Official Everybody Edits Forums

Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?

You are not logged in.

#426 2016-04-07 00:47:42, last edited by Zoey2070 (2016-04-07 00:50:36)

Zoey2070
Moderation Team
From: Shakuras
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 5,509

Re: Everybody Edits Contest: Spring 2016! [Registration and Rules!]

what!!!! no!!! we can't let such an OUTSTANDING MEMBER OF OUR COMMUNITY BE BANNED. that's nonsense! i removed the ban

he's still warned tho


proc's discorb UnGdm07.gif stylish themes for forums/the game UnGdm07.gif
꧁꧂L O V E & C O R N꧁꧂   ᘛ⁐̤ᕐᐷ
danke bluecloud thank u raphe   Gq8tv9Z.gif [this section of my sig is dedicated to everything i've loved that's ever died]
? Hc0cu9u.gif         6yG4Efc.gif

Offline

Wooted by: (2)

#427 2016-04-07 00:54:53

Anak
Guest

Re: Everybody Edits Contest: Spring 2016! [Registration and Rules!]

Stagecrew wrote:

the level was clearly a joke,

Sorry, I don't quite see how it was "clearly a joke"? Unless it was something in the level, it looks submitted in seriousness to me.

#428 2016-04-07 00:55:35

Kirby
Member
Joined: 2015-04-04
Posts: 4,307

Re: Everybody Edits Contest: Spring 2016! [Registration and Rules!]

Anak wrote:
Stagecrew wrote:

the level was clearly a joke,

Sorry, I don't quite see how it was "clearly a joke"? Unless it was something in the level, it looks submitted in seriousness to me.

Did you even play it lmao

Offline

#429 2016-04-07 00:59:42, last edited by Onjit (2016-04-07 01:02:23)

Onjit
Member
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 9,709
Website

Re: Everybody Edits Contest: Spring 2016! [Registration and Rules!]

In all honesty, not banning lictor sets a bad precedent.

What's stopping me from making as many entries as I want next time, and just claiming that "it's just a joke" when I get caught?

Or me working on multiple teams, saying "don't ban them, just ban me" when I get caught?



Lictor could have just as easily had two winning entries if he wasn't caught.
Sure, his other entry was only tangentially related to spring*, but the art was good and the gameplay was decent.

If he hadn't been caught cheating he would have had two wins.

And this isn't a matter of "NSFW is good and I want to beat them", it's about standards. If any other person was caught cheating, I would expect them to be disqualified. (And they probably would.)

*And a lot of the levels are only tangentially related to spring, so this is basically a non-issue. It would probably get a honourable mention, which is still a sizeable reward.


:.|:;

Offline

#430 2016-04-07 00:59:49

Anak
Guest

Re: Everybody Edits Contest: Spring 2016! [Registration and Rules!]

Kirby wrote:
Anak wrote:
Stagecrew wrote:

the level was clearly a joke,

Sorry, I don't quite see how it was "clearly a joke"? Unless it was something in the level, it looks submitted in seriousness to me.

Did you even play it lmao

Ok, then it was something in the level, no need to be rude

#431 2016-04-07 01:00:42

Kirby
Member
Joined: 2015-04-04
Posts: 4,307

Re: Everybody Edits Contest: Spring 2016! [Registration and Rules!]

Anak wrote:

no need to be rude

ya tryna START SUMTHIN BUB

I will FITE U

Offline

#432 2016-04-07 01:01:23

32OrtonEdge32dh
Member
From: DMV
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 5,166
Website

Re: Everybody Edits Contest: Spring 2016! [Registration and Rules!]

I am announcing my availability to help with any level, even if you've got 5 people.  I don't want the gems so they can disqualify me.  It's a joke, so you'll be fine to stay in the contest.


32ortonedge32dh.gif

Offline

#433 2016-04-07 01:04:21

Bimps
Member
Joined: 2015-02-08
Posts: 5,067

Re: Everybody Edits Contest: Spring 2016! [Registration and Rules!]

nPDca93.png

Offline

Wooted by: (2)

#434 2016-04-07 01:32:24

Onjit
Member
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 9,709
Website

Re: Everybody Edits Contest: Spring 2016! [Registration and Rules!]

