Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Familiarity is irrelevant if is reinterpreted in the same ruleset twice to mean different things. I don't see how you expect people to know that "the rules are just wrong, we redefined these words, but only in some parts"
Anyway. The vote for gladiator should only take into account votes for the gladiator and the challengee to determine whom to lync. As the rules alreadys say by using the term majority...
Offline
I'm pretty sure Majority is used the same in both senses. I assume these are the sentences you're talking about:
- A lynch will not occur when a majority has been reached. A lynch can only occur when the day ends. When a day ends, all lynch votes will be counted, and whichever player was voted for the most will be executed after factoring in role modifiers and abilities. If you do not vote, your vote will be counted as !sleep. Players can vote to not lynch anyone during the day by using the !sleep command.
Gladiator - Once per game, during the Day, you can Declare one other player; the game host will confirm that you are the Gladiator, and for the rest of the Day Phase, all other players now must vote amongst you and your target. A majority must be reached for either you or your target to be Lynched. If no Majority is reached, you die. You are neutrally aligned with yourself. You win if and only if a majority vote is reached against your Declared target.
If these two are the lines you're referencing, the two majorities mean the same thing, all its saying is that instead of ending the day when a lynch occurs (like some forum games do), the game will always end at the stated time.
And if you're arguing about the plurality thing, it clearly stated it in the rules before by saying "Whichever player was voted for the most will be executed," which is stating the plurality effect not by name (which is better since just saying 'plurality rule is in effect' might make people question what it means but here it actually explains it. Gladiator's role explicitly states that it needs a majority, rather than the most voted player. These rules have always been in effect and arguing against them doesn't do anything. The one thing I can understand is the fact that your vote got retracted because of gladiator, but is it really that big of a deal to just, vote again? Like in a theoretical situation sure it could stop votes, but it didn't.
This is kinda a throwaway post, but i think era bashing on mini is just dumb.
In any regard, i dont think a lynch is gonna happen, there's like 3 hours left.
Don't ask me what I'm doing, I don't even know what I'm doing.
~BeepnBoop
Offline
Okay I don't know what possessed me to post that but let's let the game resume
Click the image to see my graphics suggestions, or here to play EE: Project M!
Offline
Hey norwee, you should revote in like 1 minute
Don't ask me what I'm doing, I don't even know what I'm doing.
~BeepnBoop
Offline
i didnt realize it was here
Don't ask me what I'm doing, I don't even know what I'm doing.
~BeepnBoop
Offline
norwee pls vote again
Don't ask me what I'm doing, I don't even know what I'm doing.
~BeepnBoop
Offline
This has been the most eventful 25 minutes of my life. A vote was had and decided, flip coming soon.
Click the image to see my graphics suggestions, or here to play EE: Project M!
Offline
The town started becoming unhappy with the laws set about before them. They seemed inconsistent, perhaps irresponsible, and it was clear that if the government had its way, perhaps some of the town would die as a result. One player really stood against these practices. With a glimmer in his eye, Norwee aimed for justice. His speeches moved crowds, and in the end, he was the victor.
So surprised at losing one of their own, the government had no choice but to call this a loss. However, they still had a purpose, and only time could tell if that purpose gets fulfilled.
Click the image to see my graphics suggestions, or here to play EE: Project M!
Offline
Wind howls, leaves fall. The world is becoming a safer place, or is it...? Devastated that the villagers would so easily turn on their agents, the government started to reconsider their options. A new note was left on the door of the Mayor, ShadowsEdge.
We demand that whoever is responsible for the deaths of our agents step forward immediately. Punishment will be swift. Failure to act in accordance with law will result in a worse ending.
Player Abiqi has been jailed!
Player Althea's death was successfully predicted to occur last night!
There were two kills last night! Day time begins!
(Optional Side Quest: Alphabetical Order!!! Make sure all the words in your posts are ordered alphabetically, forwards or backwards. Examples: "Anyone can gather good, hefty lots of resources today. Understood?" or "You wouldn't try to talk slowly, or maybe hurriedly, eh?"Anyone who can fulfill this task can choose a different background image for their Role Card ID that will appear at the end of the game or when flipped!)
Click the image to see my graphics suggestions, or here to play EE: Project M!
Offline
also i would like to announce that i shot althea, and that shadowsedge is the town flagbearer
(norbius is lucky that my other modifier was novice, otherwise i would have shot him N1 as a joke)
:.|:;
Offline
Also according to my information (source: me), Irrelevant or Allen is the other maf. I'm suspecting that there's 3 maf, more of a hunch than anything, the only real evidence I have to why there's only 3 maf is that Mutant started trying to solve for who the third mafia was after concluding that Onjit and Era were mafia.
Whichever isn't maf, I assume the other is a neutral, whether thats neutral or neutral evil is tbd.
Marten and Fabien need to be more active, as I literally cannot read them if they don't talk, and just for the record, what did you investigate N1KF as era?
Don't ask me what I'm doing, I don't even know what I'm doing.
~BeepnBoop
Offline
[ Started around 1732292014.1665 - Generated in 0.855 seconds, 14 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.76 MiB (Peak: 2.02 MiB) ]