Who is the greatest among us?

mrjawapa · 2018-10-07 15:07:54

yes I was definitely crying

actually I retract my earlier statement. I want a category just below xeno/diff, only for people with "jawapa" in their name. If I don't get it, I will riot.

minam · 2018-10-07 15:12:50

mrjawapa wrote:

yes I was definitely crying
actually I retract my earlier statement. I want a category just below xeno/diff, only for people with "jawapa" in their name. If I don't get it, I will riot.

1. Xenonetix and Different
2. People who survived perm bans.(and also have people with "jawapa" in their name.)
3. Zoey Kirby and HummerZ
4. Patrons
5. People that have been banned from the forums more than once
6. Brand new players
7. People who make boss to code or free edit worlds
8. People that are lowkey mentally ill
9. Anyone not in the other categories
10. People who play for more than an hour a day
11. People that cry because they cant get a cosmetic item

Slabdrill

Kira · 2018-10-07 16:47:15

Pncordik.

TaskManager · 2018-10-07 17:35:55

Kira wrote:

Pncordik.

a doubt? ask for me

peace, pwnzor, PTU

azurepudding · 2018-10-07 22:26:14

NorwegianboyEE wrote:

azurepudding wrote:
NorwegianboyEE wrote:
This is actually a narcissism test. If you vote for yourself it means you tested positive.
NorwegianboyEE wrote:
as compared to the presence of my sheer genius topics that which garners a lot of applause and attention like the entire "I will be experimenting with emoticons." topic or the "An introduction to the EE community. (New players view this)" topic.
We can't let ourselves lose to people like this.
https://i.imgur.com/CxVSV4V.png
https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewt … 15#p726615
:thonk:
Looks like someone failed to understand my self-irony again.
It’s the ability to laugh at oneself, to take oneself lightly. It’s a very popular form of humor in scandinavia.

No it just wasn't funny is all.

If someone doesn't laugh at your joke and if you claim they failed to understand it, it probably wasn't funny to begin with. Sometimes my jokes don't work but there's no need to be condescending man. Get off the grumps!

Norwee · 2018-10-07 22:41:07

azurepudding wrote:

NorwegianboyEE wrote:
azurepudding wrote:
NorwegianboyEE wrote:
This is actually a narcissism test. If you vote for yourself it means you tested positive.
NorwegianboyEE wrote:
as compared to the presence of my sheer genius topics that which garners a lot of applause and attention like the entire "I will be experimenting with emoticons." topic or the "An introduction to the EE community. (New players view this)" topic.
We can't let ourselves lose to people like this.
https://i.imgur.com/CxVSV4V.png
https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewt … 15#p726615
:thonk:
Looks like someone failed to understand my self-irony again.
It’s the ability to laugh at oneself, to take oneself lightly. It’s a very popular form of humor in scandinavia.
No it just wasn't funny is all.
If someone doesn't laugh at your joke and if you claim they failed to understand it, it probably wasn't funny to begin with. Sometimes my jokes don't work but there's no need to be condescending man. Get off the grumps!

I never was grumpy when i wrote either of those posts, in fact there's only one thing that really makes me grumpy. And that is people telling me to "stop being grumpy" when i never was to begin with.
>:(

Freckleface · 2018-10-07 22:47:40

mrjawapa wrote:

Muftwin wrote:
This seems pretty accurate to me anyone who can come up with more categories or changes I am open to it
can we have a category for people that survived perma bans?

#0. People who have kicked in doors

Kirby, mrjawapa

Minimania · 2018-10-08 00:35:34

NorwegianboyEE wrote:

azurepudding wrote:
NorwegianboyEE wrote:
azurepudding wrote:
NorwegianboyEE wrote:
This is actually a narcissism test. If you vote for yourself it means you tested positive.
NorwegianboyEE wrote:
as compared to the presence of my sheer genius topics that which garners a lot of applause and attention like the entire "I will be experimenting with emoticons." topic or the "An introduction to the EE community. (New players view this)" topic.
We can't let ourselves lose to people like this.
https://i.imgur.com/CxVSV4V.png
https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewt … 15#p726615
:thonk:
Looks like someone failed to understand my self-irony again.
It’s the ability to laugh at oneself, to take oneself lightly. It’s a very popular form of humor in scandinavia.
No it just wasn't funny is all.
If someone doesn't laugh at your joke and if you claim they failed to understand it, it probably wasn't funny to begin with. Sometimes my jokes don't work but there's no need to be condescending man. Get off the grumps!
I never was grumpy when i wrote either of those posts, in fact there's only one thing that really makes me grumpy. And that is people telling me to "stop being grumpy" when i never was to begin with.
>:(

