Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Currently writing a bot (don't worry, no spamming bot...) which has to say a couple messages after each other (as the messages are too long for single post).
Now my question is what the minimum delay is that has to be between messages.
It feels kinda variable, but that could be me.
Currently 0.5 seconds doesn't (always) work.
0.75 Does work for 4 consecutive messages.
Offline
760 is what i use and then i make an array of random characters and i attach a random character to every message so i don't get the spam block, and even if my bot gets spam blocked i just reconnect it
[EDIT]: Although. There is no delay between regular message and PMs, so you can send one message, then send the next message to everyone in a pm right after the message then wait 760ms then do it again
If you would like me to make a bot for you, go here.
Offline
[EDIT]: Although. There is no delay between regular message and PMs, so you can send one message, then send the next message to everyone in a pm right after the message then wait 760ms then do it again
I also get the anti spam and 'type too fast' warnings on pm?
I think you mean there is no required delay between one normal message and one pm.
Offline
I think you mean there is no required delay between one normal message and one pm.
That is what he meant.
And I guess I once heard it was around 665 or something.
Offline
[ Started around 1732484484.8614 - Generated in 0.043 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.43 MiB (Peak: 1.55 MiB) ]