a small world, so i’m giving a big bonus in creativity points.
Theme adherence: 10/10
This probably could have been an 80’s arcade game, i’m imagining a bad LCD screen display and a desk with 3 coloured buttons on them that have to be pressed fast after the colours flash on the screen. Put in a quarter to play. Full score for that.
Total: 21/30

Team Name: [ /quote ]
    Team Leader: Muffin
    Team Members: Muffin, Thwink, MrShoe

▼Hidden text

Art score omitted.
Gameplay: 8/10
It’s pretty fun actually, it’s easier in the beginning but then gradually gets a bit more challenging. Also i like the addition of the “JACKPOT” bonus, that was very clever. It’s just too bad it’s more luck based instead of requiring skill like the normal game.
Creativity: 10/10
The level’s gameplay is very simple, but still quite engaging. Good job on making a world i actually found fun that’s 25x25, that’s a huge achievement in itself.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Feels like an proper arcade game, especially the addition of a JACKPOT bonus which is obviously from a business perspective there purely to make you lose your prizes.
Total: 28/40

Winner:

▼Hidden text

[ /quote ]
Message to both teams: Don’t blow your victory by making some trashy meme level for the final rounds in the future. Than~ks!

- THE FINAL ROUND -

▼Hidden text

Team Name: Musicman
    Team Leader: Musicman
    Team Members: Musicman

▼Hidden text

Art: 7/10
Art is quite good minimap-wise, the light and dark castle remind me of levels in the “contrast” round.
Ingame looks a bit meh, not many details other than the random “skater dudes” you woosh by on your skating trek. Nothing bad about it per say, just nothing too amazing either. But i will say it’s solid, so it warrants about seven points.
Gameplay: 6/10
The positives is that the gameplay has some new elements added to it once in a while, making it feel fresh all the way through. Also the concept of “portal hopping” is done quite well and it works like it’s supposed to.
Negatives: The level is too hard, i feel like the difficulty could have been toned down quite a bit without negating any of the enjoyability gained from this level. The fact that two of the last blue coins are the same very hard minigame (meaning you do the exact thing twice, except mirrored) is not very clever. You should have changed it slightly so it wouldn't be a clone of itself. Final minigame feels like a chore, more focus on enjoyability instead of challenge would suit the contest better in my opinion. Not saying the challenges aren’t well made, but that’s what i’d prefer.
Creativity: 8/10
The concept is really unique and cool, i also appreciate the attempt at spicing up the gameplay by having a more open “collecting coins” part as well as adding the usage of jump and gravity effects in the later parts. There’s however a bit of a penalty for not adding more ingame decorations and the cloned minigame in blue coin part.
Theme adherence: 10/10
Skating, and there’s no denying it. [Bit of an unrelated comment: I think Musicman banked on the theme being so weird that his opponents would be stunlocked!]
Total: 31/40

Team Name: [ /quote ]
    Team Leader: Muffin
    Team Members: Muffin, Thwink, MrShoe

▼Hidden text

Art: 6/10
The art is a bit messy, i know you guys tried to add a lot of details, but there is a balance. The abundance of NPC’s, effects and so on really hinder the effect of the visuals, some of which are amazing. I really do like the look of the city section for example.
Gameplay: 3/10
Wow this level is pretty hard and disappointing. Let me start with my main complaint which i have just been itching to let out right now.
Whose genius idea was it to require 10 wins in the skating medley’s for each section with only 3 permitted fails? Especially considering many of them are ultrahard and some are random as fudge on whether you can clear them or not. You pretty much have to bank on the random number generator assigning you a more “easy section” at least 7-8 times or you WILL lose. This is one of the most frustrating experiences i’ve had so far, and it was a dread whenever i’d reach one of those hellish sections, what were you guys THINKING?!
And the level is hard enough without a time limit added to every single challenge, i can’t stress enough how bad this feels to play, almost the whole way through.
Suggestions? Make the “skate challenges” only require like three or five wins! Remove the time limits from everything! Make some of the god-awful challenges more easy and fun! Tone down the NPC spam! Etc etc...
Creativity: 5/10
Gonna have to be honest with you guys, this switch thing? Doesn’t work all that well, it’s so annoying having to hit that tiny switch on the road when supposedly “skating” from one switch block to the next. Musicman’s gameplay was so much better than this kinda random “haha you’re screwed!” parkour. If you guys don’t have a better concept for your level, at least make the GAMEPLAY good! All those random NPC’s littering the place saying random garbage (With some of their text being almost unreadable due to time limit on almost every challenge) and the pretentious sentences on the minimap really make this feel like a brilliant mess, it’s almost hilarious in a way. All this crap thrown in here really makes me appreciate Musicman’s style a whole lot more, at least the goal was simple and the challenges could be parsed since there wasn’t too much stuff cluttering the screen.
Anyway where was i? Oh yeah, creativity. How do i put this… There’s too much of it used on the wrong unnecessary parts of the level such as visuals and NPC dialogue, and too little of it used on what’s important such as gameplay and overall level enjoyability. Does that make sense?
Theme adherence: 10/10
I think Musicman’s vision of “skating” is top-notch, while this could have been good, except it wasn’t. I’ve never been too strict with theme score however, so i give the level a ten since it is trying to follow the theme.
Total: 24/40

