Official Everybody Edits Forums

BuzzerBee

Forum Admin

From: Texas, U.S.A.

Joined: 2015-02-15

Posts: 4,575

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

Why did you not vote me on D2 if my defense wasn't convincing?

I said your defense wasn't convincing on D3, not D2. Also, regardless, as mentioned here (quoted below), Proc was a higher priority lynch for me:

Proc isn’t answering questions and seemed to vote task to get the attention off of him. Not saying I think task is inno but I think Proc is a safer lynch

---

TaskManager

Formerly maxi123

From: i really should update this

Joined: 2015-03-01

Posts: 9,465

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

I said your defense wasn't convincing on D3, not D2.

The point I was making is that my defense didn't change since early D2, so you could vote me as early as then, instead of D3, but alright the Proc part is a fair point

---

signature by HG, profile picture by bluecloud, thank!!
previous signature by drstereos

mrjawapa

Corn Man 🌽

From: Ohio, USA

Joined: 2015-02-15

Posts: 5,840

Website

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

Finally got on the laptop here you go with some reads

2B:

▼Hidden text

I guess I'll follow the game narrator.
Shadow and crybaby kind of convinced me that norboy is scum, but i dont really know.

!vote NorwegianboyEE

I've already pointed this out before and I'm pointing it out again
As scum I played the "this guy sounds convincing so yeah im voting" card before numerous times to hop on a wagon that benefits me so I'm going to say this is scum indicative
Plus he's trying to save his face in case this turns out to be a mislynch by showing how he's unsure and simply blindly follows someone else
No desire to solve the game at all here

https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewt … 55#p772955
When Norboy confronted him, he suddenly changed his tone to a much more "joking" one
He also avoided Norboy's question that was "which one convinced you if they had different reasons?"

2B is just sheeping opinions. And I don't know exactly what to make of it. In EE Forums Mafia it seems that's consistently what happens with his playstyle. But I know from playing with him in Discord Mafia that he has the ability to scumhunt and form his own reads instead of simply sheep other people's opinions.

I thought that you know the reason for this???
Well okay then I'll try scumhunting but I'll end up on sheeping again anyway

Only showing the intent to scumhunt after being asked to and instantly drawing another excuse not to do it
This isn't as much scum indicative as it could be lazy townie though since similarly I only posted some "conclusions" when mutant asked for them, back in D1 I think

Here's imo the scummiest one: He had a scum lean on Processor but eventually did a 180 and voted me instead. Bear in mind that Proc flipped scum

I dont like how Processor literally switched the topic from him explaining his suspicions to voting TaskManager.

Processor sus
Not sure if not explaining his reads is his playstyle because I never look at playstyles.
And now he said his scum read on ele depends on Task’s flip? And yet again he gave no reason at all.
Why is Processor so keen on lynching TaskManager? He has been against Task on D1 and D2, yet provided no reasons for it. Weird.
Can you at least give explanations for your suspicions please.

And when they flip town... we lynch you?

I don'T follow, does task flipping town indicate im scum?

No. But your lack of explanations for your reads are.

And the glorious 180 post:

I disagree with the double lynching.
You might say that getting rid of two suspicious players in one day is good, but that’s a no for me.

1. If we lynch both Processor and TaskManager today, the result is either satisfying or disappointing. A scenario that both are mafia can happen, as well as 1 town 1 scum or even both town. I don’t think that both Processor are TaskManager are both mafia, so we need to be careful of our decisions. We certainly don’t want the worst scenario to happen. That’s why we should play safe and lynch one of them first, instead of both.

2. Double lynching would waste this day and possibly the next day too. If we lynch both Processor and TaskManager today, then what’s the point of this whole discussion in Day 2? This Processor vs Task thing ultimately ends in both dying after this whole discussion? Not worth it. If we know that both got lynched, then we could’ve used this day to discuss other things. If nothing surprising happened, lynching them separately can let us to have a target for lynching in Day 3, so we don’t have to worry about who to lynch, and while we have our target for Day 3, we can discuss who to lynch on Day 4 too.

3. Lynching either one of Processor or TaskManager can let us to know information about the other person, so we can make a final decision whether to lynch or not based on the lynched person’s alignment. Lynching both of them for me is like wasting a chance to have more information about the other person.

