Official Everybody Edits Forums

Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?

You are not logged in.

#1 2016-03-25 03:22:38, last edited by Bobithan (2016-03-25 03:30:45)

Bobithan
Member
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 4,476

EElections Debate Thread

Please only debate here if you are participating in the EElections. I'm just quickly making this thread to put all the debates between candidates in so just go crazy really. This may become more structured later on but for now this is just general debating between candidates regarding the elections. You can still debate in the main thread but this one may have a bit of organization behind it for special events and stuff.

Posts by non-candidates will be deleted.

Thank u


aka towwl

Offline

Wooted by: (2)

#2 2016-03-25 03:24:14

Creature
Member
From: The Dark Web
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 9,658

Re: EElections Debate Thread

Vote Socialism and you all will win.


This is a false statement.

Offline

#3 2016-03-25 03:43:26

Calicara
Member
Joined: 2015-02-16
Posts: 932

Re: EElections Debate Thread

3e477iO.jpg

General Abraham Lincat, A Critique of Jawapa

OP: http://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewto … 63#p590763

Jawapa wrote:

You fail to consider the confusion that a name change creates for the other players. It's very confusing when you suddenly see a new name on your friends list. I really think there should be an easier way of identifying who they are (or were, I suppose).

On the contrary, I had thought of this, which is why I suggested the imposition of time. Though incorporating Onjit's idea, I do believe a maximum of 3 changes (and no more) should be sufficient. Surely we have all had a time where we made an account with a cringeworthy name when we were a child, and wanted to change it when we were older. This change should not come at the expense of players money.

Jawapa wrote:

If a small country was to be full of murderers, should let them be? The country already has a small, dwindling population. If any action were to be taken, it would crush the country.

Unlike most games which run on a governmental moderation system, EE thrives on vigilantism. Players are already equipped with sufficient tools to combat trolls (save level/load level/give god/remove god/give edit/remove edit/kick...) Need I go on? We should not be pressuring moderators to take care of all the little problems, but rather be teaching the user base their own self defense.

Jawapa wrote:

Please, elaborate. Keep in mind, when a staff is bigger/stronger than the people it is ruling over, the risk of totalitarianism lurks.

Updates are few and far between. A larger staff could benefit to more content and faster game development.

Jawapa wrote:

I think you hit the nail right on the head with this one. With the 400 dig bots, there was no choice but to replay a level... they were all the same! You could, in fact, enjoy the level... time... and time... and time... again.

Besides DigBot there are many other notable bots such as Snake Bot, Yo Scroll, Bombot etc... Furthermore, if you dislike bot assisted levels no one is forcing you to play them, but they have come to form their own community which I think can be appreciated in their own way.

Jawapa wrote:

But, it's not fair to give one person an award, and not the others. Everyone in the contest tried their very best, and some walked away with nothing to show.

As vain as it may sound, that is the purpose of any contest. Upon signing up users were meant to understand that not everyone was going to win. That being said, even those who didn't win an official reward, still had the reward of a well built level.

Jawapa wrote:

You cannot offer things for money. It is unfair to those who cannot afford it.

If everything was free the game would make no money. I believe it is fair to charge money for objects so long as the money goes toward keeping the game running. Now, whether or not the staff should be making a profit off that money is a different issue entirely.


Avatar by RainDiance
tgA1y17.jpg
I am obsessed with Steven Universe

Offline

Wooted by:

#4 2016-03-25 03:51:39

STD
Formerly BenWanted
From: Binary by 0 and 1
Joined: 2015-08-19
Posts: 1,113

Re: EElections Debate Thread

Vote for STD get and STD and join the STD army.


random-pictures-316.jpg

Offline

Wooted by:

#5 2016-03-25 03:52:56

mrjawapa
Corn Man 🌽
From: Ohio, USA
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 5,840
Website

Re: EElections Debate Thread

Calicara wrote:

On the contrary, I had thought of this, which is why I suggested the imposition of time. Though incorporating Onjit's idea, I do believe a maximum of 3 changes (and no more) should be sufficient. Surely we have all had a time where we made an account with a cringeworthy name when we were a child, and wanted to change it when we were older. This change should not come at the expense of players money.

With my flat-rate $1.50 payment to sign up, players would not need to pay. Enough revenue would be raised through that.

