Mafia 52 Game Thread (GAME OVER)

Nuclear Gandhi · 2022-09-11 20:48:25

Nuclear Gandhi wrote:

I dare someone to find what the sites **** problem here is

[quote=Nuclear Gandhi][quote=Pqwerty]
Here are my notes on Gikkle. Post numbers are based on where they appear in the ISO, not in the thread.
Gikkle:
Reasons for town: #4 in ISO is where he finds ShadowsEdge's scumslip. He probably wouldn't point a scumslip out as mafia. His ISO is full of scumhunting. #35 is a logical post, despite it defending Shadow. I assume in #38 he legitimately thought Shadow was town and that's why he was sad to vote them, so it's likely not a scum realizing they're voting the traitor. So it's not fake emotion . #61 is a good explanation why Oliver is town and #62 is equally helpful, especially given the MM flip. #17, #24, #33, #66  makes it look like he's against Gandhi, but at the end of the day he voted for MM. #74 shows he's torn between the two, so it's probably not a big deal.

Reasons for mafia:  #18 I know he said he was trying to bait the mafia, but is it possible that he was just using this as an excuse as mafia for why he didn't die? #55 idk the progression on how he scumread MM. It's sort of out of nowhere. #41 he found out that Mini was most likely the cop read. It could be TMI but idk[/quote]
"Reasons for town: #4 in ISO is where he finds ShadowsEdge's scumslip. " - the scumslip is not a scumslip because it's literally in the OP, Gikkle just missed it. As a matter of fact, if you read the game at all, first few pages lost wolf was talked about: namely where I joked about Elijah's "Confirmed Gangster" comment being a lost wolf signalling.
Obviously Gikkle didn't read neither the OP nor the early game due to this. But idk how you could call this a "Gikkle pointing out a scumslip". About Gikkle I could see it being a townslip, perhaps, under the assumption that he's bad (which he's not). But you? That's just horrible.
And the rest if your townread on Gikkle is, for the most part "he's logical" "he makes sense", "he is leading the town". I hope I don't have to point out why those are horrendous reasons to townread someone?
The scumread reasons are vein aswell.

In general you seem to be a lot about "x said this, y thought that" and just townread the most influential/logical sounding. Like, your [url=https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewtopic.php?pid=795648#p795648]336[/url] for example. It's one big ball of information instead of analysis.


[quote=Pqwerty]
I think Gikkle's scumhunting and townleading far outweighs my potential doubts, so he's a townread for me. Also, I disagree that Lumi was the more likely to be the cop inspect. You said so yourself "Anyone would kill Lumi", which I interpret as "anyone would townread and kill Lumi". Not to mention, Mini was one of the wagons that almost lead to a lynch D1. If I were a cop, I'd probably inspect the guy who almost got voted off over the townread town leader. Maybe, like you, Elijah just knew Lumi was town and just didn't need an inspect to confirm it. I'm just saying I think Mini is the read here.

But say none of this hypothetical mattered. 
[/quote]
Can't help it when people forget that wolves have to fake scumhunting. But why is "townleading" a townread reason?
I agree about Lumi, after Gikkle provided that , btw.


[quote=Pqwerty]
How do you explain your votes on BB and MM when you townread both of them for making deep reads? What are your reads/opinions?[/quote]
BB
[spoiler]
[quote=Nuclear Gandhi][quote=2b55b5g]
why did you vote BB?[/quote]

I was hoping [i]anything[/i] would happen from it. I don't know, you're the only one who had any kind of reaction to it other than MM's [url=https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewtopic.php?pid=795640#p795640]328[/url].
In a world where BB is wolf, either his wolf mates are in 2b55, MM, Grilyon; or it wasn't serious enough to force any kind of reaction out of it. 
I'm rather inclined to believe the wolf team not to be MM, SB, 2b55. 
[/quote][/spoiler]

MM
[spoiler]
[quote=Nuclear Gandhi]I lost interest and dropped this game out of my mind something like 30h into Day2 or so; so I've some amount of catching up to do. Probably best if I start from SoD2 with the 2 flips in mind, I'll write my thoughts along the way.


