The Staff of EE

Processor · 2016-10-13 19:00:31

I just came back home from a looong and tiring trip and my my, this thread is on top of the topics list.

N1KF wrote:

I don't think discussing Processor's administrator is flaming. Flaming is insulting somebody on a personal level, and we haven't gone down to that level. At least, yet.

My girlfriend is a manipulator? I am trash? Completely incompetent? Tyrannical?

You must be fooling yourself if you still think that the purpose of this thread isn't to personally attack me.

ninjasupeatsninja wrote:

He was doing fine, untill he got zoey

What the ****. What is this about?

Also these two questions were left unanswered:

Zumza wrote:

What is about the 2000 gems given to TheGame by Proc?

This didn't happen.

skullz17 wrote:

What's this "immunity"? Does it mean you're excused for breaking rules? I don't get your point Processor, are you saying that Thegame was allowed to launder the gems without any repercussions (besides the gems being returned) because he helped add an anti-cheat system?

He helped us by showing us some exploits in the system, he was not banned for exploiting anticheat. This had nothing to do with him laundring the gems.

capasha · 2016-10-13 19:20:40

I request a lock on this thread.

1) This should be about the whole team. But it is only against Processor.
2) There is more talking about the IRC channel which I don't see is much about the game. What happens there should stay there.

And a lot of things.

hummerz5 · 2016-10-13 20:50:50

hi folks

Processor wrote:

You must be fooling yourself if you still think that the purpose of this thread isn't to personally attack me.

this could very well be Ninja's sole reason for this thread. However, perhaps everyone else actually feels sincerely about this issue. Using similar personal attacks is
A) rude
B) potentially rule-breaking (context-dependent)
C) unproductive -- you won't get any of the people capable of enacting your request to act based purely off of your insults.

Capasha,
1) The thread topic is entirely irrelevant. We don't have a hard-and-fast rule to lock topics that are just plainly poorly named.
2) The issue in itself is amorphous--we're slinging issues from IRC, game-related events, and forums. The relevance to the subforum doesn't necessitate a lock, but more often a move. Where, though, I'm not sure.

Ideally: if the discussion has true merit, it will persist. However, if all that is done here is simple continuation, it should lapse into silence

Schlog · 2016-10-13 21:41:35

hummerz5 wrote:

this could very well be Ninja's sole reason for this thread

I didn't create the damn thread just to attack Processor because he permabanned me and demoted Master1. I created it because I found a potentially malicious IRC chat log and I wanted to find and gather things that Proc had done in the past, which had ill intent. I'm not **** stupid, there's a legitimate reason I created the topic, and I wanted people's opinions on it.

Processor wrote:

ninja are you **** high
Why the hell is it that you only call me out on moderation when my precious online girlfriend is involved? In any other **** scenario, you'd intentionally try to ignore what I do. That would explain why you were so bent on getting me demodded, because all you do is act when you want to and not when you need to. Wake up and stop being such a hypocrite, and stop disrespecting me and saying I am a **** public figure when you, yourself, are hundreds, if not thousands of times worse. Arguing for hte wrong reason just so you can get what you want is more pathetic than anything you are accusing me of.

thanks for rewording my post, very constructive

Processor wrote:

ninjasupeatsninja wrote:
He was doing fine, untill he got zoey
What the ****. What is this about?

can't help but feel you started being a bigger and bigger **** gradually since you got a relationship
i'm not the only one with this feeling, i'm sure of it

proc btw

just because i'm me and i break rules and ****

doesn't mean 100% of everything i do is an attempt to attack someone else

god damn

XxAtillaxX · 2016-10-13 21:47:50

Ah so you're saying you didn't create the thread to attack processor because he permabanned you and demoted master1 and probably is the offspring of Satan and Hitler combined and spends his days nefariously plotting out the assured destruction of all human kind, especially yourself? Oh, my bad.