If the rules are not enforced, then the rules are meaningless, and the judging has no value.

I said it before, but I could easily see Lictor's "joke level" getting an honourable mention, which is worth 100 max energy.

This is not fair. This is not the right thing to do.

Lictor willingly ignored the rules, and it's doubtful that he wanted to be caught.

Stagecrew wrote:

what is actually the right thing to do

Lictor should acknowledge that he broke the rules, and fall on his own sword.
If you truly believe in "doing the right thing" you would let him be disqualified.


:.|:;

Offline

Wooted by: (4)

#435 2016-04-07 01:36:58

Bimps
Member
Joined: 2015-02-08
Posts: 5,067

Re: Everybody Edits Contest: Spring 2016! [Registration and Rules!]

Stagecrew wrote:

People who value rules above what is actually the right thing to do frustrate me more than anything else.

wow
dude
did you even read what you said before like
sending it?
like
dude
wow
you are saying that the rules are void
as long as you are doing the right thing
dude
d u d e
gj

Stagecrew wrote:

Let's make this clear: why do we have rules?

well obviously they are jsut thereto take up space, because like
rules dont matter
as long as you do
the right
thing
srs dude w

Stagecrew wrote:

We have rules so that nobody gets and unfair advantage in the contest, and this ensures winners are chosen correctly.

frist uf al *an
secondly of all
what
dude
rules dont matter remember?
as long as you are doing the right thing
and also lictor broke the rules dude
alsothewinnerswerechosenbeforethecontestevenstarted

Stagecrew wrote:

Lictor didn't intend to get an unfair advantage, and he wouldn't have gotten one because it was a joke level.

ok so
i can submit 1000000 blank worlds
as long as i have a so called "legit world"
and i wouldnt get banned?
in your logic, these worlds would still be considered
also how do you know it was a joke??
did he ever say it was a joke?
i dont think he did correct me if im wrong
you are saying his level is a joke when he hasnt stated whether it is or isnt
you sicken me

Stagecrew wrote:

This means there's no point in disqualifying him -- in fact, it's the opposite of what you want to do because disqualifying NSFW could give other teams an unfair advantage.

ok so
EX crew didnt sign up
that gives other teams an unfair advantage
because if they did sign up
they would win so bad it wouldnt be funny
get out with your trash logic
the point in dq'ing him is so that other teams dont get compared to a cheater on a team
they didnt cheat
so they can cheat now?
ok as long as it is the right thing to do

Stagecrew wrote:

Stop trying to use the rules to make this look like some scandal when it's completely fair. Nobody cheated here.

fristly of all nice job with those clickbait tactics using the bold tag
secondlylylylylyl of all
her is a DIRECT QUOTE
FROM THE RULES
"-Anyone in more than one team simultaneously will be disqualified."
SOURCE
bro
he was in more than one team
idk i guess it can be an opinion if he cheated or not
but
HE BROKE THE RULES
STOP MAKING SPECIAL CASES
STOP
brb joining every team
because that's ok now

Stagecrew wrote:

bobithan and zoey: comparing bimp's spam with this... it's not a good comparison at all. There's a reason there should be a warning - his post hurt the discussion, so there should be some sort of punishment to stop this from happening. There's no reason to disqualify lictor, because nobody gained an unfair advantage.

ok DONT BRING ME INTO THIS YA WILLY WONKA
lol bimp's gg hahmi
my post hurt the disscusion?
oh no bb go cri


Ok seriously it doesn't matter that Lictor didn't gain an advantage. It is still against the rules. Get your game together. Stop making up excuses and take action.



*drops mic*

Offline

#436 2016-04-07 01:55:17, last edited by Stagecrew (2016-04-07 11:32:02)

Stagecrew
Member
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 289

Re: Everybody Edits Contest: Spring 2016! [Registration and Rules!]

