Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
So once this is added will we have to buy it from the shop again or will it just be updated into our inventory? I know the candy pack got gumdrops added and didn't have to rebuy
Offline
So once this is added will we have to buy it from the shop again or will it just be updated into our inventory? I know the candy pack got gumdrops added and didn't have to rebuy
You won't have to rebuy it if you already purchased the stone (or viking pack when it was still that.)
Offline
Looks great! Reminds me of a mixture between magic and mineral blocks.
Offline
Well I guess it is a mineral. Looks awesome toop, you did a great job on this one.
thx for sig bobithan
Offline
Thanks for your input, as always it really helps.
After more thought it's been decided that a texture redesign would be best for this package.
no problem
A signature is a small piece of text that is attached to your posts. In it, you can enter just about anything you like. Perhaps you would like to enter your favourite quote or your star sign. It's up to you! In your signature you can use BBCode if it is allowed in this particular forum. You can see the features that are allowed/enabled listed below whenever you edit your signature.
Offline
o_O does this mean i could get stone pack when?
Offline
Complaints about an issue regarding some of the new background colors gives me an excuse to dig up this topic. [I planned on using it more often, but it got pushed to the back for a long time.]
After the update, it was brought to my attention that the backgrounds for the new white blocks were lacking. I decided to fix them, and upon doing so I ran into another problem with other extended items colors. I decided to fix those too.
The top four rows of colors didn't have any changes, they are there for comparison purposes.
Not all the changes will be apparent, so I'll list off the changes I made. All of these changes allowed the colors of the pack to be a lot more consistent.
Background Color Changes:
-Not enough difference of black brick and basic, beta was too dark. Also brick bg got fixed.
-Cyan Orange nor the basic block were bright enough, so I fixed them.
-Cyan beta was almost the same color as the basic, instead of pastel like the other beta blocks.
-Overhaul of white beta, basic, brick, checker, basic bg, brick bg.
-Grey brick and brick bg were redone. Also the grey beta had some yellowish tint in the bg color that I got rid of.
Graphic Changes:
-Grey and white brick were darkened to match the upclose contrast that the other bricks have with their basic counterparts.
What caused this? I think it could have been an issue that early bg colors were coded in manually, and later a system was added to automatically generate the minimap color, but it caused newer blocks to be inconsistent with older ones. That's just my guess though.
How do white blocks stack up with the other blocks with similar bg colors now? Like this:
Top row is all the blocks in no paticular order, bottom row organized them to make a gradient.
Offline
shadowda, Badoosh, TaskManager, Xfrogman43, N1KF, Prodigy, AmdS, Goldy301, Swarth100, Boba
Offline
Whyx are white blocks fatter then others
Whyx are white blocks fatter then others
dont fatshame
white blocks are people too
[ Started around 1747524302.7255 - Generated in 0.216 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.52 MiB (Peak: 1.69 MiB) ]