A Task lynch would be hard to do, since all players who still didn’t vote needs to vote on Task in order to get him lynched. But I’m convinced by Proc that he’s most likely town, since he defended himself when Shadow attacked him, this just disproves the statement that Processor is avoiding questions. And Task is also fine with himself lynched, so I’m gonna place my vote on Task.

!vote TaskManager

Points 1 2 3 argue against double lynching
Then there's a subtle notice that Proc suddenly "convinced" him in his townishness because Processor invalidated the statement of him dodging the questions
Do remember that there were other reasons for lynching Proc too
That whole excuse for town reading Proc just stinks like hastily thrown together **** to me
Then he votes me, even though at the moment I had less votes than Proc (I had 3, Proc had 5), which literally brings us closer to a double lynch and contradicts his own arguments!

!vote Mutantdevle
hi this is a vote that was made because of the time limit
i didnt fully read day 3 yet so i'll do that soon

This vote was rushed without looking through the thread and done to avoid dying
Scum are more likely to play careful and would at all costs avoid that modkill

2B participated in both town mislynches with a careless sheeping attitude, but not in the wagon that lynched Proc

I'm fairly confident that 2B is scum and he is Proc's teammate

BuzzerBee:

▼Hidden text

Buzzer has slight townie credit from me because of the Proc wagon

Okay, when push came to shove mutant came with some good explanations and reasoning, and for that I'll give him the benefit of the doubt.

TaskManager hasn't given a convincing enough defense in my opinion. Also didn't realize how little time was left, so:

!vote TaskManager

I'm not sure what defense would you find convincing, given that Mutant pushed for lynching me since D1 and both his case on me and my defense were presented early in D2
Why did you not vote me on D2 if my defense wasn't convincing?
I'm not sure what to think of this since Proc flipped scum eventually

But I do find the usage of "convincing" card to be generally scummy indicative, again, based on personal experience

Other than that Buzzer shows minor signs of scumhunting, but generally the amount of contribution is abysmal
Going to mark him as slight scum lean

Peace:

▼Hidden text

I can easily bet that Peace is town, if I'm wrong then im bad at this game

Shadow:

▼Hidden text

Shadow doesn't post often but his contributions are good
The fact that he didn't care much about getting modkilled because of not voting twice earns him some town credit from me

Probably town

Onjit:

▼Hidden text

Quite a lot of **** but the contributions are good

Still he should post more

A tiny bit town lean

Ele:

▼Hidden text

The act of saving Shadow should be no basis for any town credit going for her
Her vote was a rushed attempt to avoid the vote modkill too, which is scummy and given that she rushed it, she most likely saved Shadow without realizing it

Crybaby picked her posts apart fairly well imo so you should prolly look into that

personally i don't think that devle is scum for defending proc, he could be town just defending the wrong person. right now i'm okay with devle being lynched, but i'm not gonna do so myself because i'm not convinced that he's scum. i understand the reasons for voting for him (sorta) but i'm not really convinced

If I had to give a definitive answer on the third person I'd say ele.

i changed my mind. this actually makes me think if he is scum then he is trying to **** frame me by "pretending to distance" himself and i'm upset now so i'm now okay with lynching him but i wanna see a vote count first and his post that he's "planning to prepare"
devle, why do u think i'm the third scum?

Playing "angry mode" to make your hop on the wagon seem legitimate

Scum lean

Crybaby:

▼Hidden text

There's too much and I'm running out of time rn because I got other **** to do so not going through 3 pages of his posts, although I probably should cause there's a lot of content
Damn

Anyway I only want to point out one most recent thing

Well, sorry Mutant. In good news, though, everything he said can now be trusted. He mentioned something he wished to happen the day after his death, lynch either Jawapa or Task, if either flip scum then lynch the other, if not then lynch elei, then regardless lynch the other person. I still have my suspicions on Elei even though they saved Shadow from certain death really late last night, and I suspect 2b might be alone with Processor dead. I know Mutant had me 3rd from the bottom on his sus list, so if y'all think lynching me is an okay alternative then that's okay, too,  but I'm gonna start with a vote.

!vote TaskManager

Don't feel pressured by my vote, though, just vote for whoever you think is sus the most.

