Official Everybody Edits Forums

Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?

You are not logged in.

#1 Re: Game Business » Everybody Edits: Satanya's Next Sacrifice ☆ » 2021-02-20 20:55:10

I'm just writing about how this sentence makes me not feeling valued and about how it does make me sad. And yeah, I indeed would feel better if the news was instead about how we can transfer the progress we've made to EE!. I don't see anything wrong about feeling that way and tbh. I also think it's less about entitlement. It's just a personal truth lol. And I'm kinda sure there are others too, who would have been happier if it was that way. But it isn't.

That's why I wrote:

But what do I even care. EE at this point can't go any further downhill (because it's dead) and I guess, you, Satanya, can't make everyone happy. 🤷 At least it sounds like there finally is a plan.

Good luck //forums.everybodyedits.com/img/smilies/smile


PS: Tomahawk, thank you for bothering to reply. But I guess attacking me personally also doesn’t show a lot of strength of character and compassion. 🤷

#2 Re: Game Business » Everybody Edits: Satanya's Next Sacrifice ☆ » 2021-02-18 22:35:31

"All legacy players will receive a standard bonus for their account." I'm sorry, but that sucks and makes me feel sad. If some shiny smiley (or whatever item it might be) will be the result of hundreds of hours spend in this game, that just feels to me like a sad joke. I surely was proud about having all them blocks, smileys and the energy. And I do remember moments where I got some of them. Chris once did a talk about how he manipulated kids into spending hundreds of dollars for useless smileys. And why did they? Maybe because some level of emotional attachment to this stuff. Losing all of it is just sad. And tbh. even if it might not sound as nice, it also feels crazy unfair to give all "legacy accounts" the same shiny item.

But what do I even care. EE at this point can't go any further downhill (because it's dead) and I guess, you, Satanya, can't make everyone happy. 🤷 At least it sounds like there finally is a plan.

Good luck //forums.everybodyedits.com/img/smilies/smile

#3 Re: Game Discussion » WHAT HAPPENED??? » 2021-02-18 22:04:29

Same, wth. happened? Can we do anything to keep these memories? Will the worlds from original EE be transfered to EE!? What happend to my account? Will all the magic coin grind be rewarded in EE!?

Or is all lost? *sob* //forums.everybodyedits.com/img/smilies/sad

I mean, this game was indeed my childhood.. Our childhood!

#4 Off Topic Discussion » This is what EE could have been, in 3D » 2019-06-14 10:38:51

Mylo
Replies: 3

Don't have anything else to say really.
EE was full of potential, and maybe still is. Game Builder is almost everything, EE could've / should've been, in 3D. It's a multiplayer sandbox game, with scripting included.

https://store.steampowered.com/app/929860/Game_Builder/

#5 Re: Game Suggestions » Add an official client download button to homepage » 2019-02-05 22:35:17

I do have the most recent version of each browser. The issue comes not from missing flash, I do have flash installed. The homepage looks broken right now, at first glance in every browser. Even in chrome where flash is still per click through supported. It should be quite easy to make an flash wrapper for macOS & linux even when flash is not installed on the system. I don't see you guys releasing EEU in the next few months, so why make the game look like it's dead in the meantime, for most users? Why not make the game more accessible? Why not maintain the homepage adequate? Don't you have webdevelopers on board?

FYI: Click through support in chrome will be disabled by default in a few months: https://www.chromium.org/flash-roadmap# … -July-2019-

#6 Re: Game Suggestions » Add an official client download button to homepage » 2019-02-01 14:13:28

LukeM wrote:

https://i.imgur.com/Z1aw2Qp.png
At the bottom of the page

Although flash player is still working in every browser I've used... What are you using?

This resolves one part of my suggestion. I suggest to add a version for macOS to and place the button at a more prominent location. Think about it: If a player downloads the game, the chance rises he will come back again when the icon is seen at his desktop. You've got a lot of space when the flash client won't load, why not use that location to advertise the wrapped client? Instead right now a big black box is shown, which makes it look like the game itself is broken. You're losing new players there.