- Dead cop had only night1 to do investigations, and the first thing he did was [ [url]https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewtopic.php?pid=795588#p795588[/url] ]
Assuming no further indications of Elijah having checked someone else, like a sudden heavy townread for example, then this should be a good vote.

Given that [url=https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewtopic.php?pid=795596#p795596]284[/url]+[url=https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewtopic.php?pid=795603#p795603]291[/url]+[url=https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewtopic.php?pid=795607#p795607]295[/url]+[url=https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewtopic.php?pid=795632#p795632]320[/url] show that he could state reasons to sus BB but not the same for MM, while voting MM first and foremost (the BB sus looks like more of a afterthought), says to me that he had a red check on MM while the BB read is only there to not make it too obvious he's a Cop.

[url=https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewtopic.php?pid=795609#p795609]297[/url]+[url=https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewtopic.php?pid=795619#p795619]307[/url] [i]could[/i] indicate Elijah having a green check on minimania. But the "almost" and "99%" parts make it less likely to me. 

With this in mind, this might be conf biasing but [url=https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewtopic.php?pid=795614#p795614]302[/url] looks a bit dishonest. I mean the Lumi part. Lumi's main/only real meta tell is level of confidence, so Lumi being so in their town range while being a potentially strong asset - Idk why would someone who's so familiar with Lumi as MM is be happy that Lumi's dead.

On the flip side though, [url=https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewtopic.php?pid=795617#p795617]305[/url] makes little sense if he knew MM to be wolf? Not sure. Either way, Elijah's check was either MM wolf or Minimania town. 50/50 imho

[url=https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewtopic.php?pid=795623#p795623]311[/url]+[url=https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewtopic.php?pid=795624#p795624]312[/url]+[url=https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewtopic.php?pid=795643#p795643]331[/url] could indicate Elijah having checked Lumi or BB instead? I wish he was more obvious, but at the very least he was obvious enough for the wolves to know he's a cop for whatever reason - so I don't think it's one of these.

MM is someone who knows better than almost anyone else that I sometimes stir up the pot for reactions and content. This this end, [url=https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewtopic.php?pid=795639#p795639]327[/url] is a bit weird reaction because I'd assume my intent there should've been obvious to him.

[url=https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewtopic.php?pid=795646#p795646]334[/url] - Imagine a dead cop having in his ISO a post where he calls you 100% Mafia, in caps. :D

ngl, upon seeing [url=https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewtopic.php?pid=795648#p795648]336[/url]+knowing that there's multiple new and very active slots to read later, kinda makes me want to procrastinate a bit more. Maybe a bit later, maybe tommorow, we'll see.

[b]!vote Marshmallow Marshall[/b][/quote/][/spoiler]

reads/opinions
[spoiler]
none because
[quote=Nuclear Gandhi]
I haven't read like the last 400 posts or so[/quote]

Well, ok, I'll give you 1 thing - you're 'reads' feel rather vein to me. I'm yet to decide if it's alignment indicative.
[/spoiler][/quote]

EBWOP

srsly wtf is this websites **** problem?
3 spoiler openers
3 spoiler closers
7 quote openers
7 quote closers

Nuclear Gandhi · 2022-09-11 20:57:18

Pqwerty wrote:

Let me know if/when you read up. I was able to parse through your message for the most part. Just so I understand it correctly, the vote on BB was to drum up activity and the vote on MM was because (at the time) you thought MM was the inspect?

About BB - I quoted my post
About MM - I quote my post
About my reads - I quote where I said I hadn't read 400 posts at least, but I did give you 1 opinion - your reads are vain.

