toxic pack...

Kaleb · 2017-04-18 17:21:51

Like the one from the EE2 Client

shadowda, WMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWM, Raphe9000, Weirdoverse, Raon

shadowda · 2017-04-18 23:48:20

man, I miss ee2. it had some awesome blocks.

drunkbnu · 2017-04-18 23:54:46

Here you go...

Acid_Block_%231.png
Acid_Block_%232.png
Acid_Block_%233.png

These were made by Xen90:

N1KF · 2017-04-19 00:03:36

shadowda wrote:

man, I miss ee2. it had some awesome blocks.

Like the graphics directly stolen from Super Mario World?

dcomet · 2017-04-19 00:04:33

for some reason the link to the imgur redirects to this
we have some made by TOOP (at this time, brushfire)
And some made by the amateur known as me.

take your pick

WMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWM · 2017-04-19 01:03:39

Yea EE2 had great physics and allowed us to get almost every block. But the acid was really working. It was like water but more force.

Xfrogman43 · 2017-04-19 01:48:42

WMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWM wrote:

Yea EE2 had great physics and allowed us to get almost every block. But the acid was really working. It was like water but more force.

but we are in EE2 ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Raphe9000 · 2017-04-19 02:44:38

Xfrogman43 wrote:

WMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWM wrote:
Yea EE2 had great physics and allowed us to get almost every block. But the acid was really working. It was like water but more force.
but we are in EE2 ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

No, no we're not.

shadowda · 2017-04-19 23:03:02

some of ee2s graphics were brushfires aka toop.

like the wood, bedrock , domestic, volcanic, and toxic packs.

brushfire

Abelysk · 2017-04-19 23:35:12

Raphe9000 wrote:

Xfrogman43 wrote:
WMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWM wrote:
Yea EE2 had great physics and allowed us to get almost every block. But the acid was really working. It was like water but more force.
but we are in EE2 ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
No, no we're not.

https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewt … p?id=29776

shadowda · 2017-04-20 00:51:49

Kefka wrote:

Raphe9000 wrote:
Xfrogman43 wrote:
WMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWM wrote:
Yea EE2 had great physics and allowed us to get almost every block. But the acid was really working. It was like water but more force.
but we are in EE2 ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
No, no we're not.
https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewt … p?id=29776

sorry to rain on your parade

Nou wrote:

Everybody Edits 2.0

2.0

not ee2 not everybody edits 2

its 2.0

the website is still "http://everybodyedits.com/"

not http://everybodyedits2.com/

its just the name of the update. a new ear of ee so to speak.

Raphe9000

Xfrogman43 · 2017-04-20 05:05:53

shadowda wrote:

Kefka wrote:
Raphe9000 wrote:
Xfrogman43 wrote:
WMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWM wrote:
Yea EE2 had great physics and allowed us to get almost every block. But the acid was really working. It was like water but more force.
but we are in EE2 ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
No, no we're not.
https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewt … p?id=29776
sorry to rain on your parade
Nou wrote:
Everybody Edits 2.0
2.0
not ee2 not everybody edits 2
its 2.0
the website is still "http://everybodyedits.com/"
not http://everybodyedits2.com/
its just the name of the update. a new ear of ee so to speak.

2.0 rounds down to 2

N1KF, mutantdevle, 1448

drunkbnu · 2017-04-20 11:41:08

Xfrogman43 wrote:

shadowda wrote:
Kefka wrote:
Raphe9000 wrote:
Xfrogman43 wrote:
but we are in EE2 ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
No, no we're not.
https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewt … p?id=29776
sorry to rain on your parade
Nou wrote:
Everybody Edits 2.0
2.0
not ee2 not everybody edits 2
its 2.0
the website is still "http://everybodyedits.com/"
not http://everybodyedits2.com/
its just the name of the update. a new ear of ee so to speak.
2.0 rounds down to 2

Yet it would still be a floating point number, while we are working with integers.

Raphe9000, 1448

Abelysk · 2017-04-20 16:25:19

I'm pretty sure "2.0" means 2. Why else would Nou put 2.0

kubapolish · 2017-04-20 16:34:27

we don't need toxic pack, the community is toxic enough /s

Master1, mutantdevle, drstereos

Gosha · 2017-04-20 16:40:42

2.0 is not 2 lol

2 is all versions from 2.0 to 2.9 (or higher like 2.10)

So EE 2.1, 2.5, 2.0 are all in range of 2, but not 2

N1KF · 2017-04-20 18:07:03

Gosha wrote:

2 is all versions from 2.0 to 2.9 (or higher like 2.10)

2.10 would be equal to 2.1. Or 2.100 or 2.1000 etc.

LukeM · 2017-04-20 18:13:28

N1KF wrote:

Gosha wrote:
2 is all versions from 2.0 to 2.9 (or higher like 2.10)
2.10 would be equal to 2.1. Or 2.100 or 2.1000 etc.

not with versions numbers

For version numbers, this is usually the way it works, although the bugfix is often not included:
[Version].[Revision].[Bugfix]
So this means that things things like 5.10.3 are allowed, and would come after a vesion like 5.6.8

N1KF · 2017-04-20 18:35:31

destroyer123 wrote:

For version numbers, this is usually the way it works, although the bugfix is often not included:
[Version].[Revision].[Bugfix]
So this means that things things like 5.10.3 are allowed, and would come after a vesion like 5.6.8

That may be the way people use it, but it doesn't make sense from a mathematical point of view.

