Official Everybody Edits Forums

Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?

You are not logged in.

#1 2018-08-15 23:12:47

Freckleface
Member
Joined: 2015-04-02
Posts: 1,364

Text Decoration

Decoration block that has one letter per block, since mod text is too laggy for peasant usage.


F

Offline

#2 2018-08-15 23:41:36

Latif
Member
From: The Netherlands
Joined: 2015-03-13
Posts: 1,206

Re: Text Decoration

Oh that, the thing in TOOP's cut content thread. I don't know why they've cut this because I really liked the idea.

Offline

Wooted by: (3)

#3 2018-08-16 01:53:46

minam
Member
Joined: 2016-02-10
Posts: 459

Re: Text Decoration

The thing about English is that they have different widths.
For example, "W" has more space than "l".
Therefore, wouldn't it look a bit wonky if it weren't evenly placed?


Isn't this eggciting?
ZWfJa.gif07acp.gif

Offline

#4 2018-08-16 02:38:34

Freckleface
Member
Joined: 2015-04-02
Posts: 1,364

Re: Text Decoration

minam wrote:

The thing about English is that they have different widths.
For example, "W" has more space than "l".
Therefore, wouldn't it look a bit wonky if it weren't evenly placed?

Well then we make them all the same width??? I dont see the problem


F

Offline

#5 2018-08-16 03:06:57

Pingohits
Banned
From: aids lizard
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 7,591

Re: Text Decoration

minam wrote:

The thing about English is that they have different widths.
For example, "W" has more space than "l".
Therefore, wouldn't it look a bit wonky if it weren't evenly placed?

ever heard of monospace


791mAP8.png

Offline

#6 2018-08-16 03:38:50

minam
Member
Joined: 2016-02-10
Posts: 459

Re: Text Decoration

Pingohits wrote:
minam wrote:

The thing about English is that they have different widths.
For example, "W" has more space than "l".
Therefore, wouldn't it look a bit wonky if it weren't evenly placed?

ever heard of monospace

Yes. That's what looks wonky imo.
images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQgD2US-Lh602-OmQtoXQCnooYlbWkoNR4pMqr2vgQHUE2Qr6Ys

Freckleface wrote:
minam wrote:

The thing about English is that they have different widths.
For example, "W" has more space than "l".
Therefore, wouldn't it look a bit wonky if it weren't evenly placed?

Well then we make them all the same width??? I dont see the problem

The problem is that they are all the same width, and for me, it looks bad.


Isn't this eggciting?
ZWfJa.gif07acp.gif

Offline

#7 2018-08-16 06:07:46

LukeM
Member
From: England
Joined: 2016-06-03
Posts: 3,009
Website

Re: Text Decoration

minam wrote:
Pingohits wrote:
minam wrote:

The thing about English is that they have different widths.
For example, "W" has more space than "l".
Therefore, wouldn't it look a bit wonky if it weren't evenly placed?

ever heard of monospace

Yes. That's what looks wonky imo.
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/imag … QHUE2Qr6Ys

I think that's just because that uses a non monospace font to demonstrate monospace, which means it wasn't designed to be used like that so looks a bit wonky... If you used an actual monospace font then the wide letters would be squished a bit smaller and the thin letters stretched a bit wider, so it wouldn't look as out of place.

This is an actual monospace font, so it doesn't look that bad

Offline

#8 2018-08-17 07:20:22

minam
Member
Joined: 2016-02-10
Posts: 459

Re: Text Decoration

LukeM wrote:

I think that's just because that uses a non monospace font to demonstrate monospace, which means it wasn't designed to be used like that so looks a bit wonky... If you used an actual monospace font then the wide letters would be squished a bit smaller and the thin letters stretched a bit wider, so it wouldn't look as out of place.

This is an actual monospace font, so it doesn't look that bad

Would it still look as good when the length and width is the same?


Isn't this eggciting?
ZWfJa.gif07acp.gif

Offline

minam1534486822719952

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB

[ Started around 1732960013.4704 - Generated in 0.044 seconds, 15 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.51 MiB (Peak: 1.66 MiB) ]