EE_Bot, A User Conifgurable Event-Listener

Pugmatt · Before February 2015

32OrtonEdge32dh wrote:

Same as what Chewy said.

Cyral · Before February 2015

32OrtonEdge32dh wrote:

Same as what Chewy said.

Same as what 32OrtonEdge32dh said

and look at Chewys sig, he even says to listen too him lol.

Mylo · Before February 2015

same as chewy eebeast and all the other dudes

soccerfreak006 · Before February 2015

do you have a website?

32OrtonEdge32dh · Before February 2015

If not, I can make it/help make it. I am quite knowledgeable in HTML and CSS, as is Maikel.

ChrisKringel · Before February 2015

Thanks for the offer guys. I'm currently working on it (at 1AM ). I hope I'll be able to share it with you in the next few days. This website will also be used for the beta-testing applications. And I've worked out the licensing: Upon beta-testing application you'll have to tie your EE login e-mail to a hardware-id. The bot can than only be used from one computer.

So stay tuned ;-)

Cyral · Before February 2015

ChrisKringel wrote:

Thanks for the offer guys. I'm currently working on it (at 1AM ). I hope I'll be able to share it with you in the next few days. This website will also be used for the beta-testing applications. And I've worked out the licensing: Upon beta-testing application you'll have to tie your EE login e-mail to a hardware-id. The bot can than only be used from one computer.
So stay tuned ;-)

Cant wait!

32OrtonEdge32dh · Before February 2015

ChrisKringel wrote:

The bot can than only be used from one computer.

Waitasec. One computer, or one IP? Because I regularly use two different computers, with the same IP.

Cyral · Before February 2015

32OrtonEdge32dh wrote:

ChrisKringel wrote:
The bot can than only be used from one computer.
Waitasec. One computer, or one IP? Because I regularly use two different computers, with the same IP.

It uses the hardware ID of the computer, so yes, it would be limited to one computer, unless you got to of the bots or something.

32OrtonEdge32dh · Before February 2015

Oh yeah, didn't see the word 'hardware'. Crap! I guess I'd be fine with one and better with two.

Jojatekok · Before February 2015

Aww... Sharing a bot with everybody is a bad choice, my friend. After that, 'Shift'-like levels won't be epic anymore.

Mylo · Before February 2015

they are still epic -this bot is slower than shift

Cyral · Before February 2015

^Eh, more like it isnt a shift bot.

Jojatekok · Before February 2015

EE Beast wrote:

^Eh, more like it isnt a shift bot.

But it can be, if it can draw Animator frames...

Cyral · Before February 2015

Jojatekok wrote:

EE Beast wrote:
^Eh, more like it isnt a shift bot.
But it can be, if it can draw Animator frames...

True, but it would still need to time, and see where players are (if they get crown)

I guess it could be possible with the OnEvent functions, Im not sure

Persona · Before February 2015

Don't listen to those "Slow life-complainers" Who don't want this bot to be public. Why not? This bot would innovate new stuff into EE and all you have to think about is "Oh, I am a wussie, I will cry, trollers wo-wo-would useh iht"..

Trollers can still be trolls.
Just don't give out the code, see?
And we all want EE to be innovative and new.
So why not this?
Chris, release this.
Don't listen to them.

There really are no consiquences that could have happend before this.
All you people care about is it going into the wrong hands.
You don't need to worry because those "Wrong handed" people
cannot get the code with out you giving it to them, or them guessing your silly
little worthless 4 number code.

32OrtonEdge32dh · Before February 2015

Don't forget to beta test it first!

Last edited by 32OrtonEdge32dh (Oct 22 2011 10:25:48 am)

Mylo · Before February 2015

persona THATS WHAT I MEAN!
thats exactly my point !
mylo
+ rep for that

ChrisKringel · Before February 2015

Persona wrote:

Don't listen to those "Slow life-complainers" Who don't want this bot to be public. Why not? This bot would innovate new stuff into EE and all you have to think about is "Oh, I am a wussie, I will cry, trollers wo-wo-would useh iht"..
Trollers can still be trolls.
Just don't give out the code, see?
And we all want EE to be innovative and new.
So why not this?
Chris, release this.
Don't listen to them.
There really are no consiquences that could have happend before this.
All you people care about is it going into the wrong hands.
You don't need to worry because those "Wrong handed" people
cannot get the code with out you giving it to them, or them guessing your silly
little worthless 4 number code.

