Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Decoration block that has one letter per block, since mod text is too laggy for peasant usage.
F
Offline
Oh that, the thing in TOOP's cut content thread. I don't know why they've cut this because I really liked the idea.
Offline
Offline
The thing about English is that they have different widths.
For example, "W" has more space than "l".
Therefore, wouldn't it look a bit wonky if it weren't evenly placed?
Well then we make them all the same width??? I dont see the problem
F
Offline
The thing about English is that they have different widths.
For example, "W" has more space than "l".
Therefore, wouldn't it look a bit wonky if it weren't evenly placed?
ever heard of monospace
Offline
minam wrote:The thing about English is that they have different widths.
For example, "W" has more space than "l".
Therefore, wouldn't it look a bit wonky if it weren't evenly placed?ever heard of monospace
Yes. That's what looks wonky imo.
minam wrote:The thing about English is that they have different widths.
For example, "W" has more space than "l".
Therefore, wouldn't it look a bit wonky if it weren't evenly placed?Well then we make them all the same width??? I dont see the problem
The problem is that they are all the same width, and for me, it looks bad.
Offline
Pingohits wrote:minam wrote:The thing about English is that they have different widths.
For example, "W" has more space than "l".
Therefore, wouldn't it look a bit wonky if it weren't evenly placed?ever heard of monospace
Yes. That's what looks wonky imo.
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/imag … QHUE2Qr6Ys
I think that's just because that uses a non monospace font to demonstrate monospace, which means it wasn't designed to be used like that so looks a bit wonky... If you used an actual monospace font then the wide letters would be squished a bit smaller and the thin letters stretched a bit wider, so it wouldn't look as out of place.
This is an actual monospace font, so it doesn't look that bad
Offline
I think that's just because that uses a non monospace font to demonstrate monospace, which means it wasn't designed to be used like that so looks a bit wonky... If you used an actual monospace font then the wide letters would be squished a bit smaller and the thin letters stretched a bit wider, so it wouldn't look as out of place.
This is an actual monospace font, so it doesn't look that bad
Would it still look as good when the length and width is the same?
Offline
Pages: 1
[ Started around 1732681893.5373 - Generated in 0.049 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.5 MiB (Peak: 1.66 MiB) ]