Official Everybody Edits Forums
Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
Pages: 1
#1 2015-11-30 01:15:15, last edited by Kirby (2015-11-30 01:16:29)
- Kirby
- Member
- Joined: 2015-04-04
- Posts: 4,307
LOOPHOLE IN THE RULES
Technically following the rules is ban evasion
which is against the rules.
ninja ur a genius
Offline
- Wooted by: (27)
lrussell, Fastmapler, Weirdoverse, NegaStrife, Sensei1, Jesse, bizaro, Anch, Pingohits, Creature, Null, Onjit, Evilbunny, drstereos, TaskManager, Erquerliet, hummerz5, Schlog, Krosis, TSF14, W24, AmdS, Freckleface, KingFudge, oranj, Insanity, Xfrogman43
#2 2015-11-30 01:18:23
- Creature
- Member
- From: The Dark Web
- Joined: 2015-02-15
- Posts: 9,658
Re: LOOPHOLE IN THE RULES
Getting banned is against the rules, you can get banned for that.
This is a false statement.
Offline
#3 2015-11-30 01:41:15, last edited by Aoitenshi (2015-11-30 01:49:45)
- Aoitenshi
- Member
- Joined: 2015-02-18
- Posts: 2,058
Re: LOOPHOLE IN THE RULES
Getting banned is against the rules, you can get banned for that.
It's against the rule to get banned?
What?
Offline
#5 2015-11-30 03:55:01
- Slushie
- Member
- From: look behind u
- Joined: 2015-03-04
- Posts: 504
Re: LOOPHOLE IN THE RULES
What if someone doesn't play EE? Should we ban them for ban evasion too?
ok
Offline
- Wooted by: (2)
#6 2015-11-30 05:05:02, last edited by AmdS (2015-11-30 05:06:14)
#7 2015-11-30 05:08:11
- hummerz5
- Member
- From: wait I'm not a secret mod huh
- Joined: 2015-08-10
- Posts: 5,853
Re: LOOPHOLE IN THE RULES
What if we stop complainning about that? It isn't against the rules
You guys are making the game too hard :/
Are you not EVADING A BAN by claiming that EVADING A BAN is not against the rules?
clever, but you didn't quite make it
Offline
#8 2015-11-30 05:10:34, last edited by AmdS (2015-11-30 05:10:57)
Re: LOOPHOLE IN THE RULES
AmdS wrote:What if we stop complainning about that? It isn't against the rules
You guys are making the game too hard :/
Are you not EVADING A BAN by claiming that EVADING A BAN is not against the rules?
clever, but you didn't quite make it
This is the reason 1nsanity is banned and he did another account to play the game?
Offline
#10 2015-11-30 06:13:13
- Schlog
- Member
- Joined: 2015-07-21
- Posts: 1,957
Re: LOOPHOLE IN THE RULES
You guys are worse than tumblr at night
I think you mean tumblr in general.
Offline
#11 2015-11-30 11:07:41
- Processor
- Member
- Joined: 2015-02-15
- Posts: 2,246
Re: LOOPHOLE IN THE RULES
Technically following the rules is ban evasion
Your logical fallacy is so... pls. Which "ban" are you evading? If you aren't breaking any rules you aren't evading any bans because no bans exist for you yet. The ban is first created when you break a rule. You are indeed evading GETTING BANNED tho, which is not against the rules.
I have never thought of programming for reputation and honor. What I have in my heart must come out. That is the reason why I code.
Offline
#12 2015-11-30 11:20:24
- Zumza
- Member
- From: root
- Joined: 2015-02-17
- Posts: 4,656
Re: LOOPHOLE IN THE RULES
Getting banned is against the rules, you can get banned for that.
Processor, you made a stack overflow.
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
#13 2015-11-30 14:50:27
- hummerz5
- Member
- From: wait I'm not a secret mod huh
- Joined: 2015-08-10
- Posts: 5,853
Offline
- Wooted by:
#14 2015-11-30 14:52:51
- TaskManager
- Formerly maxi123
- From: i really should update this
- Joined: 2015-03-01
- Posts: 9,465
Offline
#15 2015-11-30 18:21:52
- Insanity
- Member
- From: Douchebag Island
- Joined: 2015-03-07
- Posts: 1,123
Re: LOOPHOLE IN THE RULES
This is genius
mirin hard brah
Maverick: Started up on a 6, when he pulled from the clouds, and then I moved in above him.
Charlie: Well, if you were directly above him, how could you see him?
Maverick: Because I was inverted.
Offline
#16 2015-11-30 18:51:45
- Processor
- Member
- Joined: 2015-02-15
- Posts: 2,246
Re: LOOPHOLE IN THE RULES
Did anyone read my post? I can't argue with ignorance, you know...
I have never thought of programming for reputation and honor. What I have in my heart must come out. That is the reason why I code.
Offline
#17 2015-11-30 21:52:56
- KingFudge
- Member
- From: In a land not so far away.
- Joined: 2015-03-28
- Posts: 177
Re: LOOPHOLE IN THE RULES
I don't even know what rule would be broken. I have no idea.
P.S. Did Processor Rossecorp really make a stack overflow? That's pretty cool.
Offline
#18 2015-12-01 03:01:14
- hummerz5
- Member
- From: wait I'm not a secret mod huh
- Joined: 2015-08-10
- Posts: 5,853
Re: LOOPHOLE IN THE RULES
Did anyone read my post? I can't argue with ignorance, you know...
You're arguing semantics in the English language, which contains many holes for ambiguous messages. Everyone knows which meaning and emphasis is implied, but strictly speaking, the rule does have an alternate meaning.
Offline
Pages: 1
[ Started around 1732047838.0162 - Generated in 0.705 seconds, 13 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.71 MiB (Peak: 1.94 MiB) ]