Official Everybody Edits Forums

Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?

You are not logged in.

#1 2016-08-08 13:38:25

Calyfornia
Member
From: Scotland
Joined: 2016-07-09
Posts: 41

Hostigner is bad nd it shuold feel bad !!!

2MxVUGH.png

That was on Hostinger, with very light PHP work. I'd not touch Hostinger unless you plan on getting a paid plan or not using server-side scripting.


EENeat | Teaches itself how to play EE (Made in partnership with Jesse)
Rider   | Cross-platform, alternative C# IDE by JetBrains.

Offline

Wooted by:

#2 2016-08-08 13:57:56

Different55
Forum Admin
Joined: 2015-02-07
Posts: 16,574

Re: Hostigner is bad nd it shuold feel bad !!!

Calyfornia wrote:

http://i.imgur.com/2MxVUGH.png

That was on Hostinger, with very light PHP work. I'd not touch Hostinger unless you plan on getting a paid plan or not using server-side scripting.

That doesn't sound light.


"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto

Offline

#3 2016-08-08 14:07:56, last edited by Calyfornia (2016-08-08 14:16:00)

Calyfornia
Member
From: Scotland
Joined: 2016-07-09
Posts: 41

Re: Hostigner is bad nd it shuold feel bad !!!

Different55 wrote:

That doesn't sound light.

Probably not, but never had any issues with the same code elsewhere //forums.everybodyedits.com/img/smilies/smile

Looking through it, preg_replace and levenshtein could be very inefficient but wouldn't have thought so with small strings.


EENeat | Teaches itself how to play EE (Made in partnership with Jesse)
Rider   | Cross-platform, alternative C# IDE by JetBrains.

Offline

#4 2016-08-08 15:44:13

goeyfun
Member
From: Mighty Japan
Joined: 2015-02-18
Posts: 667

Re: Hostigner is bad nd it shuold feel bad !!!

Calyfornia wrote:

http://i.imgur.com/2MxVUGH.png

That was on Hostinger, with very light PHP work. I'd not touch Hostinger unless you plan on getting a paid plan or not using server-side scripting.

Paying Hostinger isn't also a good idea. I used to be on a premium plan and had hosted a website with a lot of visitors. Hostinger then routes my site to a captcha (which doesn't even work). I approached their customer service (requesting to remove the captcha) and their programmers didn't manage to resolve it.

Hostinger
> only Perfect for Free Users


Ug3JzgO.png

Offline

#5 2016-08-08 15:46:40, last edited by Koya (2016-08-08 15:53:27)

Koya
Fabulous Member
From: The island with those Brits
Joined: 2015-02-18
Posts: 6,310

Re: Hostigner is bad nd it shuold feel bad !!!

Different55 wrote:
Calyfornia wrote:

http://i.imgur.com/2MxVUGH.png

That was on Hostinger, with very light PHP work. I'd not touch Hostinger unless you plan on getting a paid plan or not using server-side scripting.

That doesn't sound light.

I use hostinger for everything but Node sites and never had any issues - even intensive PHP is fine, I think Calyfornia had some infinite loops going on.

goeyfun wrote:
Calyfornia wrote:

http://i.imgur.com/2MxVUGH.png

That was on Hostinger, with very light PHP work. I'd not touch Hostinger unless you plan on getting a paid plan or not using server-side scripting.

Paying Hostinger isn't also a good idea. I used to be on a premium plan and had hosted a website with a lot of visitors. Hostinger then routes my site to a captcha (which doesn't even work). I approached their customer service (requesting to remove the captcha) and their programmers didn't manage to resolve it.

Hostinger
> only Perfect for Free Users

Cloudflare does that, haven't had Hostinger do it for me - color.koya.io has a minimum of 200 people on the page at once and Hostinger haven't done anything to badly affect that.

Their support team is quick to reply to me and help out whenever possible, they have standard web host issues but out of the 31 help requests I have sent 28 were sorted within 24 hours, 2 within 72 hours and there was one where there was actually an issue with the docs - out of those 31 requests about 18 were down to my fault, about 10 being inquiries on how Hostinger does things and 1 where it was their fault but it wasn't a huge deal (the sql subdomain I was given was not correct, I was given a general subdomain (sql) rather than a specific (sql##) - the specific should have been shown to me).


Po9cnQh.png

PLNQVL8.png
Thank you eleizibeth ^

1SYOldu.png

I stack my signatures rather than delete them so I don't lose them
giphy.gif

WfSi4mm.png

Offline

#6 2016-08-08 15:49:05

goeyfun
Member
From: Mighty Japan
Joined: 2015-02-18
Posts: 667

Re: Hostigner is bad nd it shuold feel bad !!!

Koya wrote:
Different55 wrote:
Calyfornia wrote:

http://i.imgur.com/2MxVUGH.png

That was on Hostinger, with very light PHP work. I'd not touch Hostinger unless you plan on getting a paid plan or not using server-side scripting.

That doesn't sound light.

I use hostinger for everything but Node sites and never had any issues - even intensive PHP is fine, I think Calyfornia had some infinite loops going on.

Possibly Hostinger in different areas has diversified quality of service.