"Reasons for town: #4 in ISO is where he finds ShadowsEdge's scumslip. " - the scumslip is not a scumslip because it's literally in the OP, Gikkle just missed it. As a matter of fact, if you read the game at all, first few pages lost wolf was talked about: namely where I joked about Elijah's "Confirmed Gangster" comment being a lost wolf signalling.
Obviously Gikkle didn't read neither the OP nor the early game due to this. But idk how you could call this a "Gikkle pointing out a scumslip". About Gikkle I could see it being a townslip, perhaps, under the assumption that he's bad (which he's not). But you? That's just horrible.
And the rest if your townread on Gikkle is, for the most part "he's logical" "he makes sense", "he is leading the town". I hope I don't have to point out why those are horrendous reasons to townread someone?
The scumread reasons are vein aswell.
In general you seem to be a lot about "x said this, y thought that" and just townread the most influential/logical sounding. Like, your 336 for example. It's one big ball of information instead of analysis.

Nuclear Gandhi · 2022-09-11 21:06:52

Like, how can you not know anything that's happend in this game.
You don't know there was mention of lost wolf in the OP nor you ever noticed the talk about the lost wolf in the beginning of the game? How can you honestly stand there and say "Gikkle pointed out a scumslip by Shadow".
You don't know about my basically only post Day2, where I voted MM nor know it's reason.
You don't know why I voted BB despite me having explicitly said why.
What DO you know?
You know how to townread someone for "scumhunting", as if wolves wouldn't fake that. You townread someone for "being logical and making sense", as if wolves were idiots.
You provide more informantion instead of analysis, like in that 336.
You know how to follow someone elses lead on the basis of a wrong "they pointed out a wolfslip" and "they're leading" and "they're logical".
Like.. you just want to coast on someone elses back this game, is what I get from your takes.

Nuclear Gandhi · 2022-09-11 21:09:49

BuzzerBee wrote:

try this, Gandhi

Pqwerty wrote:

Here are my notes on Gikkle. Post numbers are based on where they appear in the ISO, not in the thread.
Gikkle:
Reasons for town: #4 in ISO is where he finds ShadowsEdge's scumslip. He probably wouldn't point a scumslip out as mafia. His ISO is full of scumhunting. #35 is a logical post, despite it defending Shadow. I assume in #38 he legitimately thought Shadow was town and that's why he was sad to vote them, so it's likely not a scum realizing they're voting the traitor. So it's not fake emotion . #61 is a good explanation why Oliver is town and #62 is equally helpful, especially given the MM flip. #17, #24, #33, #66 makes it look like he's against Gandhi, but at the end of the day he voted for MM. #74 shows he's torn between the two, so it's probably not a big deal.
Reasons for mafia: #18 I know he said he was trying to bait the mafia, but is it possible that he was just using this as an excuse as mafia for why he didn't die? #55 idk the progression on how he scumread MM. It's sort of out of nowhere. #41 he found out that Mini was most likely the cop read. It could be TMI but idk

"Reasons for town: #4 in ISO is where he finds ShadowsEdge's scumslip. " - the scumslip is not a scumslip because it's literally in the OP, Gikkle just missed it. As a matter of fact, if you read the game at all, first few pages lost wolf was talked about: namely where I joked about Elijah's "Confirmed Gangster" comment being a lost wolf signalling.
Obviously Gikkle didn't read neither the OP nor the early game due to this. But idk how you could call this a "Gikkle pointing out a scumslip". About Gikkle I could see it being a townslip, perhaps, under the assumption that he's bad (which he's not). But you? That's just horrible.
And the rest if your townread on Gikkle is, for the most part "he's logical" "he makes sense", "he is leading the town". I hope I don't have to point out why those are horrendous reasons to townread someone?
The scumread reasons are vein aswell.

In general you seem to be a lot about "x said this, y thought that" and just townread the most influential/logical sounding. Like, your 336 for example. It's one big ball of information instead of analysis.

Pqwerty wrote:

I think Gikkle's scumhunting and townleading far outweighs my potential doubts, so he's a townread for me. Also, I disagree that Lumi was the more likely to be the cop inspect. You said so yourself "Anyone would kill Lumi", which I interpret as "anyone would townread and kill Lumi". Not to mention, Mini was one of the wagons that almost lead to a lynch D1. If I were a cop, I'd probably inspect the guy who almost got voted off over the townread town leader. Maybe, like you, Elijah just knew Lumi was town and just didn't need an inspect to confirm it. I'm just saying I think Mini is the read here.
But say none of this hypothetical mattered.