I'm using Firefox, where the black box is shown. Safari won't start it either. In Chrome I have to accept first - inexperienced users might think the game is dangerous. As I heard the EE team contains webdevelopers and designers, why does nobody care about such fundamental issues? EE needs every single player from every single ecosystem right now, look at the numbers.

#7 Game Suggestions » Add an official client download button to homepage » 2019-02-01 10:22:57

Mylo
Replies: 14

Flash doesn't load anymore in modern browsers, and I'd like to play anyways as would others. Please build somehow a wrapper for macOS and Windows around the flash file and display the option to download prominently.

#8 Re: Off Topic Discussion » EE CM » 2017-12-27 00:01:20

It's a promising alternative, and worth a try!

#9 Re: Game Discussion » I am thankful » 2017-11-30 10:51:48

Now this will be a direct post to Atilla:

Why do you keep backfiring when you did something wrong? You can't always justify your actions with something someone else did. You overstepped your own boundries. It's not important who did the first step. You should have been sane and not follow him!

Do you believe calling someone a rude name outside of the game should result in an in-game moderator punishing the user? If not, how is that not an abuse of power? If so, where do you draw the line - when do they have the jurisdiction to punish you, what offensive names are permitted, or are you unable to insult them entirely? I think having that sort of precedent is far more like a dictatorship and it's an extremely bad idea. Mega Lamb openly admits that he believes that the in-game moderators should be able to punish users on these forums for what they say. Do you agree? If so, why?"

I agree (because this are not fan forums anymore, just look at the url), but that's not relevant. Again, my point was what you two (expecially you) do/did is unprofessional. Just because someone abuses his power, It's not okay if you do. Even if Mega Lamb would have destroyed the servers of Everybodyedits, that wouldn't be your problem! If you think something like this would happen: go, call NVD or co-owner (HR), and get an okay. Because that's how a company should work. And even if Mega Lamb would make this conflict a big public drama, you - as part of the staff - should represent the company. You should keep calm and even more important keep the dignity of this company. And if you say you aren't part of the staff, how could you even think to have the privilege to do what you did.

It's an unfortunate circumstance that there's very little room for this business to legally take responsibility for the actions of it's employees - I don't consider it an entirely reasonable prospect for any damages caused to be handled in court, especially when Mega Lamb is in an entirely different country and under an entirely different rule of law. I'm not HR and there isn't any HR. I don't think you fully grasp what damages could be caused by a reckless employee who acts purely out of their personal frustrations.

But the thing is, it's not your business. And I mean this sentence literally.

Also, just as suggestion: Stop using chat-examples like you would need to proof something. Just because someone else did wrong, it doesn't make YOUR OWN actions better.

#10 Re: Game Discussion » I am thankful » 2017-11-29 13:37:20

Wow. The EE Staff seems to be such a kindergarten. For real, instead of discussing this private with NVD - you both decided to do this. This is a huge unprofessional mess. But at least it's entertaining.  Atilla is clearly part of the staff, or at least acts like it. Else he wouldn't try to "protect" Everybodyedits by removing permissions from a moderator. They both did wrong. Atilla messed up by overstepping her boundaries. Mega Lamb messed up by getting emotional.

In my opinion Atilla is what he accused Mega Lamb to be. He went rouge by removing permissions from a Moderator without even having the okay to do so. Which would mean for me, I can't trust him. Like, what if he thinks NVD would do something "bad" to Everybodyedits. Would he "remove" him too? And so on. If an employee seems to do something wrong and you notice, you should tell HR (or the equivalent of it). And let them decide what should be done. Is Atilla the HR of Everybodyedits?

Everybodyedits staff was always a huge mess, much drama. And as the time progresses I can understand Mega Lambs decision to quit better and better and better. It seems like all the people in the staff are doing is manipulating each other. To get power, or to get someone out of their way. And that's why Everybodyedits became what it is.