It is very odd how he starts with a vote right at the start of the day (no this is not ironic because doing it on D1 is different, dont you dare play that move on me)
Just cause he wished for it doesn't mean he's right
This move seems like merely a tribute to Mutant, if scum!Crybaby already knows that I'm most likely town then he is aware that Mutant's wish benefits him and would gladly support it
Keep in mind that many of us here are known for taking advantage of town!Mutant's mistakes in previous mafia games
I would argue that this is an opportunistic and scummy move, but you do you

Neutral / slight scum lean
Can't be more precise because I didn't really look into his posts but  this is the general vibe

Anyway that's as much as I could manage in the time that I had
Maybe I'll add the rest before the day ends

I'm most likely going to vote 2B

Now go ahead lynch me no balls

P. S. I'm also paranoid about Jawapa potentially lurking under my own radar but I don't have any rational evidence to suspect him yet as I didn't look through his posts

Bruh wtf

Are you trying to make us look like a team?

---

Discord: jawp#5123

TaskManager

Formerly maxi123

From: i really should update this

Joined: 2015-03-01

Posts: 9,465

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

Finally got on the laptop here you go with some reads

2B:

▼Hidden text

I guess I'll follow the game narrator.
Shadow and crybaby kind of convinced me that norboy is scum, but i dont really know.

!vote NorwegianboyEE

I've already pointed this out before and I'm pointing it out again
As scum I played the "this guy sounds convincing so yeah im voting" card before numerous times to hop on a wagon that benefits me so I'm going to say this is scum indicative
Plus he's trying to save his face in case this turns out to be a mislynch by showing how he's unsure and simply blindly follows someone else
No desire to solve the game at all here

https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewt … 55#p772955
When Norboy confronted him, he suddenly changed his tone to a much more "joking" one
He also avoided Norboy's question that was "which one convinced you if they had different reasons?"

2B is just sheeping opinions. And I don't know exactly what to make of it. In EE Forums Mafia it seems that's consistently what happens with his playstyle. But I know from playing with him in Discord Mafia that he has the ability to scumhunt and form his own reads instead of simply sheep other people's opinions.

I thought that you know the reason for this???
Well okay then I'll try scumhunting but I'll end up on sheeping again anyway

Only showing the intent to scumhunt after being asked to and instantly drawing another excuse not to do it
This isn't as much scum indicative as it could be lazy townie though since similarly I only posted some "conclusions" when mutant asked for them, back in D1 I think

Here's imo the scummiest one: He had a scum lean on Processor but eventually did a 180 and voted me instead. Bear in mind that Proc flipped scum

I dont like how Processor literally switched the topic from him explaining his suspicions to voting TaskManager.

Processor sus
Not sure if not explaining his reads is his playstyle because I never look at playstyles.
And now he said his scum read on ele depends on Task’s flip? And yet again he gave no reason at all.
Why is Processor so keen on lynching TaskManager? He has been against Task on D1 and D2, yet provided no reasons for it. Weird.
Can you at least give explanations for your suspicions please.

And when they flip town... we lynch you?

I don'T follow, does task flipping town indicate im scum?

No. But your lack of explanations for your reads are.

And the glorious 180 post:

I disagree with the double lynching.
You might say that getting rid of two suspicious players in one day is good, but that’s a no for me.

1. If we lynch both Processor and TaskManager today, the result is either satisfying or disappointing. A scenario that both are mafia can happen, as well as 1 town 1 scum or even both town. I don’t think that both Processor are TaskManager are both mafia, so we need to be careful of our decisions. We certainly don’t want the worst scenario to happen. That’s why we should play safe and lynch one of them first, instead of both.

2. Double lynching would waste this day and possibly the next day too. If we lynch both Processor and TaskManager today, then what’s the point of this whole discussion in Day 2? This Processor vs Task thing ultimately ends in both dying after this whole discussion? Not worth it. If we know that both got lynched, then we could’ve used this day to discuss other things. If nothing surprising happened, lynching them separately can let us to have a target for lynching in Day 3, so we don’t have to worry about who to lynch, and while we have our target for Day 3, we can discuss who to lynch on Day 4 too.

3. Lynching either one of Processor or TaskManager can let us to know information about the other person, so we can make a final decision whether to lynch or not based on the lynched person’s alignment. Lynching both of them for me is like wasting a chance to have more information about the other person.

A Task lynch would be hard to do, since all players who still didn’t vote needs to vote on Task in order to get him lynched. But I’m convinced by Proc that he’s most likely town, since he defended himself when Shadow attacked him, this just disproves the statement that Processor is avoiding questions. And Task is also fine with himself lynched, so I’m gonna place my vote on Task.