Can't help it when people forget that wolves have to fake scumhunting. But why is "townleading" a townread reason?
I agree about Lumi, after Gikkle provided that , btw.

Pqwerty wrote:

How do you explain your votes on BB and MM when you townread both of them for making deep reads? What are your reads/opinions?

BB

▼Hidden text

MM

▼Hidden text

Nuclear Gandhi wrote:

I lost interest and dropped this game out of my mind something like 30h into Day2 or so; so I've some amount of catching up to do. Probably best if I start from SoD2 with the 2 flips in mind, I'll write my thoughts along the way.

- Dead cop had only night1 to do investigations, and the first thing he did was https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewt … 88#p795588
Assuming no further indications of Elijah having checked someone else, like a sudden heavy townread for example, then this should be a good vote.
Given that 284+291+295+320 show that he could state reasons to sus BB but not the same for MM, while voting MM first and foremost (the BB sus looks like more of a afterthought), says to me that he had a red check on MM while the BB read is only there to not make it too obvious he's a Cop.
297+307 could indicate Elijah having a green check on minimania. But the "almost" and "99%" parts make it less likely to me.
With this in mind, this might be conf biasing but 302 looks a bit dishonest. I mean the Lumi part. Lumi's main/only real meta tell is level of confidence, so Lumi being so in their town range while being a potentially strong asset - Idk why would someone who's so familiar with Lumi as MM is be happy that Lumi's dead.
On the flip side though, 305 makes little sense if he knew MM to be wolf? Not sure. Either way, Elijah's check was either MM wolf or Minimania town. 50/50 imho
311+312+331 could indicate Elijah having checked Lumi or BB instead? I wish he was more obvious, but at the very least he was obvious enough for the wolves to know he's a cop for whatever reason - so I don't think it's one of these.
MM is someone who knows better than almost anyone else that I sometimes stir up the pot for reactions and content. This this end, 327 is a bit weird reaction because I'd assume my intent there should've been obvious to him.
334 - Imagine a dead cop having in his ISO a post where he calls you 100% Mafia, in caps.
ngl, upon seeing 336+knowing that there's multiple new and very active slots to read later, kinda makes me want to procrastinate a bit more. Maybe a bit later, maybe tommorow, we'll see.
!vote Marshmallow Marshall

reads/opinions

▼Hidden text

BuzzerBee

Nuclear Gandhi · 2022-09-11 21:10:11

what did I miss BB?

Nuclear Gandhi · 2022-09-11 21:11:26

Pqwerty wrote:

I mean hey if you think I'm mafia then why don't you just vote me?

literally beginning of the day, and I haven't read over the half the game.
I probably will though

Nuclear Gandhi · 2022-09-11 21:16:26

BuzzerBee wrote:

anyway, good morning everyone
i received a fruit (:

It seems unlikely that the Traitor is also a Fruit Vendor, and the other mafia is the one with the factional kill so he probably can't do it either.
fruit vendor should be clear I think.

Nuclear Gandhi · 2022-09-11 21:18:08

BuzzerBee wrote:

BuzzerBee wrote:
Pqwerty, Oliwaz, and 2b all going for the hammer at the end of yesterday leads me to believe at least 1 out of the 3 are scum
anyway going back to this, i'm still very suspicious of oliwaz considering that Marshmallow had their vote on Oliwaz at EoD and Oliwaz was trying hard to hold the hammer

Why is it important who hammers, if it's 3 minutes before EoD anyways?

Nuclear Gandhi · 2022-09-11 21:20:06

I'm not the fruit vendor just fyi

Anyhow, who were the guys in the neighberhood chat and how it's going in there?