You can't tell people to understand how your post could be funny if it wasn't funny to begin with.

Kira · 2018-10-08 02:20:24

minimania wrote:

You can't tell people to understand how your post could be funny if it wasn't funny to begin with.

Sure he can. Isn't that the core of every subtle jokes based on cultural, historical references?

ILikeTofuuJoe · 2018-10-08 02:36:20

Category 1: Gods: Xenophobia, Diff
Category 2: Demigods: Forum mods and EE staff
Category 3: Royals: At least spent 1000 hours in EE
Category 4: Royal citizens: Well known on forums
Category 5: Upper citizens: Have been in a world with any EE staff more tha 10 times.
Category 6: Citizens: At least spent 100 hours on EE
Category 7: Lower citizens: Beat all easy campaigns
Category 8: Stray: Only beat tutorials
Category 9: Come and go: Didn't meet any of requirements above
Its my categorizing

Kira · 2018-10-08 02:43:06

ILikeTofuuJoe wrote:

Category 1: Gods: Xenophobia, Diff
Category 2: Demigods: Forum mods and EE staff
Category 3: Royals: At least spent 1000 hours in EE
Category 4: Royal citizens: Well known on forums
Category 5: Upper citizens: Have been in a world with any EE staff more tha 10 times.
Category 6: Citizens: At least spent 100 hours on EE
Category 7: Lower citizens: Beat all easy campaigns
Category 8: Stray: Only beat tutorials
Category 9: Come and go: Didn't meet any of requirements above
Its my categorizing

You mean Categorization don't you?
But yeah pretty much it.

HeyNK · 2018-10-08 02:53:37

People. Stop making hirearchies. You are going way too fast.

We must first find the greatest before we move onto the second greatest and below. This is going to be a comprehensive hirearchy, one by one, we will name them. This is a "real" "serious" project.

Freckleface · 2018-10-08 04:56:11

Here's my hierarchy:
1. The greatest
2. Not the greatest

daneeko · 2018-10-08 11:30:25

1. best
2. pretty best
3. not very best
4. unbest

MWstudios · 2018-10-08 16:29:23

Daneeko wrote:

1. best
2. pretty best
3. not very best
4. unbest

1. bestest
2. bester, but not the bestest of the best
3. bestn't
4. azbest
5. the unbestest of the best
6. macy ace
7. ???

Jorc · 2018-10-08 17:59:25

MWstudios wrote:

Daneeko wrote:
1. best
2. pretty best
3. not very best
4. unbest
1. bestest
2. bester, but not the bestest of the best
3. bestn't
4. azbest
5. the unbestest of the best
6. macy ace
7. ???

pls. number one is

BEST KID IN THE UNIVERSE
BEST KID
bestest and **** ranks

ILikeTofuuJoe · 2018-10-09 05:27:17

the best is xeno
second is diff
third is every staff
fourth is eveyone here
fifth is everyone not here
last is people didnt even play
even worse is people who dont know wtf EE is (99.9999 %)

HeyNK · 2018-10-09 05:36:13

damn.. you guys.......

this was supposed to be a topic making fun of those losers who actually make social hirearchies in EE, but then you idiots actually went and missed the joke and took it seriously... (except you know, "as a joke" which in this context counts as taking it seriously). the OP was me throwing some of that self depreciating humor where I point out that the only people who make these and want to see themselves in them are just insecure on some level. and instead it revives some weird thread from ages past??? wtf?

... man i am going to lock this thread soon because of you people... shame on everyone who makes these hirearchies, things even as a joke. also that doesn't include me because you guys didn't let me make mine.

