Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Ok you realize that it's like a parody click bait site, right? It's like a sister site to the Onion.
In that case you'd probably be more convincing if that weren't a parody site.
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
Pyromaniac wrote:Ok you realize that it's like a parody click bait site, right? It's like a sister site to the Onion.
In that case you'd probably be more convincing if that weren't a parody site.
It's not really a parody, it's just satier
The Onion is not a reliable news site but it makes very interesting points about society through the use of satire, and ClickHole does the same.
Offline
I'm pretty sure things like this would still happen due to how easy it can be sometimes to illegally obtain guns
+ banning guns would remove the civilian's defenses against situations like this and other things such as robberies, it's quite the catch 22.
A mix of gun control and freedom would be the best option so far on such a complicated issue.
the man who made zoey delete her tumblr
Offline
Different55 wrote:Pyromaniac wrote:Ok you realize that it's like a parody click bait site, right? It's like a sister site to the Onion.
In that case you'd probably be more convincing if that weren't a parody site.
It's not really a parody, it's just satier
The Onion is not a reliable news site but it makes very interesting points about society through the use of satire, and ClickHole does the same.
This. And parody and satire are often some of the most poignant forms of social commentary if you take the time to think. I don't know why you're so set on this tiny point of yours lol
Offline
Zoey2070 wrote:also keep in mind this was a gay club so the motive was 100% homophobia so
I wouldn't be so sure. There have been shootings in schools, restaurants, subway stations, movie theaters, concerts, workplaces, casinos, etc. and people didn't jump into conclusions so fast. Just because this one time it happened in a gay bar doesn't mean homophobia was the entire reason.
Hah! http://gawker.com/multiple-people-say-t … 1781932976
Oh well, now that the shooter turned out to be gay, let's stop focusing on Islamophobia and shift our focus to homophobia!
Disclaimer: Watch at your own risk.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbkanARGVMc
I have never thought of programming for reputation and honor. What I have in my heart must come out. That is the reason why I code.
Offline
I understand that the situation is pretty much a catch 22 in the US. Criminals have guns, so citizens need guns for self defense, so criminals easily get guns...
Bimps wrote:NorwegianboyEE wrote:It's all because of the ridiculous amounts of guns circulating the US. One man= 50 dead? More like one assault rifle= 50 dead.
yeah totally not because this guy is a muslim and literally shot up a GAY bar. he also pledged allegiance to the islamic state. i dont care who you support in the presidential election, this is not a problem of gun distribution
This is Republican jargon. "This isn't an issue about gun distribution" says citizen of only nation where mass shootings regularly happens. Hilarious.
Recently in Sweden a person went on a killing spree. How many did he kill? Only 2. He used a machete. Imagine how many he could have killed if he just legally bought a semi-automatic assault rifle like its possible in many states of the US.You are right though. This is obviously an issue about Islam and gay people. Only have to fear gun violence if you're in these groups
✅ LGBT
✅ Go to school
✅ or college
✅ or movie
✅ or mall
✅ oh **** that's everyone
I'm just glad guns are extremely rare where i live.
guns dont kill people, people kill people. i dont think i need to say more than that
Offline
Yeah but with a gun one person can kill 50 people, with a knife you got to be very skillfull to kill 5. Lmao
Pm me with anything math related please
Offline
Yeah but with a gun one person can kill 50 people, with a knife you got to be very skillfull to kill 5. Lmao
...i dont even know how to respond to this. are you actually retarded?
Offline
Emma333 wrote:Yeah but with a gun one person can kill 50 people, with a knife you got to be very skillfull to kill 5. Lmao
What if people invent knife guns?
It's been done.
Pretend I didn't exist until now
All hail me, the king of insensitive jerks
Woot if you hate me
Offline
Processor wrote:Zoey2070 wrote:also keep in mind this was a gay club so the motive was 100% homophobia so
I wouldn't be so sure. There have been shootings in schools, restaurants, subway stations, movie theaters, concerts, workplaces, casinos, etc. and people didn't jump into conclusions so fast. Just because this one time it happened in a gay bar doesn't mean homophobia was the entire reason.
Hah! http://gawker.com/multiple-people-say-t … 1781932976
▼Hidden textOh well, now that the shooter turned out to be gay, let's stop focusing on Islamophobia and shift our focus to homophobia!