Winner:

▼Hidden text

Musicman
Note: Finally the contest is over. =_=
I was so hyped when it started, but man it was quite taxing having to judge so many levels stretched over such a large timespan. If i ever judge anything EE related in the future i hope it’s a more traditional contest.
Anyway congratulations for receiving my vote yet again Musicman, i hear many people don’t “want” you to win apparently, but i don’t really get why. I think your levels are really good for the most part so why the hate? Well whatever. I’m finally done WOOO!

---

★              ☆        ★        ☆         ★
   ☆    ★                     ★

drunkbnu

Formerly HG

Joined: 2017-08-16

Posts: 2,306

Re: Norwegianboy's official reviews of EE Tournament worlds.

Really bad winning level

That's because it wasn't intended to be a winning level, lol.

But I guess...

The mystery continues...

Minimania

Moderation Team

From: PbzvatFbba 13

Joined: 2015-02-22

Posts: 6,393

Re: Norwegianboy's official reviews of EE Tournament worlds.

The true winners here are those worlds that make you ponder about the mystery of how their owners thought they would actually be okay to submit.

---

Click the image to see my graphics suggestions, or here to play EE: Project M!

azurepudding

Member

Joined: 2016-11-18

Posts: 726

Re: Norwegianboy's official reviews of EE Tournament worlds.

[Radioactive Sunflowers]

I agree that the gameplay in this round's entry is a bit lacking unfortunately, though I did want to do something more than having just a question mark in the world, or reach the end to find out who did something (as that feels a little theme-skipping to me, unless it's hint-and-guess which is what I did.. but with food! Heh.. I almost went with a robbery of the MusEEum, but Large to Medium, and with switch block machine.. couldn't really work it).  Ah.. I really wish this theme had came later with a larger world, as it's hard to convey a mystery when you can see half the world!  Vision blocks when??

For awhile I had considered purple blocks changing up the mini but I felt with what little gameplay area was left, it might've gotten messy pretty fast.. though team blocks did skip my mind.  I could have used those, oops..  With limited space to play through, I didn't want the world to be TOO short (I mean, it's short as it is), and hoped that the randomized samples could keep things mildly interesting.  Anyway.. this is probably a concept that'd be better utilized in a larger world.  Pending the other judge's votes.. if we move forward I'll focus more on gameplay again.  This time concept was favored but sadly a randomizer eats up so much space

Thank you for the feedback.  If I do remake this later in a larger world, expect less cramped design and more diverse gameplay!

---

Joeyc

Guest

Re: Norwegianboy's official reviews of EE Tournament worlds.

Wow it was actually pretty close, good job to I'm 2nub

PTU

Formerly Pipec

From: Mailboxٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴٴ

Joined: 2017-04-15

Posts: 862

Re: Norwegianboy's official reviews of EE Tournament worlds.

Am I fool or did I miss LR3 review?

---

Yonanoke

Formerly Glaauber

From: Kumamoto, Japan

Joined: 2015-07-07

Posts: 389

Website

Re: Norwegianboy's official reviews of EE Tournament worlds.

good, you back with reviews.

---

In-game arts

友達をまだ忘れていません。
Our memories will always belong to Everybody Edits

Norwee

Formerly NorwegianboyEE

From: Norway

Joined: 2015-03-16

Posts: 3,773

Re: Norwegianboy's official reviews of EE Tournament worlds.

(Don't ask me to make reviews of the earlier rounds. It's not happening.)

Am I fool or did I miss LR3 review?