Ug3JzgO.png

Offline

#7 2016-08-08 16:16:12

Koya
Fabulous Member
From: The island with those Brits
Joined: 2015-02-18
Posts: 6,310

Re: Hostigner is bad nd it shuold feel bad !!!

goeyfun wrote:
Koya wrote:
Different55 wrote:
Calyfornia wrote:

http://i.imgur.com/2MxVUGH.png

That was on Hostinger, with very light PHP work. I'd not touch Hostinger unless you plan on getting a paid plan or not using server-side scripting.

That doesn't sound light.

I use hostinger for everything but Node sites and never had any issues - even intensive PHP is fine, I think Calyfornia had some infinite loops going on.

Possibly Hostinger in different areas has diversified quality of service.

I wouldn't say no to that, like how Amazon.com is not completely the same as Amazon.co.uk - Hostinger.com may not be the same as Hostinger.co.uk; I should then note that I use Hostinger.co.uk with zero issues.


Po9cnQh.png

PLNQVL8.png
Thank you eleizibeth ^

1SYOldu.png

I stack my signatures rather than delete them so I don't lose them
giphy.gif

WfSi4mm.png

Offline

#8 2016-08-08 18:26:21

Calyfornia
Member
From: Scotland
Joined: 2016-07-09
Posts: 41

Re: Hostigner is bad nd it shuold feel bad !!!

On the topic of response times, look at these blazingly inaccurate timings.
Djia1eb.png

But I suppose, for free, I can't really complain. One of the better free services though //forums.everybodyedits.com/img/smilies/smile


EENeat | Teaches itself how to play EE (Made in partnership with Jesse)
Rider   | Cross-platform, alternative C# IDE by JetBrains.

Offline

#9 2016-08-08 18:52:02

Koya
Fabulous Member
From: The island with those Brits
Joined: 2015-02-18
Posts: 6,310

Re: Hostigner is bad nd it shuold feel bad !!!

Calyfornia wrote:

On the topic of response times, look at these blazingly inaccurate timings.
http://i.imgur.com/Djia1eb.png

But I suppose, for free, I can't really complain. One of the better free services though //forums.everybodyedits.com/img/smilies/smile

Kek, lightning fast requests and responses.
Premium undoubtedly gets a higher priority with reports - and why wouldn't they be.


Po9cnQh.png

PLNQVL8.png
Thank you eleizibeth ^

1SYOldu.png

I stack my signatures rather than delete them so I don't lose them
giphy.gif

WfSi4mm.png

Offline

Wooted by:

#10 2016-08-08 23:05:27, last edited by Different55 (2016-08-08 23:07:16)

Different55
Forum Admin
Joined: 2015-02-07
Posts: 16,574

Re: Hostigner is bad nd it shuold feel bad !!!

Splitting topic please hold

EDIT: Split. This topic is now hostinger discusison.


"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto

Offline

#11 2016-08-08 23:28:19

maroncool
Member
Joined: 2015-07-05
Posts: 77
Website

Re: Hostigner is bad nd it shuold feel bad !!!

They are actually quite nice


b5t6k8M.png

Offline

#12 2016-08-08 23:37:50

XxAtillaxX
Member
Joined: 2015-11-28
Posts: 4,202

Re: Hostigner is bad nd it shuold feel bad !!!

Hostinger isn't good, as with the majority of free shared hosting.
They are the same owners as 000webhost, which is notoriously unprofessional and insecure.


signature.png
*u stinky*

Offline

#13 2016-08-09 01:44:39

drunkbnu
Formerly HG
Joined: 2017-08-16
Posts: 2,306

Re: Hostigner is bad nd it shuold feel bad !!!

*reads the topic title*

Hostigner

Offline

#14 2016-08-11 02:00:11, last edited by W24 (2016-08-11 02:01:51)

W24
Member
From: USA
Joined: 2015-05-30
Posts: 591
Website

Re: Hostigner is bad nd it shuold feel bad !!!

I've heard that their customer service isn't too good. I've used them in the past, I liked the user interface a lot.


freeho.st is much better FYI.


yqSDpmp.png

Offline

#15 2016-08-13 00:42:47, last edited by F4ncy (2016-08-13 00:47:15)

F4ncy
Member
From: Texas™
Joined: 2016-08-10
Posts: 79
Website

Re: Hostigner is bad nd it shuold feel bad !!!

W24 wrote:

I've heard that their customer service isn't too good. I've used them in the past, I liked the user interface a lot.


freeho.st is much better FYI.

freeho.st closed recently.

There's afreecloud.com, which is free VestaCP.
Other CPs might be in the free plan soon. Oh, and their premium hosting is $3 a year... (with 3 cp's to choose from, cPanel, Interworx, and Vesta)
Which is way cheaper than most.
Also, it's managed by the co-founder of Secure Dragon LLC, Joe Dougherty. Who was a freewebhostingtalk admin, until 2010 when he started Secure Dragon.
Should be reliable for small sites or etc.

edit: you also may want to check out FreeVPS.us's 'free related services' section


1e71e2.png5b2628.png44570b.png

Offline

#16 2016-08-13 13:17:48

capasha
Member
Joined: 2015-02-21
Posts: 4,066

Re: Hostigner is bad nd it shuold feel bad !!!

I use HostMantis. No problems at all. It was jesse that said it was a good hosting company.

Offline

Wooted by:
capasha1471090668618663

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB

[ Started around 1713559636.7404 - Generated in 0.056 seconds, 13 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.69 MiB (Peak: 1.92 MiB) ]