Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
well in my opinion the rules are great, straightforward, and humorous
even support from can-be moderator
Offline
Zoey2070 and I have put our minds together to create these rules:
FORUM RULES
By using these forums, you agree to abide by these rules (and any future variants) and acknowledge that administrators and moderators reserve the right to issue warnings and ban users for not following these rules, or for no reason at all.
Note, the rules are subject to change at any time without any notice.
Post content should be of substance; remember: quality over quantity.
Leave the moderation to those with authority, it is not the job of the forum users to "mini-mod" each other. Abusing the report system makes it hard for others to do their job efficiently.
Be who you say you are; do not impersonate others.
Keep content appropriate for underage users.
Be nice to people; be courteous to other users.be courteous to other users, and avoid swearing and sexual content.
Post in the appropriate sub-forum and follow each sub-forum's individual rules.
Type in a coherent manner and always speak in the language of the original post.
Get administrative permission prior to creating an account on a device with your same IP address.
Gravedigging, double-posting, and quoting the original post should only be done when necessary.
Only post legal content, and follow standard copyright laws when posting art and media you don't own.
Keep images in your signature and posts a decent size. Signatures should not exceed 300 pixels in height.
Remember, these rules are standard guidelines, and while not everything is covered, you should use common sense and think before you post.
Why put restrictions on signature width? Don't they get clipped off if they're too wide, anyway? Even if it's not that way now, it could easily be changed to be that way.
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
BuzzerBee wrote:Zoey2070 and I have put our minds together to create these rules:
FORUM RULES
By using these forums, you agree to abide by these rules (and any future variants) and acknowledge that administrators and moderators reserve the right to issue warnings and ban users for not following these rules, or for no reason at all.
Note, the rules are subject to change at any time without any notice.
Post content should be of substance; remember: quality over quantity.
Leave the moderation to those with authority, it is not the job of the forum users to "mini-mod" each other. Abusing the report system makes it hard for others to do their job efficiently.
Be who you say you are; do not impersonate others.
Keep content appropriate for underage users.
Be nice to people; be courteous to other users.be courteous to other users, and avoid swearing and sexual content.
Post in the appropriate sub-forum and follow each sub-forum's individual rules.
Type in a coherent manner and always speak in the language of the original post.
Get administrative permission prior to creating an account on a device with your same IP address.
Gravedigging, double-posting, and quoting the original post should only be done when necessary.
Only post legal content, and follow standard copyright laws when posting art and media you don't own.
Keep images in your signature and posts a decent size. Signatures should not exceed 300 pixels in height.
Remember, these rules are standard guidelines, and while not everything is covered, you should use common sense and think before you post.
Why put restrictions on signature width? Don't they get clipped off if they're too wide, anyway? Even if it's not that way now, it could easily be changed to be that way.
Wot where does it say signature width is restricted
Offline
What in the world I could have sworn it said something about signature width when I looked at it the first time. It had 2 examples, one of an okay signature and one of a not okay signature and then I saw those and I went and looked at the signature rules and it said something about it not exceeding some limit in height.
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
What in the world I could have sworn it said something about signature width when I looked at it the first time. It had 2 examples, one of an okay signature and one of a not okay signature and then I saw those and I went and looked at the signature rules and it said something about it not exceeding some limit in height.
That would have been Pingohits version of the rules, not Buzzerbee's
This is hella gay
Offline
Could formal informal warnings be incorporated in some way officially?
I remember moderators of past forums warning ppl verbally and not thru warnings system.
Was there ever some kind of system for them to know when to warn someone with warning/verbal warning?
There was a thread I made where 2 ppl made the same mistake and one of them was verbally warned while the other was not. I am unsure as to whether the other was warned in the system/actually given a warning or not.
idk
Offline
Could formal informal warnings be incorporated in some way officially?
I remember moderators of past forums warning ppl verbally and not thru warnings system.
Was there ever some kind of system for them to know when to warn someone with warning/verbal warning?
There was a thread I made where 2 ppl made the same mistake and one of them was verbally warned while the other was not. I am unsure as to whether the other was warned in the system/actually given a warning or not.
With the warnings mod on the other forums you could hand out 0 post warnings which were basically verbal warnings.
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
[ Started around 1738536536.5335 - Generated in 0.063 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.47 MiB (Peak: 1.62 MiB) ]