Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
So, the thread is de-stickied because -- the ideas are no longer considered? The thread is too derailed? Did I miss the explaining post?
Probably because it would "ruin" the idea of bots.
thanks zoey aaaaaaaaaaaand thanks latif for the avatar
Offline
In whose opinion? Did we really come to this conclusion without debate?
Do you not like this thread?
Did CJMAEDER renege on his idea?
Offline
In whose opinion? Did we really come to this conclusion without debate?
Do you not like this thread?
Did CJMAEDER renege on his idea?
I thought there was quite enough debate. And at this point, nobody gives two craps.
The point of creating bots, is so it is completely customizable for and by the user. It isn't meant for the staff to handle.
Also, if they did screw around with this, it would (most likely) ruin all bots that are out right now.
There are no complaints about the way bots work ATM.
There is no need to screw around with the way bots work.
Just leave it as it is.
Please woot if you agree.
If you don't agree, a puppy doesn't get adopted
Owner of GooCrew
GooCrew Worlds:
GooCrew Art World
Offline
There are no complaints about the way bots work ATM.
thanks zoey aaaaaaaaaaaand thanks latif for the avatar
Offline
Gooberg wrote:There are no complaints about the way bots work ATM.
1. I think you know what I mean
2. I mean the way bots work, not the way some bot owners choose to use/program theirs.
Owner of GooCrew
GooCrew Worlds:
GooCrew Art World
Offline
I think someone earlier mentioned a way to see if two user's IPs match was an excellent feature for banlists. Instead of the offenders creating new accounts, they will be kicked again.
Offline
Ever heard of "dynamic ip's" ? there the standard in germany making such commands obsolelte , atleast against german offenders (and therefore bannign other users)
Offline
eeisold has a point though, is this discontinued? At least a statement would have been nice.
Offline
On the topic of EE ideas, I'd like to see making the chat transparent, like in minecraft (hope the image isn't too big.)
Making the chat transparent would offer several advantages, including:
- being able to see what's happening behind the chat box
- giving players a larger field of view
- possibly allow the chat box to be hidden so that distractions can be kept at a minimum
- allows old chat messages to fade away without taking up screen space
- keep the original swf size, but just change the view port (doesn't break swf size.)
Offline
Looks like those suggestions will be pending ad infinitum.
One bot to rule them all, one bot to find them. One bot to bring them all... and with this cliché blind them.
Offline
Offline
I want magic coin finder to be a feature to this bot
Offline
Is the "rect" message an actual thing? Or was that just speculation? The OP doesn't really delve into details.
Those who can't do, teach.
A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.
It is a well-known fact that those people who must want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it... anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job.
I think fish is nice, but then I think that rain is wet, so who am I to judge?
For a moment, nothing happened. Then, after a second or so, nothing continued to happen.
Offline
I want magic coin finder to be a feature to this bot
No pls.
Is the "rect" message an actual thing? Or was that just speculation? The OP doesn't really delve into details.
Test it out, if if you mean a serious suggestion, then check the trello board.
Offline
How about allow Jumping to be registered when touching ladder? At the moment, jumping doesn't register on a ladder and it could have acted as a free button.
Offline
^That, or...
If the game could detect any key pressed, this would be helpful for bots and such in many ways. "Press 1 for yes, 2 for no". They don't have to do anything in-game, but mainly for bot use.
Plus...
Users don't move when they're sending chat messages. Similarly, don't send bots [the] keystrokes if you don't want them known.
Naturally, your idea would be easier to implement. However, that point might be moot.
So, the thread is de-stickied because -- the ideas are no longer considered? The thread is too derailed? Did I miss the explaining post?
Those who can't do, teach.
A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.
It is a well-known fact that those people who must want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it... anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job.
I think fish is nice, but then I think that rain is wet, so who am I to judge?
For a moment, nothing happened. Then, after a second or so, nothing continued to happen.
Offline
Naturally, your idea would be easier to implement. However, that point might be moot.
eeisol wrote:So, the thread is de-stickied because -- the ideas are no longer considered? The thread is too derailed? Did I miss the explaining post?
They have a trello board for this stuff, no need for this thread except to 'steal' ideas from people that are oblivious of the trello board.
Offline
Can I Have please the BOT for the BomBot. Where to download. If somebody knows say me please THX for help (if you help)
ANATOLYee
Can I Have please the BOT for the BomBot. Where to download. If somebody knows say me please THX for help (if you help)
ANATOLYee
Pls.
Go.
Offline
Can I Have please the BOT for the BomBot. Where to download. If somebody knows say me please THX for help (if you help)
ANATOLYee
- That bot is private
- This topic is for features you want added
Offline
[ Started around 1732308698.7224 - Generated in 0.166 seconds, 13 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.73 MiB (Peak: 1.98 MiB) ]