[THE WINNER!] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament Results!

Zoey2070 · 2018-09-19 00:33:41

So a team that doesn't even submit gets to continue in the contest over people who actually submitted? Really dude :/

Wizard2002 · 2018-09-19 01:27:12

Zoey2070 wrote:

So a team that doesn't even submit gets to continue in the contest over people who actually submitted? Really dude :/

Actually their opponent didn't submit either, they made CK and Unua the winner since they progressed farther into the winners bracket.

peace

azurepudding · 2018-09-19 06:24:16

Theoretically someone can not submit through the entire contest and even win, as long as their opponents all the way through didn't submit either. It does feel a bit unfair to the rest of us, who have to win one more round than someone else who lucked out. This is also different from match ups with one non-submission, because at least the "free win" the winning team received still had to make a world. Since rewards are also round-based, this means CK and Unau's non-submission gets them a prize while zoey's team get a lesser prize.. so yeah I can understand the upset there too.

Tbh, standard contest makes more sense for EE world building since it's all against everyone, and the best of the best win. Tournament style is best for games that everyone can't compete at once, some examples being tennis or chess even. There can only be two teams at a time, which isn't the case for world building in EE. We've had dozens of teams compete in contests before all against each other, but you can't have 20 teams in one chess match.

Personally I feel the most liked of the teams that lost this round should take their spot, since all that time and effort gets eliminated, but someone who did literally nothing moves on still, and gets the better prize too.

I hope you understand my reasoning, even if you disagree. And nothing against CK and Unau if they see this too, which I hope they also understand my reasoning.

peace · 2018-09-19 07:22:11

azurepudding wrote:

Theoretically someone can not submit through the entire contest and even win, as long as their opponents all the way through didn't submit either. It does feel a bit unfair to the rest of us, who have to win one more round than someone else who lucked out. This is also different from match ups with one non-submission, because at least the "free win" the winning team received still had to make a world. Since rewards are also round-based, this means CK and Unau's non-submission gets them a prize while zoey's team get a lesser prize.. so yeah I can understand the upset there too.
Tbh, standard contest makes more sense for EE world building since it's all against everyone, and the best of the best win. Tournament style is best for games that everyone can't compete at once, some examples being tennis or chess even. There can only be two teams at a time, which isn't the case for world building in EE. We've had dozens of teams compete in contests before all against each other, but you can't have 20 teams in one chess match.
Personally I feel the most liked of the teams that lost this round should take their spot, since all that time and effort gets eliminated, but someone who did literally nothing moves on still, and gets the better prize too.
I hope you understand my reasoning, even if you disagree. And nothing against CK and Unau if they see this too, which I hope they also understand my reasoning.

but what if 2 peoel do nto submit and 2 people aganst easch toher make both a really good world and its hard to choose and eventualy ends up3:2 or 2:3?

azurepudding · 2018-09-19 07:28:20

peace wrote:

azurepudding wrote:
Theoretically someone can not submit through the entire contest and even win, as long as their opponents all the way through didn't submit either. It does feel a bit unfair to the rest of us, who have to win one more round than someone else who lucked out. This is also different from match ups with one non-submission, because at least the "free win" the winning team received still had to make a world. Since rewards are also round-based, this means CK and Unau's non-submission gets them a prize while zoey's team get a lesser prize.. so yeah I can understand the upset there too.
Tbh, standard contest makes more sense for EE world building since it's all against everyone, and the best of the best win. Tournament style is best for games that everyone can't compete at once, some examples being tennis or chess even. There can only be two teams at a time, which isn't the case for world building in EE. We've had dozens of teams compete in contests before all against each other, but you can't have 20 teams in one chess match.
Personally I feel the most liked of the teams that lost this round should take their spot, since all that time and effort gets eliminated, but someone who did literally nothing moves on still, and gets the better prize too.
I hope you understand my reasoning, even if you disagree. And nothing against CK and Unau if they see this too, which I hope they also understand my reasoning.
but what if 2 peoel do nto submit and 2 people aganst easch toher make both a really good world and its hard to choose and eventualy ends up3:2 or 2:3?

