Want a Feature added to Everybody Edits for bots? Post here.

Br0k3n · 2015-07-02 22:29:30

Fastmapler wrote:

Lastly, setting teams would work as:
/team [player] [teamid]

Either in /help /team it should specify teamid = teamname, or the command should be like:
/team [player] [teamid/teamname]
Just to make it easier.

(Or i didnt understand you when you said "teamid")

den3107 · 2015-07-03 01:14:58

Br0k3n wrote:

(Or i didnt understand you when you said "teamid")

0 = none, 1 = red, 2 = blue, 3 = green, etc. Same order you get when switching through the teams.

Fastmapler

Hexagon · 2015-07-03 01:31:15

Everything that is available through the GUI should also be available through a command and vice-versa, in my opinion. Many people are more keyboard-inclined and so clicking on GUI elements is a bit of a hassle for common tasks.

Era · 2015-07-03 15:43:30

den3107 wrote:

Add hasedit to "add"
You already know that.
Only the owner has edit when joining a room, and the owner's name is send in the init message.
So just check if it's the owner.

False ... did you realise that the bot might join after other players?

den3107 · 2015-07-03 22:28:29

Era wrote:

den3107 wrote:
Add hasedit to "add"
You already know that.
Only the owner has edit when joining a room, and the owner's name is send in the init message.
So just check if it's the owner.
False ... did you realise that the bot might join after other players?

Smart one...
Never make public bots and it's always my bots that give edit, so that's why I'd never need it.

In that case: support.

Era · 2015-07-03 22:31:16

Well , i like to run my bot in debug mode and restarting it causes it to loose that data of course ( i could probably store it , anyway) then uppon rjeoining it'd naturally give admins edit , which in turn just comes as spam to them since they can already edit (same scenario if the bot woudl crash durring run)

Edit: please add the ability to set the value of a specific switchid per player as worldowner

Xfrogman43 · 2015-07-10 05:19:37

If the game could detect any key pressed, this would be helpful for bots and such in many ways. "Press 1 for yes, 2 for no". They don't have to do anything in-game, but mainly for bot use.

Jabatheblob1 · 2015-07-10 05:22:37

Xfrogman43 wrote:

If the game could detect any key pressed, this would be helpful for bots and such in many ways. "Press 1 for yes, 2 for no". They don't have to do anything in-game, but mainly for bot use.

they already said no to this, i don't remember the reasoning

BuzzerBee · 2015-07-10 05:54:07

Jabatheblob1 wrote:

Xfrogman43 wrote:
If the game could detect any key pressed, this would be helpful for bots and such in many ways. "Press 1 for yes, 2 for no". They don't have to do anything in-game, but mainly for bot use.
they already said no to this, i don't remember the reasoning

Privacy mainly.

Xfrogman43 · 2015-07-10 06:01:59

BuzzerBee wrote:

Jabatheblob1 wrote:
Xfrogman43 wrote:
If the game could detect any key pressed, this would be helpful for bots and such in many ways. "Press 1 for yes, 2 for no". They don't have to do anything in-game, but mainly for bot use.
they already said no to this, i don't remember the reasoning
Privacy mainly.

True, but is there a way around it?

Era · 2015-07-10 07:01:14

You can use quickchat to detect alt gr + number

eeisold · 2015-07-12 03:24:12

'privacy mainly'
Then do as EE already does. Users don't move when they're sending chat messages. Similarly, don't send bots your keystrokes if you don't want them known.
Unless you like to talk to yourself... by writing... with the box closed... "privacy" has been fully upheld.

Mylo

Jabatheblob1 · 2015-07-12 05:57:35

eeisold wrote:

'privacy mainly'
Then do as EE already does. Users don't move when they're sending chat messages. Similarly, don't send bots your keystrokes if you don't want them known.
Unless you like to talk to yourself... by writing... with the box closed... "privacy" has been fully upheld.

wtf you talking about

Xfrogman43, 1448

eeisold · 2015-07-12 17:39:24

I can't really answer "wtf you talking about". I'm not even sure if you're expressing pure confusion or simply trying to discredit my solution without addressing it directly.
The best I can respond with is completely restating what I've already said. I could even change the wording. But I don't even know if that will achieve anything.

Ever notice that you can talk about war, art, science, and design in the chat without your smiley moving? Opposite, ever click outside the chat box to move? Does the chat get manipulated?

Or perhaps you took issue with preserving privacy outside of the swf. Ever find that your smiley has continued moving after you let go of the respective key?

I hope that this response was more productive than "wtf do u not get idiot"

ZeldaXD, Mylo

Jabatheblob1 · 2015-07-13 08:08:14

eeisold wrote:

I can't really answer "wtf you talking about". I'm not even sure if you're expressing pure confusion or simply trying to discredit my solution without addressing it directly.
The best I can respond with is completely restating what I've already said. I could even change the wording. But I don't even know if that will achieve anything.
Ever notice that you can talk about war, art, science, and design in the chat without your smiley moving? Opposite, ever click outside the chat box to move? Does the chat get manipulated?
Or perhaps you took issue with preserving privacy outside of the swf. Ever find that your smiley has continued moving after you let go of the respective key?
I hope that this response was more productive than "wtf do u not get idiot"

thank you c:

Gooberg · 2015-07-18 04:25:42

This defeats the purpose of having/creating bots -.-

eeisold · 2015-07-18 04:46:07

gooberg123, an interesting point you're contending.