Nuclear Gandhi · 2022-09-11 21:27:36

2b55b5g wrote:

Nuclear Gandhi wrote:
You don't know there was mention of lost wolf in the OP nor you ever noticed the talk about the lost wolf in the beginning of the game? How can you honestly stand there and say "Gikkle pointed out a scumslip by Shadow".
im assuming lost wolf is traitor. i thought the scumslip was that Shadow mentioned theres 2 mafia when that wasnt mentioned anywhere?

For reference:

Gikkle wrote:

ShadowsEdge wrote:
With only 2 mafia who know each other
How do we know this? I don't see this anywhere in the OP.

Norwee wrote:

Setup information
- The mafia is confirmed to have an Traitor. The traitor is an member of the mafia that knows their teammates but can not communicate with their faction through other channels. And can not perform the factional kill unless they are the sole member remaining. The other mafia is not informed of this players identity in their role.
- Multi-tasking is in effect for any roles with multiple powers.

From the wording you can only summize that it's 1 triaior + >1 wolf team, true. Like for example 1 traitor + 6 other wolves.
But FM's default is [town member count]=3x[wolf member counter]+1, so 3v10.
Besides, I can't imagine a 4v9 game where the host made the game less mechanical than usual.

2b55b5g

Nuclear Gandhi · 2022-09-11 21:28:53

BuzzerBee wrote:

Nuclear Gandhi wrote:
BuzzerBee wrote:
BuzzerBee wrote:
Pqwerty, Oliwaz, and 2b all going for the hammer at the end of yesterday leads me to believe at least 1 out of the 3 are scum
anyway going back to this, i'm still very suspicious of oliwaz considering that Marshmallow had their vote on Oliwaz at EoD and Oliwaz was trying hard to hold the hammer
Why is it important who hammers, if it's 3 minutes before EoD anyways?
i don't think it would've been important if Marshmallow had flipped scum, but they flipped town, and to me the biggest red flag is
Oliwaz144 wrote:
!Vote MM
Headshotted scum.
Antiterrrorists win.
Ez 4 ence
Protect Mini
this post by Oli. and then Oli coming on again today to say
Oliwaz144 wrote:
Sorry MM.
I wanna talk to you post game
like, half the town obviously made a mistake in scumreading Marshmallow. so it just seems like some weird kind of fake confidence followed by fake damage control

I don't mind the confidence, but the "damage control" does seem weird yeh

Nuclear Gandhi · 2022-09-11 21:29:40

also lol @ multi-tasking
I guess fruit vendor is not cleared after all ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Nuclear Gandhi · 2022-09-11 21:35:04

2b55b5g wrote:

im honestly having a hard time reading MM, cuz im not familiar with him. im also still wondering who MM's teammate would be.
if MM is scum, i dont think his teammate is anyone that's scumread him (Gikkle, Oli, Gandhi, BB), i dont think it's Pqwerty cuz of his Miller claim, and also because he's my neighbor, i dont think it's Mini because of the cop green check that most likely happened, and it's not me. so this seems to imply that Grilyon is his teammate.
Grilyon did mention MM a lot when you read his posts. he voted Pqwerty because he thought he's trying to make MM suspicious, he trusted MM's explanation about Elijah, and honestly his vote on Gandhi feels weird (because he said MM and BB are suspects, but he didnt seem to check their ISOs?). so maybe Grilyon + MM team is actually possible, but im also having a hard time believing it cuz Grilyon is new
if scum MM's teammate isnt Grilyon, then i think it's either Gandhi or BB, but idk, Gandhi + MM seems weird since Gandhi voted for MM, maybe BB + MM is more likely, since MM seems to townread him, but BB also scumreads MM. i guess the question is, is it worth it for mafia to bus?
i can vote MM right now, but idk if other people prefer to wait

ngl never seen a miller role before
is it common on this site?
I imagine if I had it, I'd claim it at the start of the game. So what's the story of that miller claim middle of the game anyway?