My words. If someone has the knowledge to reverse engineer the bot, he will also have the skill to use a flash decompiler on the EE-Game and write his own bot - this would be much faster than trying to bypass the licensing. And the bot itslef will not enforce trolling, since he only can join owned worlds. And if someone abuses it somehow, I can easyly revoke the testing-license and make the software unusable.

At the moment I'm working on the web-backend so there is not much progress and no new video :-( I'll have to make a lot of code changes on the Bot as well in order to fully implement the licsenses. So i think it will take one or two weeks (because im not at home 4 to 5 days in the coming two weeks) to make some progress there. I also have to finish another webproject this week so development will be slow :-/

In addition, I've found two promising free hosting solutions one with and one without ads. I' currently going for the second one but they have only a very limited amount of new registrations per day so it will take some time till i can open beta registration. And whil we're on it, maybe some infos about the registration progress.

You'll have to visit the website in order to accept the closed-beta terms of use. There you'll be able to download a tool that sends your hardware id to the server. Then you revisit the website and fill out an application form. This form will include some questions, like what you're planning to do with the bot (by the way: applications consistiong of "I want to copy shift" will be turned down...). I then select a few of the applicants and generate licenses for the so that they can test the bot. The number of testers will increase with every major change in the bot.

I hope I can limit the "shift"-copycats with this step and enforce more unique levels... If someone has thoughts on this don't hesitate to share them ;-)
And because I don't have a video this time I'll share a screenshot with you

Cyral · Before February 2015

ChrisKringel wrote:

Persona wrote:
Don't listen to those "Slow life-complainers" Who don't want this bot to be public. Why not? This bot would innovate new stuff into EE and all you have to think about is "Oh, I am a wussie, I will cry, trollers wo-wo-would useh iht"..
Trollers can still be trolls.
Just don't give out the code, see?
And we all want EE to be innovative and new.
So why not this?
Chris, release this.
Don't listen to them.
There really are no consiquences that could have happend before this.
All you people care about is it going into the wrong hands.
You don't need to worry because those "Wrong handed" people
cannot get the code with out you giving it to them, or them guessing your silly
little worthless 4 number code.
My words. If someone has the knowledge to reverse engineer the bot, he will also have the skill to use a flash decompiler on the EE-Game and write his own bot - this would be much faster than trying to bypass the licensing. And the bot itslef will not enforce trolling, since he only can join owned worlds. And if someone abuses it somehow, I can easyly revoke the testing-license and make the software unusable.
At the moment I'm working on the web-backend so there is not much progress and no new video :-( I'll have to make a lot of code changes on the Bot as well in order to fully implement the licsenses. So i think it will take one or two weeks (because im not at home 4 to 5 days in the coming two weeks) to make some progress there. I also have to finish another webproject this week so development will be slow :-/
In addition, I've found two promising free hosting solutions one with and one without ads. I' currently going for the second one but they have only a very limited amount of new registrations per day so it will take some time till i can open beta registration. And whil we're on it, maybe some infos about the registration progress.
You'll have to visit the website in order to accept the closed-beta terms of use. There you'll be able to download a tool that sends your hardware id to the server. Then you revisit the website and fill out an application form. This form will include some questions, like what you're planning to do with the bot (by the way: applications consistiong of "I want to copy shift" will be turned down...). I then select a few of the applicants and generate licenses for the so that they can test the bot. The number of testers will increase with every major change in the bot.
I hope I can limit the "shift"-copycats with this step and enforce more unique levels... If someone has thoughts on this don't hesitate to share them ;-)
And because I don't have a video this time I'll share a screenshot with you
<a href="http://i52.tinypic.com/2mhsver.png" rel="nofollow">http://i52.tinypic.com/2mhsver.png</a>

Nice web design, but its XP only? Is so... I run on vista...

ChrisKringel · Before February 2015

"EE Beast wrote:

Nice web design, but its XP only? Is so... I run on vista...

"later" meaning Vista, Windows 7 and Windows 8 (last one not tested )

Cyral · Before February 2015

Ah ok, I thought thats what it ment, wasnt sure, I have vista sevice pack 2

Sabrillian · Before February 2015

I love the web design. I like the clean layout and simple color scheme

BillyP · Before February 2015

Persona wrote:

Don't listen to those "Slow life-complainers" Who don't want this bot to be public. Why not? This bot would innovate new stuff into EE and all you have to think about is "Oh, I am a wussie, I will cry, trollers wo-wo-would useh iht"..
Trollers can still be trolls.
Just don't give out the code, see?
And we all want EE to be innovative and new.
So why not this?
Chris, release this.
Don't listen to them.
There really are no consiquences that could have happend before this.
All you people care about is it going into the wrong hands.
You don't need to worry because those "Wrong handed" people
cannot get the code with out you giving it to them, or them guessing your silly
little worthless 4 number code.

