Official Everybody Edits Forums

Its a bit disingenuous to show this while using a bunch of 2-high segments for the sides of the 7-segment display.  The larger the display is, the less the corners matter.

Nevertheless, as tamashiimizu says, this is very useful if you have the ids to spare.

I'm quite certain it is possible to make 4-function calculators that handle large numbers without using a bot.

On top of that, making a calculator with a bot would miss the point entirely.

I hope you aren't actually pointing out the similarity in the table/chairs design?  Because thats been the simplest and most basic design since 2010.

Not possible using 7-segment displays and only 100 switch IDs, I'm afraid.

He made the bot; the minis were made by like 131234897 different people.  As far as I know the bot is still updated from his original version.

Glad you guys enjoyed it!

Its not like I'm rude and mean to everybody.  Yes, I'm arrogant in that I have a high opinion about my knowledge in certain areas, but I am also generally nice to people.  I thank people for playing my levels, I compliment them on theirs, I help people when asked for advice, no matter how "noob" they may be.  I don't diss levels or builders just because I don't 'like' what they make; there are quite a few levels out there that I don't like because they aren't my thing, but I like that they exist and respect the people who made them.  That also applies to people I actively dislike, and there are a couple who have levels I would readily support as being part of a campaign.

The confession I quoted, the reason I pointed out that I was arrogant was not to take joy in it, it was to acknowledge something, so that when I disagreed with something else it would carry more weight.  The confession claimed that:

This is objectively untrue, as I have never done such a thing.  What does it say about certain people who don't like me that they think its ok to make up falsehoods about me?  If I'm so awful, why don't they say how awful I am by mentioning things I actually do?

A lot of the hatred we get is not because of anything we do.  How fair is it to hate us because there are people who love our levels and will strongly defend them?  We didn't recruit a bunch of people to attack anybody who doesn't like our work.  We made levels because we liked making levels, and like everybody else in the game who actively makes stuff, we think the stuff we make is usually pretty good.  Why is that so awful?

As a result, we get a lot of unjustified hate.  Search around a bit, see how many people take unprovoked shots at EX Crew.  In the only recent thread where I got in an argument with somebody, I only spoke up because somebody took what looked like a shot at us.  Even if it wasn't meant to be a shot at us, how fair is it that we are meant to be representative of something that people don't like, when that isn't all we do?

My posting history is visible.  Count how often I actually take a shot at somebody on a personal level.  It almost never happens.  On the other hand, in this thread alone you've called me old, irrelevant, and a douche.  You've spoken rudely and dismissively about my 'lil ex crew buddies' and mocked how we write.  Although I don't have the best memory, I'm pretty sure this isn't the first time you've taken a shot at EX Crew, and maybe not even the first time you've taken a personal shot at me.

What did I do to justify this level of hatred?  If I insulted you in the past, I am sorry.  If I came off as standoffish, I did not mean offense.  I would like to understand why you continue to attack us, when, as far as I know, none of us has had much if any interaction with you for a long time.

"X is bad, so is Y.  Here is how we deal with bad things."

Seemed like a straightforward comparison to me.

Congrats.

Which would have been fine if they didn't take potshots at other level creators. 

This isn't a subject that should be provoking controversy.   The only reason this is controversial is because its being posed as an issue of 'us vs them'.

Between that eedictionary of yours, and your general attitude this entire conversation, its very easy to get the idea that your interest in alternate campaigns is less about getting variety into the campaigns and more about railing against some perceived orthodoxy to which you take personal offense.  This conversation, in general, hasn't been about acknowledging reality than about trying to encourage some preferred opinion.  As an example,

Spoken by minimania and wooted by nlmdejonge.  However, as of right now, if you ignore the tutorial campaign, and consider "water levels" to be an arrow path level, the current percentage of non-arrow path levels in the campaigns is a little over 10% due to the puzzle pack.  Things are gradually changing, but for a long period of time, arrow path levels made up about 90% or even 95% of all levels that were made (excluding bosses, stairs, and run-from-god type levels).

The bigger issue with the campaigns has been the overall difficulty level (way too high), not the lack of 'unique' levels.  If you think that having more unique levels would solve that problem, thats one thing (and I might agree with that), but thats different from being irritated about the lack of unique levels for their own sake.