Minimania · 2018-10-09 17:37:02

HeyNK wrote:

damn.. you guys.......

this was supposed to be a topic making fun of those losers who actually make social hirearchies in EE, but then you idiots actually went and missed the joke and took it seriously... (except you know, "as a joke" which in this context counts as taking it seriously). the OP was me throwing some of that self depreciating humor where I point out that the only people who make these and want to see themselves in them are just insecure on some level. and instead it revives some weird thread from ages past??? wtf?
... man i am going to lock this thread soon because of you people... shame on everyone who makes these hirearchies, things even as a joke. also that doesn't include me because you guys didn't let me make mine.

You're the one not getting the joke everyone else is playing on you by pretending to take this seriously.

HeyNK · 2018-10-09 19:51:07

yeah, read my post.

Minimania · 2018-10-09 19:53:17

HeyNK wrote:

yeah, read my post.

"except you know, "as a joke" which in this context counts as taking it seriously"
no the **** it does not and you know it

Loganyoshi · 2018-10-09 20:37:27

Here's my hierarchy:

1. Loganyoshi and Yu
2. Everyone else
3. him... A.k.a YOU for either quoting this or actually highlighting this.

HeyNK · 2018-10-09 20:57:01

minimania wrote:

HeyNK wrote:
yeah, read my post.
"except you know, "as a joke" which in this context counts as taking it seriously"
no the **** it does not and you know it

actually it does

Trytu · 2018-10-09 21:01:21

My hierarchy:
1. Robbie Rotten
2. Staff (without Xenonetix)
3. Bot programmers
4. EE system makers
5. Parkour masters
6. EE Parkour makers
7. EE Art makers
8. EE Musicians
9. Players that obtained all the blocks for energy but haven't the abilities above
10. Guests that play in the game without the account for more than 2 years (yes i know some of them)
11. Averange player without any of these abilities
12. Guests that just play/Beginers
13. Trollers
14. Hackers - I hate them

HeyNK · 2018-10-09 21:16:58

you're all reported, enjoy your bans

drunkbnu

Official Everybody Edits Forums

#26 2018-10-07 15:07:54

Re: Who is the greatest among us?

#27 2018-10-07 15:12:50

Re: Who is the greatest among us?

#28 2018-10-07 16:47:15

Re: Who is the greatest among us?

#29 2018-10-07 17:35:55

Re: Who is the greatest among us?

#30 2018-10-07 22:26:14, last edited by azurepudding (2018-10-07 22:27:39)

Re: Who is the greatest among us?

#31 2018-10-07 22:41:07

Re: Who is the greatest among us?

#32 2018-10-07 22:47:40

Re: Who is the greatest among us?

#33 2018-10-08 00:35:34

Re: Who is the greatest among us?

#34 2018-10-08 02:20:24

Re: Who is the greatest among us?

#35 2018-10-08 02:36:20

Re: Who is the greatest among us?

#36 2018-10-08 02:43:06

Re: Who is the greatest among us?

#37 2018-10-08 02:53:37

Re: Who is the greatest among us?

#38 2018-10-08 04:56:11

Re: Who is the greatest among us?

#39 2018-10-08 11:30:25

Re: Who is the greatest among us?

#40 2018-10-08 16:29:23

Re: Who is the greatest among us?

#41 2018-10-08 17:59:25

Re: Who is the greatest among us?

#42 2018-10-09 05:27:17

Re: Who is the greatest among us?

#43 2018-10-09 05:36:13

Re: Who is the greatest among us?

#44 2018-10-09 17:37:02

Re: Who is the greatest among us?

#45 2018-10-09 19:51:07

Re: Who is the greatest among us?

#46 2018-10-09 19:53:17

Re: Who is the greatest among us?

#47 2018-10-09 20:37:27

Re: Who is the greatest among us?

#48 2018-10-09 20:57:01

Re: Who is the greatest among us?

#49 2018-10-09 21:01:21, last edited by Trytu (2018-10-09 21:03:31)

Re: Who is the greatest among us?

#50 2018-10-09 21:16:58

Re: Who is the greatest among us?

Board footer