Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Let's say someone makes a nice topic with a OP filled with images and text, then someone decides to quote the OP just to say something. Do you find it annoying? I do.
I think there should have a new rule regarding needlessly long-quoting. Someone agree?
This is a false statement.
Offline
I tend to trim down what I'm quoting so it refers to what I'm responding to. Especially if it's a longer post. It's so much easier to read for everyone, and there's less confusion in what I'm talking about.
I thought there was already a rule, but if there's not, then yes. Maybe also a warning if you try to quote something over a certain number of characters.
thx for sig bobithan
Offline
I tend to trim down what I'm quoting so it refers to what I'm responding to.
So few people do this, and it usually ends in long 5 quote chains. It's even worse when the reply is only really talking about what that one person said and nothing else in the chain, I mean, it's not hard to highlight something and click quick quote.
Offline
I thought there was already a rule, but if there's not, then yes. Maybe also a warning if you try to quote something over a certain number of characters.
There is
Gravedigging, double-posting, and quoting the original post should only be done when necessary.
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
skullz17 wrote:I thought there was already a rule, but if there's not, then yes. Maybe also a warning if you try to quote something over a certain number of characters.
There is
Gravedigging, double-posting, and quoting the original post should only be done when necessary.
That's just the original post though.
This is more about all those "I suport +1 woot" quoting trains
Different55 wrote:skullz17 wrote:I thought there was already a rule, but if there's not, then yes. Maybe also a warning if you try to quote something over a certain number of characters.
There is
Gravedigging, double-posting, and quoting the original post should only be done when necessary.
That's just the original post though.
This is more about all those "I suport +1 woot" quoting trains
I thought it was about quoting long posts, not quoting trains.
thx for sig bobithan
Offline
Anak wrote:Different55 wrote:skullz17 wrote:I thought there was already a rule, but if there's not, then yes. Maybe also a warning if you try to quote something over a certain number of characters.
There is
Gravedigging, double-posting, and quoting the original post should only be done when necessary.
That's just the original post though.
This is more about all those "I suport +1 woot" quoting trainsI thought it was about quoting long posts, not quoting trains.
Quoting trains tend to become long
That was just an example anyhow
skullz17 wrote:I thought there was already a rule, but if there's not, then yes. Maybe also a warning if you try to quote something over a certain number of characters.
There is
Gravedigging, double-posting, and quoting the original post should only be done when necessary.
But what if there's a big post around and it gets quoted?
This is a false statement.
Offline
Pages: 1
[ Started around 1738516165.4994 - Generated in 0.051 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.52 MiB (Peak: 1.68 MiB) ]