Official Everybody Edits Forums

Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?

You are not logged in.

#1 2017-03-23 16:07:41

SirJosh3917
Formerly ninjasupeatsninja
From: USA
Joined: 2015-04-05
Posts: 2,095

16777216 shades of RGB

4096 x 4096 image watch out

RGB increments go from R to G to B, X to Y.

This means:

R = 0
G = 0
B = 0
B = 1
B = 2
B = 3
...
B = 254
B = 255
G = 1
B = 0
B = 1
...
e.tc

X to Y means

Y = 0
X = 0
X = 1
X = 2
...
X = 4094
X = 4095
Y = 1
X = 0
X = 1
...
e.t.c

warning huge

If you want to you can request the image a specific way

e.g.
B to R to G Y to X and draw the pixels from bottom to top e.t.c

Offline

Wooted by:

#2 2017-03-24 00:15:50

XxAtillaxX
Member
Joined: 2015-11-28
Posts: 4,202

Re: 16777216 shades of RGB

This is similar although way more interesting.

When you typically see a GIF posted it's fairly low quality, and that's usually due to colour restraints (256 colours).
However, in the specification the colour restraint is actually per-frame, so you can combine multiple individual frames to get a full colour image.

baXjffcIvg.gif


signature.png
*u stinky*

Offline

Wooted by: (4)

#3 2017-03-24 00:21:04, last edited by LukeM (2017-03-24 00:22:54)

LukeM
Member
From: England
Joined: 2016-06-03
Posts: 3,009
Website

Re: 16777216 shades of RGB

XxAtillaxX wrote:

This is similar although way more interesting.

When you typically see a GIF posted it's fairly low quality, and that's usually due to colour restraints (256 colours).
However, in the specification the colour restraint is actually per-frame, so you can combine multiple individual frames to get a full colour image.

https://atil.la/x/img/baXjffcIvg.gif

Wow... I never knew that... although having to wait for the image is a bit annoying, and it probably wouldn't lower the file size at all, so for practical purposes it would probably be best to use another format, but this is interesting nonetheless //forums.everybodyedits.com/img/smilies/big_smile

Offline

#4 2017-03-24 00:32:08

Different55
Forum Admin
Joined: 2015-02-07
Posts: 16,575

Re: 16777216 shades of RGB

destroyer123 wrote:
XxAtillaxX wrote:

This is similar although way more interesting.

When you typically see a GIF posted it's fairly low quality, and that's usually due to colour restraints (256 colours).
However, in the specification the colour restraint is actually per-frame, so you can combine multiple individual frames to get a full colour image.

https://atil.la/x/img/baXjffcIvg.gif

Wow... I never knew that... although having to wait for the image is a bit annoying, and it probably wouldn't lower the file size at all, so for practical purposes it would probably be best to use another format, but this is interesting nonetheless //forums.everybodyedits.com/img/smilies/big_smile

You can set the delay on some of those frames to 0ms which might work. Still it'd get massive fast, at that point you're 100% better off using webm or apng or something like that.


"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto

Offline

#5 2017-03-24 01:17:33

Different55
Forum Admin
Joined: 2015-02-07
Posts: 16,575

Re: 16777216 shades of RGB

HG wrote:
Different55 wrote:
destroyer123 wrote:
XxAtillaxX wrote:

This is similar although way more interesting.

When you typically see a GIF posted it's fairly low quality, and that's usually due to colour restraints (256 colours).
However, in the specification the colour restraint is actually per-frame, so you can combine multiple individual frames to get a full colour image.

https://atil.la/x/img/baXjffcIvg.gif

Wow... I never knew that... although having to wait for the image is a bit annoying, and it probably wouldn't lower the file size at all, so for practical purposes it would probably be best to use another format, but this is interesting nonetheless //forums.everybodyedits.com/img/smilies/big_smile

You can set the delay on some of those frames to 0ms which might work. Still it'd get massive fast, at that point you're 100% better off using webm or apng or something like that.

APNG is just... cancer.

Good argument I am convinced I have seen the error of my ways I renounce my heretical views.


"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto

Offline

Different551490314653651983

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB

[ Started around 1734533825.0881 - Generated in 0.056 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.49 MiB (Peak: 1.62 MiB) ]