Get your act together and start taking responsibility over your own actions. And finally stop throwing toys around. Sometimes it's better to just say sorry.  Please, at least try to act like a professional company. If I was an Investor, I wouldn't want to invest in such a mess.

Because of the language barriers I hope I got my own point across. Thank you.

#11 Re: Bug Reports » Game on Facebook not loading » 2017-05-30 11:32:25

Alright, I found out why. I changed my password on Facebook and told Facebook to log me everywhere out. Turns out this creates a new access token for me. Since EE doesn't handle this, I kind of lost access to my account.

#12 Bug Reports » Game on Facebook not loading » 2017-05-22 11:39:07

Mylo
Replies: 4

As title says.
Chrome is showing following error:

Mixed Content: The page at 'https://apps.facebook.com/everedits/' was loaded over HTTPS, but requested an insecure script 'http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/sw … fobject.js'. This request has been blocked; the content must be served over HTTPS.

#13 Re: Game Discussion » I quit » 2017-03-12 19:31:03

XxAtillaxX wrote:
Mylo wrote:

I think - giving the game a pause, replacing staff and devs with active ones, and then rebooting it - would have been the better option.
No need for a developer as manager/leader. You (Nou) shouldn't care so much about the people around you, the community (the drama).
Instead focusing on fixing the game's core problems.

Whatever. I wish you the best //forums.everybodyedits.com/img/smilies/wink

I think it's only fair that, after NVD had given him a chance, that he would let NVD have a chance as well.

Then I hope NVD will not fall into the EE-drama trap and start not caring about all the scheming people here ;D

#14 Re: Game Discussion » I quit » 2017-03-12 19:18:55

I think - giving the game a pause, replacing staff and devs with active ones, and then rebooting it - would have been the better option.
No need for a developer as manager/leader. You (Nou) shouldn't care so much about the people around you, the community (the drama).
Instead focusing on fixing the game's core problems.

Whatever. I wish you the best //forums.everybodyedits.com/img/smilies/wink

#16 Re: Game Discussion » The Staff of EE » 2016-10-14 07:52:45

I don't even know what happend here, and the last few days.
But remember the good things Processor did for this game <3


Ninja: "There is no doubt in my mind that Processor and Mylo had a little scheme going, to make me look bad. Mylo claimed that whatever was used, was his ideas, and his only. Because no one ever thought about changing the background image, right? Koya had also made a design, that used some of the features Mylo claimed as his. Nothing was ever said to Koya. Instead, hate was incited, and I was made out to be a bad person."

So what are you doing right now?
Let's hope you talked to Processor one by one, before you posted this.
Else you wouldn't be better than what you just incited.

Who cares if he doesn't mod. Maybe that's cause he isn't a mod, but an administrator / developer?
Maybe someone who saves the game if it's broken? Do you know? What right do you have to question these things?
In the end it's Nou's choice.

Spread love, not hate. I learned my lesson, you should too.

#17 Re: Game Discussion » more people online before?! » 2016-06-14 20:57:10

( the post N1KF is responding to: click )



N1KF wrote:

Are you serious?

I am.


N1KF wrote:

and by suggesting you remove them to make them "mature" you are sucking all personality or fun out of the game.

Am I by suggesting? The smileys are the only thing which convey fun and personality of this game?


N1KF wrote:

changing smileys to figures is suddenly going to make the game "mature" even though stick figures in the first place are still kind of childish themselves.

Did I say stick figures? I said figures. Which leaves pretty much space - I thought of something like in Downwell, maybe.


N1KF wrote:

going to waste the staff's time by having to create lots of animations and fix lots of bugs

I hope they can code good enough to avoid bugs in first place. Also now that you say it, nice animations could really push the game forward. Eg. Clash Royale.


