Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

peace · 2020-01-25 23:19:13

diff it makes it a litle bit harder for them to win becuase they dont know each other if it was a group of 4 they coudl eaisly co-op also if for exmaple maf b is lyncged and one of the players of maf a is lynched and the last maf wins then that menas only maf team A wins

Different55

peace · 2020-01-25 23:20:39

mrjawapa wrote:

Peace, you need to chill

you say that to me when mutant alos can make like a quintuple posting in here? cmon

eleizibeth wrote:

peace wrote:
kira are we allowed to pord poeple if yes teh i would like to:
!prod eleizibeth
cmon eleizibeh stop **** lrukign aorudn and sovl ethe damn **** game ffs
i'm sorting out my reads right now dude **** chill

your last post was 22 **** hours ago and im nto the only one callign you out for inactivety

---

alos migtght be coincidence but why are your post and jawap's post be so short after each other?

mrjawapa · 2020-01-25 23:29:29

Wasn't about the multi-posting. It was about this:

peace wrote:

woudltn it be ****

peace wrote:

stop **** lrukign

peace wrote:

ethe damn **** game ffs

But since you brought it up, posting several times in a row is annoying too. It wouldn't be an issue of you were actually saying something. You're not. Half of your posts are pointless and don't add anything.

Sometimes I wonder if you're having a conversation with yourself.

ShadowsEdge · 2020-01-25 23:30:16

My assumption is that it's similar to Universe Mafia, their win conditions can be tied together if they play their cards right, but if not, it makes it so that if one scum team is eliminated, the other scum team can still survive.

peace

rat · 2020-01-25 23:50:12

shadow, peace, buzzerbee, and devle all seem to care about solving the game, so townlean for them. strong townlean to buzzerbee and shadow.

diff, jawapa, task, and onjit are all neutral for me. task is neutral because i think he has both townie and scum qualities, and it evens out. the rest are neutral because there’s not much to get out of their few posts.

crybaby - scumlean
just a gut feeling again. i felt like his “Well ****.” post after norboy flipped was not genuine. i know he usually posts a regretful message after a townie is lynched, but i don’t really care enough to compare it to other games when he was playing as either maf or town

2b - scumlean, isn’t really contributing much
he’s not really contributing much. then again y’all seem to think i’m not contributing much so
he also said that devle and norboy don’t give him scummy vibes here, but then voted for norboy anyway? his iso is strange and he seems to be trying to intensify minor suspicions from other people.

proc - scumlean
this is mostly because of just the general vibe i’m getting. he explained his town reads, but didn’t explain his scum reads. he called jawapa and me both suspicious here, but didn’t explain why

Different55

Different55 · 2020-01-25 23:59:10

Seconding the 2b thing. I had that thought earlier but forgot about it til now. Gonna reread his iso to try and find where it came from.

Kira · 2020-01-26 00:04:31

peace wrote:

kira are we allowed to pord poeple if yes teh i would like to:
!prod eleizibeth
cmon eleizibeh stop **** lrukign aorudn and sovl ethe damn **** game ffs

Foolish kid. You do not decide how to run my game. You are merely a pawn on my chess board and I look at you high up there with my smug smile, deep in thought about my next move. That's right. My next move is that I'm going to wipe you the **** out of this game.

Peace is dead.

▼flip

rat, mrjawapa, Different55, ShadowsEdge, Minimania, Onjit, 2b55b5g

rat · 2020-01-26 00:15:16

Processor wrote:

Diff you ninja'ed me
Different55 wrote:
Maf going for a dual town lynch would be interesting, but wouldn't it be in the scum's best interest to be trying to hunt down the other team at the moment?
I think mafia couldn't care less who the other mafia group is... no?

i was thinking that the mafia groups would try to find out who each other are so they could coordinate, especially if they both win if town is dead. i'd think they'd want to avoid intentionally lynching the other mafia members

ShadowsEdge wrote:

For that reason, both of them were fine with tying the votes, which would ultimately lead in the death of two players, one confirmed Town, and one townlean for me.

speaking for myself, i was fine with tying the votes because i was trusting devle to break the tie. i was honestly on the fence about who to vote for, but ultimately decided to vote for norboy because of reasons i previously mentioned. also, norboy wasn't a townread for me at the time. task also still isn't necessarily a townread for me

shadow, who was the "confirmed town"?