---

★              ☆        ★        ☆         ★
   ☆    ★                     ★

peace

Member

From: admin land

Joined: 2015-08-10

Posts: 9,226

Re: Norwegianboy's official reviews of EE Tournament worlds.

Art: 2/10
Art points for minimap question mark block. Otherwise it doesn’t look good.  yeah well it was firstly hard to think of what to build where art woudld look good in too i orginay had the idea to make a mysterious maze wiht secrte blocks but then i would have NO art so i had to think of a better idea i came along wiht this but ha dot rush wiht time goo that i ha dmy plugit bot the platforms were firtsly randomly placed wiht basic gray and were adjusted a bit and i added some ofc only gray basic woudl look bad so sinc ei had like 1.5 hour left i decied to make them go from whit eto black
wiht shade so ti altealst looked better
Gameplay: 2/10
The gameplay fails due to the fact that the level literally becomes a time waster near the end. You have to gamble for 1 out of 24 effects, but to get to the victory trophy the requirement is to get every single effect at least once. Meaning you’ll waste ages on those last 3-4 coins. Something which may take hours. I did not finish the world due to this reason. Other than that, the gameplay is acceptable, but i got stuck sometimes due to getting an combination of effects that doesn’t allow one to leave the starting room. There are too many untested variations of effects which really makes it impossible to properly design an challenge room to accommodate them. Though you tried. Some points for attempted creative level design. well time qwaste havent really thoguht of that honestly
i wanted all effects and a few of the multi jumps and poisons ofc its luck based what you get maby i had to make thet blue coin a switch 1 too so you had more chanc eof getting 2 effects abotu effect combination i havent really thoguth of it i have tested multiply effects i wasnt sure of hence i added team doors for low jump/zombie i also added arrows for some gravity effects in combine wiht low jump then i laste rreleased low jump+zombie was **** and like unplaybale i did not want to fix that as it become a mess to add hrundgdreds of team doors what could make a solo effect unplayable slow speed+zombie havent really tested it either but i gues i guessed that it was possible havent really tested anythign wiht low grav as i thought it could jump hihg and over all the platforms btu i guess now i think about it that its quite hard to control low grav+high jump... had to test that sorry forgot to do that about the posions yes they ar emeant to be unplayuable atleats for the 1 sec one havent tested if you coudl be fast enough for 10 sec one and 30 sec one well i guess i could imporve this level later i am planning to make a laist of all my tournament worlds once its over so i will mostlikly make minor chnages to em while i have uunlimited time
Creativity: 6/10
The concept is the best part of the level, i just wish it was done better. Fewer effects and better level design for example. yeah i just wanteed all effects so it was more ranodm what you would get maby i could lower the requirements for winbrick to like 20 coins and add a crown for 24 coins i think then it doesnt take long and maby i csn think of more nicer platforms
Theme adherence: 10/10
Mystery mario block. yeah i aksed multiply poeple who were playing my levle in my last few minutes of building and they all said it sorta fitted so i was happy i choosed a right level ive never expected you coudl make a world in like 2 hours that is still decent but i surely will improve it later maby when i have more time
Total: 20/40

GG i won GG er wait is the judge period only 1 day? or is this just your point to me and it now 1:0 fo rme? well ill say somethign about each point you describled and gav epoints for

---

thanks hg for making this much better and ty for my avatar aswell

Norwee

Formerly NorwegianboyEE

From: Norway

Joined: 2015-03-16

Posts: 3,773

Re: Norwegianboy's official reviews of EE Tournament worlds.

GG i won GG er wait is the judge period only 1 day? or is this just your point to me and it now 1:0 fo rme? well ill say somethign about each point you describled and gav epoints for

It's only my vote. So it's at least 1:0 in your favour.

---

★              ☆        ★        ☆         ★
   ☆    ★                     ★

TaskManager

Formerly maxi123

From: i really should update this

Joined: 2015-03-01

Posts: 9,465

Re: Norwegianboy's official reviews of EE Tournament worlds.