Nuclear Gandhi · 2022-09-11 22:07:19

Pqwerty wrote:

Nuclear Gandhi wrote:
BuzzerBee wrote:
anyway, good morning everyone
i received a fruit (:
It seems unlikely that the Traitor is also a Fruit Vendor, and the other mafia is the one with the factional kill so he probably can't do it either.
fruit vendor should be clear I think.
The traitor is dead, btw

Ohh..
So let me get this straight.
You guys don't believe a Traitor would their mates in their scumreads despit not knowing who their mates are? What is wrong with you guys? srsly..

Nuclear Gandhi · 2022-09-11 22:11:19

Ok, outside of mini whom we can assume being green checked by Elijah and Grikkle whom you townread because they're "talking logical sentences and are leading"'
Pqwerty, is there anyone else you townread or have out of your current PoE? And don't give me that "Traitor wouldnt scumread his scummates which he doesnt know who they are" crap plz.

Nuclear Gandhi · 2022-09-11 22:16:27

Pqwerty wrote:

Nuclear Gandhi wrote:
Ohh..
So let me get this straight.
You guys don't believe a Traitor would their mates in their scumreads despit not knowing who their mates are? What is wrong with you guys? srsly..
Are you not reading the OP?
Norwee wrote:
The mafia is confirmed to have an Traitor. The traitor is an member of the mafia that knows their teammates but can not communicate with their faction through other channels.
The traitor knew their team. The team didn't know the traitor.

My bad, I confused it the opposite direction for a moment.
Anyhow, funny question coming from someone who townreads someone on the basis of you yourself not knowing about Traitor being written in the OP nor noticing any of the early game talk about it
Don't be a hypocrite

Nuclear Gandhi · 2022-09-11 22:32:29

Pqwerty wrote:

Nuclear Gandhi wrote:
My bad, I confused it the opposite direction for a moment.
Anyhow, funny question coming from someone who townreads someone on the basis of you yourself not knowing about Traitor being written in the OP nor noticing any of the early game talk about it
Don't be a hypocrite
Wait, what? I knew there was a traitor this whole time. Where did you get that I didn't?

here

Pqwerty wrote:

▼My Notes on Gikkle
Gikkle:
Reasons for town: #4 in ISO is where he finds ShadowsEdge's scumslip. He probably wouldn't point a scumslip out as mafia.

which refers to

Gikkle wrote:

ShadowsEdge wrote:
With only 2 mafia who know each other
How do we know this? I don't see this anywhere in the OP.

Idk what you thought I was talking about, if anything, tbh.

Nuclear Gandhi · 2022-09-11 22:47:53

Pqwerty wrote:

To fill you in, Gikkle noticing that 2 mafia knowing each other was not listed in the OP lead to ShadowsEdge making an obvious fake claim, which lead to Shadow getting chopped. If Gikkle didn't make that observation, Shadow would probably still be here. If Gikkle was mafia, they probably would've kept that observation hidden so that they didn't accidentally kill their traitor buddy. Is believing in someone who started a chain of events that lead to the death of a mafia a bad reason to believe they are town?

Yeah I was unaware of that chain of events.
Anyhow, my 2 take aways from this:
1) The chain of events what happend from Gikkle missing something in the OP seem to have resulted in a wolf elimination. That's good. But wolves were not aware who's the Traitor, so giving that chain of events any town credit is not taking into account the fact.
2) You again imply it's not listed in the OP, I thought we were arguing about who read the OP and who didn't

Nuclear Gandhi · 2022-09-11 22:51:59

I do wonder if Gikkle didn't see the mention of Traitor in the OP at all, or he seriously thought there could be more than the default of 3 wolves for whatever reason.
Regardless though, I disagree about awarding town cred to someone for causing a lost wolf getting eliminated, unless you can explain how they'd know who the Traitor was ofc.

Nuclear Gandhi · 2022-09-11 22:54:01

Pqwerty wrote:

Are you trying to get me to stop townreading Gikkle?

I'm pointing out some stupid things
You can keep townreading Gikkle if you give a solid reason, I don't mind.
I'm more in disbelief about your takes and trying to evaluate if it's alignment indicative or not.