Calicara wrote:

Need I go on? We should not be pressuring moderators to take care of all the little problems, but rather be teaching the user base their own self defense.

I disagree. I think a vote-to-ban system should be put in place. If someone is being a nuisance, and the community votes them out... they are banned.

Calicara wrote:

Updates are few and far between. A larger staff could benefit to more content and faster game development.

A larger staff is harder to manage. Nou (the totalitarian) can't even manage the current staff. He's resorted to slowly kicking members out, so that he can have all the power. What we really need is a democracy. Get Nou out of there, and vote a new leaders in; ones we can trust.

Calicara wrote:

Besides DigBot there are many other notable bots such as Snake Bot, Yo Scroll, Bombot etc... Furthermore, if you dislike bot assisted levels no one is forcing you to play them, but they have come to form their own community which I think can be appreciated in their own way.

No one is forcing me to play, but I have no other option.

Calicara wrote:

Upon signing up users were meant to understand that not everyone was going to win. That being said, even those who didn't win an official reward, still had the reward of a well built level.

Not good enough. Those who received an award were then higher up to everyone else... that's not fair.

Calicara wrote:

If everything was free the game would make no money. I believe it is fair to charge money for objects so long as the money goes toward keeping the game running. Now, whether or not the staff should be making a profit off that money is a different issue entirely.

As a totalitarian, it wouldn't surprise me if Nou is pocketing all of our tax dollars.


Discord: jawp#5123

Offline

#6 2016-03-25 03:53:15

Onjit
Member
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 9,709
Website

Re: EElections Debate Thread

don't vote for a tryhard like calicara

that is all for now

tune in for more later


:.|:;

Offline

Wooted by: (2)

#7 2016-03-25 04:03:46

ZeldaXD
EE Homeboy
From: Cyprus
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 1,539
Website

Re: EElections Debate Thread

OFFICIAL MAP OF EE

38966a1fc9.png

Let's use this, like if EE was a country.


gLjTZE1.png

Offline

#8 2016-03-25 04:29:00

ZeldaXD
EE Homeboy
From: Cyprus
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 1,539
Website

Re: EElections Debate Thread

4bb940e58c.png

THIS IS AN OFFICIAL MESSAGE

My answer will be in orange

Calicara wrote:

3e477iO.jpg

General Abraham Lincat, A Critique of ZeldaXD

Hidden text

Filthy immigrants, I said it correctly, that's what they are. These immigrants are inferior to us, the veterans, in all aspects. They have not mastered their skills playing or creating as much as we have, and they need to learn the hard way.
I have to remind you that we were newcomers too, we conquered this land with our sweat, we didn't have any friends and we didn't have as many items as we have now, our possibilities were really limited, but we still did amazing things with the few tools we had. The should start like we did, being mocked for it is the only way to learn.

Hidden text

"Sharing their culture"? Don't make me laugh, they're not sharing it, they're IMPOSING it. We have crossed seas, harnessed rivers, carved mountains, tamed deserts, and colonized the most barren ice fields. And what have they done? They just come here and impose their poor culture on us, and expect us to just degrade our own culture to favor theirs. If I don't like it, I change it, I'm not going to leave the nation that I helped build and watch how it burns, if they can't integrate to our culture, they're the ones who have to go.

Hidden text

We are the flame which lights this nation, and when we vanish, the flame will die with us.


gLjTZE1.png

Offline

#9 2016-03-25 04:51:15

mrjawapa
Corn Man 🌽
From: Ohio, USA
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 5,840
Website

Re: EElections Debate Thread

ZeldaXD wrote:

Filthy immigrants, I said it correctly, that's what they are. These immigrants are inferior to us, the veterans, in all aspects. They have not mastered their skills playing or creating as much as we have, and they need to learn the hard way.
I have to remind you that we were newcomers too, we conquered this land with our sweat, we didn't have any friends and we didn't have as many items as we have now, our possibilities were really limited, but we still did amazing things with the few tools we had. The should start like we did, being mocked for it is the only way to learn.

Maybe the way things were when you grew up; isn't the way things should be now.  The previous way have only led to problems.

ZeldaXD wrote:

We have crossed seas, harnessed rivers, carved mountains, tamed deserts, and colonized the most barren ice fields.

Congrats, you know geology.

