🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

Bobithan · 2024-03-31 17:19:47

Pqwerty wrote:

BUT here’s the thing. Edilights posted their role card AND they haven’t been modkilled for it (even though posting role PMs is generally against the rules). So maybe Edilights posted a fake role PM created by their partner to instantly clear themselves of suspicion. I mean, we all believed it. This explains the fancy plays Bobithan is going for since they’re essentially a lone wolf but once they take the tracker out, Edilights is free to kill whoever and we’ll just say “oh they’re towncleared so it’s not Edilights”. Like Processor thought Edilights was scummy before the role PM leak and no one questioned the slot since.

From mafiascum:

When someone pretends to break a rule in a game and there is no action taken subsequently because they did not actually break a rule, other players may speculate in-game whether the lack of action was game-relevant - and indeed, the original user is often intending for the lack of action to appear game-relevant. Players might believe that a game moderator is less likely to take action on particular rule violations when the offender is one alignment versus another. In some cases, the user pretending to break a rule may impact game integrity by doing so. For example, a player who pretends to take an action that would get them modkilled, who is then not modkilled, could argue that the game moderator did not want to modkill their slot because of their alignment or role.
This is why we treat pretending to break a rule as if the rule had been broken.

So I'm not really interested in pursuing this line of reasoning. If you have other arguments for a bob+edi pairing though I'm all ears.

Processor · 2024-03-31 23:26:37

Before I to to sleep -

!vote Schlog

Schlog · 2024-03-31 23:30:19

this game became such a mess after d2, i still have no idea why everyone decided i was suspicious after posting basic reads

like im not good at this game but i'm not completely incompetent, i can perform analysis to some degree

honestly it just makes so little sense because if anything i'd be hella suspicious of bobithan for basically trying to burn a guy at the stake over a kill that could've so easily been a mislead, or n1kf for practically having no opinion throughout the entire game, only doing what bobithan does

Processor

Processor · 2024-03-31 23:47:05

Schlog wrote:

i still have no idea why everyone decided i was suspicious after posting basic reads

I think I have pressured almost every single player in this game, you're the one that broke under the pressure <3

Also -
Your reads always felt a bit like you were just going with the flow, yknow?
You weren't doing things that would put you out there for criticism.
Scum knows who's town or who's scum so they have to play a game of pretending to not know this at all.
Its not so easy to play pretend

Processor · 2024-03-31 23:52:25

Bobithan wrote:

Processor wrote:
But why did Schlog throw? I have no **** clue and it doesnt seem 100% logical in either scenario. I am going to stop interpreting Schlogs throw because it makes my brain hurt
Of course it isn't logical lol, humans are not infallibly rational actors. There doesn't need to be a strategic source of every decision we make. Sometimes scum feel like they've been caught and don't think it's worth putting in the extra effort to keep lying.

Why did Schlog feel like he was caught?

We were about to lynch Pqwerty, not him.
Did anyone hypothesize Pqwerty+Schlog before Schlog threw?

This only makes sense if Pqwerty is town... Then Schlog would feel like he is caught after Pqwerty flips town!
But all the other flags point toward Pqwerty scum...

N1KF · 2024-04-01 00:02:58

5 hours remaining.

Votes

Schlog (2): Edilights (#188), Pqwerty (#214), Processor (#352)
Bobithan (2): Pqwerty (#220, #250), Schlog (#338)
Processor (1): Schlog (#281)
Pqwerty (1): Schlog (#216), Bobithan (#334)

I still haven't voted. I plan to vote for Schlog later.

Schlog wrote:

n1kf for practically having no opinion throughout the entire game, only doing what bobithan does

Hey, Day 3 I posted first! Now you can blame Bobithan for shared opinions on Day 3!

Processor

Processor · 2024-04-01 00:27:08

N1KF wrote:

Processor (1): Schlog (#281)

small correction - this vote got replaced by #338 and I have 0 votes on me rn

N1KF

Pqwerty · 2024-04-01 00:33:15

Dang so we're really voting Schlog, huh. I guess that's the game. gg mafia

Pqwerty · 2024-04-01 00:35:58

I don't want to bother with this today so if you're hammering Schlog can u just do it now?

N1KF · 2024-04-01 00:38:28

ok

!vote Schlog

Bobithan · 2024-04-01 00:40:56

!vote schlog

Pqwerty · 2024-04-01 00:42:09

ok that's hammer.