N1KF wrote:

I've never seen people who criticize the game for having "smileys" [...] so I'm kind of doubtful that many people will join as a result.

Maybe that's why you never saw people criticize the game for having smileys. Or maybe it's because no one has thought about it before. Who knows.


N1KF wrote:

The game has many simple, colourful blocks, so we may as well make them look more realistic so its more "real" and "mature".

Mature != Realistic. I said real in the context of "a true, worthy game" - cleaner, better thought through.


N1KF wrote:

The game is basically using a bunch of building blocks with your imagination and playing around with others, so the sheer concept of the game is childish

I don't think so. Imagination is not a childish thing. I would agree it's a simple, but good concept. Drawing isn't childish either, is it?


N1KF wrote:

I gotta wonder why creating stuff in Minecraft is so popular... Oh wait, perhaps its because not everything has to be "real" and "mature" to be good? Just a thought.

I think Minecraft is pretty mature. It had, when it was big, a clean UI - and tbh I never had a problem with recommending Minecraft.
Also it was at the beginning not aimed at 4/10-years-old kids. And it's not a freemium game.


N1KF wrote:

I cant see any reasons this would be the case besides insecurity of how "mature" you are.

You're getting kind of personal here. Seems like I hit a sweet spot on your personality. Anyways, I don't think I have to prove I am mature.


N1KF wrote:

Why does such a small, trivial thing about the game bug you so much?

I did not say it bugs me a lot. I just said it's one of the things why I won't recommend EE to friends or colleagues.


N1KF wrote:

Or do you have shallow friends that would instantly judge a game as bad when they realize its not "real" or "mature" (by your definitions)?

So, I can't say how old your friends are - I can only speak for my age group (16-20).
If my friends think a game is stupid, they won't spend their time on it. Why should they?
105% they won't be like "wow this seems to be a cool game", because it just isn't.


N1KF wrote:

People of all ages, from children to adults can enjoy it.

Yes, they can. But most of the older ones won't, as far as I experienced.


N1KF wrote:

Sure, if you have no sort of imagination, or sense of fun, then it's a "childish" waste of time.

People's taste differs. But for me - I am bored of EE, and without REAL friends Ingame I don't see any future in it.


N1KF wrote:

Just like drawing, as well as video games in general can be enjoyed by children, they can also be enjoyed by adults.

I agree.


N1KF wrote:

This game isn't a "kid's" game.

It is. And if you don't see it, you're somehow closing your eyes.
Ask people how old they are, and ask the older ones if they have REAL LIFE friends inside.
Oh - and pay attention to the way people use the chat.


N1KF wrote:

It lost over the years all the things it used to be (which is not always bad, but in most of the cases..)

There are three cycling aspects to the game: the staff, the game, and the community. The staff creates the game; the game brings in a community; the community supports the staff.
Which one is it, and why? I think its mostly the community.

That's just a fact. At the beginning (if you can remember) it (Minecraft) was about open worlds, pushing your worlds to the top, keeping them alive etc. etc.





Please take a second, after reading a post where you don't agree with the opinion of the author. You don't have to get personal.
It's always better to (at least) try to be rational when trying to find the reason of a problem and responding to something which might have offended you.
I tried to find out where I see the reason of EE fading - and even if you might not like it - it could be true.

#18 Re: Game Discussion » more people online before?! » 2016-06-14 07:35:13

Zoey2070 wrote:

[...] but there's also the fact that a lot of players have outgrown the game.

This is the main problem of EE. Replace smileys with little figures, make it a little bit more like a real game, a mature game.

I can't recommend EE to my friends because I am ashamed of it.
At the moment it's a kids game - and it's a pretty bad one, tbh.

It lost over the years all the things it used to be (which is not always bad, but in most of the cases..)

#19 Re: Game Discussion » I Can Dig It and Copyright Laws » 2016-06-07 08:59:00

Maybe ask https://www.reddit.com/r/legaladvice, since no one here is able to give you real help.