ZeldaXD wrote:

And what have they done? They just come here and impose their poor culture on us, and expect us to just degrade our own culture to favor theirs.

"I may not like what you have to say; but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
Same goes for cultural beliefs. We're all entitled to our own beliefs.

ZeldaXD wrote:

We are the flame which lights this nation, and when we vanish, the flame will die with us.

It is much better to burn out, than to fade away. Unfortunately, that's not was is occurring. The country isn't dying in a sudden catastrophe, it's slowing fading away.


Discord: jawp#5123

Offline

#10 2016-03-25 16:44:54

Zumza
Member
From: root
Joined: 2015-02-17
Posts: 4,656

Re: EElections Debate Thread

EE Forever wrote:

84e7b16ee2.png

Hello my username is Zumza and with your votes I will become the EE President. I am a programmer, I have knowledges about how things work. I believe this gives me an advantage ahead of my political colleagues.
I consider that Everybody Edits must be a friendly place where everybody comes to have fun. I want everybody be able to speak freely. Chat should be free!
This game must encourage the idea that everybody is equal but those who work with passion must be celebrated. Text should be available for everybody! Contest winners should have exclusive content!
I consider that moderators can never be off-duty. I also believe that rules are well made and moderators must take actions on those who present offensive behaviour. However trolling shouldn't be an act of crime. We can't be utopian. Everybody should have responsibilities. And the world owners should act like Gods. World owners should be able to kick moderators.
Also staff members shouldn't do favours for their relatives. The shop system is functional as it is now, daily bonuses exists. Name changes should cost gems. Thought some prices should be modified(to smaller and / or grater values).
Bots are wonderful, and what people can do with them is amazing! Everybody can have a more dynamic experience.
There should be added easier campaigns too. We should have diversity in everything!
We must keep improving but without damaging the core of this game!
Thanks for reading this and remember green means friend


Everybody edits, but some edit more than others

Offline

Wooted by:

#11 2016-03-25 17:11:02

Luka504
Member
From: Serbia,probs never heard of it
Joined: 2015-02-19
Posts: 2,934

Re: EElections Debate Thread

This message is brought to you by The Nerf Party

uo1qNkv.png

Hello everyone,

I am Luka504 and i dedicate to more freedom in Everybody Edits. I side with you, your hopes and wishes for the game.
I think every player should have more freedom and more possibilities. I want people to get most from this game.
But at the same time i can confirm: Too much of anything is bad, even freedom!
Shortly, i want more freedom, but at the same time some rules should be there to keep us in check.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask, i will anwser as soon as i can.
Love, Luka504
A great machine needs even better parts


How long will it take me to get banned again?
Place your bets right here.

Offline

#12 2016-03-25 18:06:36

Luka504
Member
From: Serbia,probs never heard of it
Joined: 2015-02-19
Posts: 2,934

Re: EElections Debate Thread

Hello everyone

uo1qNkv.png

So i have decided to read out how my opponents have anwsered the issues. I was quite shocked at some of the anwsers i found.
-32OrtonEdge32dh (Green Party)
Most of what is here seems to allign with my anwsers, but i found these:

32OrtonEdge32dh wrote:

Should more easy difficulty campaigns be introduced to the campaign roster to balance game difficulty?
Campaigns should be removed entirely. 
Should exclusive smileys be made available again through new opportunities?
Exclusive smileys should not be unavailable forever.  Any seasonal smiley should come back every time that season comes back, and any other smiley should periodically return as well.

Wait what? Campaigns should be removed entirely?
And the fact that by requesting rare items to be available to everyone, sounds a bit unfair to people who played since 2011 or something. And i find it quite ironic how you said this:

Aside from these issues, I would like to bring to your attention that our great game was based on a simple principle, and that principle is fairness.

Lol wow.

-Bimps (Death Party)
Ugh it just seems wrong to want the thing you are arguing about dead. Seems a bit unnatural if you ask me.

#makeEEdeadagain #bimps2k16

   
Ok.....

-Calicara (Noubs)
Noubs have a pretty similar goal with me, and i didnt find anything weird with the anwsers. So i guess i will leave them be.

