Official Everybody Edits Forums
Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#51 2017-12-02 20:58:26
- Pehpe
- Member
- Joined: 2017-12-01
- Posts: 45
Re: minecraft server
Yeah, and i think the majority of people want old combat, so lets just go with that.
many things happen over a dramatic course of action
Offline
#52 2017-12-03 04:45:58
- Gosha
- Member
- From: Russia
- Joined: 2015-03-15
- Posts: 6,211
Re: minecraft server
1.7 Beta was the best verion of the game. Let's do that pls
Offline
#53 2017-12-04 03:20:55
- John
- Member
- Joined: 2019-01-11
- Posts: 2,011
Re: minecraft server
ok ill set it up soon™
(hopefully tomorrow; depends on CNIT homework)
):
1.7 Beta was the best verion of the game. Let's do that pls
running old software isn't ideal, but if enough people want it then sure i guess.
i think 1.12.X with old combat is a good compromise for newer stuff but old combat
Offline
#54 2017-12-04 04:40:15, last edited by AlphaJon (2017-12-04 04:40:37)
- AlphaJon
- Member
- From: Who knows
- Joined: 2015-07-21
- Posts: 1,297
Re: minecraft server
i think 1.12.X with old combat is a good compromise for newer stuff but old combat
There is a bukkit/spigot plugin I know that allows people from different minecraft versions to play together. It allows all versions from 1.4.7 to 1.12.2 together.
IIRC, blocks from newer versions are shown as bricks on older clients. I don't know how PVP works across versions though.
The plugin's name is ProtocolSupport, and could require ProtocolLib to work
Bukkit site link
Spigot site link
Offline
#55 2017-12-05 00:10:12
- Anch
- Member
- Joined: 2015-02-16
- Posts: 5,447
Re: minecraft server
when will the server be up
Offline
#56 2017-12-05 00:41:43
- Firecrackericebreak
- Member
- Joined: 2015-02-15
- Posts: 616
Offline
- Wooted by: (2)
#57 2017-12-05 01:45:31
- John
- Member
- Joined: 2019-01-11
- Posts: 2,011
Re: minecraft server
Emalton wrote:i think 1.12.X with old combat is a good compromise for newer stuff but old combat
There is a bukkit/spigot plugin I know that allows people from different minecraft versions to play together. It allows all versions from 1.4.7 to 1.12.2 together.
IIRC, blocks from newer versions are shown as bricks on older clients. I don't know how PVP works across versions though.
The plugin's name is ProtocolSupport, and could require ProtocolLib to work
Bukkit site link
Spigot site link
I'm already aware of that and have it installed. 
Offline
#58 2017-12-05 01:57:16
- Pehpe
- Member
- Joined: 2017-12-01
- Posts: 45
Re: minecraft server
AlphaJon wrote:Emalton wrote:i think 1.12.X with old combat is a good compromise for newer stuff but old combat
There is a bukkit/spigot plugin I know that allows people from different minecraft versions to play together. It allows all versions from 1.4.7 to 1.12.2 together.
IIRC, blocks from newer versions are shown as bricks on older clients. I don't know how PVP works across versions though.
The plugin's name is ProtocolSupport, and could require ProtocolLib to work
Bukkit site link
Spigot site linkI'm already aware of that and have it installed.
we need ip ty
many things happen over a dramatic course of action
Offline
#59 2017-12-05 02:26:22
- Firecrackericebreak
- Member
- Joined: 2015-02-15
- Posts: 616
Re: minecraft server
Emalton wrote:AlphaJon wrote:Emalton wrote:i think 1.12.X with old combat is a good compromise for newer stuff but old combat
There is a bukkit/spigot plugin I know that allows people from different minecraft versions to play together. It allows all versions from 1.4.7 to 1.12.2 together.
IIRC, blocks from newer versions are shown as bricks on older clients. I don't know how PVP works across versions though.
