Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
What You See Is What You Get, please!
Uh what.
she/her
also known as DevilCharlotte
search 2bisniekitastan if you wanna find my worlds on ArchivEE
Offline
Uh what.
i reported it for spam sicne this topic is too vague if only anataoly leanrs to write more in his OP's
thanks hg for making this much better and ty for my avatar aswell
Offline
He's suggesting a WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get) editor for the forums. Essentially you wouldn't see BBCode, you would only see the actual result. So basically what you were suggesting in your other topic, peace.
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
He's suggesting a WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get) editor for the forums. Essentially you wouldn't see BBCode, you would only see the actual result. So basically what you were suggesting in your other topic, peace.
it wasnt clear but yeah thats what i want in my topic (he couldve poastted it there)
thanks hg for making this much better and ty for my avatar aswell
Offline
IDKWYM
Offline
He's suggesting a WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get) editor for the forums. Essentially you wouldn't see BBCode, you would only see the actual result. So basically what you were suggesting in your other topic, peace.
thanks for being anatoly's interpreter
Offline
2B55B5G TNG wrote:Uh what.
i reported it for spam sicne this topic is too vague if only anataoly leanrs to write more in his OP's
WYSIWYG is an official shortcut. You know if you say “too vague” I’d report every topic of yours.
peace wrote:2B55B5G TNG wrote:Uh what.
i reported it for spam sicne this topic is too vague if only anataoly leanrs to write more in his OP's
WYSIWYG is an official shortcut. You know if you say “too vague” I’d report every topic of yours.
Peace needs an interpreter because of the way he types. You need an interpreter for what you typed. Pretty big difference there.
What Diff is describing sounds useful, but there should be an option to disable it.
Click the image to see my graphics suggestions, or here to play EE: Project M!
Offline
stop trying to murder fluxbb
Offline
I still don't get what wysiwyg is or what the topic is about.
Offline
He's suggesting a WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get)
thanks hg for making this much better and ty for my avatar aswell
Offline
Different55 wrote:He's suggesting a WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get)
But still idk what it is for.
Offline
peace wrote:Different55 wrote:He's suggesting a WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get)
But still idk what it is for.
mikelolsuperman wrote:peace wrote:Different55 wrote:He's suggesting a WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get)
But still idk what it is for.
I asked you what it is, not to google it for me with some other site and then make me search a site with an explaination (Most of it is just download it or whatever). If you take the time asking if my posts are important take the time stating why yours is so important
Offline
Anatoly wrote:mikelolsuperman wrote:peace wrote:Different55 wrote:He's suggesting a WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get)
But still idk what it is for.
I asked you what it is, not to google it for me with some other site and then make me search a site with an explaination (Most of it is just download it or whatever). If you take the time asking if my posts are important take the time stating why yours is so important
:facepalm:
Look, I gave you that link for a reason. Instead of trying to pretend your cool and testing if I know what I say, go and get some help.
Wysiwyg, for people who can't google is a what you see is what you get editor; if you'd to a link Id gave you, you could see immediately two things:
If you don't understand what I say, but don't understand wikipedia either, then guess who the problem is...
that zoomed in bold and italic buttons explain EVERYTHING. All you had to do is to click a **** link and see what's there.
But obviously you try to prove me stupid.
Well,
this time you failed!
mikelolsuperman wrote:Anatoly wrote:mikelolsuperman wrote:But still idk what it is for.
I asked you what it is, not to google it for me with some other site and then make me search a site with an explaination (Most of it is just download it or whatever). If you take the time asking if my posts are important take the time stating why yours is so important
:facepalm:
Look, I gave you that link for a reason. Instead of trying to pretend your cool and testing if I know what I say, go and get some help.
Wysiwyg, for people who can't google is a what you see is what you get editor; if you'd to a link Id gave you, you could see immediately two things:
▼Hidden textIf you don't understand what I say, but don't understand wikipedia either, then guess who the problem is...
that zoomed in bold and italic buttons explain EVERYTHING. All you had to do is to click a **** link and see what's there.
But obviously you try to prove me stupid.
Well,
this time you failed!
Failed what? Failed not knowing a thing? Gee didn't know you were that special and perfect. I still don't get it since there is literally an option to make your text bold, italic and so much more already, so what do we need a bold and italic option for? And about you being so perfect, you probably know what you get if you take my birth year, multiply it by 41294 and add my age in milliseconds. No? Guess you don't know everything either.
Offline
Okay this has gone a little bit past derailed. Please return to the topic at hand.
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
If you don't know something, google it, what I gave you - a link to google it.
Okay this has gone a little bit past derailed. Please return to the topic at hand.
Back to the suggestion:
Can you make, so "Preview" at the top gets automatically updated? This way you can see during coding, when _you_ actually did mistakes. In my case, ive been trying to find a mistake in my post for two hours because the reason was completely wrong.
So... real life preview?
▼mikelolsupermanIf you don't know something, google it, what I gave you - a link to google it.
Different55 wrote:Okay this has gone a little bit past derailed. Please return to the topic at hand.
Back to the suggestion:
Can you make, so "Preview" at the top gets automatically updated? This way you can see during coding, when _you_ actually did mistakes. In my case, ive been trying to find a mistake in my post for two hours because the reason was completely wrong.
So... real life preview?
It's probably me but there's already a preview button and a bold/italics option so I really don't see what you mean. Also I googled it and didn't find anything that made me understand what you mean, so then you googled it for me and the exact same results came as it's the same site with the same keyword.
Offline
A WYSIWYG editor isn't the buttons, it's the text area. Instead of [ b]this[/b ] you would see actual bold text while you're writing. Like this.
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
A WYSIWYG editor isn't the buttons, it's the text area. Instead of [ b]this[/b ] you would see actual bold text while you're writing. Like this.
So what's your response to the suggestion?
I personally think it would be cool to have but not exactly necessary. As I understand it, the standard for forums is to just use BBCode.
Offline
I have nightmares about WYSIWYG editors so unless basically the entire site tells me to do it I'm probably not going to.
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
I have nightmares about WYSIWYG editors so unless basically the entire site tells me to do it I'm probably not going to.
Why? And do u mean the implementing or using part?
Offline
I have nightmares about WYSIWYG editors so unless basically the entire site tells me to do it I'm probably not going to.
thank god
<3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3
Offline
[ Started around 1732400074.493 - Generated in 0.114 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.88 MiB (Peak: 2.18 MiB) ]