Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Let me guess the leaderboards:
1-4: Administrators/Moderators
5-8: EX/MG Crew members
9-10: Who's used to win contests.
This is a false statement.
Offline
Let me guess the leaderboards:
1-4: Administrators/Moderators
5-8: EX/MG Crew members
9-10: Who's used to win contests.
It would feel unfair if admins/mods got gems when some of them already have like a million gems.
thx for sig bobithan
Offline
Creature wrote:Let me guess the leaderboards:
1-4: Administrators/Moderators
5-8: EX/MG Crew members
9-10: Who's used to win contests.It would feel unfair if admins/mods got gems when some of them already have like a million gems.
No ones of mods or admins won the contest, don't worry
Offline
skullz17 wrote:Creature wrote:Let me guess the leaderboards:
1-4: Administrators/Moderators
5-8: EX/MG Crew members
9-10: Who's used to win contests.It would feel unfair if admins/mods got gems when some of them already have like a million gems.
No ones of mods or admins won the contest, don't worry
How do you know that? Give source or I won't believe you.
thx for sig bobithan
Offline
AmdS wrote:skullz17 wrote:Creature wrote:Let me guess the leaderboards:
1-4: Administrators/Moderators
5-8: EX/MG Crew members
9-10: Who's used to win contests.It would feel unfair if admins/mods got gems when some of them already have like a million gems.
No ones of mods or admins won the contest, don't worry
How do you know that? Give source or I won't believe you.
http://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewtopic.php?id=28881
This guy know everything.
This is a false statement.
Offline
AmdS wrote:skullz17 wrote:Creature wrote:Let me guess the leaderboards:
1-4: Administrators/Moderators
5-8: EX/MG Crew members
9-10: Who's used to win contests.It would feel unfair if admins/mods got gems when some of them already have like a million gems.
No ones of mods or admins won the contest, don't worry
How do you know that? Give source or I won't believe you.
You can't see that Processor gave up this contest? He was too busy to finish their level I think. Just check the submit list
Offline
AmdS wrote:skullz17 wrote:Creature wrote:Let me guess the leaderboards:
1-4: Administrators/Moderators
5-8: EX/MG Crew members
9-10: Who's used to win contests.It would feel unfair if admins/mods got gems when some of them already have like a million gems.
No ones of mods or admins won the contest, don't worry
How do you know that? Give source or I won't believe you.
even admins like thanel said that he is only entering for fun and if he reachs top 10 he wants that it dosen't count
Offline
skullz17 wrote:AmdS wrote:skullz17 wrote:Creature wrote:Let me guess the leaderboards:
1-4: Administrators/Moderators
5-8: EX/MG Crew members
9-10: Who's used to win contests.It would feel unfair if admins/mods got gems when some of them already have like a million gems.
No ones of mods or admins won the contest, don't worry
How do you know that? Give source or I won't believe you.
even admins like thanel said that he is only entering for fun and if he reachs top 10 he wants that it dosen't count
apparently (this is what he said, and no i didn't take a screenshot) master1 did most of the work for his level and if he wins he's giving all of the gems to his partner
:.|:;
Offline
Creature wrote:Let me guess the leaderboards:
1-4: Administrators/Moderators
5-8: EX/MG Crew members
9-10: Who's used to win contests.It would feel unfair if admins/mods got gems when some of them already have like a million gems.
What frustrates me is that they got free BC to work on their levels when I had to pay 50 gems for mine. Eh I already talked to M1 about this so I don't really care as much anymore.
Also yes, if M1 and Thwinkt win, Thwinkt will receive all the gems.
Offline
What frustrates me is that they got free BC to work on their levels when I had to pay 50 gems for mine.
At least you have BC. Many players (including me) probably struggled to get all of the things they wanted to put in their level.
:.|:;
Offline
skullz17 wrote:Creature wrote:Let me guess the leaderboards:
1-4: Administrators/Moderators
5-8: EX/MG Crew members
9-10: Who's used to win contests.It would feel unfair if admins/mods got gems when some of them already have like a million gems.
What frustrates me is that they got free BC to work on their levels when I had to pay 50 gems for mine. Eh I already talked to M1 about this so I don't really care as much anymore.
Also yes, if M1 and Thwinkt win, Thwinkt will receive all the gems.
Still kind of unfair. If another team won, they would have to share, meaning less gems per person. Onjit asked to team up with me and when I declined he said enjoy 2nd place, but I said that the 2nd place 500 gems is more than the 1st place 350 gems I would get if I was with him. Those who team up with mods don't have this disadvantage.
tak4n wrote:What frustrates me is that they got free BC to work on their levels when I had to pay 50 gems for mine.
At least you have BC. Many players (including me) probably struggled to get all of the things they wanted to put in their level.
Advantages of stocking up on random blocks over the years . Tip: If you have nothing to buy, stock up on limited blocks, not worlds. You need the blocks more often than you need the worlds. Don't be the guy who has 50 empty great worlds, that's a massive waste of energy.
thx for sig bobithan
Offline
Still kind of unfair. If another team won, they would have to share, meaning less gems per person.
...How is that unfair? If two people build a good enough level to win gems, they should be allowed to do whatever they want with them. Nobody is forced to split them 50/50.
I'm simply choosing to spend mine on my partner, instead of myself.
Offline
skullz17 wrote:Still kind of unfair. If another team won, they would have to share, meaning less gems per person.
...How is that unfair? If two people build a good enough level to win gems, they should be allowed to do whatever they want with them. Nobody is forced to split them 50/50.
I'm simply choosing to spend mine on my partner, instead of myself.
If [mod] does 50% of the work, and [mod's partner] does the other 50%, how come [mod's partner] gets 100% of the reward? The only reason is because this person is in the same team as a mod. Therefore, being on the same team as a mod means a larger prize, which is not fair imo. It is exactly the same logic as to why a mod on their own shouldn't get a 700 gem reward.
thx for sig bobithan
Offline
not fair
I'm going to ask Shia LaBeouf to do a "Get Over It" video.
I have permanently left the game and forum.
EE is an entertaining game and I enjoyed playing it...
...but it's time for me to move on.
Offline
I haven't suggested any solutions myself, and honestly can't think of any. So I think it's fair enough that nothing gets done about it.
thx for sig bobithan
Offline
Tip: If you have nothing to buy, stock up on limited blocks, not worlds. You need the blocks more often than you need the worlds. Don't be the guy who has 50 empty great worlds, that's a massive waste of energy.
I've learned this the hard way.
Offline
so am i going last :O
Offline
so am i going last :O
I don't know what place you're getting, other than on everyone's nerves.
Click the image to see my graphics suggestions, or here to play EE: Project M!
Offline
Xfrogman43, blizzard, Onjit, skullz17, Pingohits, some woman, SPT, Ben, oranj, Krosis
Kids please.
HAHA
Offline
Just an announcement. Those who have sent us the most money have already earned a spot in the top ten list
Offline
WTF rly wow now that is interesting and not fair
Offline
-_- nvm i guess it is fair but the rules say that it has to be a world not money donation (i think)
Offline
[ Started around 1732315724.7279 - Generated in 0.178 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.91 MiB (Peak: 2.22 MiB) ]