Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
the design does not have sense
i dont requiring, its just my opinion
Offline
What doesn't make sense about it? The backwards arrow meaning slow thing?
We tried various graphics that would make more 'sense', but none of them were really obvious what they were... It turns out there isn't really a universally understood symbol for slow...
In the end we decided on a slightly darker backwards facing arrow for slow, and a slightly brighter forwards facing one for fast, which although when you actually think about it doesn't really make sense, we all thought it was the most obvious at a glance.
Offline
Try using two arrows for fast and one arrow for slow
Time before becoming a Member - Leaderboard
1. Whirl - 9 months
2. KirbyKareem - 8 months
3. pwnzor - 2.4 months
4. MWstudios - 2 months
5. ILikeTofuuJoe - 1.5 months
Piskel is the best GIF maker I've seen
HG's signature for me - Anatoly's signature for me
The Mashed Potatoes Song - The longest post on EE forums - Play my Minesweeper
Offline
I think it makes sense, I mean a right pointing arrow is mainly known as "going forward" (even though you can move left). Most platforming videogames have you heading left to right. So with that in mind, a right facing arrow appears to be giving an extra boost forward, while a left facing one appears to be giving resistance against you.
What doesn't make sense about it? The backwards arrow meaning slow thing?
We tried various graphics that would make more 'sense', but none of them were really obvious what they were... It turns out there isn't really a universally understood symbol for slow...
In the end we decided on a slightly darker backwards facing arrow for slow, and a slightly brighter forwards facing one for fast, which although when you actually think about it doesn't really make sense, we all thought it was the most obvious at a glance.
Did not know about the arrow brightness being different. You can only just barely tell when they're beside each other
Offline
In the end we decided on a slightly darker backwards facing arrow for slow, and a slightly brighter forwards facing one for fast, which although when you actually think about it doesn't really make sense, we all thought it was the most obvious at a glance.
Wow. Such different brightness.
Time before becoming a Member - Leaderboard
1. Whirl - 9 months
2. KirbyKareem - 8 months
3. pwnzor - 2.4 months
4. MWstudios - 2 months
5. ILikeTofuuJoe - 1.5 months
Piskel is the best GIF maker I've seen
HG's signature for me - Anatoly's signature for me
The Mashed Potatoes Song - The longest post on EE forums - Play my Minesweeper
Offline
Did not know about the arrow brightness being different. You can only just barely tell when they're beside each other
Wow. Such different brightness.
I didn't say it was a big difference (the 'obvious at a glance' thing was referring to the direction rather than the colour)
It just sort of makes the fast effect look slightly bolder and the slow effect look slightly dimmer, which although it doesn't make it obvious on its own, does kind of help with the overall effect.
Offline
replace the arrow with a pumpkin
make it slow the player
the player will know that its an slow effect
the icon doesnt have to make sense at all, that non-ludic
F
Offline
(>) slow
(>>) normal
(>>>)fast
Offline
(<) slow
(>) normal
(>>)fast
Fixed
F
Offline
Offline
HeyNK wrote:(>) slow
(>>) normal
(>>>)fastThe problem with that is you can't really fit it (well) in a 16x16 image... (plus as Freckleface says I'd assume that two arrows would mean fast, not normal speed)
Hold my beer
EDIT:
Very simple. It's possible that we can keep three arrows for fast, keep one arrow for normal, and have a backwards arrow for slow, and make the color difference a lot more noticable.
Click the image to see my graphics suggestions, or here to play EE: Project M!
Offline
Pages: 1
[ Started around 1732771656.0708 - Generated in 0.063 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.57 MiB (Peak: 1.75 MiB) ]