▼lots of text

Art: 2/10
Art points for minimap question mark block. Otherwise it doesn’t look good.  yeah well it was firstly hard to think of what to build where art woudld look good in too i orginay had the idea to make a mysterious maze wiht secrte blocks but then i would have NO art so i had to think of a better idea i came along wiht this but ha dot rush wiht time goo that i ha dmy plugit bot the platforms were firtsly randomly placed wiht basic gray and were adjusted a bit and i added some ofc only gray basic woudl look bad so sinc ei had like 1.5 hour left i decied to make them go from whit eto black
wiht shade so ti altealst looked better
Gameplay: 2/10
The gameplay fails due to the fact that the level literally becomes a time waster near the end. You have to gamble for 1 out of 24 effects, but to get to the victory trophy the requirement is to get every single effect at least once. Meaning you’ll waste ages on those last 3-4 coins. Something which may take hours. I did not finish the world due to this reason. Other than that, the gameplay is acceptable, but i got stuck sometimes due to getting an combination of effects that doesn’t allow one to leave the starting room. There are too many untested variations of effects which really makes it impossible to properly design an challenge room to accommodate them. Though you tried. Some points for attempted creative level design. well time qwaste havent really thoguht of that honestly
i wanted all effects and a few of the multi jumps and poisons ofc its luck based what you get maby i had to make thet blue coin a switch 1 too so you had more chanc eof getting 2 effects abotu effect combination i havent really thoguth of it i have tested multiply effects i wasnt sure of hence i added team doors for low jump/zombie i also added arrows for some gravity effects in combine wiht low jump then i laste rreleased low jump+zombie was **** and like unplaybale i did not want to fix that as it become a mess to add hrundgdreds of team doors what could make a solo effect unplayable slow speed+zombie havent really tested it either but i gues i guessed that it was possible havent really tested anythign wiht low grav as i thought it could jump hihg and over all the platforms btu i guess now i think about it that its quite hard to control low grav+high jump... had to test that sorry forgot to do that about the posions yes they ar emeant to be unplayuable atleats for the 1 sec one havent tested if you coudl be fast enough for 10 sec one and 30 sec one well i guess i could imporve this level later i am planning to make a laist of all my tournament worlds once its over so i will mostlikly make minor chnages to em while i have uunlimited time
Creativity: 6/10
The concept is the best part of the level, i just wish it was done better. Fewer effects and better level design for example. yeah i just wanteed all effects so it was more ranodm what you would get maby i could lower the requirements for winbrick to like 20 coins and add a crown for 24 coins i think then it doesnt take long and maby i csn think of more nicer platforms
Theme adherence: 10/10
Mystery mario block. yeah i aksed multiply poeple who were playing my levle in my last few minutes of building and they all said it sorta fitted so i was happy i choosed a right level ive never expected you coudl make a world in like 2 hours that is still decent but i surely will improve it later maby when i have more time
Total: 20/40

GG i won GG er wait is the judge period only 1 day? or is this just your point to me and it now 1:0 fo rme? well ill say somethign about each point you describled and gav epoints for

wow wtf
didn't know that peace is into wall of text debates

---

signature by HG, profile picture by bluecloud, thank!!
previous signature by drstereos

2b55b5g

Formerly 2B55B5G TNG

Joined: 2016-08-27

Posts: 3,005

Re: Norwegianboy's official reviews of EE Tournament worlds.

Wow, that was pretty close. At least I tried.

Max energy is useless for me but I don't care

---

she/her

also known as DevilCharlotte

search 2bisniekitastan if you wanna find my worlds on ArchivEE

pfp: https://picrew.me/image_maker/1272810

Introduction

Member

From: [Content Deleted]

Joined: 2018-08-15

Posts: 153

Re: Norwegianboy's official reviews of EE Tournament worlds.

>tfw opponent not submit for the 3rd time

---

when your signature makes about half your comment

2b55b5g

Formerly 2B55B5G TNG

Joined: 2016-08-27

Posts: 3,005

Re: Norwegianboy's official reviews of EE Tournament worlds.

Why are you so lucky??

---

she/her

also known as DevilCharlotte

search 2bisniekitastan if you wanna find my worlds on ArchivEE

pfp: https://picrew.me/image_maker/1272810

peace

Member

From: admin land

Joined: 2015-08-10

Posts: 9,226

Re: Norwegianboy's official reviews of EE Tournament worlds.

Why are you so lucky??

2b this is only HIS vote yet

---

thanks hg for making this much better and ty for my avatar aswell

Norwee

Formerly NorwegianboyEE

From: Norway

Joined: 2015-03-16

Posts: 3,773

Re: Norwegianboy's official reviews of EE Tournament worlds.

Updated.

---

★              ☆        ★        ☆         ★
   ☆    ★                     ★

Different55

Forum Admin

Joined: 2015-02-07

Posts: 16,575

Re: Norwegianboy's official reviews of EE Tournament worlds.