Nuclear Gandhi · 2022-09-11 23:17:16

Gikkle, are you pro-NoLynch? I don't understand why are you blaming people for choosing to switch over to Allen on Day1 instead of having a NoLynch day. It seems a little insincere tbh. I don't believe you'd rather NoLynch than lynch a slot that gave half the players bad vibes in our places yourself.

Nuclear Gandhi · 2022-09-11 23:21:39

Pqwerty wrote:

why would a mafia lead the town and kill off one of its own?

You're talking like they had a choice / knew who the Traitor was.
Taking the reigns and being active are such level 0 reasons to townread someone.

I very much doubt Gikkle will get day-eliminated this game. But terrible reasonings like these are what would make a wolf!Gikkle this game a free win.

Nuclear Gandhi · 2022-09-11 23:33:15

!vote 2b55b5g
That's a coasting ISO. The ISO is more about trying to assess where the thread wind's blowing, with some clarifications of misc stuffs in the mix, for the most part.
I'm not a believer in the ISO.
Also there's that attempt to switch to minimania instead of Shadow as the main wagon, but that's more meh

Nuclear Gandhi · 2022-09-11 23:34:17

Pqwerty wrote:

Ok I guess I have no read on Gikkle then since all my reasons are level 0.
When you do read up please tell me your level 100 reads/opinions because I obviously have no idea what I'm doing

Sorry
But you can be town now

Nuclear Gandhi · 2022-09-12 01:57:52

Pqwerty can you tell something about 2b55 from your neighbor chat?

Official Everybody Edits Forums

#76 2022-09-11 20:48:25

Re: Mafia 52 Game Thread (GAME OVER)

#77 2022-09-11 20:57:18

Re: Mafia 52 Game Thread (GAME OVER)

#78 2022-09-11 21:06:52

Re: Mafia 52 Game Thread (GAME OVER)

#79 2022-09-11 21:09:49

Re: Mafia 52 Game Thread (GAME OVER)

#80 2022-09-11 21:10:11

Re: Mafia 52 Game Thread (GAME OVER)

#81 2022-09-11 21:11:26

Re: Mafia 52 Game Thread (GAME OVER)

#82 2022-09-11 21:16:26

Re: Mafia 52 Game Thread (GAME OVER)

#83 2022-09-11 21:18:08

Re: Mafia 52 Game Thread (GAME OVER)

#84 2022-09-11 21:20:06

Re: Mafia 52 Game Thread (GAME OVER)

#85 2022-09-11 21:27:36

Re: Mafia 52 Game Thread (GAME OVER)

Setup information

#86 2022-09-11 21:28:53

Re: Mafia 52 Game Thread (GAME OVER)

#87 2022-09-11 21:29:40

Re: Mafia 52 Game Thread (GAME OVER)

#88 2022-09-11 21:35:04

Re: Mafia 52 Game Thread (GAME OVER)

#89 2022-09-11 22:07:19

Re: Mafia 52 Game Thread (GAME OVER)

#90 2022-09-11 22:11:19

Re: Mafia 52 Game Thread (GAME OVER)

#91 2022-09-11 22:16:27

Re: Mafia 52 Game Thread (GAME OVER)

#92 2022-09-11 22:32:29

Re: Mafia 52 Game Thread (GAME OVER)

#93 2022-09-11 22:47:53

Re: Mafia 52 Game Thread (GAME OVER)

#94 2022-09-11 22:51:59

Re: Mafia 52 Game Thread (GAME OVER)

#95 2022-09-11 22:54:01

Re: Mafia 52 Game Thread (GAME OVER)

#96 2022-09-11 23:17:16

Re: Mafia 52 Game Thread (GAME OVER)

#97 2022-09-11 23:21:39

Re: Mafia 52 Game Thread (GAME OVER)

#98 2022-09-11 23:33:15

Re: Mafia 52 Game Thread (GAME OVER)

#99 2022-09-11 23:34:17

Re: Mafia 52 Game Thread (GAME OVER)

#100 2022-09-12 01:57:52

Re: Mafia 52 Game Thread (GAME OVER)

Board footer