EElections Debate Thread

Zumza · 2016-03-26 17:07:21

Zumza wrote:

JaWapa wrote:
Zumza wrote:
Keep it simple
There is really no other way.

mrjawapa · 2016-03-26 17:23:53

If you have a better idea, put it forth.

Luka504 · 2016-03-26 17:32:30

Zumza can you just stop with the dumb banners and flipping contribute to the topic!?

Exclusive smileys being fanboy, artist, rabbit, pumpkin, etc.
In my opinion, we should remove the smileys from past winners, and give them to the new winners. It prevents new smileys from being made, it helps the economy, and everyone can get a taste of them.

Is this what UBED wants?
I think that might cost you a few votes.
Seriously this is a terrible idea. Taking someone's special smiley they worked hard for and giving them to someone else?
How about i take your sandwich and give them to a random person neither of us ever met?
You wouldnt like that, now would you?

N1KF

AsurcH · 2016-03-26 17:59:46

The Ideal Rankine Cycle

Greetings my fellow participants,

I see you have all dwelled into mundane problems of our daily EE lives. I would like you all to take into consideration our following issues.

First, I see most of you are trying to show uncited data for your own accord. I claim not else of this, however, the data you have shown must be eligible for it to display accurate results of your campaign. Whenever you refer to an audiovisual, please use the correct format and include an appendix where we might refer to your predetermined standards. For easy of usage, I suggest we use SI system throughout our campaigns which is also widely accepted by EE community.

Second issue would be our contribution and design. I understand completely that all of us try our best to design our campaigns accordingly to reach the general elections, yet we miss the most common design parameters that should never ever leave our minds:

Design for Environment
Design for Efficiency
Design for Everyone
Design for Ease of usage

The list can be continued. I, here stand knocking your door, please humbly accept my request. Whatever happens after the election period, we must all be united for one purpose, that is to design Everybody Edits for a better place. Our ways, our ideas differ, but at this precise point we must all press our feet to ground and ask us a few questions:

Who am I? What am I doing? Is my way the most EEfficient way to achieve our ultimate goal?

Ladies and gentlemen, I have no right to interfere on how you manage your own party, but I have answered all the above stated questions. And I can safely say that my operation cycle is ideal. This means we, as a party have already reached our utmost EEficiency. There is no further increasing it without changing the design. So I distribute this message to all our followers:

Choose us, and help us redesign Everybody Edits, it is the fastest solution we have that will lead to everyone's benefit.

mrjawapa · 2016-03-26 18:00:22

Look, I was just in Mafia, Everistan, and the people there are starving. People are "up to no food."

So, if you took my sandwich and gave it to someone in those kind of conditions, I would be pleased.

Now, this is only a satirical thing. I didn't truly mean that. It's just to get people to think, and to realize how much better the tax plan is. If you better the tax in flow, you better everything.

VOTE UBED
VOTE JAWAPA

N1KF · 2016-03-26 18:03:20

You missed the point, JaWapa. It is not about you, it is about the contest winners.

mrjawapa · 2016-03-26 18:04:25

N1KF wrote:

You missed the point, JaWapa. It is not about you, it is about the contest winners.

Again, it was purely satire. It was not a literal standing point.

N1KF · 2016-03-26 18:06:32

JaWapa wrote:

N1KF wrote:
You missed the point, JaWapa. It is not about you, it is about the contest winners.
Again, it was purely satire. It was not a literal standing point.

Are you going to post a non-satirical response to it, then?

mrjawapa · 2016-03-26 18:09:31

N1KF wrote:

Are you going to post a non-satirical response to it, then?

I will later.

N1KF

Luka504 · 2016-03-26 18:19:19

Oh for petes sake Jawapa, do you even truly care about anyone here except yourself and your goals?
First you make, not one, but two posts about how previous contest winners should lose their prizes just so ,,More smileys do not need to be created,,
And when you start looking bad you claim
,,ITS A JOKE,,
Also what kind of response is this!?

Look, I was just in Mafia, Everistan, and the people there are starving. People are "up to no food."
So, if you took my sandwich and gave it to someone in those kind of conditions, I would be pleased.

Calicara · 2016-03-26 18:21:23

General Abraham Lincat Whiskers, On Contest Prizes

Contest smilies are special smilies awarded to users who have won an official everybody edits contest. It should be noted, the purpose of any contest is to encourage competition and bring out the best of ones skills, awarding those who are believed to be the most skillful of them all. It is also noted, that when participating contest it should be clear that not everyone can win, and so not everyone will receive a prize. However, those who do win and receive a prize, whether it be a contest smiley, energy increase, or special block, should be recognized for their skill. They worked hard for their victory, and so why should they not receive some sort of credit?

Contests do not exist to isolate the good from the bad, but rather to encourage players to work harder to create new and innovative levels. They also work to recognize those who make quality levels, which can be used as examples for aspiring level makers. We can all win in the end, if we look at the situation from the right perspective.

In short, contest smilies should remain with their owners, and remain exclusive to their respective contests.

