Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Is reason more of a weapon than a path to truth? By weapon I do not mean literally, but something used against someone.
thanks koya
Offline
No.
*u stinky*
Offline
my golly i was just about to delete the topic because i realized how stupid it was
thanks koya
Offline
by having a weapon im assuming you mean ad hominem, which is a fallacy. Yeah you lose the argument when you fallacy hahah
lunchbox
Offline
by having a weapon im assuming you mean ad hominem, which is a fallacy. Yeah you lose the argument when you fallacy hahah
Just because someone uses a fallacy doesn't mean they don't have a point, or that they're wrong. If someone begins with "Holy crap how stupid can you be" that doesn't mean that you should automatically yell AD HOMINEM and stuff your fingers in your ears.
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
Awesomenessgood wrote:by having a weapon im assuming you mean ad hominem, which is a fallacy. Yeah you lose the argument when you fallacy hahah
Just because someone uses a fallacy doesn't mean they don't have a point, or that they're wrong. If someone begins with "Holy crap how stupid can you be" that doesn't mean that you should automatically yell AD HOMINEM and stuff your fingers in your ears.
Maybe I wasn't clear enough. I mean, of course if the person still has a point after the ad hominem, the argument continues. But I was referring to a situation where the person runs out of points (which is usually where ad hominem comes in) and just tells the person to screw off or something along those lines, they lose.
lunchbox
Offline
[ Started around 1732746434.7156 - Generated in 0.048 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.43 MiB (Peak: 1.54 MiB) ]