Different55 wrote:

Seconding the 2b thing. I had that thought earlier but forgot about it til now. Gonna reread his iso to try and find where it came from.

here is where he said "Mutant and Norboy doesn’t give me scummy vibes."
and here is where he voted for norboy. he backed it up with "Shadow and crybaby kind of convinced me that norboy is scum, but i dont really know."

2b, which posts convinced you that norboy was definitely scum?

ShadowsEdge · 2020-01-26 00:19:17

eleizibeth wrote:

shadow, who was the "confirmed town"?

Norwegian, since they now flipped Town.

rat

rat · 2020-01-26 00:38:28

ShadowsEdge wrote:

eleizibeth wrote:
shadow, who was the "confirmed town"?
Norwegian, since they now flipped Town.

oh, my bad. i thought that you were saying one of them was confirmed town before norboy flipped.

Processor · 2020-01-26 00:48:57

eleizibeth wrote:

proc - scumlean
this is mostly because of just the general vibe i’m getting. he explained his town reads, but didn’t explain his scum reads. he called jawapa and me both suspicious here, but didn’t explain why

this, to me, reads like "I think proc is scum because he said ele is scum"

Processor · 2020-01-26 00:52:48

Can we get the Task lynch going now please?

!vote TaskManager

Processor · 2020-01-26 00:54:33

My scumread on ele heavily depends on Task's flip.

rat · 2020-01-26 00:59:47

Processor wrote:

eleizibeth wrote:
proc - scumlean
this is mostly because of just the general vibe i’m getting. he explained his town reads, but didn’t explain his scum reads. he called jawapa and me both suspicious here, but didn’t explain why
this, to me, reads like "I think proc is scum because he said ele is scum"

oh come on dude, this is 100% not it. i'm capable of not letting your opinion on me affect my opinion of you, and i trust that others are able to do so, too.

care to explain why you think jawapa and me are scum? do you think i'm scum just because i think you're scum because you think i think you're scum because you think i'm scum?

mrjawapa · 2020-01-26 01:02:12

Processor wrote:

Can we get the Task lynch going now please?
!vote TaskManager

And when they flip town... we lynch you?

rat · 2020-01-26 01:04:02

also, i was thinking you were scum before you mentioned you thought i was sus, i just didn't mention it. before the whole reads thing, i was still just getting a generally bad vibe from u

Minimania · 2020-01-26 01:12:25

eleizibeth wrote:

i know he usually posts a regretful message after a townie is lynched, but i don’t really care enough to compare it to other games when he was playing as either maf or town

So essentually you don't care enough to look for evidence to back up your claim about something I did, yet you still hold me accountable for that thing.

k.

eleizibeth wrote:

he’s not really contributing much. then again y’all seem to think i’m not contributing much so

That's because you kind of aren't. In fact, I'll prove it.

eleizibeth wrote:

shadow, peace, buzzerbee, and devle all seem to care about solving the game, so townlean for them. strong townlean to buzzerbee and shadow.

This, for all intents and purposes, is your townreads list. You claim that all of them seem to care about solving the game. Buzzerbee has not really done much outside of accusing 2b, and sure, the rest of them have been actively participating in discussion and seem like they are trying to solve the game, but everybody already knows this. You pointing this out does not add anything new to the discussion, and it's just a regurgitation of things other people have already said before.

eleizibeth wrote:

diff, jawapa, task, and onjit are all neutral for me. task is neutral because i think he has both townie and scum qualities, and it evens out. the rest are neutral because there’s not much to get out of their few posts.

Whereas the previous quote was your townlist, this seems more like the list of people you don't have any sort of reads on. For all cases except maybe Onjit, I find it rather fascinating that you have no reads on any of them, as Diff, Jawapa, and Task have been extremely active in conversation, and there aren't a whole lot of new cases for or against Jawapa and Diff. Those two in particular seem polarized, and yet you haven't even really addressed anything about them besides saying you have nothing on them. For Task, all you're saying is that he's giving kixed signals, a regurgitated summary of literally everything Mutant has ever said about him earlier today. Nothing in this list that you've said was new, at all, and you never even provided any evidence, or even a link to some posts or something, which you seem capable of, but I guess you didn't feel the need to. I'm going to assume you didn't it's because that's all been said before, therefore proving what I said about you saying nothing new, and I'll move on.

eleizibeth wrote:

crybaby - scumlean
just a gut feeling again. i felt like his “Well ****.” post after norboy flipped was not genuine. i know he usually posts a regretful message after a townie is lynched, but i don’t really care enough to compare it to other games when he was playing as either maf or town

Back to this again, this is a very weak argument made without evidence. Seems you agree because you explained you didn't even bother looking for any, even though your frequent use of hyperlinks that redirect to old posts tells me that you definitely are capable of doing so.

eleizibeth wrote:

2b - scumlean, isn’t really contributing much

Everybody and their grandma knows he hasn't been doing anything useful. He himself even blatantly admitted to sheeping. Nothing new here at all.

eleizibeth wrote:

he also said that devle and norboy don’t give him scummy vibes here, but then voted for norboy anyway?