That is what happened, tho

EDIT: Well, at least the two teams not submitting. Whether we made "good" worlds is subjective

peace · 2018-09-19 12:27:27

▼ wtf is wiht spoilers being broken?

azurepudding wrote:

peace wrote:
azurepudding wrote:
Theoretically someone can not submit through the entire contest and even win, as long as their opponents all the way through didn't submit either. It does feel a bit unfair to the rest of us, who have to win one more round than someone else who lucked out. This is also different from match ups with one non-submission, because at least the "free win" the winning team received still had to make a world. Since rewards are also round-based, this means CK and Unau's non-submission gets them a prize while zoey's team get a lesser prize.. so yeah I can understand the upset there too.
Tbh, standard contest makes more sense for EE world building since it's all against everyone, and the best of the best win. Tournament style is best for games that everyone can't compete at once, some examples being tennis or chess even. There can only be two teams at a time, which isn't the case for world building in EE. We've had dozens of teams compete in contests before all against each other, but you can't have 20 teams in one chess match.
Personally I feel the most liked of the teams that lost this round should take their spot, since all that time and effort gets eliminated, but someone who did literally nothing moves on still, and gets the better prize too.
I hope you understand my reasoning, even if you disagree. And nothing against CK and Unau if they see this too, which I hope they also understand my reasoning.
but what if 2 peoel do nto submit and 2 people aganst easch toher make both a really good world and its hard to choose and eventualy ends up3:2 or 2:3?
That is what happened, tho
EDIT: Well, at least the two teams not submitting. Whether we made "good" worlds is subjective

i mean what if judges have a hadr tim ejudgind 2 worlds because they liek both the worlds and then they get 2 teams who do not submit i mean then its kind alike meh:/ couldve gave those 2 good worlds a chanc eto win instea dof somenone who di dnot submit but wa slonger in wineers bracklet

drunkbnu · 2018-09-19 15:01:19

HG laughs evilly in the background, knowing that Zoey wouldn't rage so much if only he had submitted.

peace · 2018-09-19 19:37:13

HG wrote:

HG laughs evilly in the background, knowing that Zoey wouldn't rage so much if only he had submitted.

he did submit a world

drunkbnu · 2018-09-19 19:49:20

peace wrote:

HG wrote:
HG laughs evilly in the background, knowing that Zoey wouldn't rage so much if only he had submitted.
he did submit a world

Are you sure?

azurepudding · 2018-09-20 00:17:02

peace wrote:

▼ wtf is wiht spoilers being broken?
test
azurepudding wrote:
peace wrote:
azurepudding wrote:
Theoretically someone can not submit through the entire contest and even win, as long as their opponents all the way through didn't submit either. It does feel a bit unfair to the rest of us, who have to win one more round than someone else who lucked out. This is also different from match ups with one non-submission, because at least the "free win" the winning team received still had to make a world. Since rewards are also round-based, this means CK and Unau's non-submission gets them a prize while zoey's team get a lesser prize.. so yeah I can understand the upset there too.
Tbh, standard contest makes more sense for EE world building since it's all against everyone, and the best of the best win. Tournament style is best for games that everyone can't compete at once, some examples being tennis or chess even. There can only be two teams at a time, which isn't the case for world building in EE. We've had dozens of teams compete in contests before all against each other, but you can't have 20 teams in one chess match.
Personally I feel the most liked of the teams that lost this round should take their spot, since all that time and effort gets eliminated, but someone who did literally nothing moves on still, and gets the better prize too.
I hope you understand my reasoning, even if you disagree. And nothing against CK and Unau if they see this too, which I hope they also understand my reasoning.
but what if 2 peoel do nto submit and 2 people aganst easch toher make both a really good world and its hard to choose and eventualy ends up3:2 or 2:3?
That is what happened, tho
EDIT: Well, at least the two teams not submitting. Whether we made "good" worlds is subjective
i mean what if judges have a hadr tim ejudgind 2 worlds because they liek both the worlds and then they get 2 teams who do not submit i mean then its kind alike meh:/ couldve gave those 2 good worlds a chanc eto win instea dof somenone who di dnot submit but wa slonger in wineers bracklet

Again, that is what happened. Two teams were against each other, both which didn't submit, which resulted in one of them still progressing further.

azurepudding · 2018-09-22 22:31:44

CaRmAgE wrote:

Don't know if any of the judges found this, but...
https://i.imgur.com/FG2xHVwm.png
This is Radioactive Sunflower's world, LR7.
(If it's not obvious, the only way out is a blue team door up-right, and my team is yellow.)

..gee thanks, a pm woulda been nice..

I can't seem to recreate this bug now tho.

Yonanoke

Kirby · 2018-09-23 19:14:44

results

Slabdrill · 2018-09-23 19:15:59

what the **** how did we win

Pingohits, Kaleb, Onjit

Pingohits · 2018-09-23 19:17:55

contest is rigged

Kaleb

drunkbnu · 2018-09-23 19:19:12

▼CONTENT WARNING

TaskManager

Norwee · 2018-09-23 19:31:58

Slabdrill wrote:

what the **** how did we win

Surprised me too, but your team has made some great worlds even though i didn't vote for this particular one. So I've got nothing against this result really.

Kaleb · 2018-09-23 19:32:10

GG team on getting 2nd place!

Lictor666 · 2018-09-23 19:39:17

Kaleb wrote:

GG team on getting 2nd place!

gg team

Kaleb

Kira · 2018-09-23 20:00:28

we lost to an unfinished world

gg team and judges

Kaleb, Onjit

azurepudding · 2018-09-24 00:57:12

A world with double the favorite:play and nearly triple the like:play ratios than its opponent loses, but a joke world moves on.

nice.