-Creature (Socialism)
Well that flag there isnt stolen or anything lol.
Answers are a bit vague with no real explanation. Also i found a few details:

Are there too many staff members? Why do we need staff members.
Should the shop be more easily accessible to new players with discounts and bonuses? tbh all players should receive everything for free.
Should staff be more seriously reprimanded for giving away free items at no personal expense? Staff sucks, let EE be free.
Should the rules be made more lenient than they are today? Rules are a trouble, let the game light.

This is a weird anti-staff policy Creature. I dedicate to freedom as well, but with so much power and little rules or staff, EE is gonna be a lot less nice and spam/troll/jerk free.

-gkaby (The Hearing Party)
Can i reffer to them as the Weird Party? The flag is just plain weird.

Flag?

Also whats with this?

Hidden text

Then.

Hidden text

I dont think this makes sense
Other than that they are OK.
(Working on more)


How long will it take me to get banned again?
Place your bets right here.

Offline

#13 2016-03-25 18:34:49, last edited by Luka504 (2016-03-25 18:37:56)

Luka504
Member
From: Serbia,probs never heard of it
Joined: 2015-02-19
Posts: 2,934

Re: EElections Debate Thread

uo1qNkv.png

-JaWapa (United Big Spenders Party (UBSP))
Most of i seems ok, but i think i need more clarifacation.

Are bots a valuable addition to the game?
Oh yes, the 400 dig bots made the game 10 times better.

This doesnt exactly explain much. Do you like them?

Should EE focus on its role as a platforming game?
I think it should focus on sucking money from those who are addicted (ie: gold membership)

... Well...This is akward.

Should exclusive smileys be made available again through new opportunities?
No, the smileys should just be circulated around. So like Mustang's easter smiley is taken from him, and given to the new winner. It's much better for the econommy.

WELP!

Regarding gender diversity and neutrality, are the smileys fine as they are now?
bimpsing feminists

....

-maxi123 (Noubs)
Read Calicara please. Thanks.

-N1KF (Official CEEntrist PartEE)
Cant see anything wrong here. Moving on.

-Onjit (the winning party)

Hidden text

This is swimming in ,,Im not serious lawl,, since he didnt bother to even write seriously. Also what is a ,,****,,?

-oranj (Noubs)
Read Calicara. Ktnxbai

-Pingohits (The Egg Party?)
...
Nice slogans, but where are your issuses? Can we consider him a party without them?

-STD ( STD party)
Interesting anwsers you have there.

Are there too many staff members?
Yes. Anything above 0 staff members is just too much
Should staff be more seriously reprimanded for giving away free items at no personal expense?
There should be no staff
Should the rules be made more lenient than they are today?
rules drool
Should staff be kickable from worlds when off-duty?
Staff should be kickable even on duty

Woah socialistic much?

Should chat cost money again?
Hick yeah. I had to pay 1 cent for chat AND SO SHOULD EVERYONE ELSE. STOP THE LITTLE KID CHAT CANCER AND THE BRAZILIANS
Are bots a valuable addition to the game?
No frick that. Play the game how it was supposed to be played. Play it with everything its got in it
Should more tools be added to the game to mitigate trolling?
no. trolling is trollin. dont give people the code you dont trust, frickin noob
Should more easy difficulty campaigns be introduced to the campaign roster to balance game difficulty?
no get good scrubs

Do i need to explain why these are wrong?

-ZeldaXD (Benjaminsons)
Also no issues written down.  KEK


How long will it take me to get banned again?
Place your bets right here.

Offline

#14 2016-03-25 18:39:33

mrjawapa
Corn Man 🌽
From: Ohio, USA
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 5,840
Website

Re: EElections Debate Thread

Luka504 wrote:

This doesnt exactly explain much. Do you like them?

I suppose you have trouble reading. Let me break my answer down for you:
"Oh yes," - Absolute, no doubt, they are great, the opposite of no.
"the 400 dig bots made the game 10 times better" - Well you see, you take the original enjoyment of the game, and multiply it by ten. That's what dig bots did for me.

You're not even arguing anything for yourself. You're actually destroying your own campaign by telling people to go watch Calicara.


Discord: jawp#5123

Offline

#15 2016-03-25 18:41:33, last edited by Luka504 (2016-03-25 18:42:46)

Luka504
Member
From: Serbia,probs never heard of it
Joined: 2015-02-19
Posts: 2,934

Re: EElections Debate Thread

Dude it really sounded like u were using irony or something.
I never said that. I meant that Calicara, Maxi123 and oranj are the same. I just talked about Calicara


How long will it take me to get banned again?
Place your bets right here.