The plugin's name is ProtocolSupport, and could require ProtocolLib to work
Bukkit site link
Spigot site linkI'm already aware of that and have it installed.
we need ip ty
192.168.1.1
Offline
- Wooted by: (2)
#60 2017-12-05 02:35:22
- Pehpe
- Member
- Joined: 2017-12-01
- Posts: 45
Re: minecraft server
192.168.1.1
i cant tell if that's real or not
many things happen over a dramatic course of action
Offline
#61 2017-12-05 03:06:19
- SirJosh3917
- Formerly ninjasupeatsninja
- From: USA
- Joined: 2015-04-05
- Posts: 2,095
Re: minecraft server
Firecrackericebreak wrote:192.168.1.1
i cant tell if that's real or not
127.0.0.1
Offline
#62 2017-12-05 03:36:35, last edited by John (2017-12-05 03:37:49)
- John
- Member
- Joined: 2019-01-11
- Posts: 2,011
Re: minecraft server
im running issues with allowing multiple clients on the server so ill figure that out later but heres the IP:
now.turbosync.com
you cant claim land so LOL good luck (unless if u want that)
Offline
#63 2017-12-05 03:52:11
- Pehpe
- Member
- Joined: 2017-12-01
- Posts: 45
Re: minecraft server
im running issues with allowing multiple clients on the server so ill figure that out later but heres the IP:
now.turbosync.com
you cant claim land so LOL good luck (unless if u want that)
is it down?
many things happen over a dramatic course of action
Offline
#64 2017-12-05 03:52:44, last edited by John (2017-12-05 03:53:04)
- John
- Member
- Joined: 2019-01-11
- Posts: 2,011
Re: minecraft server
no it shouldnt be :0
EDIT:
works for me ???
Offline
#65 2017-12-05 05:32:55
- John
- Member
- Joined: 2019-01-11
- Posts: 2,011
Re: minecraft server
Ok it's been up and running and I'm considering on adding dynmap - what do you think?
In addition, do we want the ability to claim land?
Offline
- Wooted by: (4)
#66 2017-12-05 05:33:17
- John
- Member
- Joined: 2019-01-11
- Posts: 2,011
Re: minecraft server
Woot this post if you want to be able to claim land so people can't grief it.
Offline
#67 2017-12-05 05:33:39
- John
- Member
- Joined: 2019-01-11
- Posts: 2,011
Re: minecraft server
Woot this post if you do not want to have land claims.
Offline
- Wooted by: (9)
#68 2017-12-05 06:02:25
- Different55
- Forum Admin
- Joined: 2015-02-07
- Posts: 16,575
Re: minecraft server
land claims kill pranks
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
#69 2017-12-05 06:12:32
- Pehpe
- Member
- Joined: 2017-12-01
- Posts: 45
Re: minecraft server
land claims kill pranks
land claims save lives
and stops people from being a dongle
many things happen over a dramatic course of action
Offline
#70 2017-12-05 06:16:54
- Different55
- Forum Admin
- Joined: 2015-02-07
- Posts: 16,575
Re: minecraft server
banning dongles saves people from dongles
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
#71 2017-12-05 06:22:23
- Pehpe
- Member
- Joined: 2017-12-01
- Posts: 45
Re: minecraft server
banning dongles saves people from dongles
emalton has no proof of dongles being dongles
many things happen over a dramatic course of action
Offline
#72 2017-12-05 06:24:54
- Different55
- Forum Admin
- Joined: 2015-02-07
- Posts: 16,575
Re: minecraft server
no dongles no problems
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
#73 2017-12-05 06:26:05
- Pehpe
- Member
- Joined: 2017-12-01
- Posts: 45
Re: minecraft server
no dongles no problems
are you really DONGLING over the fact that there are no dongles in EE?
many things happen over a dramatic course of action
Offline
#75 2017-12-05 09:51:54
- Gosha
- Member
- From: Russia
- Joined: 2015-03-15
- Posts: 6,211
Re: minecraft server
should we add whitelist if we won't be able to claim regions?
Offline
- Wooted by:
[ Started around 1732483925.2672 - Generated in 0.074 seconds, 14 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.73 MiB (Peak: 1.96 MiB) ]