Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
hi onjit
★ ☆ ★ ☆ ★
☆ ★ ★
Offline
yes
Offline
good day to you sir
since 2012
Offline
indeed you are. of equal importance to who you are is: how are you?
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
Sir I’m gonna need to see some proof of ID, along with your **** license. You’re on thin ice here.
One bot to rule them all, one bot to find them. One bot to bring them all... and with this cliché blind them.
Offline
Sir I’m gonna need to see some proof of ID, along with your **** license. You’re on thin ice here.
:.|:;
Offline
Aight here's what we'll do. I'm torn between doing my job and meming around in a quiet forum, so I'm opening the floor to community suggestions.
What does this criminal deserve?
One bot to rule them all, one bot to find them. One bot to bring them all... and with this cliché blind them.
Offline
I believe you can just move it to off-topic. When was creating a topic in the wrong section ever an offense?
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
Aight here's what we'll do. I'm torn between doing my job and meming around in a quiet forum, so I'm opening the floor to community suggestions.
What does this criminal deserve?
2 pints of beer
Offline
Aight here's what we'll do. I'm torn between doing my job and meming around in a quiet forum, so I'm opening the floor to community suggestions.
What does this criminal deserve?
permaban
Offline
Tomahawk wrote:Aight here's what we'll do. I'm torn between doing my job and meming around in a quiet forum, so I'm opening the floor to community suggestions.
What does this criminal deserve?
permaban
no, bad idea! Even a 24 hour ban is a fascist dogwhistle. You don't want to support fascism, do you?
Offline
Why not death penalty.
★ ☆ ★ ☆ ★
☆ ★ ★
Offline
Thank you for your suggestions. I have considered them at length, and have concluded that most of the proposed actions fail to correct the wrongdoing that has occurred. In other words, they are insufficient. I'll explain why.
A community forum is a town square in which ideas are exchanged and examined through discussion and debate. The ultimate objective is Truth, which allows mankind to chart a course through the unknown. To find truth, we must have constructive dialogue. To engage in constructive dialogue, we must have order. A forum moderator, by maintaining order, ultimately guides people towards truth, and truth towards people. As a direct consequence, any action which disrupts this order drives mankind away from truth.
Without truth there is chaos. The author of this thread, by disrupting the rules-based order and thus inciting chaos, shows himself to be an enemy of truth, and an enemy of truth is an enemy to mankind. In spite of this, and having just condemned the perpetrator in the strongest possible terms, why do I still believe that neither death nor exile is a sufficient course of action?
They are insufficient because they are incomplete, and they are incomplete because they only prevent further disorder. Silencing the author does not destroy the spirit of chaos born from his thread. This spirit will not dissipate unprompted; it must be uprooted and cast away.
How, then, do we undo the sin and destroy the spirit of chaos? The answer is simple: if without truth there is chaos, then the antidote to chaos is truth. We arrive at truth through discourse, and there is one environment in this forum which stimulates and rewards discourse like no other. One activity in particular unifies its participants in a singular goal to seize order from the jaws of chaos, to separate truth from mistruth, and to eliminate the darkness of the unknown.
The sin must be undone by the sinner. The solution shall be his act of redemption. Let it be so:
onjit must be forced to host mafia
One bot to rule them all, one bot to find them. One bot to bring them all... and with this cliché blind them.
Offline
Thank you for your suggestions. I have considered them at length, and have concluded that most of the proposed actions fail to correct the wrongdoing that has occurred. In other words, they are insufficient. I'll explain why.
A community forum is a town square in which ideas are exchanged and examined through discussion and debate. The ultimate objective is Truth, which allows mankind to chart a course through the unknown. To find truth, we must have constructive dialogue. To engage in constructive dialogue, we must have order. A forum moderator, by maintaining order, ultimately guides people towards truth, and truth towards people. As a direct consequence, any action which disrupts this order drives mankind away from truth.
Without truth there is chaos. The author of this thread, by disrupting the rules-based order and thus inciting chaos, shows himself to be an enemy of truth, and an enemy of truth is an enemy to mankind. In spite of this, and having just condemned the perpetrator in the strongest possible terms, why do I still believe that neither death nor exile is a sufficient course of action?
They are insufficient because they are incomplete, and they are incomplete because they only prevent further disorder. Silencing the author does not destroy the spirit of chaos born from his thread. This spirit will not dissipate unprompted; it must be uprooted and cast away.
How, then, do we undo the sin and destroy the spirit of chaos? The answer is simple: if without truth there is chaos, then the antidote to chaos is truth. We arrive at truth through discourse, and there is one environment in this forum which stimulates and rewards discourse like no other. One activity in particular unifies its participants in a singular goal to seize order from the jaws of chaos, to separate truth from mistruth, and to eliminate the darkness of the unknown.
The sin must be undone by the sinner. The solution shall be his act of redemption. Let it be so:
Minimania wrote:onjit must be forced to host mafia
nah
:.|:;
Offline
Pages: 1
[ Started around 1733248785.0711 - Generated in 0.102 seconds, 18 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.64 MiB (Peak: 1.85 MiB) ]