Official Everybody Edits Forums

32OrtonEdge32dh

Member

From: DMV

Joined: 2015-02-15

Posts: 5,166

Website

Re: Update Discussion

For coindoors/portals/timed doors, they show a bunch of other stuff, which is very confusing.

It's just showing how they work and situations with them in it.

Also, they have a single brick representing a small world, which is ridiculous, imo.

See, you might be better off reading this.

---

Persona

Guest

Re: Update Discussion

http://eeforumify.com/viewtopic.php?pid=388337#p388337
To all the people who have the complaints, which are ridiculous, the chat and the new shop in general, read my replys

Koto

Member

Joined: 2015-02-18

Posts: 3,269

Re: Update Discussion

That topic was closed.   You ignored my point.   We had to pay $10.01 for chat +beta.   They don't have to pay $8 (chat - $3, then $5 for 50 more gems).

By that, we paid $2 more than them.   Where's our compensation for that $2?

Last edited by KingOfTheOzone (Aug 17 2012 2:53:22 pm)

---

________________________________________________________

32OrtonEdge32dh

Member

From: DMV

Joined: 2015-02-15

Posts: 5,166

Website

Re: Update Discussion

How the heck do three and five add up to seven?

---

Koto

Member

Joined: 2015-02-18

Posts: 3,269

Re: Update Discussion

Oh **** your right.   My math wasn't correct.   Haha, I'm having a slow morning.   But as you can still see, its still a tad bit unfair, don't you think?

---

________________________________________________________

0176

Member

From: Brazil

Joined: 2021-09-05

Posts: 3,174

Re: Update Discussion

For me, the reason for the chat cost is because Chris is running low on money.

But that's stupid thinking either of me or of Benja, because who would want to spend 3$ on chat, be it a parent or a (non-spoiled) kid? Maybe the rich guys? Ooops, 90% of EE live in America and 5% in the Netherlands...

EDIT: cool shop bro

Last edited by 0176 (Aug 17 2012 2:57:11 pm)

iPwner

Member

From: CaliforNYAN Land.

Joined: 2015-02-15

Posts: 1,514

Website

Re: Update Discussion

Conclusion - ever since Everybody Edits 10.0 or whatever that damned update was, EE's been getting worse and worse, and now it's turned, as everything else has in the modern generation, g a y.
EXAMPLE: WHY THE **** DOES MARIO HAVE BLUE EYES NOW

Last edited by ipwner (Aug 17 2012 2:57:20 pm)

---

ssAARASAAAAAAAAA  iAAAAAAAAAAAAA OU yaaAAAAAAAAAAAAAA YAAAaa YAAaah; yaayaayaa, yayayaya-ya-ya YAAA YAAAYA; YAYAYA YAAHAYAhAAAAAAAAAA 

EPIOOOOOUUUUUUuuuuuu   IUO0O0oooooooooooppi

;3 0>o ~X_x~ <~(^V^)~> (); ;B ;~; *~<:',',',',',{ Q=(*@`)Q

Im A ®a®ity ®

Bobithan

Member

Joined: 2015-02-15

Posts: 4,476

Re: Update Discussion

A simple way to rid paypal from complaining to Chris how the price looks fishy and how he's losing small amounts of money (not an issue imo), is just to make it somehwere from 15-50 cents. $3 is a bit much for chat, no? So many games have it for free, so why should chat cost $3 in this game?

Plus, as I have stated before, what if I don't even want gems? What if I just want to make an alt chat account? It's unfair forcing me to pay extra for something I don't want, even if I do get the thing I don't want on discount.

Last edited by Bobithan (Aug 17 2012 3:01:21 pm)

---

aka towwl

Koto

Member

Joined: 2015-02-18

Posts: 3,269

Re: Update Discussion

Its unfair, because of the discount they would get for chat and beta combined, not just chat.   I already have a solution, please check in game suggestions.