Pingohits · 2018-09-24 01:31:03

azurepudding wrote:

A world with double the favorite:play and nearly triple the like:play ratios than its opponent loses

It is fallacious to assume world statistics influence the enjoyment of a level, for there are many variables that implicitly control this. Do consider the amount of time a world was open; it is not remarkable for a world to exist only when the owners want it to. In other words, perhaps they kept it invisible most of the time and only let a certain quota of players in; perhaps they left immediately after completion. I base these off of hypothesis, so please correct me.

I do not understand the purpose of your comment; is it to express dissatisfaction? Are you expecting a result? A change? It is perfectly acceptable to dissent, but it is difficult for me to grasp what you want the contest judges to do.

Yonanoke, Luka504, Slabdrill

Onjit · 2018-09-24 02:07:02

kira when he gets beaten by an unfinished world that has major hints inaccessible

oh and if you lose you get dropped into the deepest depths of hades

Slabdrill

Kira · 2018-09-24 02:15:30

Onjit wrote:

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/ … nknown.png
kira when he gets beaten by an unfinished world that has major hints inaccessible
oh and if you lose you get dropped into the deepest depths of hades

dude facts, i wonder if the judges even played the levels at this point

Onjit · 2018-09-24 02:47:09

Kira wrote:

Onjit wrote:
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/ … nknown.png
kira when he gets beaten by an unfinished world that has major hints inaccessible
oh and if you lose you get dropped into the deepest depths of hades
dude facts, i wonder if the judges even played the levels at this point

i mean i'm glad we won

but your gameplay must have been r e a l l y ****

o o
>
\_/

Kira · 2018-09-24 02:49:09

Onjit wrote:

Kira wrote:
Onjit wrote:
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/ … nknown.png
kira when he gets beaten by an unfinished world that has major hints inaccessible
oh and if you lose you get dropped into the deepest depths of hades
dude facts, i wonder if the judges even played the levels at this point
i mean i'm glad we won
but your gameplay must have been r e a l l y ****
o o
>
\_/

better than having no gameplay at all

o o
>
\_/

Official Everybody Edits Forums

#126 2018-09-19 00:33:41

Re: [THE WINNER!] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament Results!

#127 2018-09-19 01:27:12

Re: [THE WINNER!] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament Results!

#128 2018-09-19 06:24:16

Re: [THE WINNER!] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament Results!

#129 2018-09-19 07:22:11

Re: [THE WINNER!] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament Results!

#130 2018-09-19 07:28:20, last edited by azurepudding (2018-09-19 08:12:20)

Re: [THE WINNER!] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament Results!

#131 2018-09-19 12:27:27, last edited by peace (2018-09-19 12:29:28)

Re: [THE WINNER!] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament Results!

#132 2018-09-19 15:01:19

Re: [THE WINNER!] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament Results!

#133 2018-09-19 19:37:13

Re: [THE WINNER!] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament Results!

#134 2018-09-19 19:49:20

Re: [THE WINNER!] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament Results!

#135 2018-09-20 00:17:02

Re: [THE WINNER!] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament Results!

#136 2018-09-22 22:31:44, last edited by azurepudding (2018-09-22 22:56:17)

Re: [THE WINNER!] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament Results!

#137 2018-09-23 19:14:44

Re: [THE WINNER!] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament Results!

#138 2018-09-23 19:15:59

Re: [THE WINNER!] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament Results!

#139 2018-09-23 19:17:55

Re: [THE WINNER!] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament Results!

#140 2018-09-23 19:19:12, last edited by drunkbnu (2018-09-23 19:23:32)

Re: [THE WINNER!] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament Results!

#141 2018-09-23 19:31:58, last edited by Norwee (2018-09-23 19:32:26)

Re: [THE WINNER!] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament Results!

#142 2018-09-23 19:32:10

Re: [THE WINNER!] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament Results!

#143 2018-09-23 19:39:17

Re: [THE WINNER!] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament Results!

#144 2018-09-23 20:00:28

Re: [THE WINNER!] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament Results!

#145 2018-09-24 00:57:12

Re: [THE WINNER!] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament Results!

#146 2018-09-24 01:31:03

Re: [THE WINNER!] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament Results!

#147 2018-09-24 02:07:02

Re: [THE WINNER!] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament Results!

#148 2018-09-24 02:15:30

Re: [THE WINNER!] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament Results!

#149 2018-09-24 02:47:09

Re: [THE WINNER!] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament Results!

#150 2018-09-24 02:49:09

Re: [THE WINNER!] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament Results!

Board footer