Energy to Gem Conversion

John · 2017-07-14 02:01:39

Many players who are older have nothing to spend their energy on, I have around 80 worlds consisting of only 300x300 and 200x400. Even if the energy to gem conversion was insane I am sure people would prefer to spend their energy getting gems instead of getting more worlds.

New players can also get things they really want from the classic tab too which is also good.

Thoughts?

WMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWM, kubapolish, Mouseh, peace, PTU, Zumza, Jedpogi

XxAtillaxX · 2017-07-14 02:54:31

I think it'd significantly undercut the value of gems, which is quite literally the only thing that pays for the game enough for it continue to run.

LukeM, Kaleb, drunkbnu, Weirdoverse, PTU, SirJosh3917, showpath, mrjawapa, cercul1

John · 2017-07-14 03:36:20

XxAtillaxX wrote:

I think it'd significantly undercut the value of gems, which is quite literally the only thing that pays for the game enough for it continue to run.

I thought about that too until I thought about campaigns and daily logins. Even if it was 1 gem for 1K energy I'd rather do that than have 100 of each world

Zumza

WMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWM · 2017-07-14 03:48:15

How about increase the amount of gems you get for the same price of real money. Like instead of 50 gems for 5 $ you get 75 for 5$. Then you make gems cost 1000 energy each. (the price will encourage people to buy if they cannot wait that long or will have to be forced to play for along time)

dragonranger · 2017-07-14 04:51:25

but then how could we seize the means of production

mutantdevle

HeyNK · 2017-07-14 05:26:46

^ Terrible post. Downwooted.

And on topic, I have max energy saved up in every single world, smiley, and block without buying them. I don't want any more world portals, i have over 30.

dragonranger

LukeM · 2017-07-14 11:13:06

Emalton wrote:

XxAtillaxX wrote:
I think it'd significantly undercut the value of gems, which is quite literally the only thing that pays for the game enough for it continue to run.
I thought about that too until I thought about campaigns and daily logins. Even if it was 1 gem for 1K energy I'd rather do that than have 100 of each world

It would have to cost more than that...
For the game to keep making money, you shouldn't be able to have sustained gold membership for free, and I think you could at that price. It should then probably be doubled in price after that too, so gold membership doesn't end up costing $5 a year or whatever

Edit: Ok, done some maths, you get around 17500 energy per month, which means that at 1000 energy per gem, you could get 17.5 gems a month, which could almost completely remove EE's source of income (just for comparison, you can get around 8.7 gems per month from daily rewards).
This would mean that almost any number of energy would either lead to people not buying gems, or gems almost never being bought, so this probably shouldnt be added.

Myst · 2017-07-14 11:51:27

Emalton wrote:

Even if the energy to gem conversion was insane I am sure people would prefer to spend their energy getting gems instead of getting more worlds.

why not this? it's better and the newbies don't need to convert energys to gems

LukeM, realmaster42

peace · 2017-07-14 14:53:29

well i have around 200+ worlds and i get more i dont know wehere to spend my energy on what destroyer said if w eget 17,5K ebergty in a month why not 1 gem for like 3K energy then you could get almost 6 gems or maby something that is intresting to spend energy on

Slabdrill · 2017-07-14 16:43:36

Mysterion wrote:

Emalton wrote:
Even if the energy to gem conversion was insane I am sure people would prefer to spend their energy getting gems instead of getting more worlds.
why not this? it's better and the newbies don't need to convert energys to gems
https://i.imgur.com/Fs1Kf6w.png

you forgot a 0 in each of those

LukeM, Muftwin

Master1 · 2017-07-14 17:54:33

I'm down, but 1k per gem isn't ridiculous enough. 100k per gem pls

kubapolish, Slabdrill, Kaleb, Jorc, drunkbnu, Muftwin, Kkay, Gosha, Weirdoverse, PTU, realmaster42, mrjawapa, Jedpogi

mutantdevle · 2017-07-14 18:55:24

Master1 wrote:

I'm down, but 1k per gem isn't ridiculous enough. 100k per gem pls

Sure, but only if we get 1 energy every 5 seconds.

Master1 · 2017-07-14 18:58:34

Devlin wrote:

Master1 wrote:
I'm down, but 1k per gem isn't ridiculous enough. 100k per gem pls
Sure, but only if we get 1 energy every 5 seconds.

nahhhh bro, if anything the time should be increased

bgic · 2018-02-20 22:11:47

soooooooo....

ur a mod now.

fix energy to gem conversion

Xfrogman43 · 2018-02-20 22:24:44

bgic wrote:

soooooooo....
ur a mod now.
fix energy to gem conversion

he isnt a mod and mods dont have that kind of power anyway

Jorc · 2018-02-20 22:33:20

Xfrogman43 wrote:

bgic wrote:
soooooooo....
ur a mod now.
fix energy to gem conversion
he isnt a mod and mods dont have that kind of power anyway

atleast hes better than mod

guess what?
admin? nono

.