---

________________________________________________________

Cola1

Member

From: We will meet again as stars

Joined: 2015-02-15

Posts: 3,281

Re: Update Discussion

I hate the way every now and then it takes forever to add energy to something now. I even have to reload.

---

main_gi

Guest

Re: Update Discussion

In my humble opinion, I believe it would be better to make chat free with a simple age question. Little kids would reply honestly (which would be ineligible), people seriously over recommended age would reply honestly (eligible) OR swayed (eligible if not under), and people with good IQs would lie over the age of 10(eligible if not over 13) or greater IQs with over 13 (eligible). Oh yeah. You might be thinking "IQ doesn't mean anything"...but IQ just twists common sense.

sthreet

Guest

Re: Update Discussion

most people who just might of (so they are thinking about it but havn't done it yet) bought chat don't care about gems. (or they are either really new or already have chat)

therefor 50 gems = 0$
so therefore chat increase was 3000% on price.

extremely lame.

now to top it off the new shop interface is FORCED... ...i would be prefrectly fine if it was a off/on option like it should be but sorting through it is just time consuming and difficult.

the only good side is that it shows you what you get but this is offset by two points:
1) it shows more than what you get.
2) it doesn't show everything that you get.

in addition if someone would UPDATE THE WIKI then we could just look their to see what each pack contained... ...i would work on it if i was more serious about this game.

very very lame.

now about the castle pack.
all it is is graphic updates.
neat graphic updates but... ...just a few block updates, these must be like not even effort to add by now with so many new blocks.
nice blocks though.
now with the chains... ...they are just graphic updates for the ladders... ...can't be much harder to add then a new block. it woudl be much much better to change the physics slightly for the chain, for example if you aren't moving on the chain you fall or something? maybe the chain swings?

kinda decent but kinda lame.
overall it would have made a lot more sence to do a few things:
1) bring the wiki up to date.
2) make the new shop screen and off/on option.
3) make a slight change to physics for the chain.
4) make it possible to buy chat for 25-50 cents but NOT get the 50 gems, just chat.
5) (going for the + rep from older players) put a 1-time option if you already had chat when the update came out to allow you to spend 2.99$ on 50 gems.

Tako

Member

From: Memphis, Tennessee, USA

Joined: 2015-08-10

Posts: 6,663

Website

Re: Update Discussion

Chat costing $3 helps remove the suspicious penny of doom and despair.

I like the new Energy Shop; my only wish it that you could put energy toward an item easier. The buttons shouldn't be out of the way; they should be in plain sight.

---

Yeah, well, you know that's just like, uh, your opinion, man.

Shift

Guest

Re: Update Discussion

I know this was on one of the other topics, but this is the only related topic, and it really bugged me.

Yes, it is unfair that we payed one cent, and the newer players have to pay 3$.
How unfair!

Oh, yes, let's favor the people who spent $3 in order to get what cost us $5.01! Yes, obviously they were jipped, not us.

Last edited by Shift (Aug 17 2012 8:45:01 pm)

Tako

Member

From: Memphis, Tennessee, USA

Joined: 2015-08-10

Posts: 6,663

Website

Re: Update Discussion

Yes... newer users are saving two dollars and one cent.

Woe are we.

ALT+Q+Q

CMD+W

---

Yeah, well, you know that's just like, uh, your opinion, man.

sthreet

Guest

Re: Update Discussion

but some newer users don't care about the 50 gems so that has an effective value of 0$...

they should of had both options... ...i don't see any problems with having both options.

i also think you should be able to use the old shop interface if you want to... ...some people (me) liked it better.
also please don't change my name to anything funny for disagreeing with you.
(needless to say the last comment is a joke)

Krazyman50

Guest

Re: Update Discussion

I hate the new pack and smiley, but I like the new shop design.
And I already knew it was coming thanks to MrShoe.