Offline

#16 2016-03-25 18:50:17

mrjawapa
Corn Man 🌽
From: Ohio, USA
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 5,840
Website

Re: EElections Debate Thread

Luka504 wrote:

Dude it really sounded like u were using irony or something.

Yeah, everyone's answers are satire. Don't take anything here too seriously.


Discord: jawp#5123

Offline

#17 2016-03-25 18:59:49

N1KF
Wiki Mod
From: ဪဪဪဪဪ From: ဪဪဪဪဪ From: ဪဪဪဪဪ
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 11,114
Website

Re: EElections Debate Thread

JaWapa wrote:
Luka504 wrote:

Dude it really sounded like u were using irony or something.

Yeah, everyone's answers are satire. Don't take anything here too seriously.

But I thought—um...oh, yeah, my answers are satirical! jawapa is right!

Offline

Wooted by:

#18 2016-03-25 19:06:27

mrjawapa
Corn Man 🌽
From: Ohio, USA
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 5,840
Website

Re: EElections Debate Thread

N1KF wrote:

jawapa is right!

told ya!

VOTE FOR JAWAPA
VOTE FOR UBED


Discord: jawp#5123

Offline

#19 2016-03-25 19:30:45

N1KF
Wiki Mod
From: ဪဪဪဪဪ From: ဪဪဪဪဪ From: ဪဪဪဪဪ
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 11,114
Website

Re: EElections Debate Thread

JaWapa wrote:
N1KF wrote:

jawapa is right!

told ya!

VOTE FOR JAWAPA
VOTE FOR UBED

JAWAPA IS TRYING TO DECEIVE PEOPLE BY TAKING QUOTES OUT OF CONTEXT AND TWISTING THEM

THIS IS A RED FLAG

YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED

Offline

#20 2016-03-25 19:36:50

Zumza
Member
From: root
Joined: 2015-02-17
Posts: 4,656

Re: EElections Debate Thread

3ef941c53c.png


Everybody edits, but some edit more than others

Offline

#21 2016-03-25 19:40:48

Luka504
Member
From: Serbia,probs never heard of it
Joined: 2015-02-19
Posts: 2,934

Re: EElections Debate Thread

I find it ironic people arent even gonna reply to what i have posted.
No counterarguments?
k


How long will it take me to get banned again?
Place your bets right here.

Offline

#22 2016-03-25 21:21:43

Bimps
Member
Joined: 2015-02-08
Posts: 5,067

Re: EElections Debate Thread

i am holding a q&a for the death party in this topic for as long as i can.

many people misunderstand why i want ee dead, so im doing this to clarify all the issues. please be specific with your questions

Offline

#23 2016-03-25 21:22:08

Creature
Member
From: The Dark Web
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 9,658

Re: EElections Debate Thread

No matter what, every president will want power someday and will take it from the society. However, Socialism has no president, so this surely won't happen.

Vote Socialism and everyone will win.


This is a false statement.

Offline

#24 2016-03-25 22:08:24

Luka504
Member
From: Serbia,probs never heard of it
Joined: 2015-02-19
Posts: 2,934

Re: EElections Debate Thread

Ugh no.
Creature, a place with no leader is like a horse without eyes.
It runs around in random ways blindly.
No admins=No rules
Thats fun and stuff, but
No admins=No updates.
Or do you want to make the admins powerless slaves that still make updates for you?


How long will it take me to get banned again?
Place your bets right here.

Offline

#25 2016-03-25 22:13:40

N1KF
Wiki Mod
From: ဪဪဪဪဪ From: ဪဪဪဪဪ From: ဪဪဪဪဪ
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 11,114
Website

Re: EElections Debate Thread

Creature wrote:

No matter what, every president will want power someday and will take it from the society. However, Socialism has no president, so this surely won't happen.

Vote Socialism and everyone will win.

I am pretty sure you mean "anarchy". Socialism requires a government.

Offline

Wooted by:
Bobithan1460031928594115

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB

[ Started around 1732427507.2773 - Generated in 0.165 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.9 MiB (Peak: 2.23 MiB) ]