Luka504

Bimps · 2016-03-26 18:40:29

none of these solutions matter. on the subject of contest prizes, people will whine no matter what. old contest smileys are reopened to for new contests? whining. definite answer that all old contest smilies will never be reused? whining. giving everyone contest smileys? whining. getting rid of them? whining.

vote for the death party today

Luka504 · 2016-03-26 18:51:23

True that, but think about it for a minute Bimps.
If the same thing will come no matter what we do, then does it truly matter what we do?
No.
So we use that logic to get the anwser that is best.
People who won the contests should be the only ones to have them.
Edit: Also why should i vote for deathparty
You havent exactly given us any reason for it.

Bimps · 2016-03-26 19:01:42

Luka504 wrote:

True that, but think about it for a minute Bimps.
If the same thing will come no matter what we do, then does it truly matter what we do?
No.
So we use that logic to get the anwser that is best.
People who won the contests should be the only ones to have them.
Edit: Also why should i vote for deathparty
You havent exactly given us any reason for it.

yknow if you look at my other posts in the topic you would see reasons why. the best answer is to get rid of the problem, which is ee. the same thing will come no matter what we do unless ee is killed. also you are propagandizing this because you say "people who won the contests should be the only ones to have them". people will still whine bro.

Luka504 · 2016-03-26 19:11:34

...
The best way to solve problems is by ignoring them? Oh sure.
Say that the next time you have an essay that is worth 40% of your grade.
Or when terrorist attacks become really common.
Or when there is an electricity problem everywhere in the world.

,,Yeah sure lets ignore them, since that is the best and most efficent way to solve problems.,,

Bimps · 2016-03-26 19:16:05

Luka504 wrote:

...
The best way to solve problems is by ignoring them? Oh sure.
Say that the next time you have an essay that is worth 40% of your grade.
Or when terrorist attacks become really common.
Or when there is an electricity problem everywhere in the world.
,,Yeah sure lets ignore them, since that is the best and most efficent way to solve problems.,,

im not ignoring them. ignoring them would be, in ee's case, changing nothing and probably only adding stuff. i am not ignoring the problems. this is my way of solving them, and i think it is the best way. you have seen how toxic the community can get when something changes, havent you? sure, many would complain about my decision to kill ee, but they would eventually see it is the best option for the community.

Luka504 · 2016-03-26 19:24:44

I honestly dont know how specific you want me to be Bimps.
I have provided a good argument on your dumb policy.
And you state its not ,,ignoring,, when it pretty much is?
Killing EE as a whole is not a good way to solve the problems EE might have.
Its like throwing an A worth essay just beacuse it wouldnt be an A+

Bimps · 2016-03-26 19:58:22

Luka504 wrote:

I honestly dont know how specific you want me to be Bimps.
I have provided a good argument on your dumb policy.
And you state its not ,,ignoring,, when it pretty much is?
Killing EE as a whole is not a good way to solve the problems EE might have.
Its like throwing an A worth essay just beacuse it wouldnt be an A+

i know im being pedantic here, but ee isnt an "A worth essay", and fixing problems wont make it "A+". ee has no real problems, just little things that can never really be solved due to the varying opinions of the ee community. i also have stated various times that i believe ee should die not for the game, but for the community

Luka504 · 2016-03-26 20:23:20

Ok so now that there are more candidates, im gonna analyze them.
-Zumza ( EE Forever )
Its bad enough he hardly contributes to this topic.
He keeps using the same exact banners so people blindly vote for him.
His answers are pretty clean, but....

I have knowledges about how things work. I believe this gives me an advantage ahead of my political colleagues.

Ok this is dumb. Almost everyone here knows how things work, but saying you ,,have an advantage,, seems like another blind voting attempt.

Thought some prices should be modified(to smaller and / or grater values).

Why greater values? If you want to dedicate to making people happy shouldnt the prices drop?

Name changes should cost gems.

Again, why do you want to make people happy by making them buy stuff with gems?

-Kira ( Big Brothers )
Can i even consider this an actual party?
It seems like some sort of joke.

-nlmdejonge ( Daily Challenges )
Lovely speech but you sort of contradicted yourself.

If there are no good levels, players leave and visit less. Not just that. Level creators also leave and create less if good levels they put a lot of work into barely get played.

Every day a different level gets featured for an entire day.

If you dont see it, let me explain:
If people build less worlds, how can there be worlds to be a daily challenge.
Even if there were some worlds like that, by your logic people will come, play, win and then what?
Secondly, you havent answered the issues, but gave a ,,reason,, to bring players to play EE.
But with the problems still being there, its just gonna be weird for them.

-AsurcH ( The Ideal Rankine Cycle )
Are you even a political party?
You havent answered the issues or said anything EE related
You just said random things you probably found online in hopes people blindly follow you.

-ZeldaXD ( Benjaminsons )
Im suprised i found nothing weird. Well played Zelda
Well played....

