Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Not necessary in my opinion, woots should be used sparingly, so if you use 20+ daily you’re kind of missing the point.
I support the drama)
I find that the woot limited is perfectly fine as it is except when more heated discussions occur where several posts that are well written and put forth good points can pop up in a short space of time. That said, I don't think anything should be done about that as it's not something I'd consider a proper issue and I suspect that more harm than good would come from increasing the woot limit by any meaningful extent.
Offline
I don't know. I personally never woot anything.
Offline
A month or so ago we were down below 1 post per hour. It's coming back up because of drama, but that's not sustainable.
20-30 woots/day is more than enough these days.
One bot to rule them all, one bot to find them. One bot to bring them all... and with this cliché blind them.
Offline
Not necessary in my opinion, woots should be used sparingly, so if you use 20+ daily you’re kind of missing the point.
God forbid more than 20 insightful or funny things are posted in a day
Click the image to see my graphics suggestions, or here to play EE: Project M!
Offline
[ Started around 1738299776.7284 - Generated in 0.050 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.45 MiB (Peak: 1.57 MiB) ]