!vote TaskManager

Points 1 2 3 argue against double lynching
Then there's a subtle notice that Proc suddenly "convinced" him in his townishness because Processor invalidated the statement of him dodging the questions
Do remember that there were other reasons for lynching Proc too
That whole excuse for town reading Proc just stinks like hastily thrown together **** to me
Then he votes me, even though at the moment I had less votes than Proc (I had 3, Proc had 5), which literally brings us closer to a double lynch and contradicts his own arguments!

!vote Mutantdevle
hi this is a vote that was made because of the time limit
i didnt fully read day 3 yet so i'll do that soon

This vote was rushed without looking through the thread and done to avoid dying
Scum are more likely to play careful and would at all costs avoid that modkill

2B participated in both town mislynches with a careless sheeping attitude, but not in the wagon that lynched Proc

I'm fairly confident that 2B is scum and he is Proc's teammate

BuzzerBee:

▼Hidden text

Buzzer has slight townie credit from me because of the Proc wagon

Okay, when push came to shove mutant came with some good explanations and reasoning, and for that I'll give him the benefit of the doubt.

TaskManager hasn't given a convincing enough defense in my opinion. Also didn't realize how little time was left, so:

!vote TaskManager

I'm not sure what defense would you find convincing, given that Mutant pushed for lynching me since D1 and both his case on me and my defense were presented early in D2
Why did you not vote me on D2 if my defense wasn't convincing?
I'm not sure what to think of this since Proc flipped scum eventually

But I do find the usage of "convincing" card to be generally scummy indicative, again, based on personal experience

Other than that Buzzer shows minor signs of scumhunting, but generally the amount of contribution is abysmal
Going to mark him as slight scum lean

Peace:

▼Hidden text

I can easily bet that Peace is town, if I'm wrong then im bad at this game

Shadow:

▼Hidden text

Shadow doesn't post often but his contributions are good
The fact that he didn't care much about getting modkilled because of not voting twice earns him some town credit from me

Probably town

Onjit:

▼Hidden text

Quite a lot of **** but the contributions are good

Still he should post more

A tiny bit town lean

Ele:

▼Hidden text

The act of saving Shadow should be no basis for any town credit going for her
Her vote was a rushed attempt to avoid the vote modkill too, which is scummy and given that she rushed it, she most likely saved Shadow without realizing it

Crybaby picked her posts apart fairly well imo so you should prolly look into that

personally i don't think that devle is scum for defending proc, he could be town just defending the wrong person. right now i'm okay with devle being lynched, but i'm not gonna do so myself because i'm not convinced that he's scum. i understand the reasons for voting for him (sorta) but i'm not really convinced

If I had to give a definitive answer on the third person I'd say ele.

i changed my mind. this actually makes me think if he is scum then he is trying to **** frame me by "pretending to distance" himself and i'm upset now so i'm now okay with lynching him but i wanna see a vote count first and his post that he's "planning to prepare"
devle, why do u think i'm the third scum?

Playing "angry mode" to make your hop on the wagon seem legitimate

Scum lean

Crybaby:

▼Hidden text

There's too much and I'm running out of time rn because I got other **** to do so not going through 3 pages of his posts, although I probably should cause there's a lot of content
Damn

Anyway I only want to point out one most recent thing

Well, sorry Mutant. In good news, though, everything he said can now be trusted. He mentioned something he wished to happen the day after his death, lynch either Jawapa or Task, if either flip scum then lynch the other, if not then lynch elei, then regardless lynch the other person. I still have my suspicions on Elei even though they saved Shadow from certain death really late last night, and I suspect 2b might be alone with Processor dead. I know Mutant had me 3rd from the bottom on his sus list, so if y'all think lynching me is an okay alternative then that's okay, too,  but I'm gonna start with a vote.

!vote TaskManager

Don't feel pressured by my vote, though, just vote for whoever you think is sus the most.

It is very odd how he starts with a vote right at the start of the day (no this is not ironic because doing it on D1 is different, dont you dare play that move on me)
Just cause he wished for it doesn't mean he's right
This move seems like merely a tribute to Mutant, if scum!Crybaby already knows that I'm most likely town then he is aware that Mutant's wish benefits him and would gladly support it
Keep in mind that many of us here are known for taking advantage of town!Mutant's mistakes in previous mafia games
I would argue that this is an opportunistic and scummy move, but you do you

Neutral / slight scum lean
Can't be more precise because I didn't really look into his posts but  this is the general vibe

Anyway that's as much as I could manage in the time that I had
Maybe I'll add the rest before the day ends

I'm most likely going to vote 2B

Now go ahead lynch me no balls

P. S. I'm also paranoid about Jawapa potentially lurking under my own radar but I don't have any rational evidence to suspect him yet as I didn't look through his posts

Bruh wtf

Are you trying to make us look like a team?

