Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
The "you see it in nature so it's natural" argument is a load of bs. How about this: Humans moving faster than the speed of sound, flying, using computers, medicine, bloody everything in today's age is freaking unnatural. The whole "natural means okay" notion is a ridiculous ploy for the child-minded who want to poke around in and dictate other people's business.
But those things are products of human intellect and curiosity. I fail to see how that even compares to the notion that homosexuality can be found in nature.
You best be trolling, Toby. >_>
Being a homosexual myself I think that gays are an abomination and defiance of god's will.
c:
Being a homosexual myself I think that gays are an abomination and defiance of god's will.
c:
Alex wrote:Being a homosexual myself I think that gays are an abomination and defiance of god's will.
c:
I italicized non serious bits because we have no strike through function that I know of.
But, no, the entire argument makes no sense
I don't like people that have loud barking dogs that wake me up in the morning but I'm not going to try to make dogs illegal because of it.
Toby wrote:The "you see it in nature so it's natural" argument is a load of bs. How about this: Humans moving faster than the speed of sound, flying, using computers, medicine, bloody everything in today's age is freaking unnatural. The whole "natural means okay" notion is a ridiculous ploy for the child-minded who want to poke around in and dictate other people's business.
But those things are products of human intellect and curiosity. I fail to see how that even compares to the notion that homosexuality can be found in nature.
You best be trolling, Toby. >_>
My point was that the whole argument over whether it's natural or not doesn't even matter because everything we do now-a-days isn't natural.
It's not a point of whether it's natural or not, it's whether or not it affects everyone else (which it doesn't) and whether it's really any of their business (which it isn't).
Why would I troll?
Why would I troll?
Becuase you're Toby.
RPGMaster2000 wrote:Toby wrote:The "you see it in nature so it's natural" argument is a load of bs. How about this: Humans moving faster than the speed of sound, flying, using computers, medicine, bloody everything in today's age is freaking unnatural. The whole "natural means okay" notion is a ridiculous ploy for the child-minded who want to poke around in and dictate other people's business.
But those things are products of human intellect and curiosity. I fail to see how that even compares to the notion that homosexuality can be found in nature.
You best be trolling, Toby. >_>
My point was that the whole argument over whether it's natural or not doesn't even matter because everything we do now-a-days isn't natural.
It's not a point of whether it's natural or not, it's whether or not it affects everyone else (which it doesn't) and whether it's really any of their business (which it isn't).
Why would I troll?
Ahh, that makes more sense. Sorry for the confusion.
RPGMaster2000 wrote:Toby wrote:The "you see it in nature so it's natural" argument is a load of bs. How about this: Humans moving faster than the speed of sound, flying, using computers, medicine, bloody everything in today's age is freaking unnatural. The whole "natural means okay" notion is a ridiculous ploy for the child-minded who want to poke around in and dictate other people's business.
But those things are products of human intellect and curiosity. I fail to see how that even compares to the notion that homosexuality can be found in nature.
You best be trolling, Toby. >_>
My point was that the whole argument over whether it's natural or not doesn't even matter because everything we do now-a-days isn't natural.
It's not a point of whether it's natural or not, it's whether or not it affects everyone else (which it doesn't) and whether it's really any of their business (which it isn't).
Why would I troll?
Wise words!
BEE wrote:God dammit I thought this topic was dead.
And TGT, I can't pass on my entire college degree to you through the internet. If you are truly interested, take psychology yourself.
No, just tell me what I said about id, ego and super-ego that isn't correct. You do not need to write an essay. I've had a basic course in psychology, so everything isn't new to me.
Okay, this part isn't correct: "Id, ego and super-ego does exist."
Freud is MOCKED outright by basically every intelligent human being in the scholastic world.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unconsciou … ontroversy
If you wish.
Don't listen to "Pop-psychology", it gives psychology a bad name.
Last edited by BEE (Jun 14 2011 8:42:29 am)
Offline
Okay. I have some interesting questions to ask about Freud (I still believe that not everything he has said is rubbish) but I would have a hard time to express myself in English. Anyway, I hope we can continue with this discussion someday.
Although, feel free to PM me...
I honestly don't care but this forum is hilarious!:lol:
Katniss Everdeen gets a warning for grave-digging.
Locking this topic since it has failed to generate any more responses.
[ Started around 1732527255.31 - Generated in 0.048 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.54 MiB (Peak: 1.71 MiB) ]