Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Just what the title says.
Note: I can already smell the people saying "Me." Don't.
Results, so far:
Tesla: 4
Marie Curie: 2
Einstein: 2
Michio Kaku: 2
Jamie Hyneman: 1
Charles Darwin: 1
Steven Hawking: 1
Kurt Godel: 1
Thomas Edison: 2
Richard Feynman: 1
Beth Stadler: 1
Dmitri Mendeleev: 1
Douglass Adams: 1
Carl Sagan: 1
Neil DeGrasse Tyson: 1
My opinion:
I made this topic for a reason, because there was one scientist who, as soon as I found out about him, I thought was awesome. Through bad-assery, inventing awesome stuff, and being the underdog who is stolen from, he is the best scientist ever. Nikola Tesla.
EDIT: My least favorite scientist ever: Edison.
A slightly inappropriate picture
Last edited by xputnameherex (Feb 21 2012 6:31:31 am)
Michio Kaku
This is probably the hardest question I've ever encountered in my life.
But I guess I'll say Tesla as well.
proc's discorb stylish themes for forums/the game
꧁꧂L O V E & C O R N꧁꧂ ᘛ⁐̤ᕐᐷ
danke bluecloud thank u raphe [this section of my sig is dedicated to everything i've loved that's ever died]
?
Offline
Marie Curie, she waz an evil woman bent on world destruction. JK. She was a woman who worked with radioactive elements. She died from radiation, of course.
This is probably the hardest question I've ever encountered in my life.
But I guess I'll say Tesla as well.
Yesh.
I'm gonna make this a vote...
Errrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr...........
It would be Dawkins only he's kinda a ****, so I'll say Goodall.
Offline
Jesus, of course.
My favorite would be Bill Nye. lol If he doesn't count it would be Jimmy Neutron. If you don't count him it would then me Thomas Edison.
Last edited by Gamerbro64 (Feb 12 2012 8:53:07 pm)
Added/Bump
Gamerbro64: I was like...no, no Bill Nye. No, no Jimmy Neutron. Tho..Tho...Eff.
Gordon Freeman.
If not that, then Telsa.
aka towwl
Offline
Offline
Einstein
Tesla 3, Marie Curie 2, Einstein 1.
Michio Kaku. OR Hawking.
Wikipedia seems to have Nikola Tesla down as an inventor and engineer, not a scientist. My own vote, however, most definitely goes to Richard Feynman. It'd be nice if I could be more like him.
The Pleasure Of Finding Things Out
The Character of Physical Law
Fun to Imagine
Space Shuttle Challenger Investigation
Hello future
Last edited by Ratburntro44 (Nov 8 2014 10:11:11 pm)
Offline
@Twipply: Meh, it depends on what you consider a scientist really. (Like how I consider Edison more of a businessman than an inventor, kinda like Steve Jobs) But yeah, Tesla is basically a scientist, what with all AC Current, death rays, radio, and such.
Updated.
it depends on what you consider a scientist really.
I like to consider a scientist as someone who has a vast knowledge in at least one of the natural sciences, such as physics, chemistry, or biology. While some sites claim he gained a degree in physics, wikipedia seemingly has four sources from that university saying otherwise. It only lists engineering under his fields, and I can find no scientific theories attributed to him.
Of course, even if we do classify him as a scientist, I don't know how he even compares to some other names. While maybe not important to who's your favourite, at least names such as Einstein and Feynman have degrees, theories, and even nobel prizes.
Mythbusters. They test things we care about.
xputnameherex wrote:it depends on what you consider a scientist really.
I like to consider a scientist as someone who has a vast knowledge in at least one of the natural sciences, such as physics, chemistry, or biology.
That would make me a scientist, even though all I am is a drunken zoo worker who reads a crap-load of books on evolution and genetics.
Last edited by krubby (Feb 13 2012 10:42:58 pm)
Offline
That would make me a scientist, even though all I am is a drunken zoo worker who reads a crap-load of books on evolution and genetics.
If you only read about those two things, then you're missing out on a great deal of fundamental information about biology. This would already exclude you from having a 'vast' knowledge, which I would consider to be a bachelor's degree at a minimum anyway. Do you have one of those from a reputable university?
Dr. Twipply
No, I don't mean the above poster, I think there is a Dr. Twipply.
Albert Einstein
Issac Newton
Alexander Fleming
xputnameherex wrote:it depends on what you consider a scientist really.
I like to consider a scientist as someone who has a vast knowledge in at least one of the natural sciences, such as physics, chemistry, or biology. While some sites claim he gained a degree in physics, wikipedia seemingly has four sources from that university saying otherwise. It only lists engineering under his fields, and I can find no scientific theories attributed to him.
Of course, even if we do classify him as a scientist, I don't know how he even compares to some other names. While maybe not important to who's your favourite, at least names such as Einstein and Feynman have degrees, theories, and even nobel prizes.
I think to be a scientist they have to have more than a vast knowledge. They have to have actively contributed to, affirmed knowledge, or spread knowledge in the subject at some point in their lifetime.
Offline
[ Started around 1738738343.1959 - Generated in 0.070 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.62 MiB (Peak: 1.82 MiB) ]