Luka504 · 2016-03-26 20:26:16

Bimps wrote:

Luka504 wrote:
I honestly dont know how specific you want me to be Bimps.
I have provided a good argument on your dumb policy.
And you state its not ,,ignoring,, when it pretty much is?
Killing EE as a whole is not a good way to solve the problems EE might have.
Its like throwing an A worth essay just beacuse it wouldnt be an A+
i know im being pedantic here, but ee isnt an "A worth essay", and fixing problems wont make it "A+". ee has no real problems, just little things that can never really be solved due to the varying opinions of the ee community. i also have stated various times that i believe ee should die not for the game, but for the community

,,EE has no real problems,,
Wow.
So you want to kill EE beacuse of small problems?
Like what?
Also what has the community done to get the game killed beacuse of them?

Zumza · 2016-03-26 20:26:20

I play Nationstates which is a game where you take the role of a President and solve the nation's issues.
So I have experience about having a presidential sit too.

Luka504 · 2016-03-26 20:29:11

Lol

Bimps · 2016-03-26 20:34:38

Luka504 wrote:

Bimps wrote:
Luka504 wrote:
I honestly dont know how specific you want me to be Bimps.
I have provided a good argument on your dumb policy.
And you state its not ,,ignoring,, when it pretty much is?
Killing EE as a whole is not a good way to solve the problems EE might have.
Its like throwing an A worth essay just beacuse it wouldnt be an A+
i know im being pedantic here, but ee isnt an "A worth essay", and fixing problems wont make it "A+". ee has no real problems, just little things that can never really be solved due to the varying opinions of the ee community. i also have stated various times that i believe ee should die not for the game, but for the community
,,EE has no real problems,,
Wow.
So you want to kill EE beacuse of small problems?
Like what?
Also what has the community done to get the game killed beacuse of them?

no you... ive explained why i want ee dead in other posts. if you could read you would see that. the community is naturally divided in its opinions, so they indirectly caused me to want the game killed, but just because they have differing opinions doesnt make them bad.

Zumza · 2016-03-26 20:37:14

Luka504 wrote:

-Zumza ( EE Forever )
I have knowledges about how things work. I believe this gives me an advantage ahead of my political colleagues.
Ok this is dumb. Almost everyone here knows how things work, but saying you ,,have an advantage,, seems like another blind voting attempt
Thought some prices should be modified(to smaller and / or grater values).
Why greater values? If you want to dedicate to making people happy shouldnt the prices drop?
Name.

I'm sure that you don't know how to manage a server, a database and a website. And even if you do, which I doubt, you surely don't have my experience.
As for the prices I consider that some of them must rise now because their unlimited. As I said I want equality for everybody but I also want for those who work hard and have contributed to this community so much to be praised. Also I consider that item prices should be also be reported to their functionality as well, so thats why some of the prices should low.
I also don't want any more corruption, so thats why I prefer political freedom to be Average.

mrjawapa · 2016-03-26 21:20:20

Luka504 wrote:

,,ITS A JOKE,,
Also what kind of response is this!?

There is a story I read before where a country was starving, and the population was too high. A guy wrote a story in a very serious manner, saying people should eat babies... solving both problems.
It was satire. But it made people think.

Luka, I'm not really sure what you're doing, but it's quite annoying. I'd admire your will to still fight, even though you're losing in the polls, but please... just stop.

Official Everybody Edits Forums

#76 2016-03-26 17:07:21

Re: EElections Debate Thread

#77 2016-03-26 17:23:53

Re: EElections Debate Thread

#78 2016-03-26 17:32:30

Re: EElections Debate Thread

#79 2016-03-26 17:59:46

Re: EElections Debate Thread

The Ideal Rankine Cycle

#80 2016-03-26 18:00:22

Re: EElections Debate Thread

#81 2016-03-26 18:03:20

Re: EElections Debate Thread

#82 2016-03-26 18:04:25

Re: EElections Debate Thread

#83 2016-03-26 18:06:32

Re: EElections Debate Thread

#84 2016-03-26 18:09:31

Re: EElections Debate Thread

#85 2016-03-26 18:19:19

Re: EElections Debate Thread

#86 2016-03-26 18:21:23, last edited by Calicara (2016-03-26 18:21:33)

Re: EElections Debate Thread

#87 2016-03-26 18:40:29

Re: EElections Debate Thread

#88 2016-03-26 18:51:23, last edited by Luka504 (2016-03-26 18:52:11)

Re: EElections Debate Thread

#89 2016-03-26 19:01:42

Re: EElections Debate Thread

#90 2016-03-26 19:11:34

Re: EElections Debate Thread

#91 2016-03-26 19:16:05

Re: EElections Debate Thread

#92 2016-03-26 19:24:44

Re: EElections Debate Thread

#93 2016-03-26 19:58:22

Re: EElections Debate Thread

#94 2016-03-26 20:23:20

Re: EElections Debate Thread

#95 2016-03-26 20:26:16

Re: EElections Debate Thread

#96 2016-03-26 20:26:20

Re: EElections Debate Thread

#97 2016-03-26 20:29:11

Re: EElections Debate Thread

#98 2016-03-26 20:34:38

Re: EElections Debate Thread

#99 2016-03-26 20:37:14, last edited by Zumza (2016-03-26 20:57:57)

Re: EElections Debate Thread

#100 2016-03-26 21:20:20

Re: EElections Debate Thread

Board footer