Zoey2070, Onjit, Freckleface, AlphaJon, Xfrogman43, Thegame

Freckleface · 2016-10-14 03:07:35

Processor wrote:

Ninja wrote:
proc are you **** high
Why the hell is it that you only "care" about moderation when your precious online girlfriend is involved? In any other **** scenario, you'd intentionally try not to give a ****. That would explain why you were so bent on getting Master1 demodded and me permanently banned, because all you do is act when you want to and not when you need to. Wake up and do your **** job properly, and stop disrespecting the forum moderators and saying they're **** public figures when you yourself are hundreds, if not, thousands of times worse. Arguing for the wrong reason just so you can do what you want is more pathetic than my incessant harassment.
ninja are you **** high
Why the hell is it that you only call me out on moderation when my precious online girlfriend is involved? In any other **** scenario, you'd intentionally try to ignore what I do. That would explain why you were so bent on getting me demodded, because all you do is act when you want to and not when you need to. Wake up and stop being such a hypocrite, and stop disrespecting me and saying I am a **** public figure when you, yourself, are hundreds, if not thousands of times worse. Arguing for hte wrong reason just so you can get what you want is more pathetic than anything you are accusing me of.

When you lose an argument so you just mimic what they say ^

N1KF · 2016-10-14 03:11:00

Freckleface wrote:

When you lose an argument so you just mimic what they say ^

Him also stooping down his level by copying Ninja's aggressive tone also doesn't really help.

Schlog · 2016-10-14 03:37:24

N1KF wrote:

Freckleface wrote:
When you lose an argument so you just mimic what they say ^
Him also stooping down his level by copying Ninja's aggressive tone also doesn't really help.

huge sign of guilt imo

Processor · 2016-10-14 05:19:35

Ninja wrote:

N1KF wrote:
Freckleface wrote:
When you lose an argument so you just mimic what they say ^
Him also stooping down his level by copying Ninja's aggressive tone also doesn't really help.
huge sign of guilt imo

Pure logic right here.

Mylo · 2016-10-14 07:52:45

I don't even know what happend here, and the last few days.
But remember the good things Processor did for this game <3

Ninja: "There is no doubt in my mind that Processor and Mylo had a little scheme going, to make me look bad. Mylo claimed that whatever was used, was his ideas, and his only. Because no one ever thought about changing the background image, right? Koya had also made a design, that used some of the features Mylo claimed as his. Nothing was ever said to Koya. Instead, hate was incited, and I was made out to be a bad person."

So what are you doing right now?
Let's hope you talked to Processor one by one, before you posted this.
Else you wouldn't be better than what you just incited.

Who cares if he doesn't mod. Maybe that's cause he isn't a mod, but an administrator / developer?
Maybe someone who saves the game if it's broken? Do you know? What right do you have to question these things?
In the end it's Nou's choice.

Spread love, not hate. I learned my lesson, you should too.

Onjit

mrjawapa · 2016-10-14 12:07:38

Lines are being blurred. This topic was intended to call out Proc on his ****, not argue for ninja's ban to be appealed.

Mylo wrote:

Let's hope you talked to Processor one by one, before you posted this.
Else you wouldn't be better than what you just incited.

Many people have spoke with Proc about the way he handles things. Nothing ever comes of it.

Mylo wrote:

What right do you have to question these things?

We're members of the community who have to deal with Proc's tyrannical or lazy behavior. We are affected by everything Proc does/doesn't do.

Mylo wrote:

In the end it's Nou's choice.

You're absolutely right. This is why we talked to him, and told him what we thought was going on.

Tomahawk · 2016-10-14 23:05:20

How did Nou respond when you talked to him?

SirJosh3917 · 2016-10-15 02:14:40

Processor wrote:

ninjasupeatsninja wrote:
He was doing fine, untill he got zoey
What the ****. What is this about?

No proc I'm dearly sorry - I didn't mean it like that.
I meant nobody was harassing you or making a big deal about you untill stuff happened ninja came along and started pointing things out after ^that.

Processor

Schlog · 2016-10-15 04:13:07

Processor wrote:

Ninja wrote:
N1KF wrote:
Freckleface wrote:
When you lose an argument so you just mimic what they say ^
Him also stooping down his level by copying Ninja's aggressive tone also doesn't really help.
huge sign of guilt imo
Pure logic right here.

yea bro

being a **** about something you possible can show that you actually did it

stop tryin to be a ****

Mylo wrote:

Ninja: "There is no doubt in my mind that Processor and Mylo had a little scheme going, to make me look bad. Mylo claimed that whatever was used, was his ideas, and his only. Because no one ever thought about changing the background image, right? Koya had also made a design, that used some of the features Mylo claimed as his. Nothing was ever said to Koya. Instead, hate was incited, and I was made out to be a bad person."