No
Given that I never bothered reading into you much because you never confronted me, I am a little bit paranoid that you could be scum and I never noticed it

---

signature by HG, profile picture by bluecloud, thank!!
previous signature by drstereos

Different55

Forum Admin

Joined: 2015-02-07

Posts: 16,575

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

Finally got on the laptop here you go with some reads

2B:

▼Hidden text

I guess I'll follow the game narrator.
Shadow and crybaby kind of convinced me that norboy is scum, but i dont really know.

!vote NorwegianboyEE

I've already pointed this out before and I'm pointing it out again
As scum I played the "this guy sounds convincing so yeah im voting" card before numerous times to hop on a wagon that benefits me so I'm going to say this is scum indicative
Plus he's trying to save his face in case this turns out to be a mislynch by showing how he's unsure and simply blindly follows someone else
No desire to solve the game at all here

https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewt … 55#p772955
When Norboy confronted him, he suddenly changed his tone to a much more "joking" one
He also avoided Norboy's question that was "which one convinced you if they had different reasons?"

2B is just sheeping opinions. And I don't know exactly what to make of it. In EE Forums Mafia it seems that's consistently what happens with his playstyle. But I know from playing with him in Discord Mafia that he has the ability to scumhunt and form his own reads instead of simply sheep other people's opinions.

I thought that you know the reason for this???
Well okay then I'll try scumhunting but I'll end up on sheeping again anyway

Only showing the intent to scumhunt after being asked to and instantly drawing another excuse not to do it
This isn't as much scum indicative as it could be lazy townie though since similarly I only posted some "conclusions" when mutant asked for them, back in D1 I think

Here's imo the scummiest one: He had a scum lean on Processor but eventually did a 180 and voted me instead. Bear in mind that Proc flipped scum

I dont like how Processor literally switched the topic from him explaining his suspicions to voting TaskManager.

Processor sus
Not sure if not explaining his reads is his playstyle because I never look at playstyles.
And now he said his scum read on ele depends on Task’s flip? And yet again he gave no reason at all.
Why is Processor so keen on lynching TaskManager? He has been against Task on D1 and D2, yet provided no reasons for it. Weird.
Can you at least give explanations for your suspicions please.

And when they flip town... we lynch you?

I don'T follow, does task flipping town indicate im scum?

No. But your lack of explanations for your reads are.

And the glorious 180 post:

I disagree with the double lynching.
You might say that getting rid of two suspicious players in one day is good, but that’s a no for me.

1. If we lynch both Processor and TaskManager today, the result is either satisfying or disappointing. A scenario that both are mafia can happen, as well as 1 town 1 scum or even both town. I don’t think that both Processor are TaskManager are both mafia, so we need to be careful of our decisions. We certainly don’t want the worst scenario to happen. That’s why we should play safe and lynch one of them first, instead of both.

2. Double lynching would waste this day and possibly the next day too. If we lynch both Processor and TaskManager today, then what’s the point of this whole discussion in Day 2? This Processor vs Task thing ultimately ends in both dying after this whole discussion? Not worth it. If we know that both got lynched, then we could’ve used this day to discuss other things. If nothing surprising happened, lynching them separately can let us to have a target for lynching in Day 3, so we don’t have to worry about who to lynch, and while we have our target for Day 3, we can discuss who to lynch on Day 4 too.

3. Lynching either one of Processor or TaskManager can let us to know information about the other person, so we can make a final decision whether to lynch or not based on the lynched person’s alignment. Lynching both of them for me is like wasting a chance to have more information about the other person.

A Task lynch would be hard to do, since all players who still didn’t vote needs to vote on Task in order to get him lynched. But I’m convinced by Proc that he’s most likely town, since he defended himself when Shadow attacked him, this just disproves the statement that Processor is avoiding questions. And Task is also fine with himself lynched, so I’m gonna place my vote on Task.