Disclaimer: Watch at your own risk.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbkanARGVMc
Just because one warped minded "Christian" makes idiotic claims like this doesn't mean all Christians are "homophobes". Our whole church prayed for all these gay people who died, lost loved ones, and were present at this terrible tragedy. Instead of pointing fingers at people and screaming "Homophobes" "Islamaphobes" etc, we should all rally behind these people and grieve for their loss.
Offline
Emma333 wrote:Yeah but with a gun one person can kill 50 people, with a knife you got to be very skillfull to kill 5. Lmao
What if people invent knife guns?
ballistic knives
Offline
Pristine mascaraded buns squozen HIGH into the air, "
guns dont kill people, people kill people. i dont think i need to say more than that
" the monk shalloshed, and in satisfaction with his perfectly reasonable to pre-Machiavellian standards argument, erected his fingers upwards at a 39 degree tilt, and hovered up into the heavens enlightened a new man, his AR-15® defense against AR-15®'s / human target practice device firmly squozen betwixt his pristine, heavenly buns. Up 'em goes, oh bliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiss the lohd, up 'em goes.
ssAARASAAAAAAAAA iAAAAAAAAAAAAA OU yaaAAAAAAAAAAAAAA YAAAaa YAAaah; yaayaayaa, yayayaya-ya-ya YAAA YAAAYA; YAYAYA YAAHAYAhAAAAAAAAAA
EPIOOOOOUUUUUUuuuuuu IUO0O0oooooooooooppi
;3 0>o ~X_x~ <~(^V^)~> (); ;B ;~; *~<:',',',',',{ Q=(*@`)Q
Im A ®a®ity ®
Offline
hey ipwner why did you remove that utter **** towards me
Offline
hey ipwner why did you remove that utter **** towards me
I took care of it for you.
Yeah... and people use guns to kill people if you plan on killing more than a sole victim. o-O You don't think you need to say more than that because there is no more to back up that straw-woven cleavus argument! ;o It is quite literally an argument without foundation much like a pristine baby monk's mascara before applying L'Oréal® Foundation. Why is the sky green? Why is the grass blue? Why are republicans so unwaveringly intelligent? These are all questions that simply do not compute. And that's good, it really is. Ignorance is a virtue, is it not?
★ ☆ ★ ☆ ★
☆ ★ ★
Offline
Thank you my good man!
ssAARASAAAAAAAAA iAAAAAAAAAAAAA OU yaaAAAAAAAAAAAAAA YAAAaa YAAaah; yaayaayaa, yayayaya-ya-ya YAAA YAAAYA; YAYAYA YAAHAYAhAAAAAAAAAA
EPIOOOOOUUUUUUuuuuuu IUO0O0oooooooooooppi
;3 0>o ~X_x~ <~(^V^)~> (); ;B ;~; *~<:',',',',',{ Q=(*@`)Q
Im A ®a®ity ®
Offline
Even if gun ownership for civilians is banned, I'm pretty sure anybody who knows the right people at the wrong time can obtain army-grade stuff from the blackmarket. It's sort of a lose-lose situation.
Offline
you know he's a special needs student when he uses colored text for no good reason
the man who made zoey delete her tumblr
Offline
you know he's a special needs student when he uses colored text for no good reason
wow you got him good
man i wish i was as cool as you
thx for sig bobithan
Offline
Gamemonger wrote:you know he's a special needs student when he uses colored text for no good reason
wow you got him good
man i wish i was as cool as you
too bad you'll never be rad
the man who made zoey delete her tumblr
Offline
guns dont kill people, people kill people. i dont think i need to say more than that
This is meaningless (like most of your posts, honestly). I don't know why people think it constitutes an actual argument.
Offline
guns dont kill people, people kill people. i dont think i need to say more than that
do people go on killing sprees with their bare hands? with knives? with big heavy rocks? no.
people. kill. people. with. guns.
Offline
Bimps wrote:guns dont kill people, people kill people. i dont think i need to say more than that
do people go on killing sprees with their bare hands? with knives? with big heavy rocks? no.
people. kill. people. with. guns.
the question is: will banning guns really stop people from using guns? or, will it grow a large black market instead?
Offline
Well I think it will reduce the amount of gun-related homicide. I think the amount of homicides that are prevented by gun control is larger than the amount of interventions that are prevented by gun control. Because the chance of an intervention being successful is pretty small.
thx for sig bobithan
Offline
[ Started around 1732570482.184 - Generated in 0.134 seconds, 13 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.88 MiB (Peak: 2.18 MiB) ]