Ok, you guys have convinced me that Lictor should be disqualified. You were right. I'll let the judges decide.

Offline

#437 2016-04-07 01:56:51

Bimps
Member
Joined: 2015-02-08
Posts: 5,067

Re: Everybody Edits Contest: Spring 2016! [Registration and Rules!]

Stagecrew wrote:

Ok, you guys have convinced me that Lictor should be disqualified. You were right. I'll let the judges decide.

no
we havent convinced you one bit
you just dont wanna get flamed by the community
stand up for what you believe in
even if no one else likes it
dont give in

Offline

Wooted by: (4)

#438 2016-04-07 01:58:22

Stagecrew
Member
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 289

Re: Everybody Edits Contest: Spring 2016! [Registration and Rules!]

Bimps wrote:
Stagecrew wrote:

Ok, you guys have convinced me that Lictor should be disqualified. You were right. I'll let the judges decide.

no
we havent convinced you one bit
you just dont wanna get flamed by the community
stand up for what you believe in
even if no one else likes it
dont give in

No, here's why I'm convinced: a) I'm probably pretty biased because I'm on the team b) Nobody else seems to agree, so I'm probably wrong

Offline

#439 2016-04-07 01:59:21, last edited by Bimps (2016-04-07 02:07:52)

Bimps
Member
Joined: 2015-02-08
Posts: 5,067

Re: Everybody Edits Contest: Spring 2016! [Registration and Rules!]

Stagecrew wrote:
Bimps wrote:
Stagecrew wrote:

Ok, you guys have convinced me that Lictor should be disqualified. You were right. I'll let the judges decide.

no
we havent convinced you one bit
you just dont wanna get flamed by the community
stand up for what you believe in
even if no one else likes it
dont give in

No, here's why I'm convinced: a) I'm probably pretty biased because I'm on the team b) Nobody else seems to agree, so I'm probably wrong

.
.
.

Hidden text

if you truly believe than good on you
if you truly dont
that is sad

Offline

Wooted by:

#440 2016-04-07 02:22:43

Onjit
Member
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 9,709
Website

Re: Everybody Edits Contest: Spring 2016! [Registration and Rules!]

Ok let's settle this in the only fair way: strawpoll.

http://strawpoll.me/7301089


:.|:;

Offline

Wooted by:

#441 2016-04-07 02:43:13

Prodigy
Member
From: The United States of America
Joined: 2015-07-15
Posts: 2,613

Re: Everybody Edits Contest: Spring 2016! [Registration and Rules!]

Onjit wrote:

If the rules are not enforced, then the rules are meaningless, and the judging has no value.

I said it before, but I could easily see Lictor's "joke level" getting an honourable mention, which is worth 100 max energy.

This is not fair. This is not the right thing to do.

Lictor willingly ignored the rules, and it's doubtful that he wanted to be caught.

Stagecrew wrote:

what is actually the right thing to do

Lictor should acknowledge that he broke the rules, and fall on his own sword.
If you truly believe in "doing the right thing" you would let him be disqualified.

That's deep man. Peace.


h0qIF0q.png

Offline

#442 2016-04-07 02:45:44

N1KF
Wiki Mod
From: ဪဪဪဪဪ From: ဪဪဪဪဪ From: ဪဪဪဪဪ
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 11,113
Website

Re: Everybody Edits Contest: Spring 2016! [Registration and Rules!]

Onjit wrote:

If the rules are not enforced, then the rules are meaningless

Exactly what I have been trying to tell the staff for a long time now

Offline

Wooted by:

#443 2016-04-07 03:34:06, last edited by Lictor666 (2016-04-07 05:53:35)

Lictor666
Guest

Re: Everybody Edits Contest: Spring 2016! [Registration and Rules!]

If judges and the community take the Trix's map seriously,
Then remove me from the contest.
If it's to see people complaining about wrong things, I prefer stop the debate immediately...

Second try.