32OrtonEdge32dh

Member

From: DMV

Joined: 2015-02-15

Posts: 5,166

Website

Re: Update Discussion

In my humble opinion, I believe it would be better to make chat free with a simple age question. Little kids would reply honestly (which would be ineligible), people seriously over recommended age would reply honestly (eligible) OR swayed (eligible if not under), and people with good IQs would lie over the age of 10(eligible if not over 13) or greater IQs with over 13 (eligible). Oh yeah. You might be thinking "IQ doesn't mean anything"...but IQ just twists common sense.

That definitely wouldn't work.   When I was five I was signing up for things as a 30-year-old.
Maybe an algebraic equation that isn't copy-pastable?

---

Loffer Logge

Guest

Re: Update Discussion

Algebraic equations are not a reliable way of determining age.   If someone isn't good at math, they might not be able to solve it no matter what age they are, and people who are amazing at math might be able to solve it when they are very young.   However, those are extremes, and most of the time a high school/college student would be the only one able to solve it.   But then that doesn't work for underage people who have their parents' permission (My parents aren't very good at math).

sthreet wrote:
n addition if someone would UPDATE THE WIKI then we could just look their to see what each pack contained... ...i would work on it if i was more serious about this game.

New accounts were disabled because of spam with the promise of Captcha coming "soon."   That was a year ago.   So whoever has control over this needs to fix this, because I would gladly bring the wiki up to date.   If you have   any power here, I would appreciate your help.

Last edited by Loffer Logge (Aug 18 2012 8:58:08 am)

32OrtonEdge32dh

Member

From: DMV

Joined: 2015-02-15

Posts: 5,166

Website

Re: Update Discussion

Hmm...that's true.
Maybe there just isn't any other reliable way.

---

Tako

Member

From: Memphis, Tennessee, USA

Joined: 2015-08-10

Posts: 6,663

Website

Re: Update Discussion

The best option, one I think Chris should definitely pursue, is a moderation team and free-to-use chat.

The few "moderators" we have in-game rarely play, and when they do, they play for maybe ten minutes. They're trying to make a game safe without anyone being there, which will never work.

---

Yeah, well, you know that's just like, uh, your opinion, man.

Notsobad

Member

Joined: 2015-02-15

Posts: 474

Re: Update Discussion

The best option, one I think Chris should definitely pursue, is a moderation team and free-to-use chat.

The few "moderators" we have in-game rarely play, and when they do, they play for maybe ten minutes. They're trying to make a game safe without anyone being there, which will never work.

I really like this idea! Maybe he could make them be like secret mods only not secret (like no mod mode or anything too fancy).

Also, we need a team of industrial engineer like people that go around making the game more user friendly and get 1st person ideas from users in the game.

Last edited by Notsobad (Aug 18 2012 1:31:29 pm)

tak4n

Member

Joined: 2015-02-17

Posts: 1,883

Re: Update Discussion

The best option, one I think Chris should definitely pursue, is a moderation team and free-to-use chat.

The few "moderators" we have in-game rarely play, and when they do, they play for maybe ten minutes. They're trying to make a game safe without anyone being there, which will never work.

I really like this idea! Maybe he could make them be like secret mods only not secret (like no mod mode or anything too fancy).

Also, we need a team of industrial engineer like people that go around making the game more user friendly and get 1st person ideas from users in the game.

Other than other mods, Chris will trust the EX crew more than anyone with this idea. The EX crew is probably busy enough with other things in their life other than making maps in their free time... I don't know if this idea will work out better than what the mods do at the moment unless Chris actually hires someone to go around EE and get info for Chris or the mods reading the forums more often.

---

32OrtonEdge32dh

Member

From: DMV

Joined: 2015-02-15

Posts: 5,166

Website

Re: Update Discussion

Maybe he'd ask Nou (his only connection to the community, and maybe that's even inadvertant) to pick five or six people to do it.   Or pick them himself based on who he sees being active and mature.

---

Deetz

Guest

Re: Update Discussion

I thank Chris for a million. Now I have a slim chance of getting chat. Before my percent chance of chattification was about -50%.