He sheeped, as I said before

eleizibeth wrote:

his iso is strange and he seems to be trying to intensify minor suspicions from other people.

This part of your post would be a whole lot better if you gave citation or ar least some kind of explanation, but no, nothing, so I'm going to safely dismiss this as a weak claim with no evidence.

eleizibeth wrote:

proc - scumlean
this is mostly because of just the general vibe i’m getting.

Great reason to suspect anybody, not a great reason to indict anyone.

eleizibeth wrote:

he explained his town reads, but didn’t explain his scum reads.

I'm not going to take this point away from you, it's 100% true. Just as true as Mutant's inability to answer Jawapa's question about his reads last night, and Peace's inability to answer Mutant when he responded to Peace's suspicions about him. But sure, Proc hasn't answered for any of his scumreads. I'm sure that makes him scummy.

eleizibeth wrote:

he called jawapa and me both suspicious here, but didn’t explain why

Okay, but at least he is blatantly leaving that explanation out. You claim to be contributing and offering new insights, but nothing out of what you provided is new. You've either only made weak claims backed by no evidence whatsoever, brought up questions without ever answering any of them (i.e Why has Processor not explained any of his scum reads?), or simplified and restated things other people have already said. Remind me again how you are contributing?

Processor, 2b55b5g

Processor · 2020-01-26 01:20:03

mrjawapa wrote:

And when they flip town... we lynch you?

I don'T follow, does task flipping town indicate im scum?

rat

rat · 2020-01-26 01:48:21

Crybaby wrote:

So essentually you don't care enough to look for evidence to back up your claim about something I did, yet you still hold me accountable for that thing.
k.

ya, i really don't have the motivation to look through the old mafia games that you were in and look up your alignment for each of them

Crybaby wrote:

This, for all intents and purposes, is your townreads list. You claim that all of them seem to care about solving the game. Buzzerbee has not really done much outside of accusing 2b, and sure, the rest of them have been actively participating in discussion and seem like they are trying to solve the game, but everybody already knows this. You pointing this out does not add anything new to the discussion, and it's just a regurgitation of things other people have already said before.

okay uh, my townreads list was just a list of people who i thought were generally more townie than the people listed as neutral. yeah, it kinda is what other people have said before, i'm not really sure what else to add, because it was just a general ~vibe~ i was getting from them.

Crybaby wrote:

Whereas the previous quote was your townlist, this seems more like the list of people you don't have any sort of reads on. For all cases except maybe Onjit, I find it rather fascinating that you have no reads on any of them, as Diff, Jawapa, and Task have been extremely active in conversation, and there aren't a whole lot of new cases for or against Jawapa and Diff. Those two in particular seem polarized, and yet you haven't even really addressed anything about them besides saying you have nothing on them. For Task, all you're saying is that he's giving kixed signals, a regurgitated summary of literally everything Mutant has ever said about him earlier today. Nothing in this list that you've said was new, at all, and you never even provided any evidence, or even a link to some posts or something, which you seem capable of, but I guess you didn't feel the need to. I'm going to assume you didn't it's because that's all been said before, therefore proving what I said about you saying nothing new, and I'll move on.

shadow asked for my readslist and i gave it. i'd say my readslist was honestly just like, mentioning who i thought was scummy.