Uh.. we're not worried about people getting the damn code, we're worried that levels powered by bots will appear everywhere, just like stairs.

It would be cool if you released this to the public, but I reckon you should allow only trustworthy people to use the bot.

Last edited by BillyP (Oct 22 2011 7:54:01 pm)

Persona · Before February 2015

BillyP wrote:

Persona wrote:
Don't listen to those "Slow life-complainers" Who don't want this bot to be public. Why not? This bot would innovate new stuff into EE and all you have to think about is "Oh, I am a wussie, I will cry, trollers wo-wo-would useh iht"..
Trollers can still be trolls.
Just don't give out the code, see?
And we all want EE to be innovative and new.
So why not this?
Chris, release this.
Don't listen to them.
There really are no consiquences that could have happend before this.
All you people care about is it going into the wrong hands.
You don't need to worry because those "Wrong handed" people
cannot get the code with out you giving it to them, or them guessing your silly
little worthless 4 number code.
Uh.. we're not worried about people getting the damn code, we're worried that levels powered by bots will appear everywhere, just like stairs.
It would be cool if you released this to the public, but I reckon you should allow only trustworthy people to use the bot.

Don't listen to those "Slow life-complainers" Who don't want this bot to be public. Why not? This bot would innovate new stuff into EE and all you have to think about is "Oh, I am a wussie, I will cry, trollers wo-wo-would useh iht"..

Trollers can still be trolls.
Just don't give out the code, see?
And we all want EE to be innovative and new.
So why not this?
Chris, release this.
Don't listen to them.

There really are no consiquences that could have happend before this.
All you people care about is it going into the wrong hands.
You don't need to worry because those "Wrong handed" people
cannot get the code with out you giving it to them, or them guessing your silly
little worthless 4 number code.

Clearly you either missed/ misread that.

Official Everybody Edits Forums

#151 Before February 2015

Re: EE_Bot, A User Conifgurable Event-Listener

#152 Before February 2015

Re: EE_Bot, A User Conifgurable Event-Listener

#153 Before February 2015

Re: EE_Bot, A User Conifgurable Event-Listener

#154 Before February 2015

Re: EE_Bot, A User Conifgurable Event-Listener

#155 Before February 2015

Re: EE_Bot, A User Conifgurable Event-Listener

#156 Before February 2015

Re: EE_Bot, A User Conifgurable Event-Listener

#157 Before February 2015

Re: EE_Bot, A User Conifgurable Event-Listener

#158 Before February 2015

Re: EE_Bot, A User Conifgurable Event-Listener

#159 Before February 2015

Re: EE_Bot, A User Conifgurable Event-Listener

#160 Before February 2015

Re: EE_Bot, A User Conifgurable Event-Listener

#161 Before February 2015

Re: EE_Bot, A User Conifgurable Event-Listener

#162 Before February 2015

Re: EE_Bot, A User Conifgurable Event-Listener

#163 Before February 2015

Re: EE_Bot, A User Conifgurable Event-Listener

#164 Before February 2015

Re: EE_Bot, A User Conifgurable Event-Listener

#165 Before February 2015

Re: EE_Bot, A User Conifgurable Event-Listener

#166 Before February 2015

Re: EE_Bot, A User Conifgurable Event-Listener

#167 Before February 2015

Re: EE_Bot, A User Conifgurable Event-Listener

#168 Before February 2015

Re: EE_Bot, A User Conifgurable Event-Listener

#169 Before February 2015

Re: EE_Bot, A User Conifgurable Event-Listener

#170 Before February 2015

Re: EE_Bot, A User Conifgurable Event-Listener

#171 Before February 2015

Re: EE_Bot, A User Conifgurable Event-Listener

#172 Before February 2015

Re: EE_Bot, A User Conifgurable Event-Listener

#173 Before February 2015

Re: EE_Bot, A User Conifgurable Event-Listener

#174 Before February 2015

Re: EE_Bot, A User Conifgurable Event-Listener

#175 Before February 2015

Re: EE_Bot, A User Conifgurable Event-Listener

Board footer