!vote TaskManager

Points 1 2 3 argue against double lynching
Then there's a subtle notice that Proc suddenly "convinced" him in his townishness because Processor invalidated the statement of him dodging the questions
Do remember that there were other reasons for lynching Proc too
That whole excuse for town reading Proc just stinks like hastily thrown together **** to me
Then he votes me, even though at the moment I had less votes than Proc (I had 3, Proc had 5), which literally brings us closer to a double lynch and contradicts his own arguments!

!vote Mutantdevle
hi this is a vote that was made because of the time limit
i didnt fully read day 3 yet so i'll do that soon

This vote was rushed without looking through the thread and done to avoid dying
Scum are more likely to play careful and would at all costs avoid that modkill

2B participated in both town mislynches with a careless sheeping attitude, but not in the wagon that lynched Proc

I'm fairly confident that 2B is scum and he is Proc's teammate

BuzzerBee:

▼Hidden text

Buzzer has slight townie credit from me because of the Proc wagon

Okay, when push came to shove mutant came with some good explanations and reasoning, and for that I'll give him the benefit of the doubt.

TaskManager hasn't given a convincing enough defense in my opinion. Also didn't realize how little time was left, so:

!vote TaskManager

I'm not sure what defense would you find convincing, given that Mutant pushed for lynching me since D1 and both his case on me and my defense were presented early in D2
Why did you not vote me on D2 if my defense wasn't convincing?
I'm not sure what to think of this since Proc flipped scum eventually

But I do find the usage of "convincing" card to be generally scummy indicative, again, based on personal experience

Other than that Buzzer shows minor signs of scumhunting, but generally the amount of contribution is abysmal
Going to mark him as slight scum lean

Peace:

▼Hidden text

I can easily bet that Peace is town, if I'm wrong then im bad at this game

Shadow:

▼Hidden text

Shadow doesn't post often but his contributions are good
The fact that he didn't care much about getting modkilled because of not voting twice earns him some town credit from me

Probably town

Onjit:

▼Hidden text

Quite a lot of **** but the contributions are good

Still he should post more

A tiny bit town lean

Ele:

▼Hidden text

The act of saving Shadow should be no basis for any town credit going for her
Her vote was a rushed attempt to avoid the vote modkill too, which is scummy and given that she rushed it, she most likely saved Shadow without realizing it

Crybaby picked her posts apart fairly well imo so you should prolly look into that

personally i don't think that devle is scum for defending proc, he could be town just defending the wrong person. right now i'm okay with devle being lynched, but i'm not gonna do so myself because i'm not convinced that he's scum. i understand the reasons for voting for him (sorta) but i'm not really convinced

If I had to give a definitive answer on the third person I'd say ele.

i changed my mind. this actually makes me think if he is scum then he is trying to **** frame me by "pretending to distance" himself and i'm upset now so i'm now okay with lynching him but i wanna see a vote count first and his post that he's "planning to prepare"
devle, why do u think i'm the third scum?

Playing "angry mode" to make your hop on the wagon seem legitimate

Scum lean

Crybaby:

▼Hidden text

There's too much and I'm running out of time rn because I got other **** to do so not going through 3 pages of his posts, although I probably should cause there's a lot of content
Damn

Anyway I only want to point out one most recent thing

Well, sorry Mutant. In good news, though, everything he said can now be trusted. He mentioned something he wished to happen the day after his death, lynch either Jawapa or Task, if either flip scum then lynch the other, if not then lynch elei, then regardless lynch the other person. I still have my suspicions on Elei even though they saved Shadow from certain death really late last night, and I suspect 2b might be alone with Processor dead. I know Mutant had me 3rd from the bottom on his sus list, so if y'all think lynching me is an okay alternative then that's okay, too,  but I'm gonna start with a vote.

!vote TaskManager

Don't feel pressured by my vote, though, just vote for whoever you think is sus the most.

It is very odd how he starts with a vote right at the start of the day (no this is not ironic because doing it on D1 is different, dont you dare play that move on me)
Just cause he wished for it doesn't mean he's right
This move seems like merely a tribute to Mutant, if scum!Crybaby already knows that I'm most likely town then he is aware that Mutant's wish benefits him and would gladly support it
Keep in mind that many of us here are known for taking advantage of town!Mutant's mistakes in previous mafia games
I would argue that this is an opportunistic and scummy move, but you do you

Neutral / slight scum lean
Can't be more precise because I didn't really look into his posts but  this is the general vibe

Anyway that's as much as I could manage in the time that I had
Maybe I'll add the rest before the day ends

I'm most likely going to vote 2B

Now go ahead lynch me no balls

P. S. I'm also paranoid about Jawapa potentially lurking under my own radar but I don't have any rational evidence to suspect him yet as I didn't look through his posts

Bruh wtf

Are you trying to make us look like a team?