Crybaby wrote:

This part of your post would be a whole lot better if you gave citation or ar least some kind of explanation, but no, nothing, so I'm going to safely dismiss this as a weak claim with no evidence.

mostly this. he seemed kinda aggressive when mentioning that diff brought up the inno child thing. i'll give him the benefit of the doubt because he might genuinely agree that diff is sus for "defending" norboy, but it seems to me like he was trying to get everyone kinda mad at diff

Crybaby wrote:

I'm not going to take this point away from you, it's 100% true. Just as true as Mutant's inability to answer Jawapa's question about his reads last night, and Peace's inability to answer Mutant when he responded to Peace's suspicions about him. But sure, Proc hasn't answered for any of his scumreads. I'm sure that makes him scummy.

idk, i must've missed these posts

Crybaby wrote:

Okay, but at least he is blatantly leaving that explanation out. You claim to be contributing and offering new insights, but nothing out of what you provided is new. You've either only made weak claims backed by no evidence whatsoever, brought up questions without ever answering any of them (i.e Why has Processor not explained any of his scum reads?), or simplified and restated things other people have already said. Remind me again how you are contributing?

i didn't mean to claim i was "contributing and offering new insights," i'm sorry that you saw it that way? i have provided claims with evidence, you even said i did yourself.

Crybaby wrote:

brought up questions without ever answering any of them

really unsure about what you're referring to here

also, proc still hasn't explained his reads against me, so he either is too lazy to actually explain, or can't explain them.

Minimania · 2020-01-26 01:51:58

The idea is simple. If you bring up a question, offer a reasonable answer to it, because that insight is what's actually useful, not the question itself. I don't mean a literal question, but rather, when you point things out like "Proc never answered my reads" or "Crybaby made this response to Norboy's death", you could do much better by rewording these as questioms and offering actual amswers to these questions, otherwise it's not very valuable.

Minimania · 2020-01-26 01:52:29

omg the m key I'm literally doge rn

rat · 2020-01-26 01:57:00

oh, well i'm kinda like completely **** clueless about why proc called me sus

Crybaby wrote:

Great reason to suspect anybody, not a great reason to indict anyone.

also, i wasn't saying we should lynch him like straight off the bat, i'm just giving my opinion lmao

friendly reminder that proc still has not explained his suspicion against me

Minimania · 2020-01-26 01:57:42

I have a suspicion on you.

Minimania · 2020-01-26 02:02:49

You haven't said much at all yesterday. I feel like, if you were the Mafia, there would be no reason for you to, if your partner already said everything that needed to be saying, and I feel like this partner of yours, assuming Scum!Eleizibeth, is Scum!Mutant. You and him seem to post at different times. On the first day, I recall that you were almost going to be prodded by Kira, who I remember saying he would be prodding anybody who didn't actively post in the thread, even those posting in the Mafia chat. You only made a post when you needed to, just like how I feel like, you only started making useful posts today because people started suspecting you (i.e. my post saying I was going to vote for you today if you didnt make a useful post.) That's why I read your post as thoroughly as I possibly could, I'm trying to decide whether I think you're just not properly getting your point across, or you're faking it by saying a bunch if what's already been said. I'm leaning towards the ladder.

mutantdevle

rat · 2020-01-26 02:12:57

eh i mean that's reasonable? kinda offended tho because i was trying give as much of my own opinions as possible. also, as you may know from literally every other mafia game i've played, i don't post much unless i'm brought into the discussion, or if i feel like there's something useful to say.

Crybaby wrote:

That's why I read your post as thoroughly as I possibly could, I'm trying to decide whether I think you're just not properly getting your point across, or you're faking it by saying a bunch if what's already been said. I'm leaning towards the ladder.

i guess i'm just not getting my point across properly then? my apologies, i just don't know how else to explain what i'm thinking

mutantdevle

Official Everybody Edits Forums

#326 2020-01-25 23:19:13

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#327 2020-01-25 23:20:39

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

!prod eleizibeth

#328 2020-01-25 23:29:29

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#329 2020-01-25 23:30:16

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#330 2020-01-25 23:50:12

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#331 2020-01-25 23:59:10

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#332 2020-01-26 00:04:31

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

!prod eleizibeth

#333 2020-01-26 00:15:16

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#334 2020-01-26 00:19:17

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#335 2020-01-26 00:38:28

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#336 2020-01-26 00:48:57

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#337 2020-01-26 00:52:48

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

!vote TaskManager

#338 2020-01-26 00:54:33

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#339 2020-01-26 00:59:47

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#340 2020-01-26 01:02:12

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

!vote TaskManager

#341 2020-01-26 01:04:02

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#342 2020-01-26 01:12:25

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#343 2020-01-26 01:20:03

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#344 2020-01-26 01:48:21

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#345 2020-01-26 01:51:58

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#346 2020-01-26 01:52:29

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#347 2020-01-26 01:57:00

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#348 2020-01-26 01:57:42

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#349 2020-01-26 02:02:49

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

#350 2020-01-26 02:12:57

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

Board footer