Edit
Wooted by:

#444 2016-04-07 04:18:46

CommanderKitten
Member
From: California
Joined: 2015-12-12
Posts: 66

Re: Everybody Edits Contest: Spring 2016! [Registration and Rules!]

Honestly, the rule isn't clear enough to say if you can't join more than one team with one account, or you can't join multiple teams as long as you use alternate accounts. Because, if it's the former, then I can see why they would want to enforce that, because the more teams you join, the higher chance you have to win, but if it's the latter, then why even have that as a rule? It's not hurting anyone, and if you don't win on your main account, but on an alternate account, there is no way to move your prizes (with the removal of gem codes).

Offline

#445 2016-04-07 04:39:43

N1KF
Wiki Mod
From: ဪဪဪဪဪ From: ဪဪဪဪဪ From: ဪဪဪဪဪ
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 11,113
Website

Re: Everybody Edits Contest: Spring 2016! [Registration and Rules!]

CommanderKitten wrote:

It's not hurting anyone, and if you don't win on your main account, but on an alternate account, there is no way to move your prizes (with the removal of gem codes).

What if you play on multiple accounts? Or, what if you use your alt accounts as "classic pack" collector so you can get all the classic block packages, all on different accounts?

Offline

#446 2016-04-07 04:52:04

Kirby
Member
Joined: 2015-04-04
Posts: 4,307

Re: Everybody Edits Contest: Spring 2016! [Registration and Rules!]

CommanderKitten wrote:

Honestly, the rule isn't clear enough to say if you can't join more than one team with one account, or you can't join multiple teams as long as you use alternate accounts. Because, if it's the former, then I can see why they would want to enforce that, because the more teams you join, the higher chance you have to win, but if it's the latter, then why even have that as a rule? It's not hurting anyone, and if you don't win on your main account, but on an alternate account, there is no way to move your prizes (with the removal of gem codes).

you can still get the blocks then log onto that alt and place them. Or, you could get more max energy on that alt to use as an energy slave for crews

Offline

Wooted by: (2)

#447 2016-04-07 06:55:56

mutantdevle
Moderation Team
From: Hell
Joined: 2015-03-31
Posts: 3,848
Website

Re: Everybody Edits Contest: Spring 2016! [Registration and Rules!]

Onjit wrote:

Ok let's settle this in the only fair way: strawpoll.

http://strawpoll.me/7301089

Tbh, that poll is a bit bias calling a person a jerk if they voted a certain option, i didn't vote that option and i wouldn't have if it didn't say that extra bit, but just sayin' a poll like this shouldn't be bias, even if it speaks the moral truth.


kMMA0S6.png dxGW6FY.png

Offline

Wooted by:

#448 2016-04-07 07:15:30

Schlog
Member
Joined: 2015-07-21
Posts: 1,957

Re: Everybody Edits Contest: Spring 2016! [Registration and Rules!]

why are you people still arguing about the lictor disqualification "issue"

lictor said twice to just disqualify him can't we just leave it at that and move on

Offline

Wooted by: (5)

#449 2016-04-07 09:57:06

Processor
Member
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 2,246

Re: Everybody Edits Contest: Spring 2016! [Registration and Rules!]

CommanderKitten wrote:

Honestly, the rule isn't clear enough to say if you can't join more than one team with one account, or you can't join multiple teams as long as you use alternate accounts.

You, as a person, are not allowed to join a second team.

I acknowledge the community's complaints on lictor but I won't comment on it until I talk with toop.


I have never thought of programming for reputation and honor. What I have in my heart must come out. That is the reason why I code.

Offline

Wooted by: (2)

#450 2016-04-07 11:56:56

Pyromaniac
Official Caroler
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 4,868

Re: Everybody Edits Contest: Spring 2016! [Registration and Rules!]

As far as EE drama goes, this was pretty lame.
#unimpressed

Offline

Wooted by: (5)
Onjit1460850036596528

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB

[ Started around 1732315339.5875 - Generated in 0.177 seconds, 15 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.95 MiB (Peak: 2.26 MiB) ]