Official Everybody Edits Forums

Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?

You are not logged in.

#276 2016-03-01 03:56:24

Pyromaniac
Official Caroler
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 4,868

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

Ok- i've been loosely keeping up on this but I've gone back and CAREFULLY ( https://wiki.everybodyedits.com/images/c/c0/069_LOL ) re-read everything. Here are some reads on the hot topic issues

Rhaz- He's just not great at this game, I think. The first game I played with him I was SO convinced he was mafia (like you guys) because he was SUPREMELY aggressive, and randomly accused people, and was all around abrasive. Unfortunately, I was wrong, and people called ME the village idiot for some reason even though he was so clearly being scummy. I'm not bitter. So I'd be careful to judge his alliance based solely on his temperament. That being said, that first game, he claimed right away Vigilante (which he hasn't done here). This is a difference in play style that may be suspicious?

Overall, he's being really pushy and as much as I want to say that incriminates him, it IS consistent with former games.

Calicara- I've played with her as mafia before. Her strategy then was to play the fool, so people wouldn't suspect her. She isn't really doing that here, I dont think. So unless she changed her play style (which is totally plausible) I dont think she's suspicious at the moment.

AlphaJon- I got 0 scum reads from this guy, I have no idea where Rhaz got this idea.

Ninja- His voting is haphazard, true, but has he even posted anything recently?

Thats all the thoughts I have so far..

It does strike me a little odd that people zeroed in on Rhaz, given his history with mafia. Maybe they're ganging on up on him because they know he's a really easy target to shift the blame onto?

Offline

Wooted by:

#277 2016-03-01 08:12:46

AlphaJon
Member
From: Who knows
Joined: 2015-07-21
Posts: 1,297

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

I'd like to hear ninja's point of view, because atm we only have one side of the story.

Offline

Wooted by:

W24

#278 2016-03-01 14:22:25

Onjit
Member
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 9,709
Website

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

bfd5d6f583.png

here's a super professional diagram expressing my thoughts on the Rhaz v. Ninja thing.


:.|:;

Offline

#279 2016-03-01 14:24:43

TaskManager
Formerly maxi123
From: i really should update this
Joined: 2015-03-01
Posts: 9,465

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

RhazzleFrazzle wrote:

Anyways, I'm Sheriff. I got a Mafia result on Ninja last night.

look i can say that too
anyways im sheriff i got mafia result on rhazzle last night
doesnt mean its true yet?

look, we have 2 candidates for lynch - rhazzle and ninja
almost certainly 1 of them is scum
we can lynch both and if the first one we lynch is town then 2nd must be mafia?
then again its not 100% guaranteed that 1 of them is scum and if we lynch both and both turn out citizens then were pretty much bimpsed


!vote RhazzleFrazzle
i might pull the vote off if you convince me youre really a sheriff


i8SwC8p.png
signature by HG, profile picture by bluecloud, thank!!
previous signature by drstereos

Offline

#280 2016-03-01 16:04:35

Creature
Member
From: The Dark Web
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 9,658

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

Votecount 2.4

[2] Ninja - RhazzleFrazzle, W24
[2] RhazzleFrazzle - Anak, maxi123
[0] Onjit
[0] Anak
[0] maxi123
[0] Calicara
[0] Pyromaniac
[0] W24
[0] AlphaJon
[0] Kaslai

[0] No lynch
[6] Not voting: Onjit, Calicara, Ninja, Pyromaniac, AlphaJon, Kaslai.

With 10 alive, it takes 6 votes to reach majority.


This is a false statement.

Offline

#281 2016-03-01 16:52:31

RhazzleFrazzle
Member
Joined: 2015-11-10
Posts: 4,260

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

Maxi weren't you agreeing with me when I was saying Ninja was scummy? Why suddenly defend Ninja because I claimed Sheriff?

Offline

#282 2016-03-01 17:22:19

TaskManager
Formerly maxi123
From: i really should update this
Joined: 2015-03-01
Posts: 9,465

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

RhazzleFrazzle wrote:

because I claimed Sheriff?

actually
thats not the cause
and ninja more or less explained himself
i cant just ignore your nonsense vote on alpha


i8SwC8p.png
signature by HG, profile picture by bluecloud, thank!!
previous signature by drstereos

Offline

#283 2016-03-01 17:26:48

RhazzleFrazzle
Member
Joined: 2015-11-10
Posts: 4,260

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

Are you serious Maxi? Ninja hasn't even posted today. Where exactly did he explain himself?

Offline

#284 2016-03-01 18:06:59

Calicara
Member
Joined: 2015-02-16
Posts: 932

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

Well the day is technically over, but I just wanted to get a post in.

I haven't seen anyone else claim sheriff, and the way Rhazz was asserting himself would make sense considering his role. I believe him, but I just think it's foolhardy to reveal at such an early stage in the game.

That being said, it still doesn't explain his vote on AlphaJon. Ninja I can unserstand, Alpha not so much.

maxi123 wrote:

actually thats not the cause
and ninja more or less explained himself
i cant just ignore your nonsense vote on alpha

Ninja has not explained himself and I expect to hear a statement from him once the night is over.