what

Tomahawk wrote:

How did Nou respond when you talked to him?

he wanted definitive evidence of these wrongdoings, but g0d, having it all, is was either being a **** or just changed his mind because he thought it would make him look good

so i guess he doesn't support any of this, nor does he care because he doesn't have a reason to

Processor · 2016-10-15 11:15:19

Ninja wrote:

he wanted definitive evidence of these wrongdoings, but g0d, having it all, is was either being a **** or just changed his mind because he thought it would make him look good

semper necessitas probandi incumbit ei qui agit
Which translates into: The burden of proof lies on the accuser.

By now it is clear that you have failed to prove anything you accused my EE administration of. So I wonder, why do you keep dragging this on? Anyone else in your place would have given up and be convinced that I am saying the truth, and thegame has lied to you. Hell, I was even able to convince JaWapa with my post.

You claim that you never wanted to attack me, but you keep doing it.

I so have to wonder, are you sure this isn't about me banning you? You have always been so hostile towards me since then, on IRC and elsewhere. I mean, you failed to prove a single thing and yet here you are, still attacking me. What is your motive? Because clearly it isn't the truth.

Tomahawk, mrjawapa, Xfrogman43

Schlog · 2016-10-16 01:04:06

update:

kiraninja was banned for 24 hours because of an inappropriate link, kira, with 2 hours on the ban left, went on lictor's account
processor ip-banned kiraninja for 15 days for "ban evasion"
nou removed it because he, too, thought it was retarded

proc you should stop with your filthy attempts to moderate

mrjawapa · 2016-10-16 01:32:11

[20:12:57] <Proc> The point of bans after a ban evasion isn't to be fair
[20:13:09] <Proc> because clearly you arent playing by the rules either

[20:13:38] <Proc> atillabyte they should learn
[20:13:53] <atillabyte> the only thing they'll learn is that you're a nazi
[20:13:58] <atillabyte> if you ban them for 15 days
[20:14:00] <atillabyte> for a 24 hour ban
[20:14:15] <Proc> atillabyte idc how long the initial ban was
[20:14:35] <atillabyte> then you don't care about the context of previous warnings
[20:14:59] <atillabyte> Proc, which is ironic and hypocritical since you permabanned ninja or whatever
[20:15:05] <atillabyte> for repeatedly breaking rules

[20:14:39] <Proc> ban evasion is the worst of all crimes
[20:15:02] <Smitty> worse than posting ****?
[20:15:17] <Proc> worse than posting **** smitty
[20:15:30] <atillabyte> ban evasion isn't worse than posting ****
[20:15:34] <atillabyte> what kind of logic is that
[20:15:54] <Proc> ban evasion after posting **** is pretty servere
[20:15:55] <atillabyte> that's like saying
[20:16:05] <atillabyte> double posting on forums is worse than posting gore
[20:16:17] <atillabyte> its extremely trivial

[20:18:34] <Proc> if someone ban evades Ill be more open to a perma ban
[20:18:45] <Proc> than any other rule breaking

[20:24:41] <Proc> but it is our way of saying "**** you, we don't want you to play our game anymore"

[20:15:12] <Zoey2070> w/e it just proves nou's a **** ****
[20:15:20] <Zoey2070> "oh we'll do better. also let me unban my friend"

[20:27:26] <atillabyte> Proc, bans aren't public records
[20:27:42] <Proc> thus you have no idea how i moderate
[20:28:17] <Proc> because clearly you are just setting up hypothesis but i see no issue in reality

Schlog

Zoey2070 · 2016-10-16 01:46:26

Ninja wrote:

nou removed it because he, too, thought it was retarded

[8:38:07 PM] Nou: [20:15:12] <Zoey2070> w/e it just proves nou's a **** ****
[20:15:20] <Zoey2070> "oh we'll do better. also let me unban my friend"
[8:38:10 PM] Nou: what did i do now
[8:38:34 PM] Zoey: according to ninja, unban kiraninja
[8:38:41 PM] Zoey: also mfw "****" wasn't caught by censors
[8:38:44 PM] Nou: i didnt unban ****
[8:38:55 PM] Zoey: okay

almost as if ninja's just trying to cause MORE unnecessary drama

Processor

Schlog · 2016-10-16 01:50:22

Zoey2070 wrote:

Ninja wrote:
nou removed it because he, too, thought it was retarded
[8:38:07 PM] Nou: [20:15:12] <Zoey2070> w/e it just proves nou's a **** ****
[20:15:20] <Zoey2070> "oh we'll do better. also let me unban my friend"
[8:38:10 PM] Nou: what did i do now
[8:38:34 PM] Zoey: according to ninja, unban kiraninja
[8:38:41 PM] Zoey: also mfw "****" wasn't caught by censors
[8:38:44 PM] Nou: i didnt unban ****
[8:38:55 PM] Zoey: okay

http://i.imgur.com/hx3LP1E.gif

kira said he was unbanned so i don't know the truth?????????

edit: ok so kira wasn't unbanned, it was just shortened to 1 day

my mistake on that part

Kkay · 2016-10-16 02:30:25

Why does this topic still exist... christ

Schlog · 2016-10-16 02:32:51

because proc is still doing stupid ****

Prodigy · 2016-10-16 03:00:54

Damn, This looks so... confusing but yet so interesting.

Guest. · 2016-10-16 03:33:12

Ninja wrote:

update:
kiraninja was banned for 24 hours because of an inappropriate link, kira, with 2 hours on the ban left, went on lictor's account
processor ip-banned kiraninja for 15 days for "ban evasion"
nou removed it because he, too, thought it was retarded
proc you should stop with your filthy attempts to moderate

yes he banned me for one day for saying "processor is gay because he likes zoey and she has cooties"

totally banworthy

Schlog · 2016-10-16 03:49:49

that actually is banworthy you called an admin gay wtf did you expect

mrjawapa · 2016-10-16 03:51:16

hey so I was just in lrussell's world, just minding my own business, trolling coins, having fun, and WHAM!

lrussell plz

Official Everybody Edits Forums

#76 2016-10-13 19:00:31

Re: The Staff of EE

#77 2016-10-13 19:20:40

Re: The Staff of EE

#78 2016-10-13 20:50:50, last edited by hummerz5 (2016-10-13 21:14:36)

Re: The Staff of EE

#79 2016-10-13 21:41:35, last edited by Schlog (2016-10-13 21:48:40)

Re: The Staff of EE

#80 2016-10-13 21:47:50, last edited by XxAtillaxX (2016-10-13 21:48:10)

Re: The Staff of EE

#81 2016-10-14 03:07:35

Re: The Staff of EE

#82 2016-10-14 03:11:00

Re: The Staff of EE

#83 2016-10-14 03:37:24

Re: The Staff of EE

#84 2016-10-14 05:19:35

Re: The Staff of EE

#85 2016-10-14 07:52:45

Re: The Staff of EE

#86 2016-10-14 12:07:38, last edited by mrjawapa (2016-10-14 12:08:09)

Re: The Staff of EE

#87 2016-10-14 23:05:20

Re: The Staff of EE

#88 2016-10-15 02:14:40, last edited by SirJosh3917 (2016-10-15 02:20:23)

Re: The Staff of EE

#89 2016-10-15 04:13:07

Re: The Staff of EE

#90 2016-10-15 11:15:19

Re: The Staff of EE

#91 2016-10-16 01:04:06

Re: The Staff of EE

#92 2016-10-16 01:32:11

Re: The Staff of EE

#93 2016-10-16 01:46:26, last edited by Zoey2070 (2016-10-16 01:49:55)

Re: The Staff of EE

#94 2016-10-16 01:50:22, last edited by Schlog (2016-10-16 01:56:10)

Re: The Staff of EE

#95 2016-10-16 02:30:25

Re: The Staff of EE

#96 2016-10-16 02:32:51

Re: The Staff of EE

#97 2016-10-16 03:00:54, last edited by Prodigy (2016-10-16 03:03:28)

Re: The Staff of EE

#98 2016-10-16 03:33:12

Re: The Staff of EE

#99 2016-10-16 03:49:49, last edited by Schlog (2016-10-16 03:50:22)

Re: The Staff of EE

#100 2016-10-16 03:51:16, last edited by mrjawapa (2016-10-16 03:51:48)

Re: The Staff of EE

Board footer