The owner!

bgic · 2018-02-20 22:44:46

Xfrogman43 wrote:

bgic wrote:
soooooooo....
ur a mod now.
fix energy to gem conversion
he isnt a mod and mods dont have that kind of power anyway

How am I supposed to keep up with all those name changes they went through?

We have mods and guardians, that's all.

Jorc · 2018-02-20 23:46:00

bgic wrote:

Xfrogman43 wrote:
bgic wrote:
soooooooo....
ur a mod now.
fix energy to gem conversion
he isnt a mod and mods dont have that kind of power anyway
How am I supposed to keep up with all those name changes they went through?
We have mods and guardians, that's all.

guardians don't exist, are you still living in 2015-2016

bgic · 2018-02-21 00:03:11

EEJoranasc wrote:

bgic wrote:
Xfrogman43 wrote:
bgic wrote:
soooooooo....
ur a mod now.
fix energy to gem conversion
he isnt a mod and mods dont have that kind of power anyway
How am I supposed to keep up with all those name changes they went through?
We have mods and guardians, that's all.
guardians don't exist, are you still living in 2015-2016

how is this relevant to the idea Emalton proposed?

drunkbnu

shadowda · 2018-02-21 00:42:04

they should be expensive. like, crew item expensive or huge world expensive. 4000 to 6000 energy.

TaskManager · 2018-02-21 01:01:46

honestly due to the nearly dead state of the game the gems have already inflated pretty much
players that have bought all classics and beta have nothing to spend them on (gold membership is a joke, unless you want support the game but that is real $$$s not free gems; as for name changes, well, doesnt really work as a gem sink, neither the diamond or big spender, again, viable with $$$s only)
so yeah for these players gems are worth literally nothing
introducing a cheap way to get free gems, such as this one, will drop their value even more (implying its not zero already)

Xfrogman43 · 2018-02-21 01:14:05

TaskManager wrote:

(gold membership is a joke, unless you want support the game but that is real $$$s not free gems

? you can use gems from daily/contest to buy gm

drunkbnu

TaskManager · 2018-02-21 03:25:03

Xfrogman43 wrote:

TaskManager wrote:
(gold membership is a joke, unless you want support the game but that is real $$$s not free gems
? you can use gems from daily/contest to buy gm

why tho
its a waste tbh

Gosha · 2018-02-21 04:14:44

1000 energy > 1 gem
1000 gems > 1 dollar
We can build an infrastructure here!
Earn real money by playing games
Kids will be triggered

Xfrogman43 · 2018-02-21 06:37:44

TaskManager wrote:

Xfrogman43 wrote:
TaskManager wrote:
(gold membership is a joke, unless you want support the game but that is real $$$s not free gems
? you can use gems from daily/contest to buy gm
why tho
its a waste tbh

you were saying it costs money to buy gems for gm, im saying it doesnt.

Official Everybody Edits Forums

#1 2017-07-14 02:01:39

Energy to Gem Conversion

#2 2017-07-14 02:54:31

Re: Energy to Gem Conversion

#3 2017-07-14 03:36:20

Re: Energy to Gem Conversion

#4 2017-07-14 03:48:15, last edited by WMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWM (2017-07-14 03:48:33)

Re: Energy to Gem Conversion

#5 2017-07-14 04:51:25

Re: Energy to Gem Conversion

#6 2017-07-14 05:26:46

Re: Energy to Gem Conversion

#7 2017-07-14 11:13:06, last edited by LukeM (2017-07-14 11:49:24)

Re: Energy to Gem Conversion

#8 2017-07-14 11:51:27, last edited by Myst (2017-07-14 11:52:48)

Re: Energy to Gem Conversion

#9 2017-07-14 14:53:29

Re: Energy to Gem Conversion

#10 2017-07-14 16:43:36

Re: Energy to Gem Conversion

#11 2017-07-14 17:54:33

Re: Energy to Gem Conversion

#12 2017-07-14 18:55:24

Re: Energy to Gem Conversion

#13 2017-07-14 18:58:34

Re: Energy to Gem Conversion

#14 2018-02-20 22:11:47

Re: Energy to Gem Conversion

#15 2018-02-20 22:24:44

Re: Energy to Gem Conversion

#16 2018-02-20 22:33:20

Re: Energy to Gem Conversion

#17 2018-02-20 22:44:46

Re: Energy to Gem Conversion

#18 2018-02-20 23:46:00

Re: Energy to Gem Conversion

#19 2018-02-21 00:03:11

Re: Energy to Gem Conversion

#20 2018-02-21 00:42:04

Re: Energy to Gem Conversion

#21 2018-02-21 01:01:46, last edited by TaskManager (2018-02-21 01:02:25)

Re: Energy to Gem Conversion

#22 2018-02-21 01:14:05

Re: Energy to Gem Conversion

#23 2018-02-21 03:25:03

Re: Energy to Gem Conversion

#24 2018-02-21 04:14:44

Re: Energy to Gem Conversion

#25 2018-02-21 06:37:44

Re: Energy to Gem Conversion

Board footer