🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

Processor · 2024-03-27 23:07:07

My heart says Pqwerty is town :<

Yeah, Bobithan seems townie because of how bold they play

Among [Bob, Schlog, Pqwerty, N1KF], if there are 2 scum, I expect it to be either:

Bob+Schlog or Pqwerty+N1KF

N1KF · 2024-03-27 23:09:47

Under 6 hours remain.

Pqwerty wrote:

@Peoxwaaoe

Pqwerty wrote:

@N1KF sometimes the calculations are helpful but unless you have time to both calculate and solve I'd really prefer that you prioritized solving over calculating and summarizing.

Fair enough. I tried to keep this short. The odds are technically lower because of the 2/3 chance of Jailkeeper, who has 2/6 chance of jailing night killer or night kill victim.

Day 2
5/7 of voting out a Townie. (Assuming all players are equally suspect, which is unlikely.)
Total chance: 71.428%: ((5/7) * 100)
Night 2
2/3 chance of Juggernaut kill.
Total chance: 47.619% ((5/7) * (2/3) * 100)

Processor · 2024-03-27 23:15:12

Processor wrote:

Among [Bob, Schlog, Pqwerty, N1KF], if there are 2 scum, I expect it to be either:
Bob+Schlog or Pqwerty+N1KF

But given that I am town reading Bob and Pqwerty; I think it's more likely that it's one scum there and one scum among [Diff, Edi] (which would be N1KF+Edi or Schlog+Edi)...

which makes me actually be OK with an Edi vote as well...

Processor · 2024-03-27 23:17:12

because both N1KF and Schlog are pushing for a Diff lynch, I consider a N1KF/Schlog + Diff combo to be less likely

of course I may be wrong on Pqwerty and Bob; which would nullify my Edi hypothesis

Processor · 2024-03-27 23:18:13

Schlog has been open to an N1KF lynch, which is why I think its less likely for them to be aligned

Processor · 2024-03-27 23:19:08

Both Pqwerty and N1KF are reluctant to vote for another; which is giving me the strongest scum vibe overall; even tho my heart says Pqwerty is innocent

I am torn here

N1KF · 2024-03-27 23:22:45

whoops, Juggernaut has 1/3 chance.

Schlog wrote:

the likelihood of him getting subbed in is extremely low because the day ends in 6 hours and onjit will be at work the entire time

Why couldn't he be subbed Day 3?

Pqwerty · 2024-03-27 23:24:37

One sec i'm trying to give a speed commentary on N1KF's ISO. rn it seems more like just summarizing things and agreeing with Bobithan.

Bobithan · 2024-03-27 23:27:58

Schlog just put diff at L-1 guys, that's kind of a big deal and we just blew right past it

Processor

Schlog · 2024-03-27 23:28:44

N1KF wrote:

Why couldn't he be subbed Day 3?

you have no idea how hard i facepalmed after you said this

holy **** im dumb

N1KF

Pqwerty · 2024-03-27 23:31:07

N1KF's ISO:

D1 0
Starts by voting Schlog. seems like rvs

Votes for Proc for having 1 post

Gives reads list. It's a little bare but it exists.

Says the proc vote isn't based on much so they're willing to hear more from people about it

Gives a votecount and time left

agrees with bobithan about why they prefer a D1 vote and says they'll make a chart of the interactions.

Thinks BB is backpedaling about babysitter read.

Says Diff55 and Proc should definitely post more

Makes a summary of the game.

Hammers BB

D2 -

Said processor started sr-ing them (N1KF) and Schlog without reason.

Agrees with Bobithan that processor looks suspicious. Begins the hypothetical that I'm (Pqwerty) worried about a babysitter because I have insider knowledge of a juggernaut. Says my babysitter strategy was bad and that they want Diff55 to talk

New list of reads posted: notably they have turned on me, and Diff55 is still a higher sr than me. They also don't like processor (so their top srs are 1. Diff 2. me 3. proc)

Continues sussing proc

Votes Diff55 and does the math for a babysitter strat

Is open to voting someone else other than Diff55

Gives time left.

Processor · 2024-03-27 23:31:29

Diff seems Innocent!

everyone I have as a potential scum-read is in favor of lynching diff

Processor · 2024-03-27 23:33:01

Town:

Bobithan
Diff

Heart says town, brain says unsure:
Pqwerty

Scum:
N1KF
Schlog
Edilights

Pqwerty · 2024-03-27 23:34:14

!Vote N1KF

I definitely see this as partnered with bobithan cuz most of the ISO is spent agreeing with Bobithan, making surface-level summaries or votecounts, throwing shade on me and proc, and then saying they're open to different votes whenever a wagon isn't gaining traction. Just like Bobithan it feels like Bobithan is lining me up for slaughter and N1KF is shading proc for tomorrow.

