Official Everybody Edits Forums
Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#27 2016-03-25 22:15:05
- Creature
- Member
- From: The Dark Web
- Joined: 2015-02-15
- Posts: 9,658
Re: EElections Debate Thread
Creature wrote:No matter what, every president will want power someday and will take it from the society. However, Socialism has no president, so this surely won't happen.
Vote Socialism and everyone will win.
I am pretty sure you mean "anarchy". Socialism requires a government.
Everyone is government.
This is a false statement.
Offline
#28 2016-03-25 22:27:20
Re: EElections Debate Thread
Luka504 wrote:No admins=No rules
That's like saying no religion = no morals.
True, but having no religion means that you have self-guided morals that you can shape to fit selfish desires. This similarly applies to admins/rules.
Offline
- Wooted by:
#29 2016-03-25 22:32:38
- Luka504
- Member
- From: Serbia,probs never heard of it
- Joined: 2015-02-19
- Posts: 2,934
Re: EElections Debate Thread
Luka504 wrote:No admins=No rules
That's like saying no religion = no morals.
You are awfully pushy here Jawapa, but are you trying to prove something?
I was just using Creature's idea and what sort of consequences it might bring.
If there were no admins (or any staff at all), EE would be a complete trainwreck as people can do whatever they please.
Do you want to live in that world?
And what will the admins do?
NOTHING! Beacuse they have no power.
I dont think Socialism is the way to go.
How long will it take me to get banned again?
Place your bets right here.
Offline
#31 2016-03-25 22:42:27, last edited by Creature (2016-03-25 22:43:01)
- Creature
- Member
- From: The Dark Web
- Joined: 2015-02-15
- Posts: 9,658
Re: EElections Debate Thread
JaWapa wrote:Luka504 wrote:No admins=No rules
That's like saying no religion = no morals.
You are awfully pushy here Jawapa, but are you trying to prove something?
I was just using Creature's idea and what sort of consequences it might bring.
If there were no admins (or any staff at all), EE would be a complete trainwreck as people can do whatever they please.
Do you want to live in that world?
And what will the admins do?
NOTHING! Beacuse they have no power.
I dont think Socialism is the way to go.
lmao, since when socialism is one world? You have your own, your own world, your own rules. No admin will have superior powers on your world.
This is a false statement.
Offline
#32 2016-03-25 22:45:48
- Luka504
- Member
- From: Serbia,probs never heard of it
- Joined: 2015-02-19
- Posts: 2,934
Re: EElections Debate Thread
...
Isnt that already happening without socalism?
I right now have full power in ma own worlds.
So ugh, that begs the question:
What is the point of socialism if it already exists?
How long will it take me to get banned again?
Place your bets right here.
Offline
#33 2016-03-25 22:47:21
- Creature
- Member
- From: The Dark Web
- Joined: 2015-02-15
- Posts: 9,658
Re: EElections Debate Thread
...
Isnt that already happening without socalism?
I right now have full power in ma own worlds.
So ugh, that begs the question:
What is the point of socialism if it already exists?
No admins shall rule the universe of EE worlds.
This is a false statement.
Offline
#36 2016-03-25 22:49:57
- Creature
- Member
- From: The Dark Web
- Joined: 2015-02-15
- Posts: 9,658
Re: EElections Debate Thread
Luka504 wrote:What is the point of socialism if it already exists?
Ha... wut?
Everistan is not under a socialist government; not even close.
EE is under a pretty selfish government and there are still candidates trying to make the government even worse than what it is.
This is a false statement.
Offline
#38 2016-03-25 22:53:16
Re: EElections Debate Thread
I was just using Creature's idea and what sort of consequences it might bring.
If there were no admins (or any staff at all), EE would be a complete trainwreck as people can do whatever they please.
Do you want to live in that world?
And what will the admins do?
NOTHING! Beacuse they have no power.
I dont think Socialism is the way to go.
If I recall correctly, the second government abruptly disappeared for about a year. Not often were the staff's intervention necessary to keep things organized. Unlike the Real Life world, the Everybody Edits world does not allow players to physically harm each other.
Somebody offending you? Do not care about it.
Somebody harassing you? Ignore them and avoid them.
Somebody ruining your level? Remove their edit.
Somebody illegally bribing/blackmailing you? Notify Real Life authorities.
While I do support an authority and a set of rules, I just thought this was an interesting point I would bring up.
Offline
- Wooted by:
#39 2016-03-25 22:53:28
- Luka504
- Member
- From: Serbia,probs never heard of it
- Joined: 2015-02-19
- Posts: 2,934
Re: EElections Debate Thread
I know politicans lie reid, but wow you are taking it to a new level.
Seriously, next time you make a hard claim that admins are evil, make sure they do not have a reputation that makes them look good.
Nice try though.
Also what candidates make admins ,,worse,,?
How long will it take me to get banned again?
Place your bets right here.
Offline
#40 2016-03-25 22:55:16
Re: EElections Debate Thread
Seriously, next time you make a hard claim that admins are evil, make sure they do not have a reputation that makes them look good.
> Popularity contest
Why should it matter what someone's social stance is? If they are in the wrong, they should be called out.
Discord: jawp#5123
Offline
#41 2016-03-25 22:56:09
- Creature
- Member
- From: The Dark Web
- Joined: 2015-02-15
- Posts: 9,658
Re: EElections Debate Thread
Seriously, next time you make a hard claim that admins are evil, make sure they do not have a reputation that makes them look good.
Nice try though.
There are bad admins, just look how many power abuses were around.
Also what candidates make admins ,,worse,,?
UBED is a nice example.
This is a false statement.
Offline
#44 2016-03-25 22:58:40, last edited by mrjawapa (2016-03-25 22:59:09)
#45 2016-03-25 23:00:05
Re: EElections Debate Thread
-ZeldaXD (Benjaminsons)
Also no issues written down. KEK
We have written our stances on the issues today, you can revise it here.
Offline
#46 2016-03-25 23:00:26, last edited by Luka504 (2016-03-25 23:02:18)
- Luka504
- Member
- From: Serbia,probs never heard of it
- Joined: 2015-02-19
- Posts: 2,934
Re: EElections Debate Thread
Im not, im proving someone presumed ,,evil,, has never done anything wrong.
And prooving socialism has nothing in dis case.
Edit: Oh ok i guess i missed it Zelda. Gonna check it soon.
How long will it take me to get banned again?
Place your bets right here.
Offline
#47 2016-03-25 23:05:27
- Creature
- Member
- From: The Dark Web
- Joined: 2015-02-15
- Posts: 9,658
Re: EElections Debate Thread
Creature wrote:Also what candidates make admins ,,worse,,?
UBED is a nice example.What? UBED fights against the staff having power.
So UBED agrees staff shouldn't have power to ban anyone?
This is a false statement.
Offline
#49 2016-03-25 23:08:54
- Creature
- Member
- From: The Dark Web
- Joined: 2015-02-15
- Posts: 9,658
Re: EElections Debate Thread
Creature wrote:So UBED agrees staff shouldn't have power to ban anyone?
no one said that, creature.
Creature wrote:Also what candidates make admins ,,worse,,?
UBED is a nice example.What? UBED fights against the staff having power.
If this is not what you mean't, then your second argument is false.
This is a false statement.
Offline
[ Started around 1732995327.6846 - Generated in 0.080 seconds, 14 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.81 MiB (Peak: 2.08 MiB) ]