Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
serlsy?!
HmmmMMMMmmmM!??
why is there a limit? is it because you get notified everything time I do on procinators server>
YEAH thats right i haven't forgotten I still want to be forgiven and unban.
I know what frog/greg bot does, so why do you mods/staff hate me wooting threads?
I want unlimited wooting and unlimited times to do it
Offline
Calm down. I don’t want you to get banned again.
Offline
Last time we didn't have a limit we had people trying to woot every post on the forums. Not eager to repeat that
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
Last time we didn't have a limit we had people trying to woot every post on the forums. Not eager to repeat that
add woot bans
/s
Last time we didn't have a limit we had people trying to woot every post on the forums. Not eager to repeat that
no just not, i never noticed it but you mods/staff did becuase you had greg bot on your server. so what if people wooted every post? it gives free will and to choose, instead of being limted plus there are alot of threads I want to woot but I can't because I am Limted until mods/staff removes limit
I think the forum would be more active if people had more free will
If you take away the woot limit, everyone will just woot every single one of their friends posts, and wooting wouldn't have the value it does now.
that's not true, wooting still has no value, or you could say it does not have any value it just means we agree or is funny.
and what you saying what will happen is good, its called being social.
unless the staff/mods can add a button called acknowledge the post or a button called seen.
it would make and give more motivation as well. on systemshock.org forums they have an unlimited acknowledge thingy.
so why can't we?
Offline
I have no idea why you keep mentioning Gregbot
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
There's nothing valuable about woots on the forums to begin with. I don't understand why having no limit on it is even a problem, or even why people wooting every post is a problem when they mean literally nothing at all (in most cases)
Click the image to see my graphics suggestions, or here to play EE: Project M!
Offline
I have no idea why you keep mentioning Gregbot
because i know it records woots and notifies person on discord that a thread has been wooted. i seen it with my own eyes when i was on the server with proc and zoey
There's nothing valuable about woots on the forums to begin with. I don't understand why having no limit on it is even a problem, or even why people wooting every post is a problem when they mean literally nothing at all (in most cases)
I AGREE
Offline
Just because you want to continue wooting every single post that has your name on it?
★ ☆ ★ ☆ ★
☆ ★ ★
Offline
Just because you want to continue wooting every single post that has your name on it?
no i woot posts that have nothing to do with me, tis got nothing to do with my name.....
Offline
Different55 wrote:I have no idea why you keep mentioning Gregbot
because i know it records woots and notifies person on discord that a thread has been wooted. i seen it with my own eyes when i was on the server with proc and zoey
minimania wrote:There's nothing valuable about woots on the forums to begin with. I don't understand why having no limit on it is even a problem, or even why people wooting every post is a problem when they mean literally nothing at all (in most cases)
I AGREE
okay but gregbot has nothing to do with the woot limit, it was around before greg and it will be around after.
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
ok well if anyone out there agrees with me please stand up!
because different is making excuse he just forgot etc
Offline
different is making excuse he just forgot etc
Last time we didn't have a limit we had people trying to woot every post on the forums. Not eager to repeat that
I think past experience is a good reason not to repeat our mistakes.
Offline
hwo abotu no limit but you need to wait 10 secs after each woot
thanks hg for making this much better and ty for my avatar aswell
Offline
just bring back rep ffs
Offline
hwo abotu no limit but you need to wait 10 secs after each woot
How would that fix the people wooting every post thing? We need whatever limit we have to at least prevent that, otherwise there's no point of having the limit...
Offline
yes there is already no point of the woot limit it is takign away our free will and makes people less active becuase they don't know fi to post or not or if people read their post of think tis funny or like a like on facebook.
Does facebook have a likeing/button limit? no they allow to like how many as many posts.
so whats the big deal with people wooting everypost?
i don't understand how that effects anything, all it does it means that person or people are interested and more. the only reasonable and logical explaintion I can find it that the woot limit is to stop the mods/staff and anyone on discord since they have gregbot being mention or seeing a chat full of wooted thread?
it can't be anything other than this. if its not than give me a reason that does invole"OHH ITS NOT VALUBLE ANYMORE BECAISE ITS USED ALL THE TIME" OR "BECUASE THERE WOULD BE NO REASON TO HAVE IT THEN"
i think that is a dumb reason, facebook doesnt have a limt, or other socials
Offline
Offline
allow more woots the longer someone is registered maybe?
Offline
Offline
allow more woots the longer someone is registered maybe?
i agree what about rep point or vouches or somthing? or it could have as many woots as how many warns you get or that have had in the past like. reduce the woot button every time or has had in past etc
Offline
how about the more woots you get, the more maximum woots you're allowed to have
Offline
Offline
Offline
[ Started around 1732417668.4886 - Generated in 0.120 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.81 MiB (Peak: 2.1 MiB) ]