Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
^
edit you need ot be goldmember too and i mean in someone others world
thanks hg for making this much better and ty for my avatar aswell
Offline
do you also want to place diamond blocks if owner has any
Offline
do you also want to place diamond blocks if owner has any
yes
This is obviously a joke, but I do not find this a very bad suggestion. It would be kinda interesting to have something that 'boosts' a world if the owner is GM.
Not in the way as suggested here but in some other kind of way maybe.
Ingame: marten22 My steam: MartenM
Offline
do you also want to place diamond blocks if owner has any
that is not needed as they are nto unlimited gm blocks are unlimited and therefor you coudl help the owner fill an area with gm bg if you are also gm
thanks hg for making this much better and ty for my avatar aswell
Offline
do you also want to place diamond blocks if owner has any
i think it would be reasonable, as it wouldn't still only be in their world and it'd still have the same maximum as the owner
regardless, having it do this for GM makes sense. it's rly annoying when you have GM and you can't place them in someone else's world. Beta doesn't do this
Offline
it's rly annoying when you have GM and you can't place them in someone else's world
this is reasonable but what not reasonable is is that if owner has gm too and you can thelphim fill his world
thanks hg for making this much better and ty for my avatar aswell
Offline
Gosha wrote:do you also want to place diamond blocks if owner has any
i think it would be reasonable, as it wouldn't still only be in their world and it'd still have the same maximum as the owner
regardless, having it do this for GM makes sense. it's rly annoying when you have GM and you can't place them in someone else's world. Beta doesn't do this
the entire point of gm is to make money though. it’s a limited service because of that - if other people were always placing the blocks for others you’d be losing money
Kirby wrote:Gosha wrote:do you also want to place diamond blocks if owner has any
i think it would be reasonable, as it wouldn't still only be in their world and it'd still have the same maximum as the owner
regardless, having it do this for GM makes sense. it's rly annoying when you have GM and you can't place them in someone else's world. Beta doesn't do this
the entire point of gm is to make money though. it’s a limited service because of that - if other people were always placing the blocks for others you’d be losing money
Ok yes we understand that. But peace is trying to say that gold members should be allowed to place gold blocks if the owner of the world they are in is a gold member too. So if someone else places a gold block in your world you could've placed the gold block yourself too (if you're both gm).
This should be implemented. I like this idea. Except that diamond thing then.
Offline
Jet wrote:Kirby wrote:Gosha wrote:do you also want to place diamond blocks if owner has any
i think it would be reasonable, as it wouldn't still only be in their world and it'd still have the same maximum as the owner
regardless, having it do this for GM makes sense. it's rly annoying when you have GM and you can't place them in someone else's world. Beta doesn't do this
the entire point of gm is to make money though. it’s a limited service because of that - if other people were always placing the blocks for others you’d be losing money
Ok yes we understand that. But peace is trying to say that gold members should be allowed to place gold blocks if the owner of the world they are in is a gold member too. So if someone else places a gold block in your world you could've placed the gold block yourself too (if you're both gm).
This should be implemented. I like this idea. Except that diamond thing then.
oh. that sounds fine
i couldn’t understand peace because his typing is abysmal it’s like he tries to misspell every word
Latif wrote:Jet wrote:Kirby wrote:Gosha wrote:do you also want to place diamond blocks if owner has any
i think it would be reasonable, as it wouldn't still only be in their world and it'd still have the same maximum as the owner
regardless, having it do this for GM makes sense. it's rly annoying when you have GM and you can't place them in someone else's world. Beta doesn't do this
the entire point of gm is to make money though. it’s a limited service because of that - if other people were always placing the blocks for others you’d be losing money
Ok yes we understand that. But peace is trying to say that gold members should be allowed to place gold blocks if the owner of the world they are in is a gold member too. So if someone else places a gold block in your world you could've placed the gold block yourself too (if you're both gm).
This should be implemented. I like this idea. Except that diamond thing then.
oh. that sounds fine
i couldn’t understand peace because his typing is abysmal it’s like he tries to misspell every word
i thought you were the main of translator, are you not?
suddenly random sig change
Offline
Jet wrote:Latif wrote:Jet wrote:Kirby wrote:i think it would be reasonable, as it wouldn't still only be in their world and it'd still have the same maximum as the owner
regardless, having it do this for GM makes sense. it's rly annoying when you have GM and you can't place them in someone else's world. Beta doesn't do this
the entire point of gm is to make money though. it’s a limited service because of that - if other people were always placing the blocks for others you’d be losing money
Ok yes we understand that. But peace is trying to say that gold members should be allowed to place gold blocks if the owner of the world they are in is a gold member too. So if someone else places a gold block in your world you could've placed the gold block yourself too (if you're both gm).
This should be implemented. I like this idea. Except that diamond thing then.
oh. that sounds fine
i couldn’t understand peace because his typing is abysmal it’s like he tries to misspell every wordi thought you were the main of translator, are you not?
..no?
Offline
one argument could be made that if the owner has a bot, they could let the user place as themselves... so there's not a whole lot to be gained by saying it shouldn't happen.
But on the other hand, nothing says we have to make such actions easier.
Offline
[ Started around 1714178790.0909 - Generated in 0.084 seconds, 13 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.65 MiB (Peak: 1.85 MiB) ]