Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Ok so Ever since i went to middle school last week it takes along time to get to bus stop and a long walk to get to my home since the bus doesn't go through my street it was really hot outside my sister walks home with me we go to same school she is in 8th im in 6th we were walking home it was so hot i ask her this Question:Would You rather walk through this hot weather home or go in a hot car and drive you home what would you do?
Offline
Go in a car of course. You can always open your windows to be cooled by the wind, and you're protected from sun hitting you from above. Plus, it's much quicker.
From my experience, being in a car is much better. It's actually hotter being outside, even if the car seems hot. Though it depends on how many people are in the car. If it's full then of course it would be hot, but I think it would still be better than walking.
thx for sig bobithan
Offline
Definitely the car. You don't have to lug your bag back to your house if you ride in a car.
And walking in hot weather can be pretty tiring and in the car you have air conditioner (and even if you don't you can open the windows).
Offline
ZOEY DOESNT ACCEPT ANYTHING
Offline
bring a god(beaver)dam bike to school. Get some exercise! Well unless you're lazy of course.
F
Offline
bring a god(beaver)dam bike to school. Get some exercise! Well unless you're lazy of course.
If it's a hot day that could end up worse than walking. Maybe not though, I've never done much cycling so idk.
thx for sig bobithan
Offline
bring a god(beaver)dam bike to school. Get some exercise! Well unless you're lazy of course.
But biking takes more energy than walking.
Offline
Freckleface wrote:bring a god(beaver)dam bike to school. Get some exercise! Well unless you're lazy of course.
But biking takes more energy than walking.
Going uphill on a bike isn't fun. I'd rather walk than bike up a steep hill. HOWEVER.
11 calories / minute at 13 mph (160 lbs) (biking)
6 calories / minute at 4 mph (160 lbs) (walking)
If you're going three miles (e.g.):
biking time = 3 / 13 = 14 minutes.
walking time = 45 minutes.
calories burned:
biking - 11*14 = 154
walking - 6*45=270
So, you're going faster and burning more calories if you walk.
But that's walking at a brisk pace (my pace)
2 mph & 3 cal /min
(3 miles / 2 mph 90 minutes * 3 cal = 270
huh. this can't be right. walking quickly or slowly burns the same calories.
My point: biking takes less energy. overall, but it's more compact.
Offline
get on my yacht and drive it home :cool::cool::cool::cool::cool:
Offline
Pages: 1
[ Started around 1733341258.6415 - Generated in 0.052 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.49 MiB (Peak: 1.64 MiB) ]