If it makes you feel better I didn't make the cut either ;(

---

"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto

TaskManager

Formerly maxi123

From: i really should update this

Joined: 2015-03-01

Posts: 9,465

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

hi its drunk task again :):|:(:)
i didnt include everyone because i didnt have the time to,i included people first that i had most thoughts aboutt

---

signature by HG, profile picture by bluecloud, thank!!
previous signature by drstereos

Minimania

Moderation Team

From: PbzvatFbba 13

Joined: 2015-02-22

Posts: 6,393

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

It is very odd how he starts with a vote right at the start of the day (no this is not ironic because doing it on D1 is different, dont you dare play that move on me)
Just cause he wished for it doesn't mean he's right
This move seems like merely a tribute to Mutant, if scum!Crybaby already knows that I'm most likely town then he is aware that Mutant's wish benefits him and would gladly support it
Keep in mind that many of us here are known for taking advantage of town!Mutant's mistakes in previous mafia games
I would argue that this is an opportunistic and scummy move, but you do you

Neutral / slight scum lean
Can't be more precise because I didn't really look into his posts but  this is the general vibe

This is wrong but it's a fair argument.

---

Click the image to see my graphics suggestions, or here to play EE: Project M!

peace

Member

From: admin land

Joined: 2015-08-10

Posts: 9,226

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

task brings up some good poitns on 2b eventhoguh i sitll find task a little scummy an di dont like how he gest away with everything im als ostill nto sure abotu ele's slot that reason for crybaby about the early vote is a valid point to tak ein account but i dont think crybaby would be dumb to vote that fast because of that

onjit seriously has tto post more like holy **** if the ovtees werent permanen ti would vot ehim to get ghim posting but i dont want to waste a vote on him for now

---

thanks hg for making this much better and ty for my avatar aswell

mrjawapa

Corn Man 🌽

From: Ohio, USA

Joined: 2015-02-15

Posts: 5,840

Website

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

because you never confronted me,

because i didnt have the time

Which is it? Can't have both.

---

Discord: jawp#5123

peace

Member

From: admin land

Joined: 2015-08-10

Posts: 9,226

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

well its kidna odd how task doesnt tell anythign abotu jawap eventough some poeple have conisdered an task/jawap team

---

thanks hg for making this much better and ty for my avatar aswell

TaskManager

Formerly maxi123

From: i really should update this

Joined: 2015-03-01

Posts: 9,465

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

in your case both @jawp

---

signature by HG, profile picture by bluecloud, thank!!
previous signature by drstereos

mrjawapa

Corn Man 🌽

From: Ohio, USA

Joined: 2015-02-15

Posts: 5,840

Website

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

well its kidna odd how task doesnt tell anythign abotu jawap eventough some poeple have conisdered an task/jawap team

Hes setting me up to fail

---

Discord: jawp#5123

ShadowsEdge

Member

From: somewhere in space ig

Joined: 2018-11-06

Posts: 1,010

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

AYYYY DRUNK TASK MADE A SPECIAL REAPPEARANCE.

Anyway, I think that 2B is generally sheepy on EE Forums mafia. Although the last point where his vote did contradict his own point is actually interesting (referring to Task's post).

Also I just want to say this bit: Crybaby was kinda null on me, but then after I called out the connection between them and Processor they kinda did a turn to start suspecting me. Glad I'm finally getting the recognition I deserve in this game, but did you really have to start suspecting me right after I started to suspect you?

Contrary to the statement before, I'm not so sure Crybaby is definitively scum. I'm not going to drop suspicions on them, but I'll be looking into other cases (Mainly because I also don't want to hyperfocus on Crybaby and then end up being wrong). I do agree with quite a few of the points that Taskmanager said, although I'm not completely sold on the suspicion between Crybaby and Elei. Although, I think Elei is more suspicious in that regard. Still don't trust Different, so I'd be willing to bet that the scum are between 2B, Crybaby, Elei, and Different.

Sorry for the mass amount of sheeping here but Im also kinda tired right now and just wanted to post before I sleep.

---

Don't ask me what I'm doing, I don't even know what I'm doing.

