Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
i recently (today) revisited sploder.com and the forums, because why not. i was checking general discussion and a topic called "yo yo yo" with the op saying also "What's good ?". see if you posted that here you would be banned/warned. but there it is just chill. there is **** like this which no one has a problem with. all this **** instead gets directed to offtopic general topic by diff which is **** pointless. calm your moderation **** pls.
Offline
Different forums, different rules.
thanks zoey aaaaaaaaaaaand thanks latif for the avatar
Offline
If you want stink go to fail
#eeonthebrinkofstink
He's like the mascot of fail...
thanks zoey aaaaaaaaaaaand thanks latif for the avatar
Offline
No, WE are the ones with Different's forum and Different's rules!
That said, we're always open to suggestions. Usually more specific suggestions than "chill" though.
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
minimania wrote:No, WE are the ones with Different's forum and Different's rules!
That said, we're always open to suggestions. Usually more specific suggestions than "chill" though.
why don't we have an "eeforums purge"
one day it's just spam and **** and swearing and everything is just anarchy
how about that, eeforums purge
Offline
Nobody was ever banned for asking for gems.
This is a false statement.
Offline
Different55 wrote:minimania wrote:No, WE are the ones with Different's forum and Different's rules!
That said, we're always open to suggestions. Usually more specific suggestions than "chill" though.
why don't we have an "eeforums purge"
one day it's just spam and **** and swearing and everything is just anarchy
how about that, eeforums purge
I'm fine playing by the sensible rules
Thank you eleizibeth ^
I stack my signatures rather than delete them so I don't lose them
Offline
Pages: 1
[ Started around 1738482977.4394 - Generated in 0.052 seconds, 13 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.54 MiB (Peak: 1.69 MiB) ]