Processor · 2024-03-27 23:36:45

Let's gooo! (going back to my original N1KF idea given that it seems obtainable to lynch him now)

!vote N1KF

Processor · 2024-03-27 23:39:23

Votes:

Different55 (3): Edilights, N1KF, Schlog [L-1]
N1KF (2): Pqwerty, Processor
Pqwerty (1): Bobithan

Schlog · 2024-03-27 23:40:04

honestly i don't really like how completely neutral n1kf is, either; like surely you have someone you want out, right? i don't think you ever even explained your OWN diff vote, and just kinda did it because edilights did

this is exactly what i mean by "too perfect", he could be literally anything and i really don't like that

Schlog · 2024-03-27 23:45:15

i also forgot to do this

!unvote

between n1kf and pqwerty for me rn since those are the only possible votes today i think, still suspicious of proc like i said b4

N1KF · 2024-03-27 23:46:13

Bobithan wrote:

Schlog just put diff at L-1 guys, that's kind of a big deal and we just blew right past it

We only have a few hours left. I don't blame Schlog too much for that; anybody who hammers Schlog early (which I doubt will happen) would be suspicious.

Processor wrote:

Diff seems Innocent!
everyone I have as a potential scum-read is in favor of lynching diff

You capitalized Innocent... are you trying to hint at a Town Tracker role?

Schlog wrote:

honestly i don't really like how completely neutral n1kf is, either; like surely you have someone you want out, right? i don't think you ever even explained your OWN diff vote, and just kinda did it because edilights did

No, I didn't. I mentioned twice Day 2 that Different55 needed to post. I don't know what Edilight's motives are.

What would satisfy you? I could change much vote to Pqwerty, but would you criticize me for being too similar to Bobithan? What do you want me to do?

Processor · 2024-03-27 23:47:11

N1KF wrote:

You capitalized Innocent... are you trying to hint at a Town Tracker role?

No, that was accidental. I am not hinting at anything.

Pqwerty · 2024-03-27 23:48:48

Why would Proc be hinting at anyone being a tracker?

Schlog · 2024-03-27 23:55:42

N1KF wrote:

What would satisfy you? I could change much vote to Pqwerty, but would you criticize me for being too similar to Bobithan? What do you want me to do?

i just wanna know what you're thinking. seems less like you're forming your own opinions and more like you're just following the flow of the game

N1KF · 2024-03-28 00:15:15

Pqwerty wrote:

Why would Proc be hinting at anyone being a tracker?

Roleclaiming has benefits to both Power Roles and Mafia. Hinting at it gives more credibility to future roleclaims. Processor did say it was an accident though.

Schlog wrote:

i just wanna know what you're thinking. seems less like you're forming your own opinions and more like you're just following the flow of the game

I didn't have many opinions that were distinct from Bobithan's.

The sudden two votes on me surprised me a bit. Pqwerty strikes me as desperate, quickly distancing themselves from me after this post:

Processor wrote:

Both Pqwerty and N1KF are reluctant to vote for another; which is giving me the strongest scum vibe overall; even tho my heart says Pqwerty is innocent

Processor feels off to me. I'll look into his posts.

Bobithan · 2024-03-28 00:44:53

Take this as you may but I completely refuse to put a vote on N1KF. I can see myself bringing down the hammer on anybody tonight except for N1KF. Which means that vote isn't happening without a revival of edi or diff so we gotta choose somebody else.

Processor · 2024-03-28 00:48:27

I am going to bed!

I don't want my current vote on N1KF to tie your hands on who to lynch.
Day discussion has been happening among 5 people, and so it is fair to lynch whoever a 3-person majority agrees on.
I set an alarm for 5:55am CET to briefly log on and hammer whoever has a 3-person majority.

In case two players have 3 votes each, I will vote in the following preference order*:
N1KF > Edilights > Schlog > Pqwerty > Diff > Bobithan > Processor

*: Unless new town discussion pursues me otherwise

Official Everybody Edits Forums

#151 2024-03-27 23:07:07

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

#152 2024-03-27 23:09:47

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

Day 2

Night 2

#153 2024-03-27 23:15:12

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

#154 2024-03-27 23:17:12

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

#155 2024-03-27 23:18:13

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

#156 2024-03-27 23:19:08

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

#157 2024-03-27 23:22:45

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

#158 2024-03-27 23:24:37

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

#159 2024-03-27 23:27:58

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

#160 2024-03-27 23:28:44

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

#161 2024-03-27 23:31:07

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

#162 2024-03-27 23:31:29

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

#163 2024-03-27 23:33:01

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

#164 2024-03-27 23:34:14

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

#165 2024-03-27 23:36:45

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

#166 2024-03-27 23:39:23

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

#167 2024-03-27 23:40:04

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

#168 2024-03-27 23:45:15

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

!unvote

#169 2024-03-27 23:46:13

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

#170 2024-03-27 23:47:11

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

#171 2024-03-27 23:48:48

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

#172 2024-03-27 23:55:42

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

#173 2024-03-28 00:15:15

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

#174 2024-03-28 00:44:53

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

#175 2024-03-28 00:48:27

Re: 🕐🕑🕒🕓🕔🕕 Mafia 56 (Clock Mafia) 🕖🕗🕘🕙🕚🕛

Board footer