#20 Re: Forum Discussion » Keep a ban in sync » 2016-04-20 19:45:13

Just to clarify, this was not posted in relation to JaWapa, I don't care about him. http://oc.tc inspired me.
But if you want it - he is a great example why this rule should be in place.

I don't think the official forums and EE are two different things.
Not playing by choice is your choice. Being not wanted at this game is another shoe.
You don't get perma-banned for nothing.

And no, since they will definitely - at no point in their life - play EE legally without the penalty being lifted,
they have no reason to take part at any discussions about it.

#21 Forum Discussion » Keep a ban in sync » 2016-04-14 07:58:22

Mylo
Replies: 12

Simple:
People which got permabanned ingame should be banned here, too.
But (!) people which got permabanned at the forums should not be banned ingame.

Why?
Because people who can't play the game anymore are not able to participate in any discussion about it.
The official forums support, by not doing this, the circumvention of those punishments,
because the player still feels connected to the community, which makes it easy for him to just continue with an alt.

Clarification

#22 Re: Game Discussion » EE IS[N'T ACTUALLY] DOOMED. » 2016-04-14 07:31:29

EE is not doomed because of Money, but because of their Privacy Policy.
Looks like EE finnaly needs to grow up.

hRbwZFw.png
http://gamesplatform.co/privacy.htm

#23 Re: Game Discussion » Everybody Edits History & Change Log » 2016-02-10 16:08:06

Different55 wrote:
AnatolyEE wrote:
0176 wrote:

[...]
   ^^^since the very beginning until this era there actually existed other ingame admins (with golden name) but AFAIK they barely did anything other than rarely joining rooms. I remember Toby, Alex and Cyclone (Cyclone also took care of the original forums and seems to be still around in some way[...]

Wait era was admin?? Can I have the right order plz (i measnfor the first post). Is the any Surce like thanel or someman?

No, who the heck is era? Where in the world did you pull that out of? What post did you read?

There. This topic  - just -  *grabs popcorn*

#24 Re: Game Discussion » Regarding Jawapa's demodding » 2016-02-01 22:07:48

XxAtillaxX wrote:

As much as I dislike JaWapa, it would be good to have concrete solid evidence that he was indeed selling the gems, which is substantially worse than just giving them away, which is still condemnable given his prior status.
However, I think it's excessive to permanently ban him from the game altogether. Also, it should have been handled privately at first, not made into a huge spectacle - which just seems like inciting hate.

If Jawapa was for something good, he was for this. Learning these things should be handled privately. *cough* I wish him the best, outside of EE.

#25 Re: Game Discussion » Something needs to be done about the amount of players in EE » 2016-01-12 15:06:14

Someone ever had the idea the reason lays not behind the whole vacation / no-update stuff?

First, low quality worlds. Everywhere. Either they are frustrating or they are not fun.

It's always the same over & over.
Jumping, pressing left / right to land at the right spot - fail / repeat.

That's why bots where so much fun, - made the game grow - for some time.
They added new game-play mechanics, they added a new way to compete against other players.

Forced updates are worth nothing. The right updates are. Quality > Quantity.

In my opinion EE should step out of the kid-shoes and finnaly get mature.

How? Replace smileys with a little character you can style differently. Add PvP.
Make the game smoother. Make it easier to join (eg. slack). Give the game more restrictions. Restrictions are good for creativity. Don't give the community everything it wants, but really _listen_ to it. Give rewards for creating good worlds. Get back to simplicity. (Crew System was not needed, since there aren't even enough people playing EE). Start making harder, but better Updates. Stop adding new Texturepacks. Start to be a professional Developer Team. Make choices and stay with them. Oh - and _showing_ some passion would be nice.

There is way more than that, but tbh - it will probably not change anything -

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB

[ Started around 1711656529.7702 - Generated in 0.351 seconds, 10 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.75 MiB (Peak: 2.07 MiB) ]