N1KF · 2024-04-01 00:42:55

Pqwerty

Bobithan · 2024-04-01 00:49:57

GG game is basically over now. pretty crazy that town pulled through despite a scuffed d1 lynching tracker with like 4 people not participating lol

I got some pretty lucky JK targets which definitely helped against that.

Really unfortunate that edi posted his role card, I wish that did not happen, makes the W feel a bit more hollow.

Pqwerty

Pqwerty · 2024-04-01 00:51:59

I forfeit from here since this was my final gambit. Processor's strategy will catch me lying. For the record, I wanted to kill off Bobithan N1. I also wanted Schlog to claim Tracker but they didn't want to. We both wanted to roll a town role so we were really disappointed that we got mafia. I was in another game so I didn't take this game as serious but I really underestimated the town. I thought it would be an easy win after BB flipped Follower.

GG and sorry for gaslighting so hard.

N1KF, Processor

Pqwerty · 2024-04-01 00:53:27

I hope the Tracker claim made this game more exciting and fun to solve instead of causing mental anguish.

Bobithan, N1KF

Pqwerty · 2024-04-01 00:56:00

Also for the record I really would've said the stuff about babysitter as VT. I'm just that worried about a babysitter

Schlog · 2024-04-01 01:01:55

Processor wrote:

I think I have pressured almost every single player in this game, you're the one that broke under the pressure <3

i wouldn't say it was "breaking under pressure", it was more like "unwilling to put in the effort" because i knew full well towwl would've just gone straight for my head afterwards lol

also lying is not as hard as you think because if i were town my "reads" would have been the same

Bobithan · 2024-04-01 01:04:28

Pqwerty wrote:

I hope the Tracker claim made this game more exciting and fun to solve instead of causing mental anguish.

Oh definitely, thank you for that lol

Bobithan · 2024-04-01 01:05:06

And I mean definitely made things more fun of course

Pqwerty · 2024-04-01 01:06:07

Yeah Bobithan I thought you'd be a problem and when I said "can we just stop" and you did 2 walls after that I knew it was Joever.

Schlog · 2024-04-01 01:07:14

but **** i misplayed this game so hard with the night kills, when i used the pierce kill on zumza it was literally a random pick between the actives and i was just hoping he was the jailkeeper lmao. i thought that jailkeeper just had passive night immunity so i immediately used the ability

i also told him the tracker claim made no sense but it was still pretty funny

Pqwerty · 2024-04-01 01:08:29

I thought the 9p theme was fun. I played a turbo game (entire mafia game but days are 10mins long) for this theme so I recommended it to Onjit cuz I thought it was fun.

Schlog · 2024-04-01 01:09:20

ok wait tonight can you not jail pqwerty towwl

onjit had a funny death message prepared for you last night and i rly want to see it

Pqwerty · 2024-04-01 01:10:28

Also at one point I was considering also claiming OS-Juggernaut to try to further split the vote. Cuz u needed 4 people to vote in unison and if u couldn't get it that would be good for us.

Official Everybody Edits Forums

#351 2024-03-31 17:19:47

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

#352 2024-03-31 23:26:37

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

!vote Schlog

#353 2024-03-31 23:30:19

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

#354 2024-03-31 23:47:05

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

#355 2024-03-31 23:52:25

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

#356 2024-04-01 00:02:58

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

Votes

#357 2024-04-01 00:27:08

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

#358 2024-04-01 00:33:15

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

#359 2024-04-01 00:35:58

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

#360 2024-04-01 00:38:28

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

!vote Schlog

#361 2024-04-01 00:40:56

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

!vote schlog

#362 2024-04-01 00:42:09

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

#363 2024-04-01 00:42:55

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

#364 2024-04-01 00:49:57

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

#365 2024-04-01 00:51:59

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

#366 2024-04-01 00:53:27

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

#367 2024-04-01 00:56:00

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

#368 2024-04-01 01:01:55

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

#369 2024-04-01 01:04:28

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

#370 2024-04-01 01:05:06

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

#371 2024-04-01 01:06:07

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

#372 2024-04-01 01:07:14

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

#373 2024-04-01 01:08:29

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

#374 2024-04-01 01:09:20

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

#375 2024-04-01 01:10:28

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

Board footer