Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
But not if the world has been edited recently.
Hello! I've been playing ee for a while, and like giving input!
Offline
But have an option so the world owner can disable / enable this? (off by default).
Offline
YESS!
Hello! I've been playing ee for a while, and like giving input!
Offline
isnt this a SUGGESTION? btw nic eidea
thanks hg for making this much better and ty for my avatar aswell
Offline
I just remembered I once suggested this idea:
https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewt … p?id=38893
which serves a similar function. (It was also pointed out that there are other threads of a similar idea).
Offline
This should really be added, very useful. I always lose connection when I play worlds and it's very annoying.
I have some suggestions:
The owner of the world should be able to enable and disable it in the settings. So what Devlin said
When enabling saving progress, the owner cannot edit the world anymore until disabling it. This is because when someone makes progress in your level, and leaves. And you edit some parts. When the player comes back he/she may be stuck on a block because you edited that part. God mode is still allowed.
Commands won't really break anything. Only /giveedit and /removeedit is disabled.
When disabling saving progress, everyone's saved progress will be removed (not current progress ofc). So when they come back they just have to start again.
The text box to enter the edit key is replaced with text. Something like "This world saves your progress. Getting edit is not possible."
Offline
This should really be added, very useful. I always lose connection when I play worlds and it's very annoying.
I have some suggestions:
The owner of the world should be able to enable and disable it in the settings. So what Devlin said
When enabling saving progress, the owner cannot edit the world anymore until disabling it. This is because when someone makes progress in your level, and leaves. And you edit some parts. When the player comes back he/she may be stuck on a block because you edited that part. God mode is still allowed.
Commands won't really break anything. Only /giveedit and /removeedit is disabled.
When disabling saving progress, everyone's saved progress will be removed (not current progress ofc). So when they come back they just have to start again.
The text box to enter the edit key is replaced with text. Something like "This world saves your progress. Getting edit is not possible."
i would like to see that you canstill edit but then to tp players out or so what if its hard level and u test last mini and see its imposs u cant edit it?
thanks hg for making this much better and ty for my avatar aswell
Offline
Lol no
You know how much space it would take?
Offline
Lol no
You know how much space it would take?
Bu, but, Unity is coming right.... we will have space then... please tell me Unity IS coming?...
Offline
Lol no
You know how much space it would take?
Not much...
How many finished worlds do you play in 24 hours? Just a few hundred bytes per player, per world should be enough to store everything needed, so maybe a few kilobytes (I guess about one medium world ish) per player at any one time
Offline
Gosha wrote:Lol no
You know how much space it would take?
Bu, but, Unity is coming right.... we will have space then... please tell me Unity IS coming?...
Unity doesn't have anything to do with this.
Offline
Devlin wrote:Gosha wrote:Lol no
You know how much space it would take?
Bu, but, Unity is coming right.... we will have space then... please tell me Unity IS coming?...
Unity doesn't have anything to do with this.
Well surely storage space won't be much of an issue with Unity?
Offline
Is EE currently low on DB space? I thought the main storage issue was the max size of... something or other in the Rooms datatable, which limits the max world size.
Aren't PlayerObjects free to grow? I assume that's where progress data would go. Saving locally would be a terrible idea.
One bot to rule them all, one bot to find them. One bot to bring them all... and with this cliché blind them.
Offline
Gosha wrote:Devlin wrote:Gosha wrote:Lol no
You know how much space it would take?
Bu, but, Unity is coming right.... we will have space then... please tell me Unity IS coming?...
Unity doesn't have anything to do with this.
Well surely storage space won't be much of an issue with Unity?
Unity is just for the client, I'm pretty sure we'll still be using playerio.
thx for sig bobithan
Offline
@skullz: yeah. If you recall, nou or someone was making a big show of how we needed playerIO to play nicely for the project to continue. Naturally, if we ditched playerio, that wouldn't be a concern.
Is EE currently low on DB space? I thought the main storage issue was the max size of... something or other in the Rooms datatable, which limits the max world size.
Aren't PlayerObjects free to grow? I assume that's where progress data would go. Saving locally would be a terrible idea.
So they made the PlayerObjects table different from the rest? I'm guessing they're all on the 500kb pieces thing. I mean if we ever wanted more room and that was the only limit, we could just fragment our storage across keys, but that's probably not wise.
But yeah, I imagine the playerobject would have more room for this.
Offline
[ Started around 1732701430.1313 - Generated in 0.067 seconds, 13 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.65 MiB (Peak: 1.87 MiB) ]