Official Everybody Edits Forums

Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?

You are not logged in.

#1 2015-04-26 23:39:15, last edited by den3107 (2015-04-26 23:52:33)

den3107
Member
From: Netherlands
Joined: 2015-04-24
Posts: 1,025

[Question] Minimum delay required per message

Currently writing a bot (don't worry, no spamming bot...) which has to say a couple messages after each other (as the messages are too long for single post).
Now my question is what the minimum delay is that has to be between messages.

It feels kinda variable, but that could be me.
Currently 0.5 seconds doesn't (always) work.
0.75 Does work for 4 consecutive messages.

Offline

Wooted by:

#2 2015-04-27 05:20:52, last edited by Jabatheblob1 (2015-04-27 05:22:44)

Jabatheblob1
Member
Joined: 2015-03-01
Posts: 856

Re: [Question] Minimum delay required per message

760 is what i use and then i make an array of random characters and i attach a random character to every message so i don't get the spam block, and even if my bot gets spam blocked i just reconnect it

[EDIT]: Although. There is no delay between regular message and PMs, so you can send one message, then send the next message to everyone in a pm right after the message then wait 760ms then do it again


If you would like me to make a bot for you, go here.

Offline

Wooted by:

#3 2015-04-27 09:59:18

den3107
Member
From: Netherlands
Joined: 2015-04-24
Posts: 1,025

Re: [Question] Minimum delay required per message

Jabatheblob1 wrote:

[EDIT]: Although. There is no delay between regular message and PMs, so you can send one message, then send the next message to everyone in a pm right after the message then wait 760ms then do it again

I also get the anti spam and 'type too fast' warnings on pm?
I think you mean there is no required delay between one normal message and one pm.

Offline

Wooted by: (2)

#4 2015-04-27 11:59:40

DarkDragon4900
Member
Joined: 2015-03-17
Posts: 251

Re: [Question] Minimum delay required per message

den3107 wrote:

I think you mean there is no required delay between one normal message and one pm.

That is what he meant.

And I guess I once heard it was around 665 or something.

Offline

Wooted by: (2)
DarkDragon49001430132380499266

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB

[ Started around 1732483473.5946 - Generated in 0.043 seconds, 11 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.43 MiB (Peak: 1.55 MiB) ]