Avatar by RainDiance
tgA1y17.jpg
I am obsessed with Steven Universe

Offline

Wooted by:

W24

#285 2016-03-01 19:18:37

Anak
Guest

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

!unvote

All but Ninja have posted so I can safely repeal my vote. Maxi, I don't see why you choose to vote now. There's no convincing to be done. No one else has owned up to sheriff. (If Ninja does, well, that'll be wild)
With that:

!vote Ninja

#286 2016-03-01 19:50:35

Kaslai
Official Caroler
From: SEAͩT̓͑TLͯͥͧͪ̽ͧE͑̚
Joined: 2015-02-17
Posts: 787

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

I was thinking about the game last night.

We're practically in MyLo right now. If the mafia is collaborating with the witch, then a mislynch will lead to a 3 mafia 1 witch 4 town result, and the rest of the game is then a formality.

If mafia is not collaborating with the witch, then a mislynch isn't an outright loss, but it'll be much harder for us to win.

Rhaz has confirmed that either he or Ninja is scum, but we don't know for sure which one is which. Rhaz is awfully aggressive and Ninja is awfully defensive. Personally, I think we should !vote No Lynch and see what happens overnight.

The worst case scenario is that we get one town death. The best case scenario is mafia attacks a veteran on alert or jailed/healed town, leading to either -1 for both sides or no change at all, respectively.

I'm still leaning towards Ninja being scum over Rhaz, but I'd rather hedge a bit. A night's-worth of information could change this game significantly in our favor.

Offline

#287 2016-03-01 19:54:53

Anak
Guest

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

Kaslai wrote:

Rhaz has confirmed that either he or Ninja is scum, but we don't know for sure which one is which. Rhaz is awfully aggressive and Ninja is awfully defensive. Personally, I think we should !vote No Lynch and see what happens overnight.

You know, that didn't occur to me. We have, what, a day left? If Ninja doesn't post within that time, he'd either be taken off for inactivity, or we'll just lynch him.

!unvote
!nolynch

It may seem like I'm chaning my mind on voting very quickly within a short amount of time, but this genuinely didn't occur to me.

#288 2016-03-01 20:06:49

Creature
Member
From: The Dark Web
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 9,658

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

Votecount 2.5

[2] Ninja - RhazzleFrazzle, W24
[1] RhazzleFrazzle - maxi123
[0] Onjit
[0] Anak
[0] maxi123
[0] Calicara
[0] Pyromaniac
[0] W24
[0] AlphaJon
[0] Kaslai

[1] No lynch: Anak
[6] Not voting: Onjit, Calicara, Ninja, Pyromaniac, AlphaJon, Kaslai.

With 10 alive, it takes 6 votes to reach majority.

If your vote wasn't counted, tell me.


This is a false statement.

Offline

#289 2016-03-01 20:13:15

Kaslai
Official Caroler
From: SEAͩT̓͑TLͯͥͧͪ̽ͧE͑̚
Joined: 2015-02-17
Posts: 787

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

Creature wrote:

If your vote wasn't counted, tell me.

Kaslai wrote:

I think we should !vote No Lynch

I am sad now. Was it because I didn't say !nolynch specifically or was it because you just didn't see?

!nolynch

Offline

#290 2016-03-01 20:14:00

Anak
Guest

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

Your vote needs to be on a separate line.

#291 2016-03-01 20:16:29

Kaslai
Official Caroler
From: SEAͩT̓͑TLͯͥͧͪ̽ͧE͑̚
Joined: 2015-02-17
Posts: 787

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

Ah, thanks. I wish I had a more substantial reply than this, but this is all I have to say...

Offline

#292 2016-03-01 20:23:57

AlphaJon
Member
From: Who knows
Joined: 2015-07-21
Posts: 1,297

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

Tbh I find it weird that Rhaz waited that long to roleclaim. If he did it right from the beginning, he would have gained trust, and honestly, bringing the mafia number down to 2 would have been hugely beneficial, and after that I suppose he would get some protection overnight.
Now for something important you apparently forgot: The lookout died! Which means that for a sheriff to actually be there, it has to be part of the random town, which is unlikely considering the number of roles, and on top of that, the role would have to go to rhaz, which reduces the chance of him being sheriff down to around 1%.
So I will hold my first intuition, and

!vote RhazzleFrazzle

Btw the mafia has to hit twice to kill the witch, which effectively delays the "LyLo" situation by one night, assuming they don't collaborate(because to collaborate, they would need to know each other).

Offline

#293 2016-03-01 20:27:13

Creature
Member
From: The Dark Web
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 9,658

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

Votecount 2.6

[2] Ninja - RhazzleFrazzle, W24
[2] RhazzleFrazzle - maxi123, AlphaJon
[0] Onjit
[0] Anak
[0] maxi123
[0] Calicara
[0] Pyromaniac
[0] W24
[0] AlphaJon
[0] Kaslai

[2] No lynch: Anak, Kaslai
[5] Not voting: Onjit, Calicara, Ninja, Pyromaniac.

