Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Hooray for the powerful.
EDIT: It's apparently not Atilla who is doing the attacking, but it's actually (one of) Processor('s websites?"). for the love of god look at this big bold text
EDIT2: Well let's see where this thread goes.
EDIT4: Leave Atilla alone he didn't do anything wrong
Click the image to see my graphics suggestions, or here to play EE: Project M!
Offline
I'm not attacking the lobby and if he were to look at the IPs like a competent person would, he'd notice that it's Processor and his site or some ****.
*u stinky*
Offline
I'm not attacking the lobby and if he were to look at the IPs like a competent person would, he'd notice that it's Processor and his site or some ****.
His words, not mine. Thanks for clarification, though.
EDIT: Would woot your post, but I've had too many woots today.
Click the image to see my graphics suggestions, or here to play EE: Project M!
Offline
Lol, yeah xD
Anyway it will be fixed soon (i hope)
Youtube: RubenEditIT
Offline
I'm not attacking the lobby and if he were to look at the IPs like a competent person would, he'd notice that it's Processor and his site or some ****.
You said you were going to, so like I competent person who just woke up 5 min ago I thought you are doing it.
Offline
XxAtillaxX wrote:I'm not attacking the lobby and if he were to look at the IPs like a competent person would, he'd notice that it's Processor and his site or some ****.
You said you were going to, so like I competent person who just woke up 5 min ago I thought you are doing it.
I'd say get your facts straight before slandering someone. "oh they said they should do it therefore they are doing it!"
really making your case at being competent with spurious accusations while neglecting contradictory evidence
*u stinky*
Offline
I'd say get your facts straight before slandering someone.
i would use your own advice sweetie
Emalton wrote:XxAtillaxX wrote:I'm not attacking the lobby and if he were to look at the IPs like a competent person would, he'd notice that it's Processor and his site or some ****.
You said you were going to, so like I competent person who just woke up 5 min ago I thought you are doing it.
I'd say get your facts straight before slandering someone. "oh they said they should do it therefore they are doing it!"
It was a DM, and the identity of the attacker doesn't matter as much to the message I was trying to get across, that Everybody Edits was being attacked by someone. I already said in the OP that it indeed wasn't you who attacked, and Emalton rectified his mistake. Let's drop it
EDIT: He also just woke up
Click the image to see my graphics suggestions, or here to play EE: Project M!
Offline
XxAtillaxX wrote:I'd say get your facts straight before slandering someone.
i would use your own advice sweetie
I love how much thought and effort you put into your post, with all your information cited here containing all the contradictions.
*u stinky*
Offline
zyhrllos wrote:XxAtillaxX wrote:I'd say get your facts straight before slandering someone.
i would use your own advice sweetie
I love how much thought and effort you put into your post, with all your information cited here containing all the contradictions.
if you want your oh-so-precious citing then i would go to literally anyone on ee who knows what you've done
I apologize if I was incorrect, Atilla. When I got like 60 messages saying that you are attacking that's what I thought.
Offline
Emalton wrote:XxAtillaxX wrote:I'm not attacking the lobby and if he were to look at the IPs like a competent person would, he'd notice that it's Processor and his site or some ****.
You said you were going to, so like I competent person who just woke up 5 min ago I thought you are doing it.
I'd say get your facts straight before slandering someone. "oh they said they should do it therefore they are doing it!"
really making your case at being competent with spurious accusations while neglecting contradictory evidence
I asked proc, it's not him.
I'm not implying that it's you doing it (like how the hell could I possibly know who it is?) I just find it ironic how you criticise Emalton for jumping to the conclusion that you were behind the attacks when you jumped to the conclusion it was yonom doing the attacks.
Not that it matters. Finding out who is doing the attacks means nothing if you can't prevent them.
Offline
people who do this kind of things are called little kids with no life
Youtube: RubenEditIT
Offline
people who do this kind of things are called little kids with no life
haha man! you're so right :lol::lol:
Offline
I'm not implying that it's you doing it (like how the hell could I possibly know who it is?) I just find it ironic how you criticise Emalton for jumping to the conclusion that you were behind the attacks when you jumped to the conclusion it was yonom doing the attacks.
I didn't. I don't know either. I said, "and his site or some ****." - emphasis on the 'or'
*u stinky*
Offline
Server is working again btw dudes. If browser or kong does not load, use perfect loader.
F
Offline
If its processor, then why?
It’s not proc.
Offline
IT WAS ME, DIO!!!
Really tho just be patient, it'll get fixed in due time
In the meantime play Civ V. It +expansions are on sale on Steam for $17
Currently playing through: Mega Man 1-6
Listen to my in-game music! (it's pretty much all I'm good at)
Offline
[ Started around 1732238283.2383 - Generated in 0.129 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.86 MiB (Peak: 2.15 MiB) ]