So uhh… What happened Different55? Too little time? Too much pressure? It’s just a nightmare to play this...

Had a few too many days where my entire day was dominated by Other Things. Doesn't really matter now but if it had been finished it would have been a race against the clock to convince an impatient and very bored god that you're worth any amount of attention before he decides to chuck you in a box for time and all eternity, forcing you to weigh your skill against the amount of time you have left and against the amount of interest you still need to grab.

Instead it's half sketched out and the other half is scrawled in at the last minute and so untested parts of it are actually broken and it's none of the things I wanted it to be. Maybe I'll finish it some time after the tournament in a larger world.

---

"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto

Introduction

Member

From: [Content Deleted]

Joined: 2018-08-15

Posts: 153

Re: Norwegianboy's official reviews of EE Tournament worlds.

its good to know I have a +1 point for round losers 5, my world gameplay was garbage and so was the art, but I really didn't knew what to do at this point. At least I got +10 points for theme

---

when your signature makes about half your comment

azurepudding

Member

Joined: 2016-11-18

Posts: 726

Re: Norwegianboy's official reviews of EE Tournament worlds.

Huh, I thought out of the 5 judges that I'd at least get your vote, for some reason.  My opponent's world had a nice, simple aesthetic, but I found it too difficult to be fun, plus you mentioned the death limit was slapped on, which is something I wanted to avoid.  I wanted a more creative use of death doors/gates, after having played end quote's level which I thought was really cool.  Though I guess you didn't find their world as frustrating as I did. 

About hiding hardmode.. well.. most who've tried it were unable to beat it, mainly due to the first segment I guess, which is a lot harder to do deathless than I originally thought.  Second section is easy and the boss you just have to be careful not to bump into a bone.  Maybe I should've gone with the originally planned 1 life mode.

Won 3:2 tho.. that is much too close for comfort, hopefully this time I won't wait until the final day. 

---

Norwee

Formerly NorwegianboyEE

From: Norway

Joined: 2015-03-16

Posts: 3,773

Re: Norwegianboy's official reviews of EE Tournament worlds.

Updated.
A bit lackluster round this time in my opinion, the only level i really liked enough to give a high score was by SHUTU P's team.
Also 3 non-submits which is disappointing by this point.

---

★              ☆        ★        ☆         ★
   ☆    ★                     ★

TaskManager

Formerly maxi123

From: i really should update this

Joined: 2015-03-01

Posts: 9,465

Re: Norwegianboy's official reviews of EE Tournament worlds.

>when you put less effort into arting this world than the previous one and get 2 points more for the Art criteria
I'm confused

---

signature by HG, profile picture by bluecloud, thank!!
previous signature by drstereos

Norwee

Formerly NorwegianboyEE

From: Norway

Joined: 2015-03-16

Posts: 3,773

Re: Norwegianboy's official reviews of EE Tournament worlds.

>when you put less effort into arting this world than the previous one and get 2 points more for the Art criteria
I'm confused

Well suppose that's it then, it had less over saturation and focus on just having art that works with the gameplay.
Moral of the story: Try less next time.

---

★              ☆        ★        ☆         ★
   ☆    ★                     ★

TaskManager

Formerly maxi123

From: i really should update this

Joined: 2015-03-01

Posts: 9,465

Re: Norwegianboy's official reviews of EE Tournament worlds.

Moral of the story: Try less next time.

i did that in the round with musicman and it didnt work

---

signature by HG, profile picture by bluecloud, thank!!
previous signature by drstereos

Wizard2002

Member

Joined: 2016-01-10

Posts: 76

Re: Norwegianboy's official reviews of EE Tournament worlds.

Strange, does anybody know why CK and Unua didn't submit a world? Did they just not have any time to build something or are they not interested in the tournament anymore...

---

The Derpiest Wizard there ever was

azurepudding

Member

Joined: 2016-11-18

Posts: 726

Re: Norwegianboy's official reviews of EE Tournament worlds.

Cirno and Touhou..? OW!  I've actually never played those games.. I get people calling my character Cirno a lot (As well as Elsa and Navi), but I never knew of her until much later.  Charlo is my own creation for a few years now

As for borrowed ideas.. It didn't hit me until after that the egg cracking thing had been done.  But it's diiiifferent, it's in a bowl, not a pan!!!! totally different..!

By one point, oof.. too close!  You betcha I'll work even harder on the next round if I make it.  Maybe less switch reliant so there can be more room for gameplay and/or art.

---