   ~BeepnBoop

2b55b5g

Formerly 2B55B5G TNG

Joined: 2016-08-27

Posts: 3,005

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

For the point that I contradicted my own arguments about me disagreeing double lynching, I just wanna say that I was being super careless and did not notice the votecount, so that was my bad.
Also about me avoiding Norboy’s question, it was me being careless again and missed the question, I can answer it now though. Both did convince me although they have different reasons.

---

she/her

also known as DevilCharlotte

search 2bisniekitastan if you wanna find my worlds on ArchivEE

pfp: https://picrew.me/image_maker/1272810

2b55b5g

Formerly 2B55B5G TNG

Joined: 2016-08-27

Posts: 3,005

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

The 180 thing is wrong but valid though.
I’m an easily convinced person so my reads can change easily. At the start of D1 I didn’t find Norboy suspicious but at the end voted for Norboy because posts convinced me (plus people found him scummy at that time)
It’s just the same as how Proc somehow convinced me at the last moment, and it’s unlucky that Proc turned out to be scum, and I didn’t vote for him.

---

she/her

also known as DevilCharlotte

search 2bisniekitastan if you wanna find my worlds on ArchivEE

pfp: https://picrew.me/image_maker/1272810

peace

Member

From: admin land

Joined: 2015-08-10

Posts: 9,226

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

enough wiht taksmanager here hes scum and im gonna vote for him now

!lynch taskmanager

proc heavily suspected task btu he maby did iit to gain town creds so task is definetly nto town ebcause proc suspected him
he is in fact scum because he is now framign jawapa

+town points to jawapa for this

---

thanks hg for making this much better and ty for my avatar aswell

peace

Member

From: admin land

Joined: 2015-08-10

Posts: 9,226

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

onjit where are you?

---

thanks hg for making this much better and ty for my avatar aswell

peace

Member

From: admin land

Joined: 2015-08-10

Posts: 9,226

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

woow onjits last poas was litraly almost 36 hours ago

---

thanks hg for making this much better and ty for my avatar aswell

peace

Member

From: admin land

Joined: 2015-08-10

Posts: 9,226

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

kira can you prod onjit please his last post was 36 hours ago and last few days he hasnt posted much aswell (some times posts are almost liek 20+hours diffrence) justt a friendly prodto him that he should post more

---

thanks hg for making this much better and ty for my avatar aswell

TaskManager

Formerly maxi123

From: i really should update this

Joined: 2015-03-01

Posts: 9,465

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

proc heavily suspected task btu he maby did iit to gain town creds so task is definetly nto town ebcause proc suspected him
he is in fact scum because he is now framign jawapa

+town points to jawapa for this

bruh

---

signature by HG, profile picture by bluecloud, thank!!
previous signature by drstereos

peace

Member

From: admin land

Joined: 2015-08-10

Posts: 9,226

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

task what do you think about jawapa then?

---

thanks hg for making this much better and ty for my avatar aswell

TaskManager

Formerly maxi123

From: i really should update this

Joined: 2015-03-01

Posts: 9,465

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

"task is not town because proc suspected him" like do you even listen to yourself because that logic legit makes me cringe
jawapa is slight town lean for me but again i didnt look into his posts thoroughly and i do have issue with that D1 response to norboys "you already voted so shut up" post

---

signature by HG, profile picture by bluecloud, thank!!
previous signature by drstereos

peace

Member

From: admin land

Joined: 2015-08-10

Posts: 9,226

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

"task is not town because proc suspected him" like do you even listen to yourself because that logic legit makes me cringe
jawapa is slight town lean for me but again i didnt look into his posts thoroughly and i do have issue with that D1 response to norboys "you already voted so shut up" post

maby he wanted toen creds for suspectign you

---

thanks hg for making this much better and ty for my avatar aswell

mrjawapa

Corn Man 🌽

From: Ohio, USA

Joined: 2015-02-15

Posts: 5,840

Website

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

+town points to jawapa for this

What are you talking about

justt a friendly prodto him that he should post more

When you want to prod but not be mod killed

---

Discord: jawp#5123

peace

Member

From: admin land

Joined: 2015-08-10

Posts: 9,226

Re: Mafia 40 - Russian Roulette Mafia Victory!

could requst for a modkill but when he didn teven reachived a single prod yet that wouldn tbe fair

peace wrote:
+town points to jawapa for this

What are you talking about

task framing you (now by not giving reads on you when some poeple suggested an task/jawap team)

---

thanks hg for making this much better and ty for my avatar aswell