All things in moderation. (the literal kind. we don't need people in charge of every aspect of life)
In this case, as long as we don't make "Features" that completely encompass ideas, we haven't defeated the purpose of bots. Further, unless the "feature" is chat-based, a bot connection is required to send the command.

In this case, I think the idea is to make additions that have multiple applications. A bot having the ability to send a rectangle is an example of many such uses. However, if we asked for a "Feature" that provided a server-supported snake, we'd be "defeating the purpose".

Gooberg · 2015-07-18 15:34:41

I see. Though still, in general, I don't want EE devs screwing around with anything that has to do with bots, I believe they should leave it as it is. I haven't really heard and complaints about how the bots work.

We the players.

John · 2015-07-19 09:16:22

I suggest /reset {PLAYER}. It would be nice only resetting certain players.

EDIT:
How about a command that resets everything, but doesn't teleport the player? Optional parameter can be a Username or UserID.

TSF14, Era, Jabatheblob1, Xfrogman43, Thanel, Gooberg

Gooberg · 2015-07-20 06:22:40

Emalton wrote:

I suggest /reset {PLAYER}. It would be nice only resetting certain players.
EDIT:
How about a command that resets everything, but doesn't teleport the player? Optional parameter can be a Username or UserID.

I just patented it. Sorry mate.

Jabatheblob1 · 2015-07-20 07:44:28

gooberg123 wrote:

I just patented it. Sorry mate.

what

Xfrogman43, Gooberg, eeisol

John · 2015-07-20 18:51:35

gooberg123 wrote:

Emalton wrote:
I suggest /reset {PLAYER}. It would be nice only resetting certain players.
EDIT:
How about a command that resets everything, but doesn't teleport the player? Optional parameter can be a Username or UserID.
I just patented it. Sorry mate.

Huh? Show us your patent then.

Xfrogman43, Gooberg

Gooberg · 2015-07-20 20:07:21

SirJosh3917, Era

den3107 · 2015-07-20 21:17:57

gooberg123 wrote:

I just patented it. Sorry mate.

Oh no, now everyody that will use the changes in the command will thank you instead of Emalton, because everybody totally keeps track who had which ideas!

eeisol · 2015-07-21 19:36:09

So, the thread is de-stickied because -- the ideas are no longer considered? The thread is too derailed? Did I miss the explaining post?

Mylo

Official Everybody Edits Forums

#76 2015-07-02 22:29:30

Re: Want a Feature added to Everybody Edits for bots? Post here.

#77 2015-07-03 01:14:58

Re: Want a Feature added to Everybody Edits for bots? Post here.

#78 2015-07-03 01:31:15

Re: Want a Feature added to Everybody Edits for bots? Post here.

#79 2015-07-03 15:43:30

Re: Want a Feature added to Everybody Edits for bots? Post here.

#80 2015-07-03 22:28:29

Re: Want a Feature added to Everybody Edits for bots? Post here.

#81 2015-07-03 22:31:16, last edited by Era (2015-07-05 20:59:46)

Re: Want a Feature added to Everybody Edits for bots? Post here.

#82 2015-07-10 05:19:37

Re: Want a Feature added to Everybody Edits for bots? Post here.

#83 2015-07-10 05:22:37

Re: Want a Feature added to Everybody Edits for bots? Post here.

#84 2015-07-10 05:54:07

Re: Want a Feature added to Everybody Edits for bots? Post here.

#85 2015-07-10 06:01:59

Re: Want a Feature added to Everybody Edits for bots? Post here.

#86 2015-07-10 07:01:14

Re: Want a Feature added to Everybody Edits for bots? Post here.

#87 2015-07-12 03:24:12

Re: Want a Feature added to Everybody Edits for bots? Post here.

#88 2015-07-12 05:57:35

Re: Want a Feature added to Everybody Edits for bots? Post here.

#89 2015-07-12 17:39:24, last edited by eeisold (2015-07-12 17:40:00)

Re: Want a Feature added to Everybody Edits for bots? Post here.

#90 2015-07-13 08:08:14

Re: Want a Feature added to Everybody Edits for bots? Post here.

#91 2015-07-18 04:25:42

Re: Want a Feature added to Everybody Edits for bots? Post here.

#92 2015-07-18 04:46:07

Re: Want a Feature added to Everybody Edits for bots? Post here.

#93 2015-07-18 15:34:41

Re: Want a Feature added to Everybody Edits for bots? Post here.

#94 2015-07-19 09:16:22, last edited by John (2015-07-20 02:08:58)

Re: Want a Feature added to Everybody Edits for bots? Post here.

#95 2015-07-20 06:22:40

Re: Want a Feature added to Everybody Edits for bots? Post here.

#96 2015-07-20 07:44:28

Re: Want a Feature added to Everybody Edits for bots? Post here.

#97 2015-07-20 18:51:35

Re: Want a Feature added to Everybody Edits for bots? Post here.

#98 2015-07-20 20:07:21, last edited by Gooberg (2015-07-20 20:07:39)

Re: Want a Feature added to Everybody Edits for bots? Post here.

#99 2015-07-20 21:17:57

Re: Want a Feature added to Everybody Edits for bots? Post here.

#100 2015-07-21 19:36:09

Re: Want a Feature added to Everybody Edits for bots? Post here.

Board footer