Either way that's all irrelevant since Everybody Edits doesn't use decimals in its version numbers anymore. If you right-click the game, you'll get the version number. It appeared as 200 during the big update, and has been increasing by 1 each update ever since.

LukeM · 2017-04-20 19:04:15

N1KF wrote:

destroyer123 wrote:
For version numbers, this is usually the way it works, although the bugfix is often not included:
[Version].[Revision].[Bugfix]
So this means that things things like 5.10.3 are allowed, and would come after a vesion like 5.6.8
That may be the way people use it, but it doesn't make sense from a mathematical point of view.
Either way that's all irrelevant since Everybody Edits doesn't use decimals in its version numbers anymore. If you right-click the game, you'll get the version number. It appeared as 200 during the big update, and has been increasing by 1 each update ever since.

What about dates? 20.04.2017
or internet addresses? forums.everybodyedits.com

Dots dont necessarily mean a decimal point, they can mean other things

Gosha

Abelysk · 2017-04-20 21:41:39

We're taking the 2.0 meaning WAY too literally. It just means 2.

shadowda · 2017-04-20 23:07:06

Kefka wrote:

We're taking the 2.0 meaning WAY too literally. It just means 2.

but its not "2". its "2.0" while they may equal the same thing numerical they are two different sets of characters.

Raphe9000

LukeM · 2017-04-20 23:40:38

shadowda wrote:

Kefka wrote:
We're taking the 2.0 meaning WAY too literally. It just means 2.
but its not "2". its "2.0" while they may equal the same thing numerical they are two different sets of characters.

Technically, ee 2.0 is the first edition of ee 2, so this is EE version 2, although this has nothing to do with the original post, so im not sure why we are arguing about it here...

Raphe9000

Raphe9000 · 2017-04-21 00:20:32

2.0 is the version. Please. This is obvious, and you guys going against it are just trying to find a petty way to make yourselves look right. The game isn't even called Everybody Edits 2. Everybody Edits 2 was a separate game, as OP would know. Anyway, yes for toxic pack. I'd personally like it to act like water but kill you like lava. It would also be very easy to distinguish and useful.

LukeM · 2017-04-21 08:29:55

Raphe9000 wrote:

2.0 is the version. Please. This is obvious, and you guys going against it are just trying to find a petty way to make yourselves look right. The game isn't even called Everybody Edits 2. Everybody Edits 2 was a separate game, as OP would know. Anyway, yes for toxic pack. I'd personally like it to act like water but kill you like lava. It would also be very easy to distinguish and useful.

Just thought I would bring in examples from other games, because this is definatly EE 2
In minecraft, people say they are playing Minecraft 1.11, where they are playing 1.11.x, so generally 'minecraft 1.11' is used to describe all versions of minecraft
The same is true for Factorio, where people use '0.15' to describe all versions 0.15.x
So shouldn't it be the same for EE? EE 2 should be able to be used for all EE 2.x versions

Also the toxic pack is a good idea
Maybe there could be a new effect called 'poisoned' which you can't transfer, but will also kill you after some time like zombie and curse. A lot of people have wanted something like this, including me, so I think it would be quite a good thing to add

Official Everybody Edits Forums

#1 2017-04-18 17:21:51

toxic pack...

#2 2017-04-18 23:48:20

Re: toxic pack...

#3 2017-04-18 23:54:46, last edited by drunkbnu (2017-04-18 23:56:13)

Re: toxic pack...

#4 2017-04-19 00:03:36

Re: toxic pack...

#5 2017-04-19 00:04:33, last edited by dcomet (2017-04-19 00:06:20)

Re: toxic pack...

#6 2017-04-19 01:03:39

Re: toxic pack...

#7 2017-04-19 01:48:42

Re: toxic pack...

#8 2017-04-19 02:44:38

Re: toxic pack...

#9 2017-04-19 23:03:02

Re: toxic pack...

#10 2017-04-19 23:35:12

Re: toxic pack...

#11 2017-04-20 00:51:49

Re: toxic pack...

#12 2017-04-20 05:05:53

Re: toxic pack...

#13 2017-04-20 11:41:08

Re: toxic pack...

#14 2017-04-20 16:25:19

Re: toxic pack...

#15 2017-04-20 16:34:27

Re: toxic pack...

#16 2017-04-20 16:40:42

Re: toxic pack...

#17 2017-04-20 18:07:03

Re: toxic pack...

#18 2017-04-20 18:13:28, last edited by LukeM (2017-04-20 18:14:29)

Re: toxic pack...

#19 2017-04-20 18:35:31

Re: toxic pack...

#20 2017-04-20 19:04:15

Re: toxic pack...

#21 2017-04-20 21:41:39

Re: toxic pack...

#22 2017-04-20 23:07:06

Re: toxic pack...

#23 2017-04-20 23:40:38

Re: toxic pack...

#24 2017-04-21 00:20:32

Re: toxic pack...

#25 2017-04-21 08:29:55, last edited by LukeM (2017-04-21 08:32:33)

Re: toxic pack...

Board footer