Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
it takes too much effort to censor everything
also i don't see why it shouldn't, i'm pretty sure most of this forum can handle swears
suddenly random sig change
Offline
I, for one, want this to stay here for now. The discussion should first be had by the users whether or not it would be useful before we take up discussing it, whether in the Mod Discussion or elsewhere.
Offline
Really, the only reason I added that to the title was because of this post:
alright guess next time i want a mod discussion topic i'll post a forum discussion topic called "for mod discussion: _____"
nothing to say for now, go on
otherwise I would've just added it to the main body.
suddenly random sig change
Offline
Perhaps only censor the stuff where people are swearing at each other, because nobody really wants to read that if it's not relevant to the post.
IMO other swearing (e.g. for effect) is fine. If it's in a spoiler with a language warning, clicking on it voids your right to complain.
One bot to rule them all, one bot to find them. One bot to bring them all... and with this cliché blind them.
Offline
Sure, as long as it is an accepted standard across the forum; this idea was brought up last time the argument was brought up - explicit tags so that those with censors will just show a snip and other people can open it and see what is inside.
Thank you eleizibeth ^
I stack my signatures rather than delete them so I don't lose them
Offline
Why is it needed on the whole forum? I can understand this rule on Mod Discussion, as removed swear words will leave things that are said unknown to the moderators. In other forums, I think people will use this as an excuse to use swearing to get their point across, even when it's not needed most of the time.
Offline
i'm pretty sure most of this forum can handle swears
Your talking about active, registered users, I'd bet plenty of random 8-12 year old check this for news
Pretend I didn't exist until now
All hail me, the king of insensitive jerks
Woot if you hate me
Offline
No. I'm against foul mouth speaking. I'm sure that anyone can express themselves in a civilised way.
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
No. I'm against foul mouth speaking. I'm sure that anyone can express themselves in a civilised way.
but omg then i have to spend entire MINUTES censoring images!!! (i screw up easily lol)
suddenly random sig change
Offline
Zumza wrote:No. I'm against foul mouth speaking. I'm sure that anyone can express themselves in a civilised way.
but omg then i have to spend entire MINUTES censoring images!!! (i screw up easily lol)
In that case then I guess you can just put an external link. So it won't be displayed on the forums directly. But I just don't think you should promote such things in the first place.
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
There should be an option to allow swears, like in the game. Or even a clickable word that shows the swear (example: [swear] > [you r dumb!])
Away.
Offline
There should be an option to allow swears, like in the game. Or even a clickable word that shows the swear (example: [swear] > [you r dumb!])
There is. I'm talking about images.
suddenly random sig change
Offline
MBlood wrote:There should be an option to allow swears, like in the game. Or even a clickable word that shows the swear (example: [swear] > [you r dumb!])
There is. I'm talking about images.
Didn't read the subject kek.
Also yes, every kid that is +8 years old can handle swears.
Away.
Offline
12345678908642 wrote:Zumza wrote:No. I'm against foul mouth speaking. I'm sure that anyone can express themselves in a civilised way.
but omg then i have to spend entire MINUTES censoring images!!! (i screw up easily lol)
In that case then I guess you can just put an external link. So it won't be displayed on the forums directly. But I just don't think you should promote such things in the first place.
How are external links okay, but spoilers aren't? They both have the same principle. There's a warning for swearing, and if you don't mind swearing you click on the link/spoiler and get to see the explicit content.
thx for sig bobithan
Offline
So is there anyone actually against something like this? Specifically, is anyone against a tw (for trigger warning) tag, essentially a modified spoiler and/or the ability to turn off language censors in your profile same as EE?
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
I'm apposing trigger warnings.
Spoiler tags are enough.
What if people don't put:
because they forgot to? they will get warned and then complain and the mods will have to deal with it and then we are back here
thanks zoey aaaaaaaaaaaand thanks latif for the avatar
Offline
MrJaWapa wrote:I'm apposing trigger warnings.
Spoiler tags are enough.
What if people don't put:
▼swearbecause they forgot to? they will get warned and then complain and the mods will have to deal with it and then we are back here
Well, then it's their fault. I guess it's just more work for the moderators, though.
Offline
MrJaWapa wrote:I'm apposing trigger warnings.
Spoiler tags are enough.
What if people don't put:
▼swearbecause they forgot to? they will get warned and then complain and the mods will have to deal with it and then we are back here
What do you mean "and then we are back here"? People aren't gonna suddenly want to allow swears without spoilers just because remembering to use a spoiler is difficult (if that's what you meant).
btw I think the swear spoilers should be limited to the following: images, videos and links. I don't think we should allow people to swear in their posts and just put a spoiler around it. It should be used primarily to share external media. Of course you might be able to abuse it by putting your text into an image, but mods are capable of using their best judgement where exceptions must be made.
thx for sig bobithan
Offline
People aren't gonna suddenly want to allow swears without spoilers just because remembering to use a spoiler is difficult
How do you know that? People will complain about anything these days. Spoilers should be used for swears or make another thing for swearing.
thanks zoey aaaaaaaaaaaand thanks latif for the avatar
Offline
btw I think the swear spoilers should be limited to the following: images, videos and links. I don't think we should allow people to swear in their posts and just put a spoiler around it. It should be used primarily to share external media. Of course you might be able to abuse it by putting your text into an image, but mods are capable of using their best judgement where exceptions must be made.
except this site has a built-in filter for swears that are in plain text.
...huh, is there no option to disable it?
suddenly random sig change
Offline
How about we stop making this place a giant **** hug box?
We don't need total anarchy... but holy ****...
Gotta tip-toe around them sensitive feelings that people have. Don't wanna upset them.
What happened to the forums just being chill?
Discord: jawp#5123
Offline
What happened to the forums just being chill?
When were these forums chill?
thanks zoey aaaaaaaaaaaand thanks latif for the avatar
Offline
skullz17 wrote:People aren't gonna suddenly want to allow swears without spoilers just because remembering to use a spoiler is difficult
How do you know that? People will complain about anything these days. Spoilers should be used for swears or make another thing for swearing.
I know people can be stupid, but have a little faith. In that circumstance, they would have no right to complain because they broke the rules. It won't be a lot of people forgetting to use spoilers, and it's not like the punishment for something like that is severe. I don't think there could be a large change of opinion from something like that.
I don't actually get your point though. Even if everyone decides they want swears without spoilers, what's wrong with that? If everyone is okay with it, then I don't see the issue. The only thing that would bother me is if a few people complaining caused a big change for everyone, but diff wouldn't let that happen.
thx for sig bobithan
Offline
[ Started around 1738432006.8917 - Generated in 0.107 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.86 MiB (Peak: 2.16 MiB) ]