With 10 alive, it takes 6 votes to reach majority.

If your vote wasn't counted, tell me.


This is a false statement.

Offline

#294 2016-03-01 20:30:23

Anak
Guest

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

He had no reason to claim earlier. Plus, he wouldn't have had anyting on Ninja before last night anyways. There are two random town roles, I don't see why it's not plausible Rhazh got sheriff on one of them.
If no one else speaks up, we can assume that Rhazh is sheriff (and we only have Ninja left to) Forgive me for assuming but I'm guessing you're voting him because of his random vote on you, (which I also disagree with) which kind of catalyses everything
Granted we're running out of time, but lynching Rhazh seems like a worse and worse option this time around.

#295 2016-03-01 21:15:19

AlphaJon
Member
From: Who knows
Joined: 2015-07-21
Posts: 1,297

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

Why would you think I'm voting him as retialation? I still don't take his vote on me seriously at the time of this post.
However, the fact that Ninja doesn't post is annoying me, to the point that I would vote him if he doesn't reply.
In the meantime my bet's still on Rhaz.

Offline

#296 2016-03-01 21:19:15

TaskManager
Formerly maxi123
From: i really should update this
Joined: 2015-03-01
Posts: 9,465

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

RhazzleFrazzle wrote:

Where exactly did he explain himself?

Calicara wrote:

Ninja has not explained himself

that was the previous day but yeah i did notice that ive been thinking of him as of town way too much just because of the "ninja vs rhazzle" thing

seriously though people
why nolynch?
if rhazzle is telling truth about being sheriff (which i start to believe more and more) then ninja is either scum or got framed. we dont know whether there is a framer so thats a 50/50
ive rethought this stuff and it is quite confusing to me but now im leaning towards ninja more //forums.everybodyedits.com/img/smilies/neutral (again)
if we lynch ninja then: ninja town = rhazzle is a lier or we got a framer (50/50); ninja mafia/witch = rhazzle was saying truth and hopefully a town protective will defend him after the hardclaim
if we lynch rhazzle: rhazzle sheriff = we lost a PR and ninja is still scum/framed 50/50; rhazzle witch = was lying to increase chances of mislynch while using the shield ability to survive after the hardclaim in case mafia attacks during the night; rhazzle mafia = was lying to increase chances of mislynch and own innocence; ninja is most likely innocent but could be witch
out of all that.. i dont even know, rhazzle's hardclaim seems quite truthful now so i guess ill do the next thing:

!unvote
!vote ninja

yes im jumping from side to side and that looks stupid but the situation changes all the time and i rethink stuff sometimes
either way nolynch is just dumb, it would in no way help town

AlphaJon wrote:

Tbh I find it weird that Rhaz waited that long to roleclaim.

i guess the hardclaim was his last resort

Calicara wrote:

Well the day is technically over, but I just wanted to get a post in.

Anak wrote:

Granted we're running out of time,

actually we still have 1 day and 20 hours left...



CREATURE DONT MISS OUT MY VOTE IN MIDDLE OF THE POST PLS


i8SwC8p.png
signature by HG, profile picture by bluecloud, thank!!
previous signature by drstereos

Offline

#297 2016-03-01 21:29:54

Creature
Member
From: The Dark Web
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 9,658

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

Votecount 2.7

[3] Ninja - RhazzleFrazzle, W24, maxi123
[1] RhazzleFrazzle - AlphaJon
[0] Onjit
[0] Anak
[0] maxi123
[0] Calicara
[0] Pyromaniac
[0] W24
[0] AlphaJon
[0] Kaslai

[2] No lynch: Anak, Kaslai
[5] Not voting: Onjit, Calicara, Ninja, Pyromaniac.

With 10 alive, it takes 6 votes to reach majority.

Not missed //forums.everybodyedits.com/img/smilies/wink


This is a false statement.

Offline

#298 2016-03-01 21:30:02

Onjit
Member
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 9,709
Website

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

!nolynch

I'd rather not get this wrong


:.|:;

Offline

#299 2016-03-01 21:47:19

Calicara
Member
Joined: 2015-02-16
Posts: 932

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

I'm sorry the clock I looked at said 0:00:00. Oh well lol.

!nolynch


Avatar by RainDiance
tgA1y17.jpg
I am obsessed with Steven Universe

Offline

#300 2016-03-01 21:52:01

AlphaJon
Member
From: Who knows
Joined: 2015-07-21
Posts: 1,297

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

Well, if there is no lynch, let's just hope the vigilante will get it right, if there is one, because the Rhaz/Ninja issue will still not be solved.
PS: Ninja's last post was more than 24hours ago (more than 48 actually), I think Creature should prod him.

Offline

RhazzleFrazzle1457531347587571

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB

[ Started around 1731604721.7351 - Generated in 0.073